Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T15:34:08.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Confrontation over Kenya: the Colonial Office and its Critics 1918–1940

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Diana Wylie
Diana Wylie
Affiliation:
Yale University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Between the world wars, Colonial Office decisions regarding Kenya were subject to two opposed pressures: while the settlers wrestled with officials for greater control of their own affairs, a body of pro-African reformers loudly protested every concession and lobbied for equal rights and an end to the colour bar. This humanitarian lobby was largely the creation of two former colonial servants, Dr Norman Leys and W. McGregor Ross. Working mainly through the Labour Party, these men broadcast their social democratic ethics and demonstrated that the colony's political economy was badly weighted against African progress. They were the precursors of a more full-bodied socialist approach to colonial reform which during World War Two began to permeate the imperial bureaucracy. Until African initiative became a major determinant of Colonial Office policy in the early 1950s, these critics, with their colleagues in religious and humanitarian groups, were able to hold the front against settler self-government in a few indirect ways. Their allegations that Africans had been unjustly deprived of land and that they received far less in services than they paid in taxes were officially corroborated by command papers in the thirties. By creating a body of pro-African opinion which could exert political pressure on the Colonial Office they discouraged official plans to surrender responsible government to the settlers. Their direct impact on the Colonial Office was simply to alienate officials. Records of the confrontations between these reformers and Whitehall reveal that during this period Colonial Office officials were not only powerless to initiate reform. They were also, with few exceptions, uninterested in reforming the colony's political economy.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , July 1977 , pp. 427 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Brett, E. A., Colonialism and Underdevelopment in East Africa: the Politics of Economic Change, 1919–1939 (London, 1973), 212.Google Scholar

2 SirDawe, Arthur, writing in 1942Google Scholar, quoted in Robinson, R. E., ‘Morals and Politics of the Empire in Kenya’, unpublished paper, 7.Google Scholar

3 Sir William Ormsby-Gore wrote to Sir Edward Grigg in 1930 that ‘left wing opinion’ in Britain had ‘always been more worried over the treatment of natives in Kenya than anywhere else’, due to ‘the activities of Norman Leys and MacGregor Ross’ (quoted in Brett, , Colonialism and Underdevelopment, 60).Google Scholar

4 Leys, Norman, ‘The Problems of East Africa’, n.d., addendum to Leys to Colonial Secretary, 7 Feb. 1918, in files of United Africa Company, Ltd., London.Google Scholar

5 Leys to Colonial Secretary, 7 Feb. 1918, Box 248, Archives of the International Missionary Council (formerly at Edinburgh House, now at S.O.A.S., London).

6 Buxton, Charles Roden to Molteno, , 13 Nov. 1936Google Scholar, Leonard Woolf Papers, Sussex University Library.

7 See Bennett, George, ‘Paramountcy to Partnership: J. H. Oldham and Africa’, Africa, xxx (1960), 356–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cell, John (ed.), By Kenya Possessed: the Correspondence of Norman Leys and J. H. Oldham, 1918–1926 (Chicago, 1976)Google Scholar; Wylie, Diana, ‘Norman Leys and McGregor Ross: a Case Study in the Conscience of African Empire, 1900–1939’, J. Imp. and Comm. Hist., v, 3 (1977).Google Scholar

8 ‘Archdeacon Owen—Contributions to the Press’, Colonial Office (C.O.), 533 /404/ 16381 (1930), Public Record Office, London.Google Scholar

9 The idea of administrative separation was frequently raised as a possible solution to conflicts of interest between the European and African communities. In the 1923 edition of The Dual Mandate, Lord Lugard had proposed a scheme which would have given rep resentative followed by responsible government to the white area in which 500,000 Africans would live; he wished to invest executive power over the vast majority of Africans in a paternal British government. The Colonial Office was sufficiently interested to print his draft scheme for private distribution in 1927. In 1925 L. S. Amery had instructed Governor Grigg to investigate the delimitation of the native reserves preparatory to the creation of two distinct units of government. Even during World War Two, the Colonial Office was seriously considering ‘A Federal Solution for East Africa’, as drawn up by Sir Henry Moore, which suggested appointing a lieutenant-governor over each African area and one over a white area to extend from the Highlands to Mombasa; the privileged position of the settlers in the Highlands would be preserved while the entire area would be given the advantage of unified control of public services (C.O. 822/111/46709).

10 Leys, to Macmillan, W. M., 29 July 1935, Macmillan Papers, private collection.Google Scholar

11 Brett, , Colonialism and Underdevelopment, 170–1.Google Scholar

12 Ibid. 182.

13 Leys to Colonial Secretary, 7 Feb. 1918, as cited in n. 5

14 ‘Draft Memorandum formulating a Colonial Policy for the Labour Party after the War’, By Woolf, Leonard S., Sept. 1941, A.C.I.Q. 236Google Scholar; Comment by Leys; Comment by J. F. N. Green; ‘White Settlement in Kenya’, by DrHinden, R., Oct. 1947, A.C.I.Q. 263, Transport House, London.Google Scholar

15 According to Ross, Cable had founded The Times of East Africa in 1927 because his anti-conscription committee—organized when Grigg allowed the Kenya Defence Force to drop its oath of loyalty to the King—had difficulty in having their material printed by the local press (Ross Papers 4/2/fo. 283, Rhodes House, Oxford). As Cable described his paper's efforts against the voluble ‘negrophobe’ element, ‘I've kept the circus quiet by constant and merciless ridicule’ (Ross Papers, 1/3/fo. 129).

16 The Labour members of Parliament with whom they had most frequent contact were Frank Horrabin, T. E. Harvey, Major James Milner, Josiah Wedgwood, Sir Robert Hamilton and Arthur Creech Jones. E. A. Brett has shown that between 1925 and 1929, Labour M.P.s concentrated on the protection of African labour while Conservatives were more concerned with economic development. Brett, , Colonialism and Underdevelopment, 60–1.Google Scholar

17 Leys, Norman, ‘On Archdeacon Owen's Statement to the Committee’, 19 Nov. 1930, Memorandum 82, A.C.I.Q., Transport House.Google Scholar

18 Denham, O. A. G., ‘Mr Norman Leys' Book on Kenya, submits observations on’, 27 Mar. 1925, C.O. 533/330.Google Scholar

19 Minute by Strachey, W. S., 27 Mar. 1925, C.O. 533/330.Google Scholar

20 Wrigley, C. C., ‘Kenya: the Patterns of Economic Life 1902–1945’, in Harlow, V. and Chilver, E. M. (eds.), History of East Africa, ii (Oxford, 1965), 247–50.Google Scholar

21 W. M. Macmillan, quoted in Joelson, F. S. to Macmillan, 8 Nov. 1935, Macmillan Papers.Google Scholar

22 Sir Edward Grigg to Colonial Secretary, n.d., Coryndon Papers, 10/3/fo. 10, Rhodes House, Oxford.

23 Memorandum by SirCameron, Donald on Federation in the East African Dependencies, June 1927, C.O. 879/122.Google Scholar

24 Lugard, Lord to Lugard, Flora, 15 June 1927Google Scholar, quoted in Perham, Margery, Lugard: The Years of Authority 1868–1945 (London, 1960), 680.Google Scholar

25 Grigg to Colonial Secretary, as cited in n. 22, fo. 26.

26 Ibid., fo. 25.

27 Leys, in the New Statesman, 9 Feb. 1929, 562–3.Google Scholar

28 Perham, , Lugard, II, 691.Google Scholar

29 Webb, Beatrice, Diaries 1924–32 (London, 1956), 224.Google Scholar

30 Final Memorandum on the Situation in East Africa and the Wilson Report, Nov. 1929, A.C.I.Q. 69A, Transport House.

31 Webb, , Diaries, 229.Google Scholar

32 Ibid. 215.

33 Meeting held between the Secretary of State and the Kenya delegation, 7 Oct. 1930, ‘East Africa’, vol. I, fo. 50, Webb Papers, London School of Economics.

34 The White Paper on Native Policy accepted the major points of the Hilton Young Commission Report's section on native policy, which had been written largely by J. H. Oldham. It appears to owe a great deal to earlier debates between Oldham and Leys. The principles which the report laid down—even the broad terms of reference which its mem bers formed independently of their instructions—were at least in agreement with those Leys had begun to urge on Oldham in 1920. Kenyatta took two hundred copies of the White Paper on Native Policy back to Kenya.

35 Both references are to Sir Philip Cunliffe-Lister.

36 Quoted in Ross, to Buxton, C. R., 1 Jan. 1935Google Scholar, C. R. Buxton Papers, 6/5/fo. 88–93, Rhodes House, Oxford.

37 Ross, to Owen, , 10 Jan. 1933, 012/2Google Scholar, Church Missionary Society Archives, London.

38 Minute by Bottomley, , 24 Feb. 1933, ‘Gold in Kenya’, C.O. 533/436.Google Scholar

39 Bottomley, to Byrne, , 27 Feb. 1933, C.O. 533/436.Google Scholar

40 Minute by Flood, J. E. W., 22 Apr. 1933, ‘Constitutional Development and Financial Control s/o Correspondence with Sir Francis Scott’, C.O. 533/436.Google Scholar

41 ‘Settlers' Grievances 1935’, C.O. 533/456/38039.

42 Minute by Bottomley, , 24 Apr. 1933, ‘Constitutional Development’, C.O. 533/436.Google Scholar

43 Ross, , Wedgwood, and Leys, to K.C.A., 23 Jan. 1930, Ross Papers, 1/3, Rhodes House, Oxford.Google Scholar

44 Leys, to Kangethe, , 3 Nov. 1929, C.O. 533/384.Google Scholar

45 SirShiels, Drummond, ‘Sidney Webb as a Minister’, in Cole, Margaret (ed.), The Webbs and their Work (London, 1949), 207.Google Scholar

46 Minute by Bottomley on Shiels, Drummond' ‘Memorandum on Alleged Injustices to Native Peoples in Kenya’, 12 Mar. 1930, C.O. 533/396.Google Scholar

47 Minute by Parkinson, A. C. C., 5 Mar. 1930, C.O. 533/396.Google Scholar

48 Minute by Bottomley, , 5 Mar. 1930, C.O. 533/396.Google Scholar

49 Leys, 's and Ainsworth, 's Memoranda on Native Labour, June and July 1921, C.O. 533/273–4Google Scholar; Leys, , ‘Land Law and Policy in Tropical Africa’, Sept. 1922, C.O. 533/289Google Scholar; Denham, O. A. G., ‘Mr Norman Leys' Book’, cited in n. 18 aboveGoogle Scholar; ‘Employment of Natives on Roads’, Nov. 1927, C.O. 533/369Google Scholar; ‘Archdeacon Owen's contributions to the Press’, cited in n. 8; ‘Memo, on Alleged Injustices’ cited in n. 46; ‘Gold in Kenya’, cited in n.38; ‘Constitutional Development’, cited in n. 40; ‘Settlers' Grievances’, cited in n. 41.

50 Minute by Flood, , 8 Oct. 1936, C.O. 533/456/38039.Google Scholar

51 Minute by Flood, , 7 Feb. 1936, C.O. 533/456/38039.Google Scholar

52 Minute by Bottomley, , 24 Apr. 1933, C.O. 533/436/31981–2.Google Scholar

53 Minute by Bottomley, , 13 Dec. 1930, C.O. 533/404/16381–30.Google Scholar

54 Minute by SirMaffey, J., 23 Sept. 1935, C.O. 533/456/38039.Google Scholar

55 Quoted in Goldsworthy, David, Colonial Issues in British Politics, 1945–1961 (Oxford, 1971), 142.Google Scholar

56 Leonard Barnes, personal communication.

57 In the Second World War, the fear of racial conflict in East Africa had become an immediate concern of Colonial Office thinking. Sir Arthur Dawe resisted the idea of an East African federation in 1942 for this reason. Robinson, , ‘Morals and Polities’, 13.Google Scholar

58 SirParkinson, Cosmo, The Colonial Office from Within 1909–1945 (London, 1947), 154.Google Scholar

59 Oates, Graham, ‘The Colonial Office, Kenya and Development 1929–1945’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar