Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 January 2009
The Ounce as a unit in the West African trade was originally applied to the goods which could be exchanged on the Gold Coast for one ounce of gold; it was generally reckoned that such goods would cost about 40s. in Europe, or half the European value of the gold. Calculations based on actual transactions show that the prime cost of an Ounce of goods was sometimes lower than this, when a favourable assortment of goods had been chosen. In the 1760's and 1770's gold was no longer being exported from the Gold Coast, but was demanded as part of the price of slaves; an ounce of gold was then valued at two Ounces of trade goods. The price of gold had risen, partly owing to a local stoppage of trade, and perhaps also because of a permanent change in the direction of Ashanti gold exports.
At Whydah, the Ounce was not in use in the first half of the eighteenth century; values of goods, including cowries, the local currency, were expressed in terms of the quantity equivalent to one slave. By 1772 the Ounce had come into use at a value similar to that on the Gold Coast. The French selling cheap brandy, and the Portuguese selling cheap Brazilian tobacco, were able to operate at very low costs per Ounce.
The ‘slave-price’ rigsdaler of Christiansborg, with regular exchange rates both with gold and with cowries, forms a link between the Gold and Slave Coast systems.
A table of slave prices at various dates during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries is given in terms of Ounces and other units.
1 Polyani, K., ‘Sortings and “ounce trade” in the West African Slave Trade’, J. Afr. Hist. V, 3 (1964), 381ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 In this paper, Gold Coast and Slave Coast are used in their eighteenth-century sense to mean the coast west of Accra and east of the Volta respectively.Google Scholar
3 Donnan, E., Documents Illustrative of the History of the Slave Trade to America, I (1930), 217ff.Google Scholar
4 Benda, a gold weight of two ounces.Google Scholar
5 In this, and other tables printed in Donnan, some of the units have been given incorrectly. Donnan prints, for example, ‘4 Barrels powder at 21. 6d. per barrel’, but totals this as 4 OZ. 14 angels. The price of powder in the manifest is 55s. a barrel. If 2s. 6d. is amended to 2z6a (2 ounces, 6 angels) the correct total is obtained. The table has been amended accordingly. There were i6 angels or angles to the ounce; this Unit is later known as the ackie.Google Scholar
6 Presumably a misprint for I3. Sleties, silesias, or platillas are folded pieces of Silesian linen.Google Scholar
7 Calculated as 13 (see note 6).Google Scholar
8 Barbot, J., Description of the Coasts of North and South Guinea (1732), 177.Google Scholar
9 Phillips, T., ‘Voyage of the Hannibal’, in Churchill, Collection of Voyages (London, 1732), 206.Google Scholar
10 Donnan, op. cit. II, 287.Google Scholar
11 This table has also been amended, substituting oz. and a. for £ and s., without which the addition is not possible. Donnan has also printed oz. for ackies in the prices of some items.Google Scholar
12 Royal African Company of England to Lords Commissioners of Trade and Plantations, letter dated 18 December 1707, P.R.O. T 70 I 5 (transcript in Furley Collection, University of Ghana).Google Scholar
13 For example, Benjamin Way's replies to Commissioners of Trade and Plantations, P.R.O. T 70 I 12 (Furley transcript).Google Scholar
14 Atkins, J., Voyage to Guinea (London, 1735), 160.Google Scholar
15 Donnan, op. cit. II, 121.Google Scholar
16 Indian cottons.Google Scholar
17 Indian grass-cloth.Google Scholar
18 Second-hand.Google Scholar
19 Purplets (presumably perpetuanas) do not appear under that name in the invoice. The prices shown are given for large ranters, a woollen cloth.Google Scholar
20 Journal of Commissioners for Trade and Plantations (1777), 134, 145.Google Scholar
21 Donnan, op. cit. II, 362ff.Google Scholar
22 Ibid. II, 502.
23 Journal of Commissioners for Trade and Plantations (1777), 131.Google Scholar
24 Bowdich, T. E., Mission to Ashantee (London, 1819), 72.Google Scholar
25 Journal of Commissioners for Trade and Plantations (1777), 92.Google Scholar
26 Ibid. 129, 134 et seq.
27 Adams, J., Cape Palmas to Rio Congo (London, 1823), 235.Google Scholar
28 Dupuis, J., Journal of a Residence in Ashantee (London, 1824), 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29 Priestley, M., ‘Richard Brew: an eighteenth-century trader at Anomabu’, Trans. Hist. Soc. Ghana, IV, I (1959), 38ff.Google Scholar
30 Hippisley, J., Essays on the African Trade (London, 1764), 40.Google Scholar
31 Donnan, op. cit. II, 542.Google Scholar
32 Ibid. II, 539.
33 Donnan, , op. cit. II, 547.Google Scholar
34 Journal of Commissioners for Trade and Plantations (1777), 134.Google Scholar
35 Letter from Director-General Haring to W.I.C., Amsterdam, 15 August 1712, Furley transcript (I am indebted to Prof. Ivor Wilks for this reference).Google Scholar
36 Jackson, J. G., An Account of Timbuctoo and Housa (London, 1820).Google Scholar
37 Hippisley, op. cit. 40.Google Scholar
38 Adams, op. cit. 236.Google Scholar
39 Dupuis, op. cit. 123.Google Scholar
40 Adams, op. cit. 238.Google Scholar
41 Phillips, op. cit. 227.Google Scholar
42 Rangocs seem to have been a type of bead; they are not, as Donnan states (Vol. II, 274 n.), a kind of woollen cloth. They are sold by the cwt. in barrels, and are classified with beads, coral, and cowries. In Mungo Park, Journal of Mission to Africa (1805), arrangoes are defined as ‘a large kind of bead’.Google Scholar
43 I.e. cabocecr, chief.Google Scholar
44 Donnan, op. cit. II, 208.Google Scholar
45 Donnan prints ‘and’, but this is impossible.Google Scholar
46 Polanyi, op. cit.Google Scholar
47 Atkins, op. cit. 112, 165.Google Scholar
48 Donnan, op. cit. II, 290.Google Scholar
49 Donnan, op. cit. 309.Google Scholar
50 Donnan, op. cit. 539.Google Scholar
51 Berbain, S., Le comptoir français de Juda (Paris, 1942).Google Scholar
52 Labat, J. B., Voyage du chevalier Des Marchais (Paris, 1730), II, 109 ff.Google Scholar
53 The existence of the treaty, or something very like it, however, is confirmed by Benjamin Way's evidence of 1707/8 (op. cit., para 18) that the King of Whydah ‘maintains an exact neutrality both at sea and ashore within and near his territories’, Whydah, Way states elsewhere, ‘is kept free by the King of the Country as a neutrall port and no manner of violence is ever offered to us by the English, Dutch or French though riding at anchor together in the open road, though no manner of fortification to hinder it’.Google Scholar
54 Berbain, S., Le comptoir français de Juda (Paris, 1942).Google Scholar
55 Labarthe, P., Voyage à Ia cole de Guinée (Paris, 1803), 235.Google Scholar
56 Bullet, Abbé, Mémoire, quoted in Berbain, op. cit.Google Scholar
57 Berbain, op. cit. 86–7.Google Scholar
58 Ibid. 100.
59 Rask, J., Rejsebeskrivelse til og fra Guinea (Trondjem, 1754), 80–1;Google ScholarDonnan, op. cit. 121, 214, etc.;Google ScholarPommegorge, , Description de la Nigritie (Paris, 1789), 157.Google Scholar
60 Labarthe, op. cit. 262.Google Scholar
61 Labarthe reckoned five francs to one ackie of gold; therefore, at this date, one franc was approximately equivalent to one shilling.Google Scholar
62 On the Guinea Coast, the rigsdaler was reckoned at sixteen to the gold ounce, or one ackie or about s. In Denmark the rigsdaler was only one-twentieth of a gold ounce.Google Scholar
63 Römer, L. F., Nachrichten von der Küste von Guinea (German, ed., Kobenhagen and Leipzig, 1769), 277.Google Scholar
64 Polyani, op. cit. 388, 392.Google Scholar
65 Isert, P. E., Voyages en Guinée (Paris, 1793), 108.Google Scholar
66 Donnan, op. cit. 539ff.Google Scholar