Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:12:10.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bunyoro: An African Feudality?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

J. H. M. Beattie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In terms of Marc Bloch's celebrated definition, the traditional interlacustrine Bantu kingdom of Bunyoro, in western Uganda, is ‘feudal’ in some respects but not in others. This is shown by a survey of Bunyoro's traditional political institutions, some of which tended to decentralize, others to centralize, political power and authority. Of the first, the most important were the considerable degree of independence enjoyed by the chiefs, and the largely self-sufficient community relationships of neighbourhood and kinship. Of the centripetal institutions, some linked the people to the kingship, others bound the chiefs to the king. Examples of both types are described. It is concluded that although traditional Bunyoro shared some features with European ‘feudal’ states, it also differed from them in important respects. Thus it would be misleading to refer to it, without a good deal of qualification, as a ‘feudality’.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 1964 , pp. 25 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Goody, Jack, ‘Feudalism in Africa?’, Journal of African History, iv, i (1963), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 I carried out fieldwork in Bunyoro in 1951–1953, and again in 1955, mostly under the auspices of the Treasury Committee for Studentships in Foreign Languages and Cultures, whose support I gratefully acknowledge.Google Scholar

3 Potekhin, I. I., ‘On Feudalism of the Ashanti’; paper read to Twenty-fifth International Congress of Orientalists, Moscow (1960).Google Scholar

4 Cf. the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary definition.Google Scholar

5 Maquet, J. J., The Premise of Inequality in Ruanda, London (1961), chapter VI and passim.Google Scholar

6 Bloch, Marc, Feudal Society (trans.), London (1961), 466,Google Scholar quoted in Goody, op. it. cit 4.Google Scholar

7 Goody, op. cit. 8.Google Scholar

8 Southall, A. W., Alur Society, Cambridge (1956).Google Scholar

9 Bloch, op. cit. 444.Google Scholar

10 Beattie, John, Bunyoro: an African Kingdom, New York (1960), chapter 4.Google Scholar

11 Murdock, C. P., Africa, its Peoples and their Culture History, New York (1959), chapter 6.Google Scholar

12 Roscoe lists ten, without specifying the period to which he is referring (Roscoe, John, The Bakitara or Banyoro, Cambridge (1923), 53).Google Scholar The present Mukama of Bunyoro listed twenty-eight counties as having been ‘arranged’ by his father, Mukama Kabarega, during the second half of the last century (K. W., ‘The Kings of Bunyoro-Kitara; Part III’, Uganda Journal, V, 2 (1937), 67), but many of these, are outside the present boundaries of the kingdom.Google Scholar

13 K. W., op. cit. 61:Google ScholarMrsFisher, A. B., Twilight Tales of the Black Baganda, London (1911), 149.Google Scholar

14 SirBaker, Samuel, Ismailia, London (1895), chapter xxiii and passim.Google Scholar

15 In the neighbouring interlacustrine kingdom of Ankole, the same gap (there between the ruling Hima and the Iru) is differently bridged. There the cult of a drum, Bagyendanwa, which is thought to be ‘above’ the king and accessible to Hima and Iru alike, provides a focus for national unity transcending the wide social division between the pastoral Hima minority and the peasant Iru. (Oberg, K., ‘The Kingdom of Ankole in Uganda’, in Fortes, M. and Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (eds.), African Political Systems, Oxford (1940), 155.)Google Scholar

16 Crazzolara, J. P., The Lwoo, Part I, Lwoo Migrations, Verona (1950), chapter 21.Google Scholar

17 E.g. in Beattie, J. H. M., ‘Rituals of Nyoro Kingship’, Africa, xxix, 2 (1959), 134–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 Mauss, Marcel, The Gift (trans.), London (1954).Google Scholar

19 Bikunya, P., Ky'Abakama ba Bunyoro, London (1927), 75–6.Google Scholar

20 Stenton, D., English Society in the Middle Ages, Vol. III, Harmondsworth (1955), 19.Google Scholar

21 A new Agreement (to replace the original Bunyoro Agreement of 1933) between the Governor and the Mukama deprived the Mukama of the power which he had held under the first Agreement to appoint and dismisshis chiefs without consultation with his Native Government. For a brief account of the ‘democratizing’ of the Nyoro kingdom in recent years, cf. Beattie, J., ‘Democratization in Bunyoro’, Civitisations, xi, 1 (1961), 8–20.Google Scholar

22 For a discussion of this concept, cf. Beattie, J. H. M., ‘On the Nyoro Concept of Mahano’, African Studies, XIX, 3 (1960), 145–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23 The persons thus favoured were the men referred to by Roscoe as the ‘Sacred Guild’ (Roscoe, op. cit. 51 and passim).Google Scholar

24 Roscoe, op. cit. 53.Google Scholar

25 Maquet, J. J., ‘Une hypothèse pour l'tude des féodalités africaines’, Cahiers d'études africaines, II, 292–324.Google Scholar