Article contents
The Origins of the Cape Franchise Qualifications of 1853
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 January 2009
Extract
In 1853, when the Cape Colony was granted representative institutions by the British Government, the franchise qualification allowed Coloured men to be placed on the voters' roll. To qualify for the franchise it was necessary to occupy, for twelve months, property valued at £25 or to earn a salary of £50, or a salary of £25 if board and lodging was provided. At the time, as in later years, there were many who regarded this qualification as low. Since the ultimate responsibility for the £25 franchise belonged to the Secretary of State for the Colonies, historians and others have come to see it as being the result of humanitarian influences. In fact the process that led to representative government, and with it the £25 franchise, was far more complex, involving as it did a series of interweaving class, national, colour and imperial considerations. Nevertheless, humanitarian influences need to be closely examined, for they reveal a relationship with the more significant structural factors and provide us with our most convenient starting-point.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964
References
1 Eybers, G. W., Select Constitutional Documents Illustrating South African History, 1795–1910 (London, 1918), 45.Google Scholar
2 Graham's Town Journal, 16 Nov. 1850. Cf. Report of the Commission to Enquire into the Subject Matter of the Separate Representation of Voters Act Validation and Amendment Bill 1953.Google Scholar
3 Walker, Eric, A History of Southern Africa (London, 1957), 243.Google Scholar
4 Eybers, G. W., op. cit. 30.Google Scholar
5 Knaplund, Paul, James Stephen and the Colonial System (Madison 1953), 256.Google Scholar
6 Curtin, Philip D., The Two Jamaicas (Harvard, 1955), 179.Google Scholar
7 Ibid. 186.
8 Parl. Pap. (1137), Correspondence Relative to the Establishment of a Representative Assembly (1850), 8.Google Scholar
9 Sir Murray, George in 1830, see above;Google Scholar and Stanley, Lord in 1842, Parl. Pap. (1637), 91, see below.Google Scholar
10 MacMillan, W., The Cape Coloured Question (1927), 249.Google Scholar
11 Parl. Pap. (1137), op. cit. 16. Montagu's case was weakened to some extent by his admission that the Malay elected to the offlce of wardmaster had declined to take his seat.Google Scholar
12 Parl. Pap. (1137), 31.Google Scholar
13 Ibid. 41.
14 Ibid. 102.
15 Parl. Pap. (1362), Further Correspondence Relative to the Establishment of a Representative Assembly (1851), 133–4.Google Scholar
16 Fairbairn, John, Papers Relative to the Establishment of a Representative Legislature at the Cape of Good Hope (London, 1851), 161.Google Scholar
17 Parl. Pap. (1581), Further Correspondence Relative to the Establishment of a Representative Assembly (1852–1853), II, 107–8, 294.Google Scholar
18 Lord Stanley, protectionist and imperialist, had warned the House of Commons in 1842 ‘Destroy this principle of protection and … you destroy the whole basis upon which the colonial system rests’ (Morrell, W. P., Colonial Policy of Peel and Russell (London, 1930), 184).Google Scholar
19 Ibid. 194.
20 Morrell, W. P., op. cit. 202–2.Google Scholar
21 Parl. Pap. (1137), 92–3.Google Scholar
22 Kilpin, R. P., Romance of a Colonial Parliament (London, 1930), 48.Google Scholar
23 Ibid. 50.
24 Zuid Afrikaan, 20 May 1832. Very gradual. Their scheme proposed the emancipation of female slaves only, and they were to be apprenticed until they were sixteen years old.Google Scholar
25 Kilpin, R. P., op. cit. 49.Google Scholar
26 Zuid Afrikaan, 21 Feb. 1840.Google Scholar
27 Graham's Town Journal, 12 Aug. 1841.Google Scholar
28 Parl. Pap. (400), Copies of All Applications from the Colonists of the Cape of Good Hope, etc. (1846), I.Google Scholar
29 Report of the Proceedings at a Public Meeting Held in Commercial Hall Cape Town, etc. (Cape Town, 1841), 21.Google Scholar
30 Ibid. 6.
31 Parl. Pap. (400), 2–2.
32 South African Commercial Advertiser, 17 Aug. 1842.Google Scholar
33 Kilpin, R. P., op. cit. 66.Google Scholar
34 Fryer, A. K., The Executive Government of the Cape of Good Hope, 1825–1854. Unpublished doctoral dissertation (Rhodes University, 1959).Google Scholar
35 Parl. Pap. (1137), 94.Google Scholar
36 Ibid. 31.
37 Ibid. 11. Judge Musgrave, op. cit. 39.
38 Parl. Pap. (1138), Papers Relating to the Reception of Convicts at the Cape, etc., 1849–50 (1850), 72.Google Scholar
39 Ibid. 57.
40 Parl. Pap. (1138), 48.
41 Ibid. 43–51.
42 South African Commercial Advertiser, 11 Aug. 1849.Google Scholar
43 Mitchel, John, The Jail Journal of John Mitchel (Dublin, n.d.), 2709. 1849.Google Scholar
44 South African Commercial Advertiser, 13 Oct. 1849. ‘… nearly all the houses of standing and property in the town. The great mass of the middle classes, rank with the Moderates.'Google Scholar
45 Mitchel, John, op. cit. 188.Google Scholar
46 Dummy, Andrew, The Role of Sir Andries Stockenström in Cape Politics (1848–56). Archives Year Book for South African History 1960, II, 98.Google Scholar
47 South African Commercial Advertiser, 25 April 1849.Google Scholar
48 Ibid. 9 May 1849.
49 Ibid. 16 and 23 May 7 July 1849.
50 Wilmot, Alex, Life and Times of Sir Richard Southey (London, 1904), 73.Google ScholarShepstone to Southey, 2 Oct. 1849.Google Scholar
51 Again caution must be exercised, for revolutionaries may have a temperamental desire to see revolution in every conflict.Google Scholar
52 Mitchel, John, op. cit. 19 Sept. 1849, 176.Google Scholar
53 Mitchel, John, op. cit. 21 Sept. 1849, 184.Google Scholar
54 Mitchel, John, op. cit. 21 Sept. 1849, 184.Google Scholar
55 Ibid. 12 Oct. 1849, 194. Also Wilmot, Alex, op. cit. T. B. Bailey to Southey, 11 Dec. 1849, 85–6.Google Scholar
56 Parl. Pap. (1427), Further Papers Relating to the Establishment of a Representative Assembly, 1851–2 (1852), 170.Google Scholar
57 Dummy, Andrew, op. cit. 126–7, Citing the Transvaal Argiefstukke, 29.Google Scholar
58 Murray, R. W., South African Reminiscences (Cape Town, 1894), 5.Google Scholar
59 Eybers, G. W., op. cit. 30.Google Scholar
60 South African Commercial Advertiser, 30 June 1832. The nature of this despotism had been outlined, the Advertiser claimed, in the columns of its Dutch language rival De Zuid Afrikaan, and would have resulted in the expulsion of the missionaries, the revocation of non-white civil liberties, the revival of commercial monopolies and the erection of tariff barriers.Google Scholar
61 Parl. Pap. (1137), 91.Google Scholar
62 Ibid. 16. Cf. Menzies, William, op. cit. 31.Google Scholar
63 Parl. Pap. (1362), 164.Google Scholar
64 Ibid. 134.
65 A little later, in 1851, Porter showed that this kind of reasoning was possible. Addressing the Legislative Council in 1852, he stated: 'I did not desire, in fact, to state my whole case…. I knew that to go into the question fully would, in spite of me, look like a bill of indictment against the colony, and an argument against representative institutions.’ Parl. Pap. (1427), 276.Google Scholar
66 Parl. Pap. (1137), 90.Google Scholar
67 Ibid. 14.
68 Ibid. 1.
69 A Report of Her Majesty's High Commissioner and Governor General of British North America (reprinted London, 1902), 227. Cf. Parl. Pap. (400), 116.Google Scholar
70 Parl Pap. (1362), pp. 734–5.Google Scholar
71 Ibid. 164.
72 Parl. Pap. (1636), Further Papers Relating to the Establishment of a Representative Assembly (1853), 2.Google Scholar
73 Parl. Pap. (1137), 18.Google Scholar
74 Ibid. 6.
75 Ibid. 49.
76 Ibid. 47. To Sit in the legislature a citizen would have to be the owner of £500 immovable property, or the owner of movable property valued at £1000, both over and above any ‘just debts'. Others who inight qualify to sit in the legislature were advocates of the Supreme Court, doctors of medicine, surgeons or officers of the Crown whose salary was greater than £200 a year.
77 Ibid. 203.
78 Parl. Pap. (1362), 156.Google Scholar
79 Ibid. 48–55.
80 Ibid. 135.
81 Parl. Pap. (1427), 159.Google Scholar
82 Ibid. (1362), 53–4.
83 Parl. Pap. (1581), Further Papers Relating to the Establishment of a Representative Assembly (1852–3), 293–307.Google Scholar
84 Fairbairn, John, op. cit. 215. At the public meeting held in the Cape Town town hail, approval for the low franchise was given not only by 420 persons with names of Dutch origin, but also by 347 persons with names of British origin. But, as Smith or Montagu would have said of the list of names, not a single merchant. Fairbairn, op. cit. 34–42.Google Scholar
85 Zuid Afrikaan, 8 March 1852.Google Scholar
86 Fairbairn, John (ed.), op. cit. 258.Google ScholarReitz, F. W. to Fairbairn, John, 23 March 1850.Google Scholar
87 Cape Town Mail, 16 March 1850.Google Scholar
88 Ibid. 13 May 21 June 1851.
89 Parl. Pap. (1636), 2.Google Scholar
90 Dummy, Andrew, op. Cit. 153–6.Google Scholar
91 Ibid. 156.
92 Parl. Pap. (1362), 166–7.Google Scholar
93 Parl. Pap. (1137), 8: the lower orders of this colony are in general an orderly and well conducted class of people and attached to the British Government', ibid. (1427), 294. The Coloureds ‘remembering past benefits, might come to the aid of the English minority, and preserve a proper balance of parties’.
94 Parl. Pap. (1427), 247.Google Scholar
95 Fairbaim (ed.), op. cit. 117.Google Scholar
96 Parl. Pap. (1427), 218–19.Google Scholar
97 Murray, R. W., op. cit. 4. Of Darling, Murray said, ‘and he thinking his bread would be better buttered by countenancing the popular or anti-convict party, showed such a decided leaning to that side, and gave the party so much encouragement that the merchants declined to put in an appearance at Government House, and on the occasion of Her Majesty's Birthday Ball but few of them were seen there …’. Darling left South Africa for Australia where he was, according to Murray, immensely popular.Google Scholar
98 Parl. Pap. (1427), 175.Google Scholar
99 Ibid.
100 Port Elizabeth Telegraph, 21 Dec. 1881.Google Scholar
- 21
- Cited by