Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T12:22:54.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SORTING OUT THE TRIBES: THE CREATION OF RACIAL IDENTITIES IN COLONIAL ZANZIBAR'S NEWSPAPER WARS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2001

JONATHON GLASSMAN
Affiliation:
Northwestern University

Abstract

The days are approaching when you will hear new things. Soon you will hear that an Arab is not an Arab, a Shirazi is not a Shirazi, and an African is not an African. You will hear this, and you will be told that you are all Zanzibaris.

Al-Falaq, paper of the Zanzibar Arab Association, 1946

Nani awezaye kumnyoosha Binaadamu pindi alitiwa kibyongo na Mungu? [Who can straighten out mankind, whom God has made a hunchback?]

Afrika Kwetu, paper of the Zanzibar African Association, 1952

STUDENTS of the history of African ethnicity will recognize in the second of these quotes a Swahili version of the aphorism from Kant with which Leroy Vail introduces his important volume on the creation of tribalism in modern Africa: ‘Out of the crooked timber of humanity nothing straight will ever be fashioned’. True to their spirit, both aphorisms can be interpreted in contradictory ways. Vail intended to point up a theme that runs throughout his volume: that ethnic categories are rarely as clear-cut as ethnic nationalists would have them seem, and that, where such clarity exists, it is only momentary, having arisen out of complex and messy historical processes. But the editors of Afrika Kwetu, the weekly newspaper of the Zanzibar African Association that published the Swahili proverb in 1952, drew less subtle implications. The immediate context was a plea against religious chauvinism, part of the newspaper's allegation that Zanzibar's Arab nationalist leaders had violated the Islamic injunction to respect other religions ‘of the book’. But the clear implication – elsewhere made explicit – was that God and nature had fashioned humankind into irreducibly separate races and nations, and that it was foolish and even blasphemous to mix or combine them, as (they charged) their Arab rivals were seeking to do.

Type
Memory, Identity, and the Limits of Invention
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)