Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:27:43.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Court of Appeal of Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Cases
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For a detailed examination of some of the legal implications of this programme see Coldham, S. F. R., “The effect of registration of title upon customary land rights in Kenya” [1978] J.A.L. 91.Google Scholar

2 Cap. 300 (Laws of Kenya 1964).

3 Ibid., s. 28.

4 Esiroyo v. Esiroyo, [1973] E.A. 388, approved by the Court of Appeal in the instant case.Google Scholar

5 Registered Land Act, s. 143(1).

6 See, for example, Limuli v. Sabayi, [1979] J.A.L. 187 and the cases discussed in Coldham, op. cit. at pp. 106ff.Google Scholar

7 E.g. the English Land Registration Act 1925, s. 74.Google Scholar

8 Land Control Act 1967, Cap. 302 (Laws of Kenya 1968), s. 6(1).Google Scholar

9 Statute Law (Repeal and Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 1980, No. 9 of 1980.Google Scholar

10 Where there is no such evidence, the position is debatable. See Hodgson v. Marks [1971] Ch. 892.Google Scholar

11 It is hard to know what kind of equitable rights Madan, J.A., is referring to, given that he was unable to find that a trust existed on the facts.

12 Hodgson v. Marks, above.

13 Williams and Glyn's Bank Ltd. v. Boland [1981] A.C. 487.Google Scholar

14 S. 70(1)(g): ”The rights of every person in actual occupation of the land or in receipt of the rents and profits thereof, save where enquiry is made of such person and the rights are not disclosed.”

15 Simpson, S. R., Land Law and Registration, Cambridge, 1976, p. 500.Google Scholar

16 As a result of the decision, presumably the appellant will bring an action against K.K.