Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 January 2009
The absence of popular participation in the political process of post-independent Kenya should be seen as the outcome of a political tension, which has its roots in the colonial period. The growth of Nairobi, a colonial urban centre par excellence, provided unequal opportunities for its African population. The majority of the Nairobi Africans came to constitute the African crowd—domestic servants, the majority of workers in private and public employment, and petty traders. This group should be distinguished from the Nairobi African middle class which formed the ‘political élite’. The African middle class possessed a fairly high level of education and had remunerative positions with government or were wealthy traders. By the mid-'forties, this group had become well integrated within the colonial system.
The different, and often contradictory, interests of these two groups of people was strikingly manifested on the level of political action. The ‘popular movements’ of the African crowd were direct and often extra-constitutional. Their organizations, e.g. the 40 Group, were characteristically militant, and were often based on mass support. The ‘élite politics’ of the African middle class were strictly constitutional and moderate. Their goal—to consolidate their position within the colonial system—had obviously only limited appeal. The conflict between these two social groups was resolved by the elimination of the African crowd as a political force.
2 Ross, M. H., Urbanization and Political Participation; the effect of increasing scale in Nairobi (ASA, Boston, 1970), 23.Google Scholar
3 Ibid. 22.
4 Werlin, H. H., ‘The Nairobi City Council: a study in Comparative Local Government’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, VIII (1965–1966), 187.Google Scholar
5 Nairobi District Annual Report, 1938.Google Scholar
6 Central Province Annual Report, 1938, 18.Google Scholar
7 Nairobi District Annual Report, 1943, 5.Google Scholar
8 Report by the Senior Medical Officer of Health, On the Housing of Africans in Nairobi (1941), 4.Google Scholar
9 Central Province Annual Report, 1939, 34.Google Scholar
10 For the complete story of the anti-wage reduction campaign, see Furedi, F., ‘The Development of Kikuyu Political Organizations’, M.A. Thesis, SOAS (1970).Google Scholar
11 East African Chronicle, 9 July, 1921.Google Scholar
12 East African Chronicle, 20 August, 1921.Google Scholar
13 Central Province Annual Report, 1939, 70.Google Scholar
14 Central Province Annual Report, 1938, 19.Google Scholar
15 Ibid. 22.
16 Central Province Annual Report, 1945, 10.Google Scholar
17 Central Province Annual Report, 1950, 52.Google Scholar
18 Municipal Native Affairs Dept., Annual Report, 1941, 2.Google Scholar
19 Central Province Annual Report, 1943, 12.Google Scholar
20 Nairobi District Annual Report, 1941, 25.Google Scholar
21 Central Province Annual Report, 1947, 1.Google Scholar
22 Ibid. 1.
23 Interview, 9 June, 1972.Google Scholar
24 Nairobi District Annual Report, 1947, 6.Google Scholar
25 Nairobi District Annual Report, 1948, 10.Google Scholar
26 Rosberg, C. G. and Nottingham, J., The Myth of Man Mau: Nationalism in Kenya (New York, 1966), 265.Google Scholar
27 Central Province Annual Report, 1951, 7.Google Scholar
28 Central Province Annual Report, 1952, 4.Google Scholar
29 Central Province Annual Report, 1953, 2.Google Scholar
30 Kenya Legislative Council Debates, 5 May, 1953.Google Scholar
31 Nairobi, DC, Annual Report, 1954, 1.Google Scholar
32 Ibid. 1.
33 Interview with Kigera, Thuo, 19 February, 1972.Google Scholar
34 Central Province Annual Report, 1952, 61.Google Scholar
35 Population figures for Africans living in Nairobi at this time are very unreliable. Estimates as to what percentage of the African population was Kikuyu around 1952 range from 45 to 75 per cent. Table I indicates that 47 per cent of the African working population was Kikuyu. Since the overwhelming majority of African traders and of African women in Nairobi were Kikuyu, it would seem that an estimate that Kikuyu made up 65–70 per cent of the total African population is not unreasonable.Google Scholar
36 Nairobi District Extra-Provincial Report, 1962, 1.Google Scholar
37 Ross, op. cit. 10.Google Scholar