No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 January 2014
This article critiques the “legal at the time” argument used by states and companies which historically practised slavery to defend themselves against claims for restitution, examining the Mauritian case. Although slavery was largely legal there before its abolition by the British, torts were common under slavery and, during the years of historic rupture, 1794–1839, when the local élite defied first French and then English law, generated systemic unlawful activity. Most types of legal action for restitution for slavery face formidable difficulties; pursuing reparations supported by broad legal arguments may therefore be a more viable route. Slavery may be argued to have been an illegitimate endeavour in itself. While sympathetic to that view, this article does not pursue it but rather seeks to demonstrate that the “legal at the time” argument against reparations contains significant lacunae even within its restricted terms. It also shows that French constitutional law offers possibilities in the form of rights that are not time-bound.
1 Gross, A “When is the time of slavery? The history of slavery in contemporary legal and political argument” (2008) 96 California Law Review 283 at 283.Google Scholar
2 Domingue, RLegal Method and the Mauritian Legal System (2003, University of Mauritius)Google Scholar at 25.
3 For discussion of these complex issues, see: Craemer, T “Framing reparations” (2009) 37/2The Policy Studies Journal 275CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Kershnaer, S “The inheritance-based claim to reparations” (2002) 8 Legal Theory 243.Google Scholar
4 The extensive dimensions of this interest in the USA and internationally are discussed in Berlin, I “American slavery in history and memory and the search for social justice” (2004) 90/4Journal of American History 1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Michelson, MA “The black reparations movement: Public opinion and congressional policy making” (2002) 32 Journal of Black Studies at 574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Anes, RD “Accounting and slavery: The accounts of the English South Sea Company 1713–22” (2002) 11/2European Accounting Review 441CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Oldroyd, D, Fleischman, RK and Tyson, TN “The culpability of accounting practice in promoting slavery in the British Empire and antebellum United States” (2008) 19/5Critical Perspectives on Accounting 764CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Heier, JR “Accounting for the business of suffering: A study of the antebellum Richmond, Virginia, slave trade” (2010) 46/1Abacus 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Flaherty, P and Carlisle, JThe Case Against Slave Reparations (2004, National Legal and Policy Center)Google Scholar at 5.
8 Howard-Hassmann, RF “Reparations to Africa and the group of eminent persons” (2004) 173–74 Cahiers d'Etudes Africaines 81.Google Scholar
9 Ulrich, G and Boserup, LKHuman Rights in Development Year Book 2001: Reparations: Redressing Past Wrongs (2003, Kluwer Law International and Nordic Human Rights Publications)Google Scholar. President Wade of Senegal spoke against reparations; see M. Gove “The new white man's burden” (3 September 2001) The Times 2 at 2.
10 A Gifford “Legal arguments in support of reparations” (paper presented to the first Pan-African Congress on Reparations, Abuja, Federal Republic of Nigeria, 27–29 April 1993).
11 P Flaherty and J Carlisle The Case Against Slave Reparations, above at note 7.
12 du Plessis, M “Historical injustice and international law: An exploratory discussion of reparation for slavery” (2003) 25/3Human Rights Quarterly 624 at 624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Flaherty and Carlisle The Case against Slave Reparations, above at note 7 at 6 and generally.
14 D Michel “Do the descendants of slaves of Mauritius have a claim for reparations?” (LLM dissertation, Liverpool John Moores University, 2009) at 76.
15 Michel, SL'Organisation Fraternelle (1998, Noir sur Blanc)Google Scholar.
16 S Narain “The Mauritius Labour Party: Historical perspective” (unpublished MA dissertation, University of Mauritius: MAU/D JQ3178. N3 1999) at 8–10. Croucher, R and McIlroy, J “Mauritius 1938: The origins of a milestone in colonial trade union legislation” (2013) 54/3Labor History 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Ramgutty-Wong, A “HRM in Mauritius” in Kamoche, K, Debrah, Y, Horwitz, F and Muuka, GN (eds) Managing Human Resources in Africa (2004, Routledge) 53.Google Scholar
18 See Michel L'Organisation Fraternelle, above at note 15 at 41–42.
19 Ibid.
20 Engerman, SL “Apologies, regrets and reparations” (2009) 17/3–4European Review 593 at 599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 Mauritius National Assembly Report (debate no 27, 5 August 2008), referred to in “Report of the Truth and Justice Commission” (November 2011) at 1. The report continues to be the subject of controversy on the island, as its recommendations do not include reparations and have not been fully implemented at the time of writing.
22 Descendants of African slaves may take their birth certificate and identity card to the Nelson Mandela Centre in Port Louis; descendants of Indians may take these documents to the Mahatma Ghandi Institute. In both cases, their family trees will be documented. These two organizations are funded by the government.
23 Ruef, M and Fletcher, B “Legacies of American slavery: Status attainment among southern blacks following emancipation” (2003) 82 Social Forces 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24 Zajonc, T “Black enterprise and the legacy of slavery” Winter 2003 Review of Black Political Economy 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25 Laville, R “In the politics of the rainbow: Creoles and civil society in Mauritius” (2000) 18/2Journal of Contemporary African Studies 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26 See Connelly v RTZ [1998] 170 at 171.
27 Flaherty and Carlisle The Case Against Slave Reparations, above at note 7 at 6.
28 Williams, ECapitalism & Slavery (1994, The University of North Carolina Press) at 9.Google Scholar
29 Black, JThe Slave Trade (2006, The Social Affairs Unit)Google Scholar at 63.
30 Low, JC “L'importance de l'occupation Néerlandaise dans l'histoire de l'Ile Maurice” [The importance of the Dutch occupation in the history of Mauritius] in Evers, SJT and Hookoomsing, VY (eds) Globalization and the South-West Indian Ocean (2000, International Institute for Asian Studies/University of Mauritius) 57 at 63.Google Scholar
31 R Ross “The Dutch as globalizers in the Western Indian Ocean?” in Evers and Hookoomsing (eds) id, 7 at 13.
32 de l'Estrac, JCMauriciens Enfants de Mille Races au Temps de l'Ile de France [Mauritian children of a thousand races at the time of the Ile de France] (2004, Graphic Press)Google Scholar at 56.
33 Ross “The Dutch as globalizers”, above at note 31.
34 Id at 12.
35 JC Low “Faire de l'histoire dans une société plurielle” [Writing history in a plural society] (paper delivered to the international seminar on Writing on the Indian Ocean: Silences, Restrictions, Forgetting: Oublis, 24 June 2013).
36 Moree, PJA Concise History of Dutch Mauritius, 1598–1710: A Fruitful and Healthy Land (1998, Kegan Paul International and International Institute for Asian Studies).Google Scholar
37 Taubira, CL'Esclavage Raconté à Ma Fille [Slavery recounted to my daughter] (2002, Bibliophane-Daniel Radford)Google Scholar at 44.
38 Allen, RBSlaves, Freedmen, and Indentured Labourers in Mauritius (1999, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar at 12.
39 Id at 56.
40 Noël, KL'Esclavage à l'Ile de France (Ile Maurice) de 1715 à 1810 [Slavery on the Ile de France (Mauritius) from 1715 to 1820] (2nd ed, 1991, Editions Two Cities)Google Scholar at 32.
41 Id at 28.
42 Ibid.
43 Sala-Molins, LLe Code Noir ou le Calvaire de Canaan [The Black Code or the Ordeal of Canaan] (4th ed, 2007, Quadrige Grands Textes, Presses Universitaires de France)Google Scholar at 17.
44 Id at 27.
45 “L'intolérable obscénité de tous et chacun de ses articles” [The intolerable obscenity of each and every one of its clauses]: id at 10.
46 Hirschman, EC and Hill, RP “On human commoditization: A model based upon African-American slavery” (1999) 26 Advances in Consumer Research 394.Google Scholar
47 Sala-Molins Le Code Noir, above at note 43 at 59–71.
48 Id at 134–43.
49 Teelock, VBitter Sugar: Sugar and Slavery in 19th Century Mauritius (1998, Mahatma Gandhi Institute)Google Scholar at 181.
50 Sala-Molins Le Code Noir, above at note 43 at 144–45.
51 Teelock Bitter Sugar, above at note 49 at 183.
52 Sala-Molins Le Code Noir, above at note 43 at 162–63 and 166–69.
53 Teelock Bitter Sugar, above at note 49 at 183.
54 Teelock, VA Select Guide to the Sources on Slavery in Mauritius and Slaves Speak Out: The Testimony of Slaves in the Era of Sugar (1995, African Cultural Centre, Bell Village).Google Scholar
55 James, CLRThe Black Jacobins (1963, Vintage Books)Google Scholar at 81. More widely, see chaps 3 and 4, 62–117.
56 Noël L'Esclavage à l'Ile de France, above at note 40 at 121–31; Claude, WLa France et la Première Abolition de l'Esclavage (1794–1802) [France and the first abolition of slavery] (1998, Editions Karthala)Google Scholar at 35.
57 Noël, id at 126.
58 Id at 127.
59 Ibid.
60 Unlawful enrichment was claimed against successor companies in equivalent circumstances in the USA.
61 Carbonnier, JDroit Civil, Les Biens, Les Obligations [Civil law, benefits, obligations] (2004, Presses Universitaires de France)Google Scholar at 2435.
62 Arret Boudier (1892) Req 15 June 1892, sec 93, 1, 281.
63 Noël L'Esclavage à l'Ile de France, above at note 40 at 82.
64 Id at 26.
65 Id at 85. The author has a Francophile approach; see his account of the island's capture by the British “malheureusement” [unfortunately] at 19–20.
66 Teelock Bitter Sugar, above at note 49 at 183.
67 Ross, RCape of Torments: Slavery and Resistance in South Africa (1983, Routledge and Kegan Paul)Google Scholar.
68 Law 2001-434 of 21 May 2001.
69 Taubira L'Esclavage, above at note 37 at 175.
70 Decisions of the Conseil Constitutionnel (2004) at 56.
71 Conseil d'Etat: opinion 250–2004.
72 Frier, PL and Petit, JPrécis de Droit Administratif [Handbook of Administrative Law] (8th ed, 2008, Montchrestien l'Extension Edition)Google Scholar at 15.
73 Conseil d'Etat Société Eky, 12 February 1960, R.101.
74 d'Etat, ConseilLiberté d'Association (1956) Les Grands Arrêts de la Jurisprudence Administratives [Key judgments in administrative law] (26th ed, 2008, Dalloz)Google Scholar at 157.
75 Conseil d'Etat Condamine (1957) id at 172–78.
76 Fasc 1440: Contentieux Constitutionel des Droits Fondamentaux: Atteinte a la Liberté d'Expression et Effet Normative des Lois Mémorielles [Infringement of the freedom of expression and the normative effect of memorial laws], secs 106–117.108; A Levade and B Mathieu “Le législateur ne peut fixer des verities et en sanctionner la contestation” [The legislator cannot determine truths and sanction their contestation] (2 April 2012) La Semaine Juridique (general edition no 14) at 425.
77 Walvin, JBlack Ivory: A History of British Slavery (1992, Fontana Press)Google Scholar at 165.
78 Sherwood, M “Britain, the slave trade and slavery, 1808–1843” (2004) 46/2Race and Class 54 at 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
79 Black, JThe Slave Trade (2006, Social Affairs Unit)Google Scholar at 70; Carter, M, Govindan, V and Peerthum, SThe Last Slaves: Liberated Africans in Nineteenth Century Mauritius (2003, Centre for Research in Indian Ocean Studies)Google Scholar at 10.
80 Teelock Bitter Sugar, above at note 49 at 183.
81 Nadal, BLes Constitutions de l'Isle Maurice [The constitutions of the island of Mauritius] (1962, Mauritius Publishing Co)Google Scholar at 79.
82 Teelock Bitter Sugar, above at note 49 at 75, 115 and 175; Sandbrook, R, Edelman, M, Heller, P and Teichman, JSocial Democracy in the Global Periphery: Origins, Challenges, Prospects (2007, Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar at 131–32.
83 Teelock id at 150.
84 Id at 117.
85 Id at 207.
86 Id at 117.
87 Hochschild, ABury The Chains: The British Struggle to Abolish Slavery (2006, London, Pan Macmillan)Google Scholar at 347.
88 Teelock Bitter Sugar, above at note 49 at 276.
89 Cook, B “The denial of slavery in management studies” (2003) 40/8Journal of Management StudiesGoogle Scholar 1895 at 1898.
90 Michel, SEsclaves Résistants [Rebel slaves] (1998, Quad Printers)Google Scholar at 6.
91 Hochschild Bury The Chains, above at note 87 at 347.
92 Michel Esclaves Résistants, above at note 90 at 1.
93 Tinker, HA New System of Slavery: The Export of Indian Labour Overseas, 1830–1920 (1974, Oxford University Press, for the Institute of Race Relations).Google Scholar
94 Meyer, J and Scott, RW “Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government” in Meyer, J and Scott, RW (eds) Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality (1992, Sage)Google Scholar 179.
95 Tinker, H “Between Africa, Asia and Europe. Mauritius: Cultural marginalism and political control” (1977) 76/304African Affairs 321 at 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
96 Teelock Bitter Sugar, above at note 49 at 274–76.
97 Ibid.
98 Rogers, WVHWinfield and Jolowicz Tort (17th ed, 2006, Thomson, Sweet and Maxwell)Google Scholar at 99.
99 Id at 99–100.
100 132 ER 769.
101 See, for example, Kershnar, S “The inheritance-based claim to reparations” (2002) 24 Legal Theory 243.Google Scholar
102 Noël L'Esclavage à l'Ile de France, above at note 40.