Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:15:37.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rastafarianism and Freedom of Conscience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Extract

In the case of In Re: Chikweche (Supreme Court of Zimbabwe, 1995, unreported), the applicant, a devout follower of the Rastafari movement, was refused registration as a legal practitioner by a High Court judge. The precise reasons for the refusal were not clear but seemingly the applicant was not considered a “fit and proper person” as required by section 5(1)(f) of the Legal Practitioners Act. Before the Supreme Court it was submitted that such refusal was by reason only of the applicant's dreadlocks hairstyle and therefore this infringed his constitutional right to freedom of conscience.

Type
Recent Developments
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)