No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Water Pollution Control in Africa: A Comparative Legal Survey
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
Extract
A country's water resources are important not only for the continued well-being of its population but also because water is a critical element in its economic development. Water is vital for human, animal and plant life. Life cannot exist without it. Most domestic needs in developing countries are satisfied through direct access to natural sources. The World Health Organisation in 1976 estimated that only 38 per cent of the total population in developing countries had access to safe water supplies. This means that 62 per cent of the population resorted to lakes, rivers, streams and wells for domestic requirements. Many industries abstract water from rivers and lakes for their industrial processes and often return it to those sources as trade effluents. Water is a critical factor in agricultural production. In turn agricultural activities create by-products such as sediment loads and chemical residues with adverse impact on water quality.
It is obvious therefore that a country must ensure that its water resources are rationally utilised and managed. Such utilisation and management entails the creation of normative and institutional structures, first, to regulate the allocation of an often scarce resource to competing legitimate demands and, secondly, to anticipate, prevent and control the adverse consequences of resources utilisation. This article examines the nature of the legal mechanisms instituted by selected African countries, viz. Zambia, Ethiopia, Ghana, Sudan and Kenya, for the control and prevention of water pollution. The objective is two-fold: first, to determine the adequacy of existing legal regimes and, secondly, to suggest how deficiencies in existing frameworks may be rectified.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1989
References
1 W.H.O. (1976), W.H.O. Chronicle 30, 8, pp. 329–334.Google Scholar
2 See generally Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law, (London, 1961).Google Scholar
3 Section 3 of the Water Act, Cap 372, the Laws of Kenya, Article 130(d) of the Revised Ethiopian Constitution 1955, section 5 of the Water Act, Cap. 312 of Zambia.
4 Section 36 Water Act, Kenya; ss. 26 and 28 Water Act, Zambia; by implication only under Article 1228 of the Civil Code, Ethiopia.
5 Caponera, D. A., Report to the Imperial Government of Ethiopia on Water Resources Policy, F.A.O., Rome, 1969. pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
6 Nicholls v. Ely Beet Sugar Factory Ltd. [1963] Ch 343.Google Scholar
7 Section 28(b) Water Act, Zambia; The Water (General) Rules LN 374/1964, Kenya, Rule 80.
8 Otieno, N. C., “Africa & The Environmental Challenge” in Westley, S. B. (ed.) Development & The Environment in Africa, I.D.S., Occasional Paper No. 15 of 1975 at p. 36.Google Scholar
9 Diamant, B. Z.,“Preventive Control of Water Pollution in Developing Countries” in Ouano, E. A. R. et al. (eds.) Water Pollution Control in Developing Countries, Asian Institute of Technology, 1978, p. 9, at p. 10.Google ScholarPubMed
10 In Zambia under s. 55 of the Water Act the penalty for a first offence is 400 Kwacha and for a second offence 800 Kwacha; in Kenya s. 160(2) of the Water Act provides a penalty of KShs. 5000/= for first offence and KShs. 10,000/= for subsequent offences.
11 The Public Health Act, Cap. 535, Section 78.
12 Environmental Protection (Amendment) Decree 1976, (S.M.C.D. 58).
13 The Environmental Health Act, 1975, s. 4.
14 Health authorities in the 1970s launched a coercive campaign under powers conferred by both the Public Health Act, Cap 242, and The Chiefs′ Authority Act, Cap 128, to get rural people to build and use pit latrines. This campaign had to be abandoned because latrines were built but never used due to various cultural beliefs. Presently the Public Health Department relies on health education rather than legal coercion to get the rural population to provide pit latrines and use them for the safe disposal of excreta: Source—interviews with Ministry of Health personnel.
15 No. 53 of 1970.
16 Ibid., ss. 13, 41, 43 and 45.
17 Cap 318, ss. 48, 56, 64, 75 and 185–187.
18 The Agriculture (Basic Land Usage) Rules, LN 26/1965; The Agriculture (Land Preservation) Rules, LN 352/1963.
19 For example, Chabeda, P.I.N., “Environmental Pollution & The Options Facing Developing Countries with Tourist Potential Based on Wildlife”, Proceedings of the Workshop on Environment & Rural Development in East Africa, Nairobi, Kenya, 11 11–30, 1974.Google ScholarNational Report on the Human Environment, Govt. of Kenya, Nairobi, 1971, p. 75.Google Scholar
20 The Pest Control Products Act, 1982, No. 4 of 1982 and Regulation 10(d) of The Pest Control Products (Registration) Regulations, LN 46/1984.
21 W.H.O., Kenya Sectoral Study & National Programming For Community & Rural Water Supply, Sewerage and Water Pollution Control, Reports Nos. 5 & 6, W.H.O. Brazzaville, 1973.Google Scholar
22 See Report of the Governing Council on the Work of UNEP's 10th Session, UNEP/GC.10/14, p. 82;Google Scholar Decision 10/4. UNEP/GC. 10/14. Kenya Development Plan 1979–1983, p. 338.Google Scholar
23 See generally, Bates, G., “Environmental Impact Assessment: The Australian Experience”, Journal of Planning & Environmental Law 1979, p. 73;Google ScholarGarner, G. F., “Environmental Impact Statements in U.S. and U.K.”, Journal of Planning & Environmental Law, 1979, p. 142;Google ScholarUNEP/GC. 10/14; Environmental Policy & Law 1/2 (1983) pp. 2–26.Google Scholar
24 Set up under the Environmental Protection Council Decree, 1974 (U.R.C.D. 239) s. 3(1).
25 The Environmental Protection Council (Amendment) Decree, 1976, (S.M.C.D. 58).
26 The Water (General) Rules, LN 374/1964 Rule 80.
27 Farver, & Milton, (eds.) The Careless Technology: Ecology & Economic Development, the Natural History Press N.Y., 1972, p. xiii.Google ScholarMberia, B. W., “Industrial Development & The Environment in Kenya”, in GK/UNEP/UNDP, Project on Environment & Development (Nairobi, 1979), p. 24.Google Scholar
28 Diamant, B. Z., op. cit., p. 12.Google Scholar Notable examples are the Ohio River Basin Authority in the U.S.A. and the River Rhine Basin Authority in Europe.
29 Wisdom, A. S., The Law on the Pollution of Waters (London, 1966), p. 75.Google Scholar