Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 January 2009
Between 1935 and 1960 a peculiar patterning of forced labour developed on Mozambique's lower Zambezi. By the beginning of the Salazar era a particular style of history had been imprinted upon Mozambique. Large scale recruiting of labour for the mines and farms of southern Africa coupled with mass migrations of Mozambique's people to escape the oppressions of Portuguese administration resulted in a severe labour shortage which companies operating in the colony had to face. Exacerbating this problem was the Portuguese decision in the mid-1930s to compel the colonies to produce enough cotton for the demands of the empire. To protect its position vis-à-vis already scarce male labour, the Sena Sugar Estates Ltd., Mozambique's largest employer of labour, formulated a system by which only female labour would cultivate cotton, leaving the men free to work in the company's sugar fields. This system, which was adopted in the 1940s by other employers of labour, led to severe oppression of the local people, notably the women, who were caught between the conflicting demands of interests more powerful than themselves. Only in the late 1950s and early 1960s did the pressures of the forced cultivation system end.
2 ‘AlgodSo Colonial’, Boletim Geral das Colonias, no. 295 (Jan. 1950), 173.Google Scholar
3 Oral Testimony (henceforth ‘O.T.’), Group interview, Caoxe village, Quelimane District, Mozambique, 26 Oct. 1976.
4 The group of songs to be considered here were collected between July and September 1975 and in November 1976 along the north bank of the Zambezi River between the Shire-Zambezi confluence and the delta, from villages within the cotton concession area formerly held by the Sena Sugar Estates Ltd. and in the rice concession area formerly held by Arrozal of Chinde. These songs are almost exclusively women's songs, and they are already fading from memory, as the concession system which sparked them was ended in 1961. They provide a vivid insight into the functioning of the concession system and, as such, are important historical documents. Tapes, transcriptions and translations will be housed at the Centro de Estudos Africanos, Universidade de Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo and at the University of Zambia Library, Lusaka.
5 van der Horst, Sheila T., Native Labour in South Africa (London, 1942), 216Google Scholar; Wilson, Francis, Labour in the South African Gold Mines (Cambridge, 1972), 70.Google Scholar
6 Johnstone, Frederick A., Class, Race and Gold: A study of class relations and racial discrimination in South Africa (London, 1976), 33–4Google Scholar. As van der Horst has pointed out, Mozambique labour was particularly vital in that it was a pool of experienced labour which could be adjusted to counteract fluctuations in the supply of non-Mozambique labour. Van der Horst, , Native Labour, 218–19.Google Scholar
7 See Foreign Office(F.O.) 63/1449, F.Crowe to F.O., 13 Apr. 1901, and MacDonnell, H. to Lansdowne, , 6 Nov. 1901Google Scholar. For a discussion of the modus vivendi, see Duffy, James, A Question of Slavery (Oxford, 1967), 142–6.Google Scholar
8 That is, those territories not governed by the Companhia do Niassa, the Companhia de Moçambique or the prazo administrations in the Zambezi valley.
9 On the mass emigrations, see Warhurst, P. R., ‘Rhodesia and Her Neighbours, 1900–1923’, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Oxford University, 1970, 167Google Scholar; 189, for migrations to Southern Rhodesia; Zambian National Archives, KSJ 4/1, ‘Annual Report, 1917/18, for East Luangwa District’ for migrations into Northern Rhodesia; Vail, Leroy, ‘Mozambique's Chartered Companies: The Rule of the Feeble’, J. Afr. Hist, xvii, 3 (1976), 401–2Google Scholar, for migration into Nyasaland; and F.O. 371/8377, Governor of Tanganyika to Colonial Office, 9 Oct. 1922, for migrations to Tanganyika.
10 See, for example, the Lourenço Marques Guardian, 18 Apr. 1922Google Scholar; also, Duffy, James, Portugal in Africa (Harmondsworth, 1962), 138.Google Scholar
11 F.O. 371/8373, Prince Arthur of Connaught to Colonial Office, 19 May 1922. Smuts threatened to open a new port at Kosi Bay and cease using Lourenço Marques unless the latter was brought under a South African commission of control. Sir Eyre Crowe, in a Minute of 22 Feb. 1922, noted that this was a move ‘on the part of the Union … towards the absorption of the Portuguese colonies. We know this to be their ambition’.
12 F.O. 371/8373, Prince Arthur of Connaught to Colonial Office, 27 Apr. 1922.
13 F.O. 371/8373, Minute of SirCrowe, Eyre, 27 June 1922.Google Scholar
14 F.O. 371/9481, Prince Arthur of Connaught to Devonshire (Colonial Office), a Mar. 1923.
15 F.O. 371/8375, Telegram of Smuts to Walton, 6 Feb. 1922, encl. in Walton, to Crowe, E., 9 Feb. 1922Google Scholar; Minute of SirCrowe, Eyre, 13 May 1922Google Scholar; Smuts, to Walton, , 6 Feb. 1922Google Scholar, notes that:
Hornung's loan is for Mozambique development and renders that Province independent of the Union. This should be prevented. Portuguese should not be allowed [to] flout Union Government.
The Foreign Office was hostile to Smut's plans and tactics. See, for example Minute of SirCrowe, Eyre, 10 Feb. 1922.Google Scholar
For Hornung's attitudes see F.O. 371/8373, Hall, to Governor General of South Africa, 19 June 1922Google Scholar. This aspect of South African imperialism is overlooked in Hyam, Ronald, The Failure of South African Expansion, 1908–1948 (London, 1972), 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 F.O. 371/9482, Memorandum of SirCrowe, Eyre, 8 Nov. 1923.Google Scholar
17 F.O. 371/9482, Minute of SirCrowe, Eyre, 26 Nov. 1923.Google Scholar
18 F O. 371/12701, Imperial Secretary to Dominions Office, 8 Dec. 1927.
19 F.O. 371/12701, President, Transvaal Chamber of Mines to Imperial Secretary, 12 Dec. 1927.
20 F.O. 371/13421, Barclay, to F.O., 28 Aug. 1928.Google Scholar
21 F.O. 371/13424, Pyke, to F.O., 18 Jan. 1928.Google Scholar
22 F.O. 371/13423, Encl. 2 in Dominions Office to F.O., 8 Aug. 1928.
23 The amount of labour going to Southern Rhodesia, as compared with the amount going to the Union, was not large, being restricted for the most part to Tete Province until at least 1936. Prior to 1936 the labour to Southern Rhodesia was governed by the Tete Agreement of 1913. For a discussion of this, see Warhurst, P. R., ‘The Tete Agreement’, Rhodesian History, i (1970), 31–42.Google Scholar
24 See Smith, Alan, ‘António Salazar and the Reversal of Portuguese Colonial Policy’, J. Afr. Hist, xv, 4 (1974), passim.Google Scholar
25 Relatórios e Informações—Annexo de Boletim Oficial, 1908 (Lourenço Marques, 1909), 55.Google Scholar
26 Boletim Geral das Colonias, no. 45 (Mar. 1929), 278–9.Google Scholar
27 Munro, J. Forbes, Africa and the International Economy, 1800–1960 (London, 1976), 102.Google Scholar
28 Ibid. 128–9.
29 Kay, Hugh, Salazar and Modern Portugal (London, 1970), 30Google Scholar; Spence, C. F., Moçambique (East African Province of Portugal) (Cape Town, 1963), 78.Google Scholar
30 The British Ambassador in Lisbon summed up the situation in the mid-1920s when he wrote his annual report for 1924:
… we find her with a weak Government, an incompetent and contemptible Parliament, her credit abroad impaired, no budget, a huge deficit, business at a standstill, high prices, and a discontented working class.
Unemployment and inflation were both increasing as the escudo, nominally at a par of 53¾d., was fluctuating wildly around the 2d. mark. F.O. 371/11090, ‘Annual Report for 1924’, by Sir Lancelot Carnegie.
31 Didrio do Governo, 1st ser., 165, 30 July 1926.Google Scholar
32 International Labour Office, Report of the Commission Appointed Under Article 26 of the Constitution of the International Labour Organisation to Examine the Complaint Filed by the Government of Ghana concerning the Observance by the Government of Portugal of the Abolition of Forced Labour Convention of 1957 (Geneva, 1962), 137 n.Google Scholar (henceforth, ‘I.L.O. Report’).
33 de Martel Patricio, Francisco, ‘Junta de Exportação do Algodão’, Boletim Geral das Colonias, nos. 341–2 (Nov. and Dec. 1953), 52.Google Scholar
34 Spence, , Moçambique, 78Google Scholar
35 de Moçambique, Colonia, O Algodão em Moçambique (Lourenço Marques, 1928), 28; 35.Google Scholar
36 Portaria no. 1180, 4 Sept. 1930, Regulamento do Trabalho des Indigenas na Colonia de Moçambique (Lourenço Marques, 1930), passim.Google Scholar
37 Confidential communication, Nov. 1976. Henceforth the Sena Sugar Estates Ltd. will be abbreviated to ‘S.S.E.’.
38 Boletim Geral das Colonias, no. 198 (Dec. 1941), 90.Google Scholar
39 Diário do Governo, 1st ser., 53, 5 Mar. 1937.Google Scholar
40 Spence, , Moçambique, 78.Google Scholar
41 Sena Sugar Estates Ltd., Archives, Luabo, Mozambique (henceforth ‘S.S.E.Ar.’), File 202, ‘Gremio de Productores de Algodão’, list of concession-holders, 1938. By 1945 rationalization of the concessions had occurred, and the number in Zambesia had been reduced to four.
42 S.S.E.Ar., File 133a, ‘Recruiting: Angonia—Quelimane—Local’, Memorandum of 10 Nov. 1937Google Scholar, ‘Marromeu Recruting’; File 93, ‘Labour Recruiting: Government Side’, passim; Wilson, , Labour in the South African Gold Mines, 68–9.Google Scholar
43 S.S.E.Ar., Mopea Head Office, Annual Reports: Sugar—1929Google Scholar; Czarnikow, C., Ltd., ‘Movements in the London and New York Sugar Markets, 1935–1938’ (London, 1939).Google Scholar
44 This argument does not obtain south of the river at Caia, as the minimum wage scale operative in the Companhia de Moçambique's territories, in which Caia was situated, was so high that local Caia labour was prohibitively expensive for the company. The company staffed the Caia factory and plantation with labour brought from north of the river, where the minimum wages were much lower than on the south bank.
45 S.S.E.Ar., File 93, ‘Labour Recruiting: Government Side’, tables.
46 Ibid., Memorandum on Labour, 20 Oct. 1937.
47 S.S.E.Ar., File 32b, ‘Companhia Comercio de Moçambique’, Memorandum by Thurnheer, M. on the History and Affairs of the Companhia Comercio de Moçambique, 16 Mar. 1962Google Scholar; File 74a, ‘Gremio-Milhos/Mealies’, Thurnheer, to Hornung, C. B., 30 Mar. 1950Google Scholar; see also Cd. 7049, Report on a Journey Made from Chinde to Tete by Mr. Vice Consul Rule (Foreign Office Miscellaneous Series no. 686), 6.Google Scholar
48 S.S.E.Ar., File 44c, ‘Final Cotton Reports’, Final Cotton Report for 1941.Google Scholar
49 Diário do Governo, 1st ser., 197, 31 Aug. 1946.Google Scholar
50 S.S.E.Ar., File 44c, ‘Final Cotton Reports’, Final Cotton Report for 1942.Google Scholar
51 Relatório do Govemador Geral de Moçambique, 1940–1942, vol. II, 78–9Google Scholar, quoted in I.L.O. Report, 124.Google Scholar
52 Diário de Martha, 7 May 1943Google Scholar, quoted in S.S.E.Ar., File 44c, ‘Final Cotton Reports’, Final Cotton Report for 1942.Google Scholar
53 Ibid., Final Cotton Report for 1949. The symbol ‘$’, replacing the decimal point, indicates that the money referred to is Portuguese escudos.
54 S.S.E.Ar., File 44c, ‘Final Cotton Reports’, Final Cotton Report for 1942.Google Scholar
55 Ibid., Thurnheer, to Hornung & Co., Ltd., 30 Nov. 1944.Google Scholar
56 S.S.E.Ar., File 201a, ‘Cotton Shipments to Portugal’, Final Cotton Report for 1940.Google Scholar
57 S.S.E.Ar., File 44c, ‘Final Cotton Reports’, Final Cotton Report for 1941.Google Scholar
58 Ibid., Final Cotton Report for 1943.
59 Ibid., Thurnheer, to Hornung & Co., Ltd., 2 July 1942.Google Scholar
60 Ibid., Hornung, to Thurnheer, , 29 Apr. 1944.Google Scholar
61 This song consists of a lead and a chorus. The lead differs from line to line, while the chorus is constant. This version was collected at Chimbazo Village, Quelimane District, Mozambique, 13 Aug. 1975. In the context of this article, songs have been edited to avoid repetitions.
62 O.T., Group interview, Caoxe Village, Quelimane District, Mozambique, 26 Oct. 1976.
63 Personal communication from Costley-White, Moses, Dec. 1976.Google Scholar
64 S.S.E.Ar., File 74, ‘Gremio-Milhos/Mealies’, chart; see also Spence, C. F., The Colony of Moçambique (Portuguese East Africa) An Economic Survey (Lourenço Marques, n.d. [1944]), 23–4Google Scholar, where the author notes that the drive for cotton had resulted in a drop in maize production and that the ‘overemphasis on cotton appears liable in the long run to prove detrimental to the interests of the Colony’.
65 Spence, , Moçambique, 78–9.Google Scholar
66 S.S.E.Ar., File 44c, ‘Final Cotton Reports’, Final Cotton Report for 1948.Google Scholar
67 Spence, , Moçambique, 80.Google Scholar
68 I.L.O. Report, 137 n.
69 Diário de Moçambique, 18 Feb. 1954, encl. in S.S.E.Ar., File 238, ‘Mopeia Estate’.Google Scholar
70 Diário do Governo, 1st ser., 257, 24 Nov. 1955.Google Scholar
71 S.S.E.Ar., File 238, ‘Mopeia Estate’, Hornung, to Thurnheer, , 11 Sept. 1952.Google Scholar
72 Ibid., Thurnheer, to DuBoulay, , 1 Dec. 1952.Google Scholar
73 Ibid., Hornung, to Thurnheer, , 11 Mar. 1954Google Scholar; Thurnheer, to Hornung, , 11 Mar. 1954Google Scholar; Thurnheer, to Hornung, , 25 Mar. 1954.Google Scholar
74 Ibid., Hornung, to Thurnheer, , 11 Mar. 1954.Google Scholar
75 Ibid.
76 S.S.E.Ar., File 44c, ‘Final Cotton Reports’, Hornung, to Luabo Office, 1 Nov. 1956Google Scholar. It is interesting to note that the post-tax profits of the sugar company, in spite of losses on cotton, increased from £103,245 in 1953 to £875,121 in 1957.
77 Song collected at Madumo Village, Quelimane District, Mozambique, 17 Aug. 1975.
78 O.T., Interview with Todo, Jiwa, Madumo Village, Quelimane District, Mozambique, 29 Oct. 1976.Google Scholar
79 Song collected at Muanavina Village, Quelimane District, Mozambique, 24 Aug. 1975.
80 I.L.O. Report, 142 n; S.S.E.Ar., File 201, ‘Cotton Shipments to Portugal’, D'Arouca to Hornung & Co., Ltd., 22 June 1959.Google Scholar
81 Diário do Govemo, 1st ser., 102, 2 May 1961.Google Scholar
82 Spence, , Moçambique, 81.Google Scholar
83 Boletim Oficial—Supplement, 24, 16 June 1941.Google Scholar
84 de Moçambique, Colonia, Cultura Industria e Comercio do Arroz (Lourenço Marques, 1941), passim.Google Scholar
85 ‘O Problema do Arroz’, Boletim Geral das Colonias, no. 409 (July 1959), 113–30, passim.Google Scholar
86 S.S.E.Ar., File 137, ‘Correspondence with Arrozal’, Rodrigues, P. A. Viana to Gomes, J. Barros, 18 Sept. 1943.Google Scholar
87 Ibid., ‘Zona Orizicola’, Report By de Paiva Raposo, A., 23 Oct. 1944.Google Scholar
88 Ibid., Appeal to Governor General of Mocambique from E.D., 8 Aug. 1944.
89 Boletim Oficial, 2nd ser., 49, 31 Oct. 1944.Google Scholar
90 S.S.E.Ar., File 137, ‘Correspondence with Arrozal’, de Paiva Raposo, A. to Rodrigues, P. A. Viana, 3 Mar. 1947.Google Scholar
91 Ibid.
92 O.T., Interview with Chanazi, Luis, Mathilde Village, Quelimane District, Mozambique, 13 Nov. 1976.Google Scholar
93 Rice, like cotton, is a very labour-intensive crop, and the allotment of half a hectare to one woman is indeed a large allotment. According to calculations, 770 hours of labour would be required in a growing season to grow half a hectare of rice. Haswell, M. R., Economics of Agriculture in a Savanna Village (London, 1953). 32Google Scholar. Haswell's figures are for the Gambia, but it is unlikely that there would be much variation in the lower Zambezi area. For an area closer to Mozambique, see the even more striking figures for rice as against maize in modem Malawi in Farrington, J., Farm Surveys in Malawi (Reading, U.K., 1975), XIII. iGoogle Scholar, where the average figures per acre are 174.5 hours for maize in a growing season and 1,622 hours for (irrigated) rice.
94 O.T., Group interview, Chinde, Quelimane District, Mozambique, 13 Nov. 1976.
95 Song collected at Pirira Village, Quelimane District, Mozambique, 5 Aug. 1975.
96 O.T., Group interview, Pirira Village, Quelimane District, Mozambique, 25 Oct. 1976.
97 S.S.E.Ar., File 137, ‘Correspondence with Arrozal’, Thurnheer, to DuBoulay, , 11 July 1957Google Scholar; Provincia da Moçambique, Acta da Conferéncia des Administradores (n.p., n.d. [Quelimane, 1957]). 41.Google Scholar
98 S.S.E.Ar., File 137, Correspondence with Arrozal', Thurnheer, to DuBoulay, , 6 Aug. 1957.Google Scholar
99 I.L.O. Report, 143.Google Scholar
100 S.S.E.Ar., File 44c, ‘Final Cotton Reports’, Relatórios sobre a campanha algodoeira, 1960 and 1962.Google Scholar
101 S.S.E.Ar., File 238, ‘Mopeia Estate’, DuBoulay, to Hornung, , 10 Apr. 1963.Google Scholar
102 Spence, , Moçambique, 85.Google Scholar
103 I.L.O. Report, 238.Google Scholar