¹ Mendels, F. F., ‘Proto-industrialisation: the first phase of the industrialisation process’, J. Econ. Hist. XXXII (1972), 241–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

² Ibid. 247–9. See also Jones, Eric, ‘Agricultural origins of industry’, Past and Present, no. 40 (July 1968), 58–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³ As one example among many, see Smith, T. C., The Agrarian Origins of Modern Japan (Stanford, 1959), 75–80.Google Scholar

⁴ Laslett, P., The World We Have Lost (London, 1965)Google Scholar and Laslett, P. with Wall, R. (ed.), Household and Family in Past Time (Cambridge, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵ Mendels, F. F., ‘Industrialisation and Population Pressure in eighteenth century Flanders’ (Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin, 1970).Google Scholar

⁶ Medick, Hans, ‘The proto-industrial family economy: the structural function of household and family during the transition from peasant society to industrial capitalism’, Social History, no. 3 (October 1976), 291–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷ Levine, David, Family Formation in an Age of Nascent Capitalism (New York, 1977).Google Scholar

⁸ See references to Wrigley's work in Levine, , Family Formation, 190.Google Scholar

⁹ Levine, , ‘Introduction’, Family Formation, 3.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Ibid. appendix: ‘The reliability of parochial registration and the representativeness of family reconstitution’, 153–74.

¹¹ Ibid. 26–30.

¹² Ibid. appendix: Table 5.12.

¹³ Ibid. 93, 112–13, 124–5.

¹⁴ Ibid. 6–7, 20, 94–5.

¹⁵ Ibid. 6.

¹⁶ Ibid. 90.

¹⁷ Ibid. 95.

¹⁸ Ibid. 11.

¹⁹ Ibid. 84–7; for data on the differences between the demographic behaviour of framework knitters and other occupational groups within Shepshed.

²⁰ Ibid. 12–13, 18–20, 51–2 and 58–67.

²¹ Ibid. 116–26.

²² Ibid. 22 and 34.

²³ Ibid. 23.

²⁴ See Chayanov, A. V., ‘Peasant farm organisation’, especially chapter 2,Google Scholar‘Measure of self-exploitation of the peasant family labour force: the concept of advantage in the labor farm’ in Chayanov, , The Theory of Peasant Economy (Homewood, 1966)Google Scholar; also Banaji, Jarius, ‘Kautsky's The Agrarian Question, A summary of selected parts’, Economy and Society, I, ii (1976), 2–49Google Scholar and especially the examples cited on 26–8.

²⁵ Levine, , Family Formation, 23–6.Google Scholar

²⁶ Ibid. 78. Levine borrows the involution concept quite explicitly from Geertz, see p. 34 and note 87.

²⁷ In this precise wording this is my own coinage, but the concept can be found in Levine (see p. 80) when he speaks of the ‘peculiar demoeconomic conditions of industrial involution’ in Shepshed. See also Medick, , ‘Proto-industrial family’, 304–7Google Scholar for a generalization of Levine's argument.

²⁸ Levine, Family Formation, 52–7 and Tables. See also his ‘Conclusions’, 151–2. Also Medick, , ‘Proto-industrial family’, 308–9.Google Scholar

²⁹ Levine, , Family Formation, 80–1.Google Scholar

³⁰ Ibid. 79.

³¹ Ibid. 11, also Kemp, Tom, Industrialisation in Nineteenth Century Europe (London, 1969), 75–6Google Scholar and Cassen, Robert, India: Population, Economy and Society (London, 1978), 36–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³² Levine, , Family Formation, 100–2.Google Scholar

³³ Ibid. 17.

³⁴ See, for example, Shorter, A., East African Societies (London, 1974), 69–71.Google Scholar

³⁵ Kitching, Gavin, Class and Economic Change in Kenya 1905–1970 (New Haven, 1980)Google Scholar, especially chapters 3, 4, 5 and 8. For some very interesting contemporary data on the same themes see Kongstad, Per and Mönsted, Mette, Family, Labour and Trade in Western Kenya (Uppsala, 1980), especially chapter 2, pp. 43–73.Google Scholar

³⁶ See for example Castle, E. B., Growing up in East Africa (London, 1966), 19–27 and 59–62.Google Scholar

³⁷ The most frequently cited African evidence in support of this generalization is Dorjahn, V., ‘Fertility, polygyny and their interrelations in Temne society’, American Anthropologist, LX (1958) 838 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and he is supported by Nag's work on Bengal: Nag, Moni, ‘Family type and fertility’, World Population Conference 1965: Proceedings, II, 160–3.Google Scholar See also discussion in Potts, M. and Selman, P., Society and Fertility (London, 1979).Google Scholar

³⁸ See Kongstad, and Mönsted, , Family, Labour and Trade, 62–73.Google Scholar

³⁹ See Birley, Martin, ‘Ecological aspects of rural development’. Paper to the first National D.S.A. Conference, University of Strathclyde, 1978.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ See Kitching, , Class and Economic Change, chapter 8.Google Scholar Also Parkin, D. J., Palms, Wine and Witnesses (London, 1972).Google Scholar

⁴¹ See Medick, , ‘Proto-industrial family’, 298 and 306.Google Scholar

⁴² Kessinger, T. G., Vilyatpur 1848–1968: Social and Economic Change in a North Indian Village (Berkeley, 1974), 140–6Google Scholar; Dore, R. P., Land Reform in Japan (London, 1959), 23–53Google Scholar; Buck, J. L., Land Utilisation in China (London, 1937), 194–9.Google Scholar

⁴³ Kitching, , Class and Economic Change, ch. 11.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ ‘From the seventeenth to the mid-nineteenth century in Britain there is no evidence to suggest anything other than a gradual, if slight, rise in the age at marriage’ (Cassen, , India, 22–3).Google Scholar

⁴⁵ See the review of this argument in Habakkuk, H. J., Population Growth and Economic Development since 1750 (Leicester, 1972)Google Scholar, and citing work by Hollingsworth, Elderton and Ogborn (pp. 96, 99). He also reviews but dismisses Razzell's thesis on the introduction of smallpox vaccinations as an important cause of decreased mortality in late-eighteenth-century England (Ibid. 34–5).

⁴⁷ See for example Van Zwanenberg, R. M. A. with King, Anne, An Economic History of Kenya and Uganda 1800–1970 (London, 1975), 7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar; also the review essay by Caldwell, J. C. (‘Major questions in African demographic history’) in the Proceedings of a Seminar on African Historical Demography (University of Edinburgh, Centre of African Studies, 1977), esp. 15–16.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Hajnal, J., ‘European marriage patterns in perspective’ in Glass, D. V. and Eversley, D., Population in History (London, 1965), 101–43Google Scholar; Malvas, J., ‘The social strategy of family formation: some variations in time and space’, Demography, II (1965), 349–62.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ For a good discussion of this issue see Kiernan, Victor, ‘Development, imperialism and some misconceptions’, Swansea Centre for Development Studies, Occasional Papers, no. 13, 1981.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Ibid. 13 and 17.

⁵⁰ ‘Unless all the figures are completely wrong there was definitely a considerable acceleration of growth in the last quarter of the eighteenth century’, Cassen, , India, 13.Google Scholar

⁵¹ See review in Habakkuk, , Population Growth, 25–51.Google Scholar

⁵² Cassen, , India, 6–8.Google Scholar

⁵³ Ibid. 11–12.

⁵⁴ Smith, Adam, The Wealth of Nations (Harmondsworth, 1970), 183.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Malthus, T. R., Principles of Political Economy (London, second edition, 1836), 234.Google Scholar