Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:16:28.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Changing Character of Moroccan Reformism, 1921–1934

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Extract

Moroccan nationalism began as a religious or cultural reformist movement based on Salafiya, a form of religious fundamentalism which arose in late nineteenthcentury Egypt as an effort to restore the original purity of Islam and the independence of the Muslim peoples. The Moroccan movement was first expressed in the 1920's by the foundation of the ‘free schools’ and the formation of secret discussion societies, neither of which represented more than a small, concerned elite and whose organization was rudimentary in the extreme. By 1934, it was transformed by events and hard experience into an essentially political and social reform movement which, while not yet a mass party, had become ‘national’ to the extent that it could demonstrate the support of important segments of Moroccan society and which had created a skeletal structure which the post-war movemen would flesh out.

The article represents part of the research for a book on the origins and rise of Moroccan nationalism, 1921–1943.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ‘North-West Africa, 1920–1926’ (S.I.A., 1925, I, 92–188) and ‘Unrest in the NorthWest African Territories under French Rule, 1927–1937’ (S.I.A. 1937, 1, 486–543).Google Scholar

2 The article was read as a paper before the annual meeting of the Society for French Historical Studies held in Cambridge, Massachusetts, 5–6 April 1963. The author extends his gratitude to that audience for its kind reception and helpful suggestions.Google Scholar

3 For the abortive Moroccan constitutional project of 1908, see Benabdullah, A., Les Grands Courants de la Civilisation du Maghreb (Casablanca, 1958), 135–40.Google Scholar

4 An informative account of the introduction of Salafiya to Morocco occurs in the article by Abun-Nasr, Jamil, ‘The Salafiyya Movement in Morocco: the Religious Bases of the Moroccan Nationalist Movement’ (St Antony's Papers, Number 16: Middle Eastern Affairs, Number Three, London, 1963, 90105). One would wish to see made a more persuasive tie between Salafiya and the nationalists. The material to do so is available.Google Scholar

5 ‘Al Maghrib’ = the West. Customarily applied to denote the countries of Western Islam: Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco. ‘Al Maghrib al-Aksa’=the Farthest West, i.e. Morocco.Google Scholar

6 Self-constituted holy men, called sufis elsewhere in the Middle East, who performed a real function in interpreting Islam to the unlettered, often indulging in heterodox, even animistic practices. The most renowned became the founders of religious brotherhoods.Google Scholar

7 Originated in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries as an evangelical reaction to the over-formalization of Islam, but eventually degenerated into saint-worship, miracles and animism. The classic work on the brotherhoods is that by Depont, Octave and Coppolani, Xavier, Les confreries religieuses musulmanes (Alger, 1897, pp. 571).Google Scholar The best modern survey is that by General André, P. J., Contribution a l'´tude des confréries religieuses musulmanes (Alger, 1956, pp. 368).Google Scholar For an informative account of their role in public affairs in Morocco, see Vidal, Federico S., ‘Religious Brotherhoods in Moroccan Politics’, Middle East journal, Oct. 1950, 427–46.Google Scholar

8 For the connexion between the free schools and nationalism, see ‘L'école coranique et Ia politique nationaliste au Maroc’, La France méditerranéenne et africaine, I (1938), 99–109, perceptive though undocumented.Google Scholar

9 The Sidi Bennani School. Interview with the founder, Ahmed Mekouar, Fès, 30 May 1959. The school ledger, p. 4, records the earliest date available: Chaoual i9 (June–July, 1921).Google Scholar

10 Qaraouiyne University, founded c. A.D. 859. Al-Azhar University (Cairo) was founded c. A.D. 970.Google Scholar

11 Sidi Bennani (1921), El-Najah (1922), Naciriya (igzz), El-Mounia and Cherradi (before 1925).Google Scholar

12 Arrakiya and Ouazahra (1921 or 1922), and Hayat (1922 or 1923).Google Scholar

13 Lalla Taja (1921–3) and Ahliyah (1924), respectively.Google Scholar

14 Much of the data obtained by the author on this subject by way of interviews is unreliable and often contradictory. A monographic study of the free school movement is clearly called for, preferably by an Arabist who has sufficient time to find and correlate the widely scattered sources.Google Scholar

15 Interviews with Ahmed Mekouar, Fés, 30 May 1959, and Mohamed Lyazidi, Rabat, 27 May 3959, and the Ahliyah School ledger (microfilmed), pp. 34–5.Google Scholar

16 A good example of this myth appears in el-Ouezzani, M. H., ‘Le Protectorat’, Maghreb, xii (07, 1933), 1623.Google Scholar

17 The documentation on this point is incomplete. The author has information on most of the early schools, but he cannot make these assertions with certainty as regards the El-Mounia and Cherradi Schools of Fés nor the Marrakech schools, although these are of secondary importance for this paper.Google Scholar

18 Ahmed El-Moudden and Ahmed Cherkaoui.Google Scholar

19 Abdesselam Bennouna and Mohamed Daoud.Google Scholar

20 Mohamed Ghazi (the director), Mokhtar Soussi, Allal el-Fassi, Brahim el-Kittani.Google Scholar

21 Darbu nitaq al-hissar ala ashab nihayat al-inkissar [The encirclement of the authors of the book called ‘The Defeat’] (Rabat, 1926).Google Scholar

22 Idhar al-haqiqa [Revelation of the Truth] (Tunis, 1925).Google Scholar

23 Bennouna, Mehdi, Our Morocco: The True Story ofa Just Cause (Tangier, 1951), 40.Google Scholar

24 Brahim el-Kittani.Google Scholar

25 Paye, Lucien, Enseignement et société musulmane (thése, dactylographiée, Univ. de Paris, Fac. de Lettres, 1957), 239–40.Google Scholar

26 Implied by Robert Rézette, Op. Cit. 257–8, and confirmed by the nationalists interviewed.Google Scholar

27 Dahir=decree issued with the royal imprimatur. Complete text of the Berber dahir in English will be found in ‘Unrest in the North-West African Territories under French Rule, 1927–1937’, Survey of International Affairs: 1937 (London, 1938), 1, 525.Google Scholar

28 S.I.A. 1937, 524–6.Google Scholar

29 For the intentions which lay behind the dahir, see: Marty, Paul, Le Maroc de Demain (Paris, 1925)Google Scholar as cited by el-Fassi, Allal, The Independence Movements in Arab North Africa (Washington, 1954) 141–2;Google ScholarGaudefroy-Demombynes, R., L'cpuvre française en matière d'enseignement au Maroc (Paris, 1928), 119;Google ScholarLyazidi, Mohamed, ‘Divers aspects de Ia politique berbére au Maroc’ (Maghreb, May–June 1933), 8–19. Marty was chef de service for Islamic justice in the mid-1920s. Gaudefroy-Demombynes was also an ex-oflicial of the Residency at the time he wrote. Allal el-Fassi (op. cit. 119) quotes the minutes of a Residency committee meeting of 8 Oct. 1924 as follows: ‘There is no harm in destroying the unity of the judicial system in the French protectorate; on the contrary, since the aim is the strengthening of the Berber element, as a counterpoise that future exigencies may require, positive political advantages would accrue from such a step.’ This, incidentally, is added confirmation of the conclusion now accepted by most scholars that the much- publicized shift in French colonial policy after World War I from ‘assimilation’ to ‘association’, however much it titillated colonial theoreticians like Albert Sarraut, never penetrated deeply into the ranks of the colonial bureaucracy.Google Scholar

30 S.I.A. 1937, 526.Google Scholar

31 Plural of alem, a doctor of Muslim law, or, more accurately, a scholar licensed to teach.Google Scholar

32 This conclusion has been clearly recognized by others. See, e.g., La France nzéditerranéenne et africaine, 1 (1938), 103;Google ScholarRézette, op. cit. 67; S.I.A. 1937, 507–9.Google Scholar

33 The latif is a communal prayer to the Saviour, which is sometimes employed in modern Islam to express public grief on occasions regarded as national calamities.Google Scholar

34 El-Fassi, op. Cit. 124, L'Action du Peuple (Fés), 15 Sept. 1933, 2.Google Scholar

35 Literally, ‘corner’. The word came to be applied to the headquarters of a sufi brotherhood, or to the brotherhood itself, which is the meaning here, in the (uncommon) political sense.Google Scholar

36 Meaning ‘group’ or ‘sect’.Google Scholar

37 Full name: el-Kutlat el-amal el-ouatani (National Action Bloc). Discreetly rendered into French as ‘Comité d'Action Marocaine’.Google Scholar

38 Rézette, op. cit. 264.Google Scholar

39 Ibid. 279.

40 L' Afrique Française, Dec. 1932, 7–9;Google ScholarRéette, op. cit. 259.Google Scholar

41 Rézette, op. cit. 77.Google Scholar

42 Ibid. 78–9.

43 Bennouna, op. cit. 47–8.Google Scholar

44 L'Afrique Française, Sept. 1932. 518.Google Scholar

45 Files of both journals are held in the Bibilothèque Nationale in Rabat and are now on microfilm at the State University of New York, at Buffalo.Google Scholar

46 Published by the ‘Comité d' Action Marocaine’, Paris, Imprimerie Labor, [Nov.] 1934.Google Scholar