Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:22:49.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Settler Farmers and Coerced African Labour in Southern Rhodesia, 1936–46*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

David Johnson
David Johnson
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper contributes to a growing body of literature on the socio-economic impact of the Second World War on Africa. The focus is on the inter-relationship between the state, settler farmers and African labour in Southern Rhodesia. The war presented an opportunity for undercapitalized European farmers to enlist state support in securing African labour that they could not obtain through market forces alone. Historically, these farmers depended heavily on a supply of cheap labour from the Native Reserves and from the colonies to the north, especially Nyasaland. But the opportunities for Africans to sell their labour in other sectors of the Southern Rhodesian economy and in the Union of South Africa, or to at least determine the timing and length of their entry into wage employment, meant that settler farmers seldom obtained an adequate supply of labour. Demands for increased food production, a wartime agrarian crisis and a diminished supply of external labour all combined to ensure that the state capitulated in the face of requests for Africans to be conscripted into working for Europeans as a contribution to the Imperial war effort. The resulting mobilization of thousands of African labourers under the Compulsory Native Labour Act (1942), which emerged as the prize of the farmers' campaign for coerced labour, corrects earlier scholarship on Southern Rhodesia which asserted that state intervention in securing labour supplies was of importance only up to the 1920s. The paper also shows that Africans did not remain passive before measures aimed at coercing them into producing value for settler farmers.

Type
Colonial Zimbabwe
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 111 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Barber, W.J., The Economy of British Central Africa (London, 1961), 93.Google Scholar Barber's theoretical inspiration for this study came from Lewis, W. A., ‘Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour’, Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, XXII (1954), 139–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Arrighi, G., ‘Labour supplies in historical perspective: a study of the proletarianization of the African peasantry in Rhodesia’, Journal of Development Studies, VI (1970), 198–233.Google Scholar

3 Arrighi, , ‘Labour supplies’, 221.Google Scholar

4 Mosley, P., The Settler Economies: Studies in the Economic History of Kenya and Southern Rhodesia, 1900–1963 (Cambridge, 1983), 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Ranger, T., ‘Growing from the roots: reflections on peasant research in central and southern Africa’, J. Southern Afr. Studies, V (1978), 119–21.Google Scholar Ranger makes a case for the survival of a viable peasantry in the Makoni district into the 1940s in his Peasant Consciousness and Guerrilla War in Zimbabwe (London, 1985).Google Scholar Wolfgang Döpcke, in opposition to the ‘rise and fall of the African peasantry school’, argues that ‘probably the majority of Africans—at least in Mashonaland—was able to maintain its peasant status’ in the 1930s, despite the depression; at the same time, however, ‘a substantial number of groups was drawn much deeper into migrant labour’. See W. Döpcke, ‘Abstract: The impact of the great depression on peasant societies in colonial Zimbabwe’ (mimeo, n.d); also Döpcke, ‘“Magomo's maize”: state and peasants during the depression in colonial Zimbabwe’, in Brown, I. (ed.), The Economies of Africa and Asia in the Inter-War Depression (London, 1989), 29–58.Google Scholar

6 For some comparative insights on the wartime role of the state in harnessing labour supplies for settler capital, see Spencer, I., ‘Settler dominance, agricultural production and the Second World War in Kenya’, J. Afr. Hist., XXI (1980), 497–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Datta, K., ‘Farm labour, agrarian capital and the state in colonial Zambia: the African Labour Corps, 1942–1952’, J. Southern Afr. Studies, XIV (1988), 371–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Vickery, K., ‘The Second World War revival of forced labor in the Rhodesias’, Int. J. Afr. Hist. Studies, XXII (1989), 423–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 ‘Planters throughout Nyasaland’, for example, ‘expressed hostility to what by the 1930s had become a flood of labour migration southwards’. They complained bitterly that this migration was taking labour from the cotton, tobacco and tea growing industries in the Protectorate. See Palmer, R., ‘White farmers in Malawi: before and after the depression’, Afr. Affairs, LXXXIV (no. 335) (1985), 211–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Similar complaints on the outward flow of labour were voiced by mining companies on the Copperbelt in Northern Rhodesia, where production expanded from the mid-1930s. See Parpart, J. L., Labor and Capital on the African Copperbelt (Philadelphia, 1983), 52, 75–6.Google Scholar

8 Nyasaland Protectorate: Report of the Committee to Enquire into Emigrant Labour (Lacey Report) (1935), 7.Google Scholar

9 The Salisbury Agreement, as the document became known, stipulated that any quotas for the gold mines in South Africa were to be subjected to three cardinal principles’: (1) ‘that the preservation of the social structure of native life must be the first requirement’; (2) ‘thereafter the reasonable needs of the three Territories should have prior claim on any available surplus’; and (3) ‘the Rand mines should only be entitled to draw upon any further surplus remaining over after the first two requirements had been met’. Public Records Office, London (PRO), Dominions Office (DO) 35/829/R17/18, ‘Aide Mémoire’, Sept. 1936.

10 Southern Rhodesia Legislative Assembly Debates (henceforth Debates), vol. 19, 15 06 1939Google Scholar, Minister of Native Affairs, cols. 1398–9.

11 Innes, D., Anglo-American and the Rise of Modern South Africa (London, 1984), 129–38.Google Scholar

12 Yudelman, D. and Jeeves, A., ‘New labour frontiers for old: black migrants to the South African gold mines, 1920–85’, J. Southern Afr. Studies, XIII (1986), 101–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Responding to Huggins' criticisms of his bias towards the Rand, H. B. Kittermaster, the Governor of Nyasaland, explained that ‘30,000 labourers going down to the Rand on contract would mean an addition of 200,000 a year in the hands of the natives to be spent in this Protectorate’. PRO, DO 35/829/R17/35, Kittermaster to Stanley, Jan. 1938.

14 S482/224/39/Oct. 1938–June 1939, ‘Confidential notes for the Prime Minister on the labour situation’, Secretary for Native Affairs, 29 Dec. 1938.

15 The number of northern migrants fell from 97,421 in 1937 to 71,021 in 1938. Debates, vol. 19, 7 06 1939Google Scholar, Major Hastings, col. 1102.

16 In October 1940 Huggins stated that all labour supplies from outside the colony had fallen except that from Mozambique. See PRO, DO 35/830/R17/167, ‘Record of proceedings at a conference, held at Salisbury on 3 October, 1940, between the Governor of Northern Rhodesia, the Governor of Nyasaland and the Prime Minister of Southern Rhodesia under the chairmanship of the Governor of Southern Rhodesia.’

17 S1542/L1/1939(2), Secretary, Native Labour Committee, to Bullock, 23 Jan. 1939.

18 Debates, vol. 19, 17 06 1939Google Scholar, col. 1103.

19 Rhodesia Herald, 2 June 1939, in PRO, DO 35/830/R17/122.

20 Bulawayo Chronicle, 31 01 1947, in F141/vol.III, part 2.Google Scholar

21 Mosley, , Settler Economies, 125, 193.Google Scholar

22 S482/516/39, ‘Report of the proceedings of the conference on Native Labour’, 7 June 1938.

23 van Onselen, C., Chibaro: African Mine Labour in Southern Rhodesia, 1900–1933 (London, 1970), chs. 3 and 4.Google Scholar

24 S482/274/39/file no. 2, Guest to Prime Minister, 17 Nov. 1939, and attached memorandum on ‘Native Labour’, 17 Nov. 1939.

25 S1215/1080/10, ‘Comments on the organization of the agricultural community in the event of national emergency’, Dennis, 11 May 1939.

26 Rhodesia Herald, 10 Nov. 1939, report on meeting of RAU on 9 Nov. 1939.

27 Rhodesia Herald, 20 Oct. 1939, report on congress of 17 Oct. 1939.

28 Rhodesia Herald, 18 Oct. 1939, in PRO, DO 35/830/R17/151.

29 S1561/50, Circular Minute No. 53, ‘Native labour: war conditions’, Bullock, 13 Sept. 1939; S482/690/39, ‘Native Affairs as affected by the War’, Secretary for Native Affairs, Oct. 1939.

30 Rhodesia Herald, 28 Mar. 1941, letter from C. A. K. Beaton, Woodstock, Gatooma.

31 S482/224/39, Huggins to Col. Stewart, 14 Mar. 1940.

32 Cooper, F., On the African Waterfront: Urban Disorder and the Transformation of Work in Colonial Mombasa (New Haven, 1987), 1.Google Scholar

33 Rhodesia Herald, 7 Mar. 1941, letter from J. R. Douglas.

34 S1563, Native Commissioner (NC), Lomagundi, Annual Report (AR), 1940. John Scott of Banket also explained that it was no use attempting to discipline labourers through the courts. This necessitated a very strong case, wasted labour-time ‘and if successful, has little effect as a general deterrent, while if unsuccessful, leads to a spate of loafing’; Rhodesia Herald, 13 Mar. 1942.

35 See, e.g. Rhodesia Herald, 3 April 1942, letter from Bridges, Edward; Rhodesia Herald, 15 05 1942Google Scholar, letter from G. R. E. Chamney.

36 One such farmer was J. M. Moubray of Shamva, one of the best-known farmers in the country. His recommendations to other farmers included encouraging workers to marry and grow their own produce on small plots of land; Rhodesia Herald, 14 Mar. 1941, letter from J. M. Moubray.

37 Debates, vol. 19, 7 06 1939Google Scholar, Hastings, cols. 1102–350; Rhodesia Herald, 9 Feb. 1940, Report on RAU meeting of 8 Feb. 1940.

38 Phimister, I., ‘Discourse and disciplines of historical context: conservationism and ideas about development in Southern Rhodesia 1930–1950’, J. Southern Afr. Studies, XII (1986), 263–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

39 Phimister, I., An Economic and Social History of Zimbabwe 1890–1948: Capital Accumulation and Class Struggle (Harlow, 1988), ch. 4.Google Scholar

40 Since most of the surplus maize from South and East Africa was earmarked for troops in the Middle East, enquiries had to be made in countries as far afield as Sierra Leone, Nigeria, Brazil and Argentina. An additional problem in obtaining food imports during the war was the acute shortage of shipping space. See correspondence in S482/151/42.

41 S482/20/42, C. Russel Ridgeway to Huggins, 16 Feb. 1942; S955/52, Note on ‘Power of Committee’ by Secretary, Dept. of Agriculture and Lands, 4 Mar. 1942. The N. Rhodesian FPC was established in 1940. See: Datta, ‘Farm Labour’.

42 Masenda, A., ‘The FPC and state food policy in colonial Zimbabwe during the 1940s’ (M.A. thesis, Department of History, University of Zimbabwe, 1987).Google Scholar

43 S961/1, Minutes, 17 Mar. 1942.

44 S961/1, FPC Minutes, 17 Mar. 1942.

45 PRO, DO 35/831/R17/180, Russell (Actg. Gov.) to Machtig, 24 April 1942.

46 PRO, DO 35/831/R17/178, O'Keefe to Stephenson, 21 April 1942. Forced labour for wartime production (in British colonial Africa) was first introduced in Kenya and Northern Rhodesia in February 1942. These measures attracted a good deal of criticism from sections of the British Labour Party but were defended by the Imperial Government as being essential for the prosecution of the war. For an analysis of the wartime usages of forced labour in Kenya and Northern Rhodesia see: Clayton, A. and Savage, D., Government and Labour in Kenya, 1895–1963 (London, 1974), ch. 7Google Scholar; K. Datta, ‘Farm labour’; and Banton, M., ‘British wartime policy: the role of the Colonial Labour Advisory Committee’ (paper for SOAS conference on Africa and Second World War, 1984).Google Scholar For an overview of coerced labour in Africa during the war see Killingray, D., ‘Labour mobilisation in British colonial Africa for the war effort, 1939–1946’, in Killingray, D. and Rathbone, R. (eds.), Africa and the Second World War (London, 1986), 68–96.Google Scholar

47 S482/55/42, Huggins to Acting Governor (Sir Fraser Russell), 1 May 1942.

48 PRO, DO 35/831/R17/178, Minutes by Tail, 4 May 1942.

49 Debates, vol. 22, 4 11 1942Google Scholar, col. 2206.

50 S235/427, C. F. Jamieson (Secretary, FPC) to Secretary for Native Affairs, 1 April 1942.

51 S235/427, Confidential Minute on ‘Compulsory Native Labour Act No. 15 of 1942’, CNC, 31 July 1942.

52 Native Affairs Department Annual [NADA], no. 26.(1949)Google Scholar; S1563, NC Mrewa, AR, 1946.

53 Quoted in Maclean, J., The Guardians: The Story of Rhodesia's Outposts—and the Men and Women who Served in them (Bulawayo, 1974), 230.Google Scholar

54 S1563, NC Lomagundi, AR, 1945.

55 S1563, NC Goromonzi, AR, 1944.

56 See NC, Annual Reports, 1943–6.

57 S1619, NC Darwin, Mt, Monthly Report (MR), 11 1942.Google Scholar

58 S1563, NC Lomagundi, AR, 1944.

59 S1563, NC Mt Darwin, AR, 1944. Some officials regarded those who attempted to avoid conscription on the basis of the need to attend to their own farms as loafers. The following self-contradictory—or self-consciously insensitive—remarks by the Native Commissioner for Selukwe, who gave potential recruits the opportunity to offer reasons for exemption, is a case in point: ‘Most of the excuses advanced were frivolous and in most cases attempts to avoid going to work. The call-ups, of course, occur just when they are preparing their own lands’. See S1563, NC Selukwe, AR, 1945.

60 S1563, NC Mrewa, AR, 1945.

61 S1563, NC Mazoe, AR, 1944.

62 S1563, NC Bindura, AR, 1942. For similar views see: S1563, NC Salisbury, AR, 1942; NC Goromonzi, AR, 1944; NC Mazoe, 1944; NC Chilimanzi, AR, 1945.

63 S1563, NC Matobo, AR, 1944.

64 S1563, Assistant Native Commissioner (ANC), Shabani, AR, 1945.

65 S482/55/42, J. G. Odendaal (Secretary to The Gazaland [South Melsetter] Farmer's Association) to Huggins, 14 June 1946. For further evidence of conscription encouraging migration to South Africa see: S1563, NC Gwaai, AR, 1944; NC Shangani, AR, 1944; NC Belingwe, AR, 1945; NC Nyamandhlovu, AR, 1945.

66 S1542/C6/vol. 16, Gwanda to Provincial Native Commissioner (PNC), Bulawayo, Minute No. 13/Misc./57/45 of 18 Oct. 1945 and attached ‘Notes of meeting with chiefs and headmen: Gwanda’, 16 Oct. 1945.

67 S958/1, ‘General revision labour gang constitution and operations’, 9 Oct. 1942.

68 Africans working with the Roads Dept, Irrigation Dept, and the RAF were being engaged at a commencing rate of 17s. 6d. to 20s. per ticket. S1563, NC Belingwe, AR, 1942.

69 S958/1, FPC Circular No. 17/1943, 6 May 1943.

70 Rhodesia Herald, 17 April 1942; S235/425, J. D. Lamb (Salisbury DFPC) to Secretary, FPC, 7 May 1942; S957/3, Report of Salisbury South DFPC to 31 July 1942; Report of Marandellas DFPC, 18 Aug. 1942.

71 S958/1, ‘Splitting native labour gangs’, FPC Circular No. 2, 14 Oct. 1942, emphasis in original; See also, Rhodesia Herald, 23 Oct. 1942.

72 S482/510/39. J. W. Swan, Secretary, FPC to Chairman, FPC, 25 Feb. 1944.

73 See S482/510/39, J. W. Swan to Chairman, FPC, 25 Feb. 1944.

74 S1563, ANC Bindura, AR, 1944.

75 S1619, NC Mazoe, MR, Nov. 1942.

76 S1563, NC Mazoe, AR, 1944.

77 S1563, Minutes, 13 Oct. 1944.

78 Report of the Secretary, Department of Mines and Public Works, on mines for the years 1942 and 1943.

79 S1619, NC Ndanga, MR, Nov. 1942; S1563, NC Ndanga, AR, 1944 and 1945.

80 S1563, ANC Beitbridge, AR, 1944.

81 S1619, NC Gwelo, MR, Nov. 1942.

82 S1563, NC Gutu, AR, 1941.

83 S1563, NC Selukwe, AR, 1944; ANC Shamva, AR, 1944; ANC Beitbridge, AR, 1944.

84 See PRO, DO 35/1398/R217/8 for details.

85 The Countryside (05 1943), 17Google Scholar; see also S961/2, Minutes, 24 Feb. 1943.

86 S482/55/42, Huggins to Harris, 8 Nov. 1944.

87 S961/2, Minutes, 15 Mar. 1945 and 10 April 1945.

88 S961/2, Minutes, 16 April 1945.

89 S961/2, Minutes, 20 Feb. 1946.

90 S1563, NC Bubi, AR, 1945.

91 S1563, NC Mrewa, AR, 1945. For other African reactions to the perpetuation of compulsory labour, see NC Chipinga, AR, 1946; NC Bikita, AR, 1945; NC Shangan, AR, 1945.

92 S1563, NC Lomagundi, AR, 1945.

93 S1563, NC Sinoia, AR, 1946.

94 CNC Annual Reports for 1943, 1944 and 1945.

95 S1563, NC Salisbury, AR, 1946.

96 Cooper, F., From Slaves to Squatters: Plantation Labor and Agriculture in Zanzibar and Coastal Kenya, 1890–1925 (New Haven, 1980), ch. 5Google Scholar; Rodney, W., A History of the Guyanese Working People, 1881–1905 (Baltimore, 1981), ch. 2.Google Scholar

97 The PNC for Fort Victoria wrote: ‘Due to reaction after years of compulsory labour, natives remained at home. The native does not realise and appreciate his duty to the community and, being naturally indolent, works only when he has to’. See S1563, PNC Fort Victoria, AR, 1946.