Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:46:17.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The accuracy of radiocarbon dates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Harold Barker
Harold Barker
Affiliation:
British Museum
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article deals in detail with the various factors which affect the accuracy of radiocarbon dates. The familiar “error term” associated with each date and which caused so much confusion to users of radiocarbon dates in the early days of the method is derived from the statistical uncertainties of the measurements of radioactivity from which the date is calculated and is the only source of error which is capable of strict mathematical treatment. Other sources of error, as for example wrong attribution of the sample or human error in labelling, can be disastrously large on occasion, although they can usually be kept quite small. Errors arising from the effects of isotopic fractionation can be eliminated by the application of corrections based on mass spectrometric measurements of the stable carbon isotopes in the sample. However, it is now known that the most serious limitation on the accuracy obtainable by the radiocarbon method is set by the fact that the level of radiocarbon in the carbon exchange reservoir has not been constant in the past. Despite this limitation, however, the method is still the most important scientific aid to archaeological research to emerge since the end of World War II.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , April 1972 , pp. 177 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Libby, W. F., ‘Atmospheric Helium Three and Radiocarbon from Cosmic Radiation’, Phys. Rev. LXIX (1946), 671;CrossRefGoogle ScholarLibby, W. F., Radiocarbon Dating (University of Chicago Press, 1952).Google Scholar

2 Mann, W. B., Marlow, W. F. and Hughes, E. E., ‘The Half-Life of Carbon-14’, Int. J. of Applied Rod, and Isotopes, XI (1961), 57;CrossRefGoogle ScholarOlsonn, I., Karlen, I., Turnbull, A. H. and Prosser, N. J. D., ‘A determination of the half-life of C 14. with a proportional counter’, Arkiv Fysik XXII (1962), 237;Google ScholarWatt, D. E., Ramsden, D. and Wilson, H. W., ‘The Half-Life of Carbon-14’, Int. J. of Applied Rad. and Isotopes, XI (1961), 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Godwin, H., ‘Half-Life of Radiocarbon’, Nature, CXCV (1962), 984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Ibid.

5 Craig, H., ‘The geochemistry of the stable carbon isotopes’, Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 11 (1953), 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Ozanne, P., ‘Atmospheric Radiocarbon’, West African Archaeological Newsletter No. II (1969), 9–11.Google Scholar

7 de Vries, H., ‘Variation in Concentration of Radiocarbon with Time and Location on Earth’, Koninkl. Nederlandse Akad. Wetensch. Proc. ser. B., LXI, No. 2 (1958), 1–9.Google Scholar

8 Willis, E. H., Tauber, H., Munnich, K. O., ‘Variations in the atmospheric radiocarbon concentration over the past 1,300 years, Radiocarbon, II (1960), 1–4.Google Scholar

9 Damon, P. E., Long, A. and Grey, D. C., ‘Fluctuations of Atmospheric C 14 during the last Six Millennia’, J. Geophys. Res., LXXI (1966), 1055–63;CrossRefGoogle ScholarRalph, E. K. and Michael, H. N., ‘Problems of the Radiocarbon Calendar’, Archaeometry, X (1967), 3–11;CrossRefGoogle ScholarRalph, E. K. and Stuckenrath, R. Jun, ‘Carbon-14 measurements of known age samples’, Nature, CLXXXVIII (1960), 183–7;Google ScholarStuiver, M. and Suess, H. E., ‘On the relationship between radiocarbon dates and true sample ages’, Radiocarbon, VIII (1966), 534–40;CrossRefGoogle ScholarSuess, H. E., ‘Secular Variations of the Cosmic-Ray-Produced Carbon 14 in the Atmosphere and their Interpretations’, J. Geophys. R.s, LXX (1965), 5937–51;CrossRefGoogle ScholarSuess, H. E., ‘Climatic Changes, Solar Activity and the Cosmic-Ray Production Rate of Natural Radiocarbon’, Meteorological Monographs, VIII (1968), 146–50.Google Scholar

10 Ferguson, C. W., ‘Dendrochronology of Bristlecone Pine’, Nobel Symposium, XII (1970), 237–59.Google Scholar

11 Nobel Symposium, xii, ‘Radiocarbon Variations and Absolute Chronology’, pub. Almqvist and Wiksell (Stockholm, 1970).Google Scholar

12 Barker, H., Burleigh, R. and Meeks, N., ‘British Museum Natural Radiocarbon Measurements, VI’, Radiocarbon, xi (1969), 278–94;CrossRefGoogle ScholarBerger, R. and Libby, W. F., ‘UCLA Radiocarbon Dates VI’, Radiocarbon, IX (1967), 477–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Bucha, V. and Neustupney, E., ‘Changes of the Earth's Magnetic Field and Radiocarbon Dating’, Nature, ccxv (1967), 261–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Bucha, V., ‘Influence of the Earth's magnetic field on radiocarbon dating’, Nobel Symposium, XII (1970), 501–11.Google Scholar

15 Tauber, H., ‘The Scandinavian varve chronology and C 54 dating’, Nobel Symposium, xii (1970), 173–96.Google Scholar