Article contents
Mary Kingsley — a reassessment
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 January 2009
Extract
The purpose of this article is to examine the ideas of Mary Kingsley, not merely in abstract, but as the political theory of certain groups active in Late Victorian colonial affairs. A ‘surgical’ approach of this kind is almost certain to reduce concepts which at first sight seem brilliant and original to more mundane proportions, so perhaps at the outset this woman's outstanding achievements should be emphasized. Among contemporaries of her sex few achieved more; at a time when women were struggling to create merely the elementary conditions in which to express themselves, Mary Kingsley overshadowed the male competitors in her chosen field, sometimes in physical and almost always in intellectual achievement.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963
References
1 This article originally took the form of a paper given before the Seminar on the Recent History of the Commonwealth, at the Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London, on 26 January 1962.Google Scholar
2 Ashanti (Oxford, 1925), 81.Google Scholar
3 Survey of British Commonwealth Affairs, vol. ii,Google ScholarProblems of Economic Policy, 1918–1939, Part 2 (Oxford, 1942), 330.Google Scholar
4 Survey of British Commonwealth Affairs, vol. II, Problems of Economic Policy, 1918–1939, Part 2 (Oxford, 1942, 1942), Appendix A passim, especially pp. 331–2.Google Scholar
5 e.g. Howard, Cecil, Mary Kingsley (London, 1957), 9–10.Google Scholar
6 Howard, op. cit. 215, quoting a letter from Mary Kingsley to John Holt.Google Scholar
7 This raises the interesting question of why she proved such a fanatical supporter of their interests, for it is quite clear that self-interest was not involved. There is little concrete evidence to suggest any firm explanation. The reason was probably the simple one that she liked most of the traders personally, developed close personal friendships with Goldie, John Holt, and others, and regarded them as a much-abused and unjustly treated group of likeable and honourable men. It does also appear that she took a personal dislike to many missionaries and Government officials, and felt them to be self-seeking and hypocritical.Google Scholar
8 I have discussed these activities in Sir George Goldie and the Making of Nigeria (London, 1960), 303–6.Google Scholar
9 Travels in West Africa (London, January 1897).Google Scholar
10 London, 1899.
11 See the published correspondence in P.P., LXII (1897), 8480, ‘Papers relative to the Liquor Trade in West Africa’.Google Scholar
12 Chamberlain was anxious to resume direct control of the Company's territories.Google Scholar
13 This had been revealed to them by the Colonial Office to Liverpool Chamber of Commerce, 15 March 1896, in P.P., LXII (1897).Google Scholar
14 October 1897, p. xii. The section referred to is pp. 491–500.Google Scholar
15 Travels (1900 edition), 494.Google Scholar
16 In the chapter ‘Commerce in West Africa’ in West African Studies, 281 ff., where there is considerable discussion of the concept of expanding trade, there is no mention of the liquor trade, or its role in development. Considering the amount of space devoted to the liquor trade in the Travels this is an extraordinary omission.Google Scholar
17 Travels, 493ff. Note also that the only missionaries singled out as exempt from the general condemnation are those like Dennis Kemp, who denied that Gold Coasters were drunkards. Mary Kingsley made no comment on Kemp's additional comment that he nevertheless thought liquor ‘of no benefit to the natives’ except to state that she did ‘not agree’, giving no reasons.Google ScholarIbid 492–3.Google Scholar
18 As usual Hancock, op. cit. 332–3, has the most stimulating comments, and others have followed him. He does not mention her idea of African inferiority, but stresses the ideas derived from this, especially the idea that African societies are worthy of respect and serious study before they are senselessly destroyed by officialdom.Google Scholar
19 Travels, 500.Google Scholar
20 Ibid. 501, see also p. 296.Google Scholar
21 Keane, was Professor of Ethnology at Cambridge. In his Ethnology (Cambridge, 1896), 266, he argued that Africans' ‘inherent mental inferiority’ was caused by ‘premature closing of the cranial sutures’!Google ScholarPubMed
22 Travels, 504.Google Scholar
23 West African Studies, 385–6.Google Scholar
24 Ibid. 385.Google Scholar
25 Ibid. 386.Google Scholar
26 Travels, 488–9.Google Scholar
27 13 March 1898, in the John Holt Papers. I am indebted to Mr Cecil Holt, of John Holt and Company (Liverpool) Ltd, for permission to quote from these papers.Google Scholar
28 Travels, 489.Google Scholar
29 Ibid 489.Google Scholar
30 Ibid 490.Google Scholar
31 Ibid 502.Google Scholar
32 Ibid. 503.Google Scholar
33 i.e. the letters from Mary Kingsley to John Holt wherein she constantly seeks his advice on matters of factual information and describes to him periodically the state of the work; in the letters reproduced in Gwynn, S., Mary Kingsley (London, 1933), in the Colonial and Foreign Office correspondence, and in the letters between the traders preserved in the John Holt Papers.Google Scholar
34 See footnote 8.Google Scholar
35 Mary Kingsley to John Holt, 1 October 1898. Her comments are on the first draft of Chapter XIII which she enclosed.Google Scholar
36 Mary Kingsley to John Holt, 2 July 1898.Google Scholar
37 West African Studies, 345.Google Scholar
38 Ibid. 357–8.Google Scholar
39 Ibid. 295.Google Scholar
40 Ibid. 324–5.Google Scholar
41 Kingsley, Mary to Holt, John, 5 September 1899.Google Scholar
42 Kingsley, Mary to Holt, John, 9 November 1899.Google Scholar
43 West African Studies, 309–10.Google Scholar
44 Kingsley, Mary to Holt, John, 5 May 1898.Google Scholar
45 West African Studies, 392ff.Google Scholar
46 Though in a letter to John Holt of 29 April 1898 she described a speech by BadenPowell ‘on railways and all manner of such-like “tommy rot”’.Google Scholar
47 Kingsley, Mary to Holt, John, a February 1898.Google Scholar
48 Kingsley, Mary to Holt, John, 21 June 1898.Google Scholar
49 Kingsley, Mary to HoIt, John, September 1899.Google Scholar
50 West African Studies, 398.Google Scholar
51 Kingsley, Mary to Holt, John, 18 September 1899.Google Scholar
- 5
- Cited by