Article contents
War and Economic Development: Settlers in Kenya, 1914–1918*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 January 2009
Extract
The First World War is perhaps the least studied period in the historiography of European settlement in Kenya. This paper reverses the previously held view of settler economic decline and disarray. Despite apparent problems of shipping shortages, closure of markets and loss of white manpower, settler products were grown and exported in ever-increasing quantities during the war years. The grain and livestock industries were stimulated by new wartime markets whilst plantation crops, chiefly sisal and coffee, continued the impetus of pre-war activity and substantial new planting took place. Prosperity and development, not reversal and decline, were the keynotes of the settler wartime economy. With this new evidence and understanding, it is possible to re-interpret much of the early history of colonial Kenya. The fundamental vulnerability and stuttering growth of white settlement before 1914 gave way to the gradual assertion of the settler economy over the African, with state support, during and after the war. But this assertion and growth was founded upon abnormal economic circumstances: on cheap and available labour, insatiable markets and a pre-occupied colonial state. The post-war crises of labour and market contraction, and the pre-eminence of the settler sector after 1920, therefore must be traced to this accelerated and artificial growth in the settler economy in 1914–18.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986
References
1 Savage, D. C. and Munro, J. F., ‘Carrier Corps recruitment in the British East Africa Protectorate, 1914–18’, J. Afr. Hist., vii, 2 (1966), 313–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Clayton, A. and Savage, D. C., Government and Labour in Kenya, 1895–1963 (London, 1974)Google Scholar; Greenstein, L. J., ‘Africans in a European war: The First World War in Africa with special reference to the Nandi of Kenya’ (Ph.D. thesis, Indiana, 1975)Google Scholar; Hodges, G. W. T., ‘African manpower statistics for the British forces in East Africa, 1914–1918’, J. Afr. Hist., xix, i (1978), 110–116Google Scholar; Kitching, G. N., Land, Livestock and Leadership, Historical Association of Kenya, Pamphlet No. 3 (Nairobi, 1981), 48–53Google Scholar; Bennett, G., ‘Settlers and politics in Kenya, upto 1945’, in Harlow, V., Chilver, E. M. and Smith, A. (eds.), History of East Africa, II (Oxford, 1965), 285–289Google Scholar; Spencer, I. R. G., ‘The First World War and the origins of the dual policy of development in Kenya, 1914–1922’, World Development, ix, 8 (1981), 735–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Huxley, E., No Easy Way (Nairobi, 1957), 31–33Google Scholar; Huxley, E., White Man's Country - Lord Delamere and the Making of Kenya (London, 1935), II, 3–49Google Scholar; Cone, L. W. and Lipscomb, J. F. (eds.), The History of Kenya Agriculture (Nairobi, 1972), 51–52.Google Scholar
3 Huxley, , No Easy Way, 32.Google Scholar
4 Wrigley, C. C., ‘Kenya: The patterns of economic life, 1902–1945’, in History of East Africa, 11, 233.Google Scholar
5 Sorrenson, M. P. K., Origins of European Settlement in Kenya (Nairobi, 1968)Google Scholar; C. C. Wrigley, ‘Kenya’: Remole, R. A., ‘White Settlers or the foundation of agricultural settlement in Kenya’ (Ph.D. thesis, Harvard, 1959)Google Scholar; Overton, J. D., ‘Spatial differentiation in the colonial economy of Kenya Africans: Africans, settlers and the state, 1900–1920’ (Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge, 1983)Google Scholar; Cone and Lipscomb, History of Kenya Agriculture; Van Zwanenberg, R. M. A., The Agricultural History of Kenya, Historical Association of Kenya, Pamphlet No.I (Nairobi, 1972).Google Scholar
6 Van Zwanenberg, R. M. A., Colonial Capitalism and Labour in Kenya, 1919–1959 (Nairobi, 1975)Google Scholar; Brett, E. A., Colonialism and Underdevelopment in East Africa (London, 1972)Google Scholar; Redley, M. G., ‘The politics of a predicament: the white community in Kenya 1918–1932’ (Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge, 1976).Google Scholar Only Remole has hinted at the notion of settler economic ‘inertia’ during the war: Remole, R. A., ‘White settlers’, 333.Google Scholar
7 Spencer, , ‘The First World War’, 738.Google Scholar
8 Leys, N., Kenya (London, 1924), 303–304Google Scholar; Wrigley, C. C., ‘Kenya’, 232–234Google Scholar; Clayton, and Savage, , Government and Labour, 81–101Google Scholar; Kitching, G. N., Class and Economic Change in Kenya (New Haven, 1980), 30–32Google Scholar; Kitching, , Land, Livestock and Leadership, 48–53Google Scholar; Mosley, P., The Settler Economics: Studies in the Economic History of Kenya and Southern Rhodesia, 1900–1963 (Cambridge, 1983)Google Scholar; Waller, R. D. ‘Uneconomic growth: the Maasai stock economy, 1914–29’, P.E.K.C. Conference Paper, Trinity College, Cambridge (1975), 9–3.Google Scholar
9 East Africa Protectorate, Blue Book of Statistics, 1912–13.
10 Cowen, M. P., ‘Capital and household production: the case of wattle in Kenya's Central Province, 1903–1964’ (Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge, 1978), 62, notes increases in tannin extract prices during the war but a decrease in exports due to lack of shipping.Google Scholar
11 East Africa Protectorate, Department of Agriculture Annual Report, 1914–15.
12 Belfield to Harcourt, 24 Sept. 1914, CO 533/140, Public Record Office, Kew; C. S. Wilson to Harcourt, 15 Sept. 1914, CO 533/148, See Newland, Tarltons Monthly, November, 1915, ‘How war has changed prices’, for a discussion of world-wide price rises in grain.
13 See, for example, Belfield to Bonar Law, 25 April 1916, Eastwood to Bowring, 17 April 1916, CO 533/168; Bowring to Bonar Law, 22 Sept. 1916, CO 533/170; East Africa Protectorate, Railway Administration Report, 1914–15 to 1917–18.
14 Bowring to Harcourt, 13 Jan. 1915, Harcourt to Belfield, 21 Jan. 1915, CO 533/151; Belfield to Bonar Law, 23 Sept. 1915, 5 Nov. 1915, CO 533/156.
15 Belfield to Bonar Law, 9 Aug. 1916, Read to War Trade Dept., 15 Aug. 1916, CO 533/169; War Trade Dept. to Bonar Law, 30 Aug. 1916, CO 533/176; Bonar Law to Belfield, 7 Sept. 1916, War Trade Dept. to Bonar Law, 15 Nov. 1916, CO 533/176.
16 Kiambu District Annual Report, 1916–17, Kenya National Archives, Nairobi [K.N.A.]; Department of Agriculture Annual Report, 1917–18; Bowring to Long, 26 June 1917, CO 533/182; Sir W. Pierce, question to House of Commons, 28 February 1917, Bottomley minute, 28 Feb. 1917, CO 533/188; Fountain to Long, 19 April 1917, CO 533/188. The settler reaction was so strong because a great deal of coffee had been planted and much was coming into bearing at that time.
17 Fountain to Long, 26 April 1917, CO 533/188.
18 Fountain to Long, 29 June 1917, CO 533/188. This 3,000 ton figure in fact substantially exceeded the total Protectorate coffee exports of only 828 tons in 1916–17.
19 Bowring to Long, 26 June 1917; A. C. MacDonald, ‘Memo on coffee advances’, 19 June 1917, CO 533/182; Monson to Long, 1 Feb. 1918, Monson to Hon. Sec. Coffee Planters Union, 23 Nov. 1917, CO 533/193. MacLellan Wilson was one of the first beneficiaries of the scheme.
20 Report on Trade Conditions in British East Africa, Uganda and Zanzibar, (Cape Town, 1919), 17.
21 Department of Agriculture Annual Report, 1917–18. The value of imports of agri-cultural implements, machinery and vehicles fell from a pre-war peak in 1913–14 of £91,424 to £42,328 in 1914–15, £31,428 in 1915–16, £59,700 in 1916–17 and £56,842 in 1917–18: Blue Books, 1913–14 to 1915–16, Trade Report of the Customs Department, 1916–17 and 1917–18. Import statistics give reliable information on value, not quantity, so the effect of wartime inflation is not clear. Also the amalgamation of the E.A.P. and Uganda Customs Department in 1917 complicates the picture for 1917–18.
22 Department of Agriculture Annual Report, 1916–17. It was also possible to import machinery for the establishment of the new flax industry.
23 Newland, Tarltons Monthly, December 1915, stated that most export crops remained ‘highly profitable’ and that the position of agriculture was ‘as sound as ever before’ (p. I).
24 Ukamba Province Annual Report, 1915–16, Nakuru District Annual Report, 1915–16, K.N.A.; Bowring to Bonar Law, 15 Feb. 1916, CO 533/167; Belfield to Long, 6 Feb. 1917, CO 533/178; Belfield to Long, 15 March 1917, Long to Belfield, 17 March 1917, CO 533/179.
25 Acting Governor Bowring in 1919 estimated local European recruitment at 1,987. Allowing for railway and official staff, missionaries, ‘aliens’, over-age and unfit men (together totalling 1,291 in 1916) this accounts for all of the pre-war male population of 3,145. Bowring to Long, 13 Jan. 1919, CO 533/206; Bowring to Monson, 31 Dec. 1919, CO 533/216; Bowring to Bonar Law, 15 Feb. 1916, CO 533/167.
26 Machakos District Annual Report, 1915–16; Uasin Gishu District Annual Report, 1914–15; Nakuru District Annual Report, 1914–15 and 1915–16; Naivasha District Annual Report, 1915–16, K.N.A.
27 Ukamba Province Annual Report, 1915–16, K.N.A.
28 Belfield to Long, 6 Feb. 1917, CO 533/178.
29 Read to Secretary, War Office, 14 Feb. 1917, CO 533/178.
30 Nakuru District Annual Report, 1915–16, K.N.A.
31 Kiambu District Annual Report, 1915–16; Nakuru District Annual Report, 1915–16, K.N.A.
32 For example: Huxley, , No Easy Way, 32Google Scholar; Huxley, , White Man's Country, II, 14Google Scholar; Huxley, E., Nellie - Letters from Africa (London, 1973), 50–55Google Scholar; Blixen, Karen, Out of Africa (London, 1937), 189Google Scholar; Mrs Lambert, R. T., ‘A political history of Baringo and Eldama Ravine’, MSS. Afr. s. 1388, Rhodes House Library, Oxford.Google Scholar
33 Kiambu District Annual Reports, 1915–16 to 1917–18; Naivasha District Annual Reports, 1914–15 to 1917–18, K.N.A.
34 Huxley, , No Easy Way, 32.Google Scholar There were in fact many skilled headmen. See Kitching, , Land, Livestock and Leadership, 22–25.Google Scholar Indeed, Huxley's family's own farm was left under the control of an African headman: Nellie, 53.
35 Watt, J. A. Stuart, ‘Recollections of Kenya, 1895–1963’, MSS. Afr. s. 391, Rhodes House Library, Oxford.Google Scholar
36 Huxley, , White Man's Country, II, 27Google Scholar; Huxley, Nellie, 52, for the case of Randall Swift who ‘left’ the East African campaign to look after his sisal farm and then later joined the forces in Europe.
37 'Bowring to Long, 13 Jan. 1919, CO 533/206; Kikuyu District Annual Report, 1917–18, K.N.A.
38 Kiambu District Annual Report, 1916–17, Uasin Gishu District Annual Report, 1915–16, K.N.A.; Annual Report of the Coffee Plant Inspector in Department of Agriculture Annual Report, 1915–16, 59.
39 See sources cited in n.I. Hodges suggests a figure of 200,000 troops, carriers and followers recruited from the East Africa Protectorate (G. W. T. Hodges, ‘African manpower statistics’, 116).
40 Kikuyu District Annual Report, 1917–18; Naivasha District Annual Report, 1916–17; Dagoretti Sub-District Annual Report, 1917–18; Dagoretti Political Record Book, 16 April 1917, K.N.A.
41 Stichter, S., Migrant Labour in Kenya: Capitalism and the African Response, 1895–1975 (London, 1982), 36–38Google Scholar; Clayton, and Savage, , Government and Labour, 92–100.Google Scholar
42 Kikuyu District Annual Report, 1917–18, K.N.A.
43 Kikuyu District Annual Report, 1917–18, K.N.A.
44 Nakuru District Annual Reports, 1915–16 and 1918–19; Kikuyu District Annual Report, 1917–18, K.N.A.
45 See, for example, Ukamba Province Annual Report, 1916–17; Naivasha District Annual Report, 1917–18, K.N.A.; Newland, Tarltons Monthly, November 1916, for wages of Rs. 5 and Rs. 6 per month at Rongai.
46 Overton, , ‘Spatial differentiation’, 216–232, for an analysis of the colonial state in Kenya during the war.Google Scholar
47 Bennett, , ‘Settlers and polities’, 285–289.Google Scholar
48 Sorrenson, M. P. K., Origins, 138–141Google Scholar; Sorrenson, , ‘Land policy in Kenya 1895–1945’, in History of East Africa, II, Appendix I, 672–689.Google Scholar
49 Bowring to Harcourt, 28 Nov. 1914, CO 533/143; Wright to Barth, 20 Jan. 1916, and 3 Aug. 1918, AG 4/1763; Wright to Barth, 4 Dec. 1918, AG 4/1871; Draft notice, n.d., AG 4/1766, K.N.A.
50 Overton, , ‘Spatial differentiation’, 222–223.Google Scholar
51 Uasin Gishu District Annual Report, 1915–16, K.N.A.
52 Nakuru District Annual Reports, 1915–16 and 1917–18, K.N.A.
53 Ukamba Province Annual Report, 1917–18, K.N.A.; Huxley, , White Man's Country, II, 33Google Scholar; Nakuru District Annual Report, 1915–16, K.N.A.
54 Naivasha District Annual Report, 1916–17, K.N.A. The evidence for squatter production is some what fragmentary though it is certain that squatter grain production was being extended and settlers were involved in its marketing.
55 Nakuru District Annual Report, 1917–18, K.N.A.
56 Nakuru District Annual Report, 1917–18, K.N.A.; Lambert, ‘A political history’, 26. Anderson, D. M., ‘Herder, settler and colonial rule: a history of the peoples of the Baringo Plains, Kenya, circa 1890 to 1940’ (Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge, 1982), 173, states that settler-processed grain was being sold to the Tugen after the war.Google Scholar
57 Coffee prices for example differed between the ‘very high prices’ and the ‘record prices’ recorded in the Department of Agriculture Annual Report of 1914–15 and 1917–18 and the falling f.o.b. export prices noted in Table I.
58 Railway traffic data also support this view of increased output. Railings of coffee from Ukamba and Nyanza Provinces (covering all the main settler outlets) increased from around 600 tons in 1913–14 to 750 tons in 1915–16 and to over 3,000 tons in 1917–18: East Africa Protectorate, Railway Administration Reports, 1913–14 to 1917–18.
59 Barth to Long, 26 Sept. 1918, MacDonald report on flax, 26 Aug. 1918, CO 533/197.
60 Barth to Long, 26 Sept. 1918, MacDonald report on flax, 26 Aug. 1918, CO 533/197; Leggett to Hewins, 10 April 1918, CO 533/204; Dagoretti Sub-District Annual Report, 1917–18, K.N.A.
61 Department of Agriculture Annual Report, 1917–18.
62 Department of Agriculture Annual Report, 1913–14.
63 The Agricultural Census of 1920 returned 14,005 acres of sisal three years old or more, i.e. planted before June 1917: Report on the Agricultural Census of the Colony and Protectorate of Kenya, 1920 (Nairobi, 1921).
64 Kenia Province Annual Reports, 1916–17 and 1917–18, K.N.A.
65 Kenia Province Annual Reports, 1915–16 and 1916–17, K.N.A.
66 Department of Agriculture Annual Report, 1917–18; Machakos District Annual Reports, 1915–16 to 1917–18, Kiambu District Annual Report, 1916–17, K.N.A. The estimate of 25,000 acres is probably too high.
67 Bowring to Long, 27 June 1917, MacDonald ‘Memo on coffee advances’, 19 June 1917, CO 533/182.
68 Ukamba Province Annual Report, 1916–17, Uasin Gishu District Annual Report, 1916–17, Kenia Province Annual Report, 1916–17, K.N.A.
69 Ukamba Province Annual Reports, 1914–15 to 1917–18, Kenia Province Annual Reports, 1916–17 and 1917–18, K.N.A. Acres under coffee in Kiambu were estimated as follows: July 1914, 5,150 acres; July 1915, 9,267 acres; July 1916, 11,616 acres; March 1918, 13,752 acres.
70 Department of Agriculture Annual Report, 1915–16 and 1917–18.
71 Cowen, , ‘Capital and household production’, 62–65. The Association also made attempts to ascertain the suitability of wattle logs for paper making (68).Google Scholar
72 For details of heavy military stock purchases and wartime meat markets, see Overton, , ‘Spatial differentiation’, 245–249 & 302–312.Google Scholar
73 Limited military purchases of settler stock are noted in the Naivasha District Annual Reports of 1914–15 and 1915–16, K.N.A.
74 See reports of stock sales selling indigenous cattle in the Rift Valley in Newland, Tarltons Monthly, April 1916, May 1916 and June 1916.
75 Bowring to Long, 26 May 1917, CO 533/181; Bowring to Long, 8 May 1918, CO 533/195; Barth to Long, 26 Sept. 1918, CO 533/197; Department of Agriculture Annual Report, 1917–18.
76 For example, Eldama Ravine District Annual Report, 1919–20, detailed several large herds in existence at the end of the war and Naivasha District Annual Reports of 1914–15 to 1917–18 estimated a doubling of cattle numbers on settler land over a five year period to 1918. In addition, 191 new cattle brands were registered during the war, an increase of 38 per cent over pre-war brand numbers. Department of Agriculture Annual Reports, 1913–14 to 1917–18.
77 Nakuru District Annual Reports, 1915–16 and 1918–19, K.N.A. The latter report noted that some settlers ‘exploited their native squatters with success’. This ‘exploitation’ could have taken the form of cheap purchase of stock for resale or breeding or could have referred to grain purchases.
78 Blue Book, 1912–13 to 1915–16. For comments on the bacon industry see Department of Agriculture Annual Report, 1916–17.
79 Department of Agriculture Annual Report, 1916–17.
80 Sorrenson, , Origins, 142–156Google Scholar; Overton, , ‘Spatial Differentiation’, 127–148.Google Scholar
81 Nakuru District Annual Report, 1917–18, Naivasha District Annual Report, 1916–17; Dobbs to Lane, 22 Aug. 1914, Lane to Earth 17 Oct. 1918, AG4/1547, K.N.A.
82 Nakuru District Annual Report, 1915–16, K.N.A.
83 Ukamba Province Annual Report, 1917–18, K.N.A.
84 Uasin Gishu District Annual Reports, 1914–15 to 1917–18, K.N.A.
85 ‘Correspondence with the government of Kenya relating to Lord Delamere's acquisition of land in Kenya’, Great Britain, Parliamentary Paper, Cmd. 2629, 1929.
86 Newland, Tarltons Monthly, November 1915 to May 1916.
87 Ibid., April 1916, July 1916, October 1916, June/July 1917.
88 Kenya Farm Survey Records (K.F.S.R./I) held by author. These data were extracted from records of the Survey Department Nairobi and, along with a collection of cadastral maps (K.F.S.R./2), comprise an invaluable data source for early land-holding in Kenya.
89 K.F.S.R./I; Overton, , ‘Spatial differentiation’, 266.Google Scholar
90 Overton, , ‘Spatial differentiation’, chapter 7 for a discussion of the wartime African economies. See also Kitching, Land, Livestock and Leadership, 48–53,Google Scholar and Waller, , ‘Uneconomic growth’, 9–13.Google Scholar
- 5
- Cited by