Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:29:25.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prelude to Scandal: Liberia and Fernando Po, 1880–1930

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

I. K. Sundiata
I. K. Sundiata
Affiliation:
University of Rutgers, New Jersey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1923–30 the League of Nations investigated the shipment of migrant labour between Liberia and the Spanish island colony of Fernando Po. Although the League concentrated its attention on Liberia, a closer examination reveals labour abuse as very much the product of conditions on Fernando Po itself. In the last quarter of the nineteenth century, black planters on the island shifted from palm oil trading to cocoa cultivation. Dependence on migrant labour and increasing competition from Europeans resulted in economic crisis in the first years of the twentieth century, with detention of labour and the nonpayment of contracts as the outcome. The eventual investigation of the trade was the product of a desire to conserve Liberian labour for use on the African mainland, rather than an attempt to relieve its abuse.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , January 1974 , pp. 97 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 League of Nations, Secretariat, Report of the Litherian Commission of Enquiry (C.658.M.272) (1930, VI), 36.Google Scholar

2 Allen, William and Thompson, Thomas, Narrative of the Expedition sent by Her Majesty's Government to the River Niger in 1841 (New York, 1967), 226.Google Scholar

3 The Bubi are a non-iron using Bantu-speaking people believed to have migrated to the island in the fifteenth century.Google Scholar

4 Fernandez, Cristóbal, Misiones y misioneros en la Guinea española (Madrid, 1962), 109.Google Scholar

5 de Teran, Manuel, Síntesis geográfica de Fernando Pó (Madrid, 1962), 84.Google Scholar

6 Church, R. J. Harrison, Africa and the Islands (New York, 1964), 278.Google Scholar Cocoa was supposedly introduced to the Gold Coast by Tetteh Quashie, a Ga blacksmith from Christiansborg, who may have worked on Fernando Po in the late seventies or early eighties. Hill, Polly, Migrant Cocoa Farmers of Southern Ghana (Cambridge, 1963), 172.Google Scholar

7 Holt, John, Diary of John Holt (Liverpool, 1948), 178.Google Scholar

8 Moreno-Moreno, José A., Reseña histórica de la presencia de España en el Golfo de Guinea (Madrid, 1952), 118 n.Google Scholar

9 Methodist Missionary Society, Primitive Methodist Mission, Fernando Po, Box 5, Boocock and W. N. Barleycom, Yearly Report, Santa Isabel, 1895.Google Scholar

10 Kingsley, Mary, Travels in West Africa (London, 1897), 71.Google Scholar

11 Carbonell, Juan Bravo, Fernando Póo y el Muni (Madrid, 1917), 126.Google Scholar

12 Moreno-Moreno, Reseña, 85.Google Scholar

13 Izquierdo, Luis Rarnos, Descripción geográfica … de las colonias españles del Golfo de Guinea (Madrid, 1912), 343.Google Scholar

14 Mildraed, J., ‘Fernando Po’, in From the Congo to the Niger and the Nile by Friedrich, Adolf, Duke of Mecklenburg (London, 1913), 259.Google Scholar

15 Methodist Missionary Society (MMS), PMM, Fernando Po, Box I, Fairley, Special Report on San Carlos Mission… no date.Google Scholar

16 MMS, PMM, Fernando Po, Box 5, Bell, J. to Wiles, 16 Jan. 1905.Google Scholar

17 MMS, PMM, Fernando Po, Box I, Wiles to General Missionary Committee, 29 Feb. 1904.Google Scholar

18 MMS, PMM, Fernando Po, Box 5, H. M. Cook to General Missionary Committee 1 Sept. 1909.Google Scholar

19 MMS, PMM, Fernando Po, Box 4, Banham to Guttery, 3 Dec. 1909.Google Scholar

20 Izquierdo, Ramos, Descripción geográfica, 205.Google Scholar

21 John Holt Papers, 10/6, Suggestions re Fernando Po Constitution, notes and comments on Reorganization of Fernando Po and with its Powers (1904?).Google Scholar

22 Public Record Office, F.O. 367/353, Bernays to Foreign Office, 30 Oct. 1913.Google Scholar

23 Mildraed in Mecklenburg, From the Congo, 252.Google Scholar

24 John Holt Papers, 14/10, Hall, Robert to Holt, John, 15 Dec. 1899.Google Scholar

25 MMS, PMM, Fernando Po, Box I, Fairley, Special Report on San Carlos Mission (no date).Google Scholar

26 For an analysis of the problem of labour mobilization see Berg, Elliot J., ‘The Development of a Labour Force in Sub-Saharan Africa’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, XII (1964–1965), 394–412.Google Scholar

27 Kru from the Liberian coast had long sought free employment along the West African littoral and had been first employed on Fernando Po in 1827. For a discussion of the development of Kru migrant labour, see Brooks, George E., The Kru Mariner in the Nineteenth Century (Newark, Delaware, 1972).Google Scholar

28 De Teran, Síntesis, 65.Google Scholar

29 F.O. 47/36, F.O. Draft (Erskind, W. F.) to Holt, John and Co., 13 June, 1904.Google Scholar

30 F.O. 47/36, Barker, Thomas H., Secretary of the African Trade Section, Liverpool Chamber of Commerce to the Under Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, 7 Sept., 1903.Google Scholar

31 Buell, Raymond, The Native Problem in Africa, II (New York, 1928), 277,Google Scholar citing Liberia, Acts, 1905, 5.Google Scholar

32 Ibid. citing Liberia, Acts, 1903, 41.

33 F.O. 47/36, W. Ring to the Principal Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, 20 May, 1903.Google Scholar

34 F.O. 47/36, Holt, John to Villiers, F. H., 27 Aug. 1903.Google Scholar

35 F.O. 47/36, British Consul Errol MacDonell to Principal Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, 27 Nov. 1903.Google Scholar

36 F.O. 47/36, Acting Consul W. Ring, to Principal Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, 20 May, 1903.Google Scholar

37 F.O. 47/36, Consul Errol MacDonell to Principal Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, 27 Nov., 1903.Google Scholar

38 F.O. 47/36, Holt, John to Villiers, F. H., 6 Feb. 1904.Google Scholar

39 F.O. 43/36, MacDonell to Principal Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, 14 Feb. 1904.Google Scholar

40 Unzueta, Abelardo, Geografía histórica de Fernando Póo (Madrid, 1948), 198.Google Scholar

41 Buell, , The Native Question, II, 777.Google Scholar

42 Ibid.

43 F.O. 367/1960, Sharp, Joseph J. to Acting Consul-General Parks, 29 Mar. 1914.Google Scholar

44 F.O. 458/39, Report upon the General Situation in Liberia as at the end of 1913, p. 11, enclosure in Mr Maugham's despatch No. 74 of I April 1914.Google Scholar

45 See Louis, William Roger and Stengers, Jean, E. D. Morel's History of the Congo Reform Movement (Oxford, 1968)Google Scholar and Cookey, S. J. S., Britain and the Congo Question 1885–1913 (New York, 1968).Google Scholar

46 The protest against labour abuse in the Portuguese islands received the very important support of William Cadbury, a Quaker chocolate manufacturer, who visited the islands in 5908 and subsequently boycotted their cocoa. For opposing sides in the debate over conditions in the Portuguese territories, see Nevinson, H. W., A Modern Slavery (London, 1906)Google Scholar and Mantero, Francisco, Portuguese Planters and British Humanitarians, the Case for S. Thomé (Lisbon, 1911).Google Scholar

47 F.O. 367/353, Foreign Office minute, 23 Oct. 1913 to letter, Bernays to Grey, zo Sept. 1953.Google Scholar

48 Akpan, M. B., ‘Liberia and the Universal Negro Improvement Association: The Background to the Abortion of Garvey's Scheme for African Colonization’, J. Afr. Hist. XIV, 1 (1973), 121.Google Scholar

49 Unzueta, Geografla, 199.Google Scholar

50 Ramos-Izquierdo, Descriptión geográfica, 259.Google Scholar

51 League of Nations, Secretariat, Report of the Liberian Commission of Enquiry (C.658. M.272) (1930, vi), 36.Google Scholar

52 MMS, PMM, Fernando Po, Box 3, File: Fernandian Cocoa Report: H. Markham Cook to General Missionary Committee, 10 June, 1915.Google Scholar

53 MMS, PMM, Fernando Po, Box 3, File: Fernando Po Papers, Reports, etc.: Report on Island Conditions, p. 2.Google Scholar

54 Unzueta, GeografIa, 199.Google Scholar

55 F.O. 371/5562, Reeve, A. C. to Consul-General, Loanda, 4 July 1920.Google Scholar

56 Buell, , The Native Question, II, 780.Google Scholar

57 Akpan, ‘Liberia and the Universal Negro Improvement Association’, 121.Google Scholar

58 Mower, J. H., ‘The Republic of Liberia’, Journal of Negro History, xxxii, 3 (07 1947), 288.Google Scholar

59 Lief, Alfred, The Firestone Story (New York, 1951), 165.Google Scholar

60 Buell, , The Native Question, II, 781.Google Scholar

61 Carbonell, Juan Bravo, Territorios españoles del Golfo de Guinea (Madrid, 1929), 95.Google Scholar

62 Ibid. 103.

63 F.O. 37/12759, Vice-Consul Chew, C. H., Isabel, Santa to Consul-General, Monrovia, 9 Nov. 1928.Google Scholar

64 F.O. 371/12758, Consul-General Rule, Monrovia, to Foreign Office, 23 Dec. 1927.Google Scholar

65 League of Nations, Report of the Liberian Commission of Enquiry, 36.Google Scholar

66 Ibid.

67 Padmore, George, American Imperialism Enslaves Liberia (Moscow, 1935).Google Scholar

68 The 1929 expression of American concern also reflects the belief that the threat of withdrawal of United States diplomatic support from a diplomatically isolated Liberia would be an important lever to use against a frequently recalcitrant regime. Bixler, Raymond, The Foreign Policy of the United States in Liberia (New York, 1957), 88.Google Scholar

69 Carbonell, Juan Bravo, ‘Posibilidades económicas de la Guinea española’, Boletín de la Sociedad Geográfica National, LXXXIII (08 1933), 525.Google Scholar

70 De Teran, Síntesis, 87.Google Scholar

71 Ruiaz, ‘Año Negro’, La Guinea española (21 Dec. 1930), 386.Google Scholar