Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:47:31.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

António Salazar and the Reversal of Portuguese Colonial Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Alan K. Smith
Alan K. Smith
Affiliation:
Syracuse University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article has argued that under António Salazar Portuguese colonial policy was altered from one which envisaged the ultimate growth and development of the African colonies to one which emphasized colonial stability. Between 1928 and 1930 he took steps to diminish the role of foreign capital in the colonies, weaken the influence of special interest groups, restrict Portuguese emigration to the colonies, and bring colonial autonomy to an end. As a result of these measures, Salazar ensured that metropolitan Portugal would be the chief beneficiary of the exploitation of the Portuguese colonies.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , October 1974 , pp. 653 - 667
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 James, Duffy, Portuguese Africa (Harvard, 1959), 246.Google Scholar

2 Eduardo, Mondlane, The Struggle For Mozambique (Baltimore, 1969), 33.Google Scholar

3 For example, James, Duffy, A Question of Slavery (Oxford, 1967).Google Scholar

4 See, Duffy, Portuguese Africa; Douglas, Wheeler and Réné, Pélissier, Angola (London, 1971);Google ScholarDavid, Abshire and Michael, Samuels, Portuguese Africa (New York, 1969);Google ScholarRonald, Chilcote, Portuguese Africa (Engelwood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1967).Google Scholar

5 These themes have been gleaned from a wide range of sources, including books, speeches, legislation, and newspaper commentary.

6 Correio da Beira, 10 04 1912, 2.Google Scholar

7 U.S., Department of State, T705/6 Dearing to State Department, 9 Dec. 1925. At various times rumours abounded that Germany, Italy, South Africa, Great Britain, and even the League of Nations had designs on the Portuguese colonies.

8 T705/32, Honaker, to S.D., , 13 05 1922; Correio da Beira, 18 03 1913, 4; Noticias da Beira, 5 05 1930, 9.Google Scholar

9 T705/33, Hollis, to D., S., 18 05 1922.Google Scholar

10 Correio do Beira, 14 02 1913, 2, Correio do Beira, 24 04 1914, 2.Google Scholar

11 T705/7, Dearing to D., S., 17 03 1927;Google Scholar T705/8, Dearing to D., S., 25 01 1928; T705/15, Brit. Board of Overseas Trade, ‘Conditions in Portugal’, 33.Google Scholar

12 T705/8, Dearing to D., S., 8 06 1928.Google Scholar

13 F.O. 371/4153, excerpt from Revista Colonial, encl, in Carnegie to Curzon, , 10 07 1920;Google Scholar ‘Portugal's Place in the Sun’, excerpt from the Morning Post, end, in T705/16, Hollis to D., S., 23 08 1923; The Times, 25 06 1924, 13.Google Scholar

14 F.O. 179/390, ‘Report on Portuguese Colonial Possessions in Africa’, by MrPeel, , encl, in MacDonnell, to Landsdowne, , II 01 1904;Google Scholar F.O. 367/343, MacDonnell, to Grey, , 8 03 1913.Google Scholar

15 The Times, 17 04 1922, p. 9.Google Scholar A state department dispatch from Lisbon provided a typical assessment of the situation. ‘…Parliamentary government seems quite unable to do anything that will rectify the situation and a dictatorship may be the solution’. T705/6, Dearing to D., S., 5 02 1924.Google Scholar

16 T705/16. Hollis, to D., S., 8 08 1921.Google Scholar

17 T705/9, Hollis, to D., S., 2 04 1920.Google Scholar

18 For example, the British government first approached the Portuguese on the question of renewal of the Niassa company charter in 1920, but it was not until 1927 that even an acknowledgment of the original request was made, even though reminders had been sent at periodic intervals.

19 See F.O. 63/1446 for British government involvement in promoting the interests of the British capital in the Mozambique company; F.O. 367/291, Bostock, to MacDonald, , 10 06 1912.Google Scholar

20 F.O. 367/27, Memo by Col, Arnold, 27 08 1906.Google Scholar

21 T705/10, Lindhurst, to D., S., 17 02 1912;Google Scholar F.O. 371/4133, excerpt from Revista Colonial, end, in Carnegie, to Curzon, , 10 07 1920.Google Scholar

22 F.O. 367/339, Hardinge, to Grey, , 30 01 1913; Correio da Beira, 18 03 1913, 4.Google Scholar

23 The view from the colonies became increasingly hostile to foreigners. Portuguese resented such things as not being able to find employment because they could only speak Portuguese. Much of the discontent in Mozambique became channelled into the ‘Liga Pars a Defesa de Mocambique’, a nationalistic organization which often protested to Lisbon about foreign domination.

24 T705/28, Styles to D., S., 16 04 1926;Google Scholar F.O. 179/530, Maugham, to O., F., 5 12 1911. No one took these threats seriously, as it was widely realized that secession was impractical.Google Scholar

25 F.O. 371/4233, Extract from the Jornal do Commercio of Lourenço, Marques, 22 07 1920, end, in McClelland, to F.O. 26 07 1920.Google Scholar

26 F.O. 371/5490, Carnegie, to Curzon, , 12 10 1920;Google Scholar T705/28, Hollis, to D., S., 4 11 1920; The Times, 27 09 1920, 9.Google Scholar

27 T705/29, Anderson, to D., S., 14 05 1921; F.O. 371/4123, minute initialled D, is March 1929.Google Scholar

28 For example, the British Consul, MacDonnell, writing from Lourenco Marques in 1918, noted that ‘during the space of six years… I have served with 4 Governor-Generals and 5 Acting Governor-Generals which… leads to … a want of stability in the administrations of the province’. F.O. 371/3373, 8 April 1928.

29 The Times, 29 06 1922, 16; Wheeler, and Pélissier, , Angola, 124.Google Scholar

30 F.O. 371/15655, Smallbones, to O., F., 19 01 1931; T705/29, Anderson, to D., S., 9 07 1929.Google Scholar

31 Noticias da Beira, 4 06 1930, 8;Google Scholar On the general theme of corruption, see, Correio da Beira, 14 03 1923, 3.Google Scholar

32 T705/6, Dearing, to D., S., 31 01 1925;Google Scholar T705/28, Styles, to D., S., 20 08 1924.Google Scholar Perhaps nothing sums up the character of the Portuguese bureaucracy better than the fact that instead of being investigated or demoted, de Matos soon became the Portuguese ambassador to Great Britain. T705/6, Dearing to D., S., 12 06 1924.Google Scholar

33 T705/30, Moffit, to D., S., 19 10 1927.Google Scholar

34 Correio da Beira, 27 05 1913, 2.Google Scholar

35 T705/7, Dearing, to D., S., 20 October 1926; T705/8, Dearing to S. D., 30 May 1929; T705/8, Dearing to S. D., 8 June 1928.Google Scholar

36 T705/6, Dearing, to D., S., 19 01 1926; T705/28Google Scholar, Bailey to S. D., 28 September 1926; T705/28, Clark to S. D., 8 December 1923.

37 The best description of the financial crisis is contained in T705/34, Moffit, to D., S., 16 05 1927;Google Scholar Also, F.O. 371/7097, Watson, to Curzon, , 3 09 1921.Google Scholar

38 T705S/30, Gourley, to D., S., 22 09 1925;Google Scholar T705/30, Gourley, to D., S., 20 12 1925;Google Scholar T705/30, Cross, to D., S., 19 03 1924;Google Scholar T705/30, Gourley, to D., S., 22 09 1925.Google Scholar

39 F.O. 371/7097, Watson, to Curzon, , 3 09 1921.Google Scholar

40 F.O. 371/5490, Curzon, to Carnegie, , II 10 1920.Google Scholar

41 T705/33, Moffit, to D., S., 12 05 1926.Google Scholar

42 F.O. 371/11927, Watson, to Chamberlain, , 27 08 1927. From 1921 to 1926 the cost of Angola to Portugal rose about elevenfold.Google Scholar

43 The fact that the government took no action in this area is even more significant because complaints against foreigners were becoming more pronounced, both in the colonies and in Portugal itself.

44 T705/34, Moffit, to D., S., 21 07 1927;Google Scholar T705/32, Moffit, to D., S., is 07 1927.Google Scholar

45 T705/28, Bailey, to D., S., 27 09 1926;Google Scholar F.O. 371/12703, Pyke, to O., F., 53 01 1927.Google Scholar

46 T705/9, Dearing, to D., S., 17 01 1928;Google Scholar T705/30, Hinkle, to D., S., 19 04 1928;Google Scholar T705/28, Bailey, to D., S., 17 10 1927.Google Scholar Colonial opinion was also opposed to the increase of the powers of the High-Commissioners, as by this time the colonists were disenchanted with their administration of the colonies. See, F.O. 371/11927, Carnegie, to Chamberlain, , 14 10 1926.Google Scholar

47 T705/34, Moffit, to D., S., 23 07 1927;Google Scholar T705/8, Dearing, to D., S., 30 05 1927.Google Scholar

48 T705/8, Dearing, to D., S., 13 03 1929.Google Scholar

49 T705/28, Tower, to D., S., 10 12 1928.Google Scholar

50 F.O. 371/15032, Lindley, to F.O., , 3 11 1930; The Times (4 01 1930), 13.Google Scholar

51 T705/28, Tower, to D., S., 10 12 1928.Google Scholar

52 F.O. 371/15032, Lindley, to F.O., , 3 11 1930; Noticias do Beira (14 10 1931), 8, 10;Google Scholar F.O. 371/14158, Smallbones, to F.O., , II 04 1929.Google Scholar

53 F.O. 371/20502, ‘Annual Report on Portugal and the Portuguese Colonies for 1935’; F.O. 371/16492, Adam, to Simon, , 6 10 1932.Google Scholar

54 F.O. 371/15033, Pyke, to F.O., , 26 08 1930.Google Scholar

55 F.O. 371/15014, Salazar, to Kylsant, , 21 02 1930;Google Scholar F.O. 371/15014, minute by Hoyer, Millar, , 24 03 1930. The position of the British Foreign Office was somewhat hypocritical. While it considered the company anachronistic and certainly poorly managed, it had been instrumental in obliging Kylsant to take over the company in the first place, so as to keep it under British control. Thus, it had to try everything in its power to try to secure the renewal of the charter. The correspondence takes up many files, among the most important being F.O. 371/13423.Google Scholar

56 Noticias da Beira, 18 03 1931, 8; The Times, 29 07 1929, 18.Google Scholar

57 F.O. 371/15030, see the Colonial Act.

58 F.O. 371/18584, O'Meara to F.O., 6 November 1934.

59 A translation of the text of the Colonial Act appears in F.O. 371/15030.

60 F.O. 371/20512, ‘Annual Report on Portugal and the Portuguese Colonies for 1935’.

61 F.O. 371/18584, ‘Memo on Angola', by Francis O’Meara, end, in O'Meara, to F.O., , 26 09 1934; ‘Provincia de Angola’, 25 09 1934Google Scholar, end, in supra; F.O. 371/15755, Smalibones, to F.O., , 19 01 1931;Google Scholar F.O. 371/16499, King, to F.O., , 26 04 1932.Google Scholar

62 Noticias da Beira, ‘Carta de Lisboa’, 4 03 1931, 8.Google Scholar