Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:57:58.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Light on Early Food-Production in the Central Sudan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Lech Krzyzaniak
Lech Krzyzaniak
Affiliation:
Archaeological Museum, Poznan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The excavations in the Central Sudanese Neolithic settlement at Kadero resulted in the discovery of a large amount of skeletal remains of domestic animals: cattle, sheep, goats and dogs. Cattle pastoralism was of great economic importance for the Kadero population and it was supplemented by the herding of sheep and goats; the presence of dogs is closely associated with this pastoralism. Preliminary examination of plant impressions on potsherds reveals the presence almost exclusively of sorghum and two kinds of millet, which were most probably cultivated. This may explain the large number of grindstones found in the Kadero settlement. The pastoralism and possible cultivation at Kadero point to a much more developed food-producing economy practised by the Central Sudanese Neolithic population, compared to that of the Esh Shaheinab settlement. Food-production at Kadero was supplemented by food-gathering activities, among which the collecting of molluscs predominated, with hunting and fishing playing a less significant role.

The data yielded by the burial ground at Kadero, where the heavily prognathous inhabitants of the local settlement were buried, seem to indicate that the Neolithic Kadero population was an autochthonous one on the Upper (main) Nile. It is assumed that the domestic animals and, perhaps, also the cultivated cereals of the Neolithic Kaderans, as well as of other Central Sudanese populations, were adopted by the local food-gathering human groups following contact with other and alien peoples.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , April 1978 , pp. 159 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sutton, J. E. G., ‘The Aquatic Civilization of Middle Africa’, J. Afr. Hist., xv, 4 (1974), 546Google Scholar, and ‘African aqualithic’, Antiquity, li (1977), 25–34.Google Scholar

2 Clark, J. D., ‘The Domestication Process in Sub-Saharan Africa with Special Reference to Ethiopia’, in Higgs, E. (ed.), Colloque XX, Origine de l'élevage et de la domestication, Ninth Congress of UISPP (Nice, 1976), 94.Google Scholar

3 Arkell, A. J., Early Khartoum (London, 1949).Google Scholar

4 Adamson, D., Clark, J. D. and Williams, M. A. J., ‘Barbed bone points from Central Sudan and the age of the “Early Khartoum tradition”’, Nature, ccxlix, 5453 (1974), 120–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Arkell, A. J., Shaheinab (London, 1953).Google Scholar

6 The excavations at Kadero are being carried out by the Polish Centre of Mediterranean Archaeology, Warsaw University, in Cairo, and are sponsored by the Archaeological Museum in Poznań, Poland. Five field seasons have been undertaken since 1972. During the fourth season, Dr Randi Haaland of the University of Bergen, Norway, joined the expedition; the writer was the field-director throughout the seasons. As regards the bibliography in English, cf. Krzyzaniak, L., ‘Kadero (first season, 1972)’, Etudes et travaux (Warsaw), viii (1975), 361–6Google Scholar; ‘Kadero (second, third season 1973–1973/74)’, Etudes et travaux, ix (1976), 283–7Google Scholar; cf. also reports by the writer in Nyame Akuma. A newsletter of African archaeology (Calgary), no. 5 (1974), 30–2Google Scholar; no. 7 (1975), 45–6; and no. 9 (1976), 41.

7 The site was reported for the first time by Chittick, H. N., ‘Two Neolithic Sites near Khartoum. With an Appendix Describing a stone Palette’, Kush, iii (1955), 75–81.Google Scholar

8 Cf. the description of the Gezira Formation, by Butzer, K. W. and Hansen, C. L., Desert and river in Nubia (Madison, 1968), 325.Google Scholar

9 See the Khartoum North and Wadi Seidna sheets of the Sudan 1:25,000 maps, prepared and printed by the Sudan Survey Department, Khartoum, in 1970.

10 The Neolithic flood level was of c. 380.2 m a.s.a. at this point of the river, as computed on the basis of the data used by Arkell, in Shaheinab, 7–8.Google Scholar

11 The samples of river shell were processed by the Laboratoriet for Radiologisk Datering in Trondheim, Norway. This was financed by the Norwegian Research Council supporting the participation of Dr R. Haaland at the excavations at Kadero.

12 Report on the vertebrate fauna by Dorothea Bate in Arkell, A. J., Shaheinab, esp. pp. 15–18.Google Scholar

13 Ibid. 16.

14 Ibid.

15 Ibid.

16 Arkell, , Shaheinab, passim.Google Scholar

17 Compare critical note by Shinnie, P. L. on the term ‘Khartoum Neolithic’ in Bulletin no. 4 of Commission on Nomenclature and Terminology of Pan-African Congress (July 1971).Google Scholar

18 Adamson, D., Clark, J. D. and Williams, M. A. J., ‘Barbed bone points from Central Sudan and the age of the “Early Khartoum” tradition’, Nature, ccxlix, 5453 (10 05 1974), 120–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar, cf. also Arkell, , Shaheinab, 102 ff.Google Scholar

19 The identification of mammalian remains from Kadero was made by Professor Marian Sobociński, i.d., ‘Animal remains from the Neolithic settlement at Kadero’, Roczniki Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu (Poznań), xciii (1977), 49–61Google Scholar, and the fish-bones were identified by Professor Michal Iwaszkiewicz; both scholars are members of the Academy of Agriculture in Poznaé, Poland. The mammalian and molluscan remains from Kadero were recently studied by Dr Achilles Gautier from Gent, Belgium, who made several new identifications and valuable observations on this material. See Gautier, A. and Sobocinski, M., Animal remains from the Neolithic settlement at Kadero (in press).Google Scholar

20 Arkell, , Shaheinab, 54.Google Scholar

21 ‘The problem of nutrition and tribal diet from the agricultural point of view’, in Tothill, J. D. (ed.), Agriculture in the Sudan (Oxford, 1948), 272.Google Scholar

22 Randi Haaland, forthcoming.

23 Dzierzykray-Rogalski, T. and Promiéska, E., ‘Étude préliminaire des ossements humaines de Kadero’, Etudes et travaux, ix (1976), 231–7Google Scholar; idem., personal communication; cf also Derry, D. E., ‘Report on the human remains’, in Arkell, Early Khartoum, 31–3.Google Scholar

24 The earliest cattle in the Egyptian Sahara are dated even as early as the end of the seventh millennium B.C.; cf. Wendorf, F., Schild, R., Said, R., Haynes, C. V., Gautier, A. and Kobusiewicz, M., ‘The Prehistory of the Egyptian Sahara’, Science, cxciii (1976), 103–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar; cf. also Clark, J. D., ‘The Domestication Process in sub-Saharan Africa with Special Reference to Ethiopia’, in Higgs, E. (ed.), Colloque XX: Origine de l'élevage et de la domestication. Ninth Congress of Prehistory and Protohistory (Nice, 1976), 36, n. 3.Google Scholar

25 McBurney, C. B. M., The Haua Fteah (Cyrenaica) and the Stone Age of the South-east Mediterranean (Cambridge, 1967), 271 ff. and 327–82.Google Scholar

26 Hays, T. R., ‘Neolithic Settlement of the Sahara as it relates to the Nile Valley’, in Wendorf, F. and Marks, A. E. (eds.), Problems in Prehistory: North Africa and the Levant (Dallas, 1975), 198Google Scholar; McHugh, W. P., ‘Late Prehistoric Cultural Adaptation in South-west Egypt and the Problem of the Nilotic Origins of Saharan Cattle Pastoralism’, Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt, xi (1974), 16.Google Scholar

27 Epstein, H., The Origin of the Domestic Animals of Africa (New York, 1969) passim.Google Scholar

28 Ibid.

29 McHugh, , ‘Late Prehistoric Cultural Adaptation’, 16.Google Scholar

30 Arkell, , Shaheinab, 68.Google Scholar

31 Adamson, et al. , as cited in note 18, pp. 122–3.Google Scholar

32 Cf. Ralph, E. K., Michael, H. N., and Han, M. C., ‘Radiocarbon dates and reality’, Masca Newsletter, ix (1973), no. 1.Google Scholar

33 Compare also suggestions made by Arkell on the ecological conditions prevailing on the Upper (main) Nile during Neolithic times, in Shaheinab, 105.Google Scholar

34 Tothill, J. D., ‘A collector's note on the large land snails of the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan’, Sudan Notes and Records, xxix (1948), part 2, 196, 199.Google Scholar

35 Cf. Clark, J. D., ‘A Re-examination of the Evidence for Agricultural Origins in the Nile Valley’, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, xxxvii (1971), part 2, 69–70.Google Scholar

36 Evans-Pritchard, E. E., The Nuer. A description of the modes of livelihood and political institutions of a Nilotic people (Oxford, 1940), 16–112.Google Scholar

37 Compare the pluviometric requirements for cattle pastoralism as listed by McHugh, , ‘Late Prehistoric Cultural Adaptation’, 13.Google Scholar