Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:09:08.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When is customary law relevant?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

James S. Read
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Cases
Information
Journal of African Law , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , Spring 1963 , pp. 57 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cr. Rev. No. 5 of 1962; reported in Monthly Bulletin of High Court Decisions No. 46, case No. 32 of 1962.

2 Civil Case No. 274 of 1960, reported in Monthly Bulletin of High Court Decisions No. 49, case No. 60 of 1962.

page 58 note 1 1961, R. & N. 673.

page 58 note 2 (1937). 6 U.L.R. 17. See also R. v. Mahota s/o Nugundo (1948), 1 T.L.R.(R.) 94; R. v. Turner (1951), 5 N.R.L.R. 584.

page 58 note 3 I.e., he should have taken evidence on the point.

page 58 note 4 1956 R. & N. 240.

page 58 note 5 1961 R. & N. 538.

page 59 note 1 Nyasaland Penal Code, s. 3.

page 59 note 2 As explained, for example, in Kotia v. Nahas, [1941] A.C. 403, 413.

page 59 note 3 [1957] A.C. 126; 23 E.A.C.A. 609.

page 59 note 4 (1956), 23 E.A.C.A. 622.

page 59 note 5 [1952] 2 Q.B. 826.