Article contents
The Ashanti Kings in the Eighteenth Century: A Revised Chronology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 January 2009
Extract
In studying the early history of the West African states, one of the difficulties encountered is that of establishing a reasonably precise framework of chronology. Eighteenth-century Ashanti, however, would appear to be an exception to this in that the reigns of its kings are dated, although with some degree of variation, in all the standard works dealing with the area. Their authors, from this point of view, have followed either Thomas Edward Bowdich or Joseph Dupuis, both of whom were in Kumasi, the Ashani capital, in the early part of the nineteenth century. In their treatment of traditions and customs, the writings of Bowdich and Dupuis are of great interest and value; the chronologies of the two authors, however, although they contain major differences, can in neither case be regarded as reliable. Fortunately there are in existence written records, hitherto little used, which make it possible to draw up a new and amended chart of the reigns of the eighteenth-century kings, and which furthermore give rise to interesting questions. These are the records of the various European companies engaged in trade on the coast, notably the English Royal African Company (1672–1750), its successor the Company of Merchants trading to Africa (1750–1821), and the second Dutch West Indies Company (1674–1791). Their agents in the forts and settlements were much interested in local developments especially in so far as trade might be beneficially or adversely affected. As a part of their duties, they kept diaries of events and dispatched reports, often of a very detailed nature, to their Companies in London and Amsterdam.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960
References
1 Bowdich, T. E., Mission from Cape Coast Castle to Ashantee (London, 1819)Google Scholar; Dupuis, J., Journal of a Residence in Ashantee (London, 1824).CrossRefGoogle Scholar Bowdich is followed by Hutton, W., A Voyage to Africa (London, 1841)Google Scholar; Dupuis by Beecham, J., Ashantee and the Gold Coast (London, 1841)Google Scholar, Ellis, A. B., A History of the Gold Coast of West Africa (London, 1893)Google Scholar, Claridge, W. W., A History of the Gold Coast and Ashanti (London, 1915), 2 vols.Google Scholar, and Ward, W. E. F., A History of Ghana (revised 2nd ed., London, 1958).Google Scholar For fuller details, see the table on p. 96 below. Both Bowdich and Dupuis claim to have used local Muslim records, no longer extant, for the purpose of their chronologies, see e.g. Bowdich, op. cit., 232Google Scholar, Dupuis, op. cit. 229.Google Scholar
2 The records of the English Companies (T.70 classification) have been consulted in the Public Record Office, London. The relevant Dutch records fall into two main series, the Archives of the Second Dutch West Indies Company (W.I.C.), and the Archives of the Dutch Possessions on the Coast of Guinea (K.v.G.). Both series are in the General State Archives, The Hague, but the authors have used the extensive collection of photostats, notes and transcripts made by the late Mr J. T. Furley, and now in the Library of the University College of Ghana.Google Scholar
3 Bowdich, op. cit. 233Google Scholar; see also Dupuis, op. cit. 227–9.Google Scholar
4 Instructions to D. van Neyendaal for his journey into the interior, granted at Elmina 9 Oct. 1701, K.v.G. 233.Google Scholar
5 Bosman, W., A New and Accurate Description of the Coast of Guinea (London, 1705), 77; letters from Director-General J. van Sevenhuysen, Elmina, to the Assembly of the X, Amesterdam, dd 30 May and 16 Nov. 1701, W.I.C. 97.Google Scholar
6 Bosman, op. cit. 75–6.Google Scholar
7 Instructions to van Neyendaal, D. dd 9 Oct. 1701, K.v.G. 233.Google Scholar
8 Dupuis, op. cit. 233.Google Scholar
9 Reindorf, C. C., The History of the Gold Coast and Asante (Basel, 1895), App. D.Google Scholar
10 Dupuis, op. cit. 229. The first Dutch edition of Bosman is in fact that of 1704, and the first English 1705.Google Scholar
11 It is often unascertainable from eighteenth-century sources whether a reference to Akim is to Abuakwa or Kotoku, or both, but in 1717 the position is clear. The Akim Kotokus under their chief Apenten had been preparing for war against Ashanti for two years, and in 1717 were joined by the Akim Abuakwas under Ofori. Apenten was killed during the war; letters from Dontreleau, Accra, dd 10 Oct. and Butler, Axim, dd 13 Dec. 1715, entered in Director-General Haring's Elmina Journal, K.v.G. 82Google Scholar; letter from van Alsen, Accra, dd 30 Oct. 1717, entered in Director-General Robbertz's Elmina Journal, K.v.G. 84. Apenten's skull is retained in Kumasi, see Rattray, R. S., Religion and Art in Ashanti (Oxford, 1927), 132.Google Scholar
12 Letters from Hendrix, Bereku, dd 19 Sept., Raarda, Apam, n.d. but received Nov., van Alsen, Accra, dd 30 Oct., and Blenke, Axim, dd 10 Nov., 1717, entered in Director- General Robbertz's Elmina Journal, K.v.G. 84.Google Scholar
13 See for example Dupuis, op. cit. 231Google Scholar; Fuller, F., A Vanished Dynasty (London, 1921), 23.Google Scholar
14 Letters from Cape Coast Castle to the Royal African Company, dd 6 Feb., 25 Sept., 25 Oct. 1717 and 26 May 1718, T.70/6, f. 48, f. 53, f. 59 and f. 75.Google Scholar
15 Letter from Cape Coast Castle to the Royal African Company, dd 15 March 1711/12, T.70/5, f. 81.Google Scholar
16 Letter from Cape Coast Castle to the Royal African Company, dd 17 June 1707, T.70/5, f. 3 Davies, K. G., The Royal African Company (London, 1957), 288–9.Google Scholar
17 Letters from Cape Coast Castle to the Royal African Company, dd 22 Oct. 1708, 8 May 1709, and 12 Feb. 1710, T.70/26; Davies, op. cit. 288.Google Scholar
18 Letter from the Royal African Company to Cape Coast Castle, dd 11 Dec. 1712, T.70/52, f. 271.Google Scholar
19 Letter from the Royal African Company to Cape Coast Castle, dd 17 March 17 12/13, T.70/52, f. 292; letter from Cape Coast Castle to the Royal African Company, dd 16 July 1713, T.70/5, f. 91.Google Scholar
20 Letters from Cape Coast Castle to the Royal African Company, dd 26 Jan., 27 May, 20 July and 2 Nov. 1713, T.70/5, f. 88, f. 90, f. 92 and f. 94; Davies, op. cit. 289Google Scholar; letter from Butler, Axim, dd 8 Oct. 1715, entered in Director-General Haring's Elmina Journal, K.v.G. 82.
21 Letter from Cape Coast Castle to the Royal African Company, dd 9 Oct. 1714, T. 70/5, f. 105.Google Scholar
22 Davies, op. cit. 288–9.Google Scholar
23 In Dutch sources from 1707 to 1717 the authors noted thirty-one uses of Zaay, fourteen times as a personal name and seventeen as a title. All fourteen former uses occurred before 1712, and all seventeen latter after 1712. The name Osei in fact seems to be accurately described as ‘the family name of the present race of kings, some of their relatives bearing it as well’, Bowdich, op. cit. 234.Google Scholar
24 Letter from Landman, Axim, dd 28 Oct. and reply from President Nuyts, Elmina, dd 4 Nov. 1706, entered in Nuyts's Diary, General State Archives, The Hague, acquisitions 1902, XXVI, 115.Google Scholar
25 Rattray, op. cit. 68Google Scholar; Busia, K. A., The Position of the Chief in the Modern Political System of Ashanti (London, 1951), 91.Google Scholar A later Kontihene in 1820, also named Amankwatia, was described as ‘a man whose rank was second only to that of the king, and who governed the country as lieutenant or viceroy’, Dupuis, op. cit. 99. A third Kontihene of the same name commanded the main Ashanti armies against the British in 1872–4. It is still customary in the absence of the Asantehene for the Kontihene to assume the presidency of the Kumasi State Council.Google Scholar
26 Letter from Director-General Haring, Elmina, to Butler, Axim, dd 16 Dec. 1715, K.v.G. 82; letter from van Alsen, Accra, dd 30 Oct. 1717, and dispatch from Director-General Robbertz's and Council to Directors, W.I.C. dd 4 March 1718, entered in Robbertz's Elmina Journal, K.v.G. 84; letter from Director-General Butler, Elmina, to van Naarssen, Accra, dd 3 Nov. 1718, K.v.G. 85.Google Scholar
27 Bowdich, op. cit. 233.Google Scholar He states that the king was killed by the ‘Atoas’, which would appear to mean the Akim Kotokus, see Reindorf, op. cit. 68.Google Scholar
28 Dupuis, op. cit. 231–3.Google Scholar
29 Bowdich, op. cit. 289Google Scholar; Ramseyer, F. A. and Kuhne, J., Four Years in Ashantee (London, 1875), 117 and 135–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gros, J., Voyages, Aventures et Captivité de J. Bonnat chez les Achantis (Paris, 1884), 213–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rattray, op. cit. ch. xii and especially 139–43.Google Scholar
30 Dupuis, op. cit. 238n.Google Scholar
31 Rattray, op. cit. 232.Google Scholar
32 The Akim Abuakwas claim to possess the skull of the Ashanti king slain at the Pra. This would appear strange if the Akim Kotokus led the attack, see footnote 27, but was perhaps due to the death of the king of Kotoku in the same campaign, see footnote 11.Google Scholar
33 When they were thought to have lost the skull of a later king, it was remarked of the Ashantis that they ‘are still more mortified at a circumstance which has robbed their royal catacombs of one of its mementoes, and broken the line of death's heads by which the chronology of the throne is perpetuated’. Holman, J., Travels in Madeira, Sierra Leone, Teneriffe, St. Jago, Cape Coast, Fernando Po, Princes Island, etc., etc. 2nd ed. (London, 1840), 227.Google Scholar
34 Dupuis, op. cit. 232–3.Google Scholar
35 Compare Dupuis, op. cit. 231 and 233Google Scholar with Reindorf, op. cit. 68–9.Google Scholar
36 Reindorf, op. cit. 69Google Scholar; Fuller, op. cit. 23. See also p. 92, footnote 41 below.Google Scholar
37 Reindorf, op. cit. 68–9.Google Scholar
38 Rattray, op. cit. 213.Google Scholar
39 Bowdich, op. cit. 233.Google Scholar
40 Dupuis, op. cit. 233 and 235.Google Scholar
41 In 1715 the Dutch factor at Axim reported a rumour, which he considered credible, that the Zaay had died, but because the succession had not been decided the event had been kept secret. Claimants to the throne were said to be making war upon Aowin with the intention of putting the heir to the Zaay in possession of it, and of then dividing Ashanti between them before announcing the king's death; letter from Butler, Axim, dd 8 Oct. 1715, entered in Director-General Haring's Elmina Journal, K.v.G. 82. This report, although difficult to understand, is important in that it may contain a further reference to the death of Osei Tutu, see pp. 85–6 above. It is also interesting to note that a century later, during the Gaman war of 1818–19, the opinion was held at Cape Coast Castle that the Ashantis had sustained such a serious defeat in that war ‘as to have produced the election of another king, who, from state policy, negotiated in the name of his predecessor’; Dupuis, op.cit. xix.Google Scholar
42 Letters from van Naarssen, Axim, dd 9 and 30 Oct. 1718, entered in Director- General Butler's Elmina Journal, K.v.G. 85.Google Scholar
43 Entry for 3 Feb. 1722 in Director-General Butler's Journal, K.v.G. 89.Google Scholar
44 Bowdich, op. cit. 234.Google Scholar
45 Letter from van Goch, Axim, n.d., entered in Director-General Valkenier's Elmina Journal, 22 Feb. 1724, K.v.G. 91.Google Scholar
46 Rømer, L. F., Tilforladelig Efterretning om Kysten Guinea (Copenhagen, 1760), 110 and 226.Google Scholar
47 Letters from Brumner, Accra, dd 3 and 29 May 1750, entered in Director-General van Voorst's Elmina Journal, K.v.G. 111.Google Scholar
48 MS. Chronicle of Imam Imoru Konandi and Al Hajj Mahama, reproduced in translation in Goody, J., The Ethnography of the Northern Territories of the Gold Coast, West of the White Volta (Colonial Office, London, 1954), App. IV. The Ashanti king recorded as dying in 1750 is curiously described as ‘Ayi son of Ayi’ but since this is not in any case an Ashanti name it is probably the result of a copyist's error. It seems likely that ben ayi (son of Ayi) is a corruption of the Twi penyin (the elder). Opoku may have been known as Osei Penyin in contrast with his younger contemporary Osei Kuma, ‘the younger Osei’, who subsequently became enthroned as Osei Kojo, dispatch from Director-General Ulsen to the Assembly of the X, dd 20 Nov. 1758, W.I.C. 114. The context of the entry in the Chronicle, however, leaves no doubt that the reference is to Opoku Ware.Google Scholar
49 Letter from Governor John Hippisley, Cape Coast Castle, to the Committee of the Company of Merchants trading to Africa dd 13 July 1766, T.70/31, ff. 201–2; letter from Director-General Huydecooper, Elmina, to the Assembly of the X, Amsterdam, dd 15 Oct. 1764, W.I.C. 115.Google Scholar
50 Rømer, op. cit. 218–27; Chronicle of Imoru and Mahama, in Goody, op. cit. App. IV.Google Scholar
51 Dispatch from Director-General van Voorst to the Presidial Chamber, Amsterdam, dd 30 Sept. 1748, W.I.C. 490; Dupuis, op. cit. 235.Google Scholar
52 Letters from Brumner, Accra, dd 3 and 29 May 1750, entered in Director-General van Voorst's Elmina Journal, K.v.G. 111; dispatch from van Voorst to the Presidial Chamber, Amsterdam, dd 17 Nov. 1751, W.I.C. 490; letters from Brumner, Accra, dd 8 Jan. and 10 Feb. 1751, entered in van Voorst's Journal, K.v.G. 112; Rømer, op. cit. 226; Chronicle of Imoru and Mahama, in Goody, op. cit. App. IV.Google Scholar
53 Fuller, op. cit. 31.Google Scholar
54 Dispatch from Director-General Ulsen to the Assembly of the X, dd 20 Nov. 1758, W.I.C. 114 dispatch from Director-General Huydecooper to the Assembly of X, dd 1 May, 1760, W.I.C. 114 letter from Fiscal Erasmi, Elmina, to the Presidial Chamber, Zeeland, dd 3 Aug. 1760, W.I.C. 114.Google Scholar
55 Letter from Director-General Huydecooper to the Assembly of the X, dd 15 Oct. 1764, W.I.C. 115 letter from Governor William Mutter, Cape Coast Castle, to the Committee of the Company of Merchants trading to Africa, dd 21 Jan. 1765, T.70/31, f. 114.Google Scholar
56 Dupuis, op. cit. 241 and 244.Google Scholar
57 Fiscal van Leefdael's Journal kept at Accra about the Danish dispute, entry for 30 Nov. 1777, W.I.C. 143 letter from Governor Richard Miles, Cape Coast Castle, to the Committee of the Company of Merchants trading to Africa, dd 19 Jan. 1778, T.70/32, f. 73.Google Scholar
58 See Priestley, M. A., ‘The Ashanti Question and the British: Eighteenth-century Origins’ which will appear in a subsequent number of the Journal of African History.Google Scholar
59 Letter from Director-General Huydecooper, Elmina, to the Assembly of the X, dd 15 Oct. 1764, W.I.C. 115; letter from Governor John Hippisley, Cape Coast Castle, to the Committee of the Company of Merchants trading to Africa, dd 13 July 1766, T.70/31, f. 199 and ff. 201–2.Google Scholar
60 Letter from Governor Richard Miles, Cape Coast Castle, to the Committee of the Company of Merchants trading to Africa, dd 25 June 1778 and from Governor John Roberts, Cape Coast Castle, to the same, dd 8 Oct. 1780, T.70/3a, f. 76 and f. 161.Google Scholar
61 Bowdich, op. cit. 239.Google Scholar
62 Bowdich, op. cit. 239Google Scholar; Dupuis, op. cit. 245; letter from Linthorst, Accra, dd 19 Feb. 1804, entered in Governor-General Bartels' Elmina Journal, K.v.G. 192.Google Scholar
63 Reindorf, op. cit. 90.Google Scholar
64 Dupuis, op. cit. 243.Google Scholar
65 See p. 94 above.
- 7
- Cited by