Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:03:56.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Value of Imported Ceramics in the Dating and Interpretation of the Rhodesian Iron Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Extract

Since the start of archaeological investigation in Rhodesia, isolated sherds of imported Chinese ceramics have been found in the important Iron Age ruins of Zimbabwe, Khami and Dhlo Dhlo. More recently, abundant finds of both Chinese and European glazed wares have occurred in excavations of early Portuguese trading stations within Rhodesia. All such imports are here redescribed from an examination of the finds and from a detailed study of the early excavator's reports. As a result, some important early misdescriptions and misunderstandings become apparent. The dating evidence provided by the imports is therefore also re-examined.

Very rare sherds of Chinese celadons are virtually the only imported ceramics found in the later deposits at Zimbabwe, and at five other sites. These may be correlated with finds from J. S. Kirkman's excavations in trading settlements of the East African coast, and are dated certainly earlier than the sixteenth century. The finds from four other sites, the most important being the Khami and Dhlo Dhlo ruins, consist mainly of Chinese blue-and-white porcelains and their European imitations. They correlate well with finds not only from the seventeenth and early eighteenth century Portuguese trading stations in Rhodesia, but also with finds from contemporary deposits at Fort Jesus, Mombasa. The precise dating of the Khami and Dhlo Dhlo ruins within this period, as suggested by the imports, shows Khami to belong to the early seventeenth century with Dhlo Dhlo a century later. The divergence between the Khami, Dhlo Dhlo and Portuguese imported ceramics and those of Zimbabwe is sufficiently striking to suggest strongly that Zimbabwe was of negligible trading power by the time the Portuguese penetrated the interior in the sixteenth century. Evidence bearing on this, particularly from the 1958 Zimbabwe excavations, is discussed in detail.

Glass beads and glass are the only other imports to survive in Central African archaeological contexts and are of considerably less chronological value than the ceramics. They are, however, also considered, as are the pattern and extent of the trade with the interior evidenced by these imports.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abraham, D. P. (1961 a). Porcelain from Hill Ruin, Khami. S. Afr. Archaeol. Bull. XVI, 63.Google Scholar
Abraham, D. P. (1961 b). Maramuca: an exercise in the combined use of Portuguese records and oral tradition. J. African Hist. II, 2.Google Scholar
Abraham, D. P. (1966). Review of R. F. H. Summers's ‘Zimbabwe, a Rhodesian Mystery’. Africa, XXXVI, 1.Google Scholar
Andrews, E. M. (1907). The Webster Ruins. Proc. Rhod. Sci. Assoc. VII, 1.Google Scholar
Bent, J. T. (1892). The Ruined Cities of Mashonaland. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Caton-Thompson, G. (1931). The Zimbabwe Culture. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chittick, H. N. (1966). Kilwa—a preliminary report. Azania, I.Google Scholar
Cooke, C. K., Summers, R. and Robinson, K. R. (1966). Rhodesian prehistory re-examined. Arnoldia, II, 17.Google Scholar
Douslin, H. B. (1922). Recent excavations at Zimbabwe. Proc. Rhod. Sci. Assoc., XX.Google Scholar
Fouché, L., ed. (1937). Mapungubwe. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garlake, P. S. (1966 a). The Early Islamic Architecture of the East African Coast. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garlake, P. S. (1966 b). Seventeenth century Portuguese earthworks in Rhodesia. S. Afr. Archaeol. Bull. XXI, 84.Google Scholar
Hall, R. N. (1905). Great Zimbabwe. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Hall, R. N. (1909). Prehistoric Rhodesia. London: T. Fisher Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R. N. (1910). Guide to Khami Ruins. Bulawayo: Philpott and Collins.Google Scholar
Hall, R. N. and Neal, W. G. (1902). The Ancient Ruins of Rhodesia. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Hodges, H. (1964). Artifacts. London: J. Baker.Google Scholar
Jones, N. (1939). A brief account of the finds made on the Macardon claims, West Nicholson, Gwanda district, S. Rhodesia. Proc. Rhod. Sci. Assoc. XXXVII.Google Scholar
Kirkman, J. S.The Arab City of Gedi. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkman, J. S. (1966). The Kenya littoral. Current Anthropology, VII, 3.Google Scholar
MacIver, D. R. (1906). The Rhodesian Ruins, their probable origin and significance. Geog. Journ. XXVII.Google Scholar
MacIver, D. R. (1906). Medieval Rhodesia. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robinson, K. R.Khami Ruins. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, K. R. (1961 a). Dated imports from Khami Ruins. S. Afr. Archaeol. Bull. XVI, 62.Google Scholar
Robinson, K. R. (1961 b). Khami imports. S. Aft. Archaeol. Bull. XVI, 63.Google Scholar