Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:34:42.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The People of the Grey Bull: the Origin and Expansion of the Turkana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

John Lamphear
John Lamphear
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

While archaeology and linguistics provide an important basis for the reconstruction of the early history of those parts of eastern Africa inhabited by pastoral societies, oral traditions also can make a valuable contribution. In this paper an examination of the traditions of the Turkana of north-western Kenya reveals an often remarkably sophisticated rendering of complex processes of origin and migration. Moreover, those traditions also embody insights into basic factors concerning the development and spread of pastoralism in East Africa that the methodologies of other disciplines have only recently begun to identify.

Turkana traditions suggest that their society had not just one, monolithic ‘origin’, but rather what might be seen as a whole series of them. Highly dramatic and memorable tales of genesis provide vivid idioms of socio-political identity and also contain fundamental cosmological messages. But they also correspond to important stages of change in the development of the Turkana community, and, as such, they (together with less ‘formal’ traditions associated with them) provide vital historical information.

The factors which combined to enable the Turkana to carry out their vast and rapid territorial expansion are identified. For instance, one early tradition suggests a fundamental change in their pastoral system – the acquisition of Zebu cattle-while others emphasize important commercial contacts which provided a steady flow of iron-ware and grain. Still others trace the development of the office of Great Diviner, revealing how it became a primary focus of economic and cultural redefinition and corporate identity as alterations to the earlier generation-set system occurred. Another tradition provides a glimpse of Turkana expansion from the point of view of peoples absorbed by it.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 29 , Issue 1: Special Issue in Honour of ROLAND OLIVER , March 1988 , pp. 27 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See for example, Ehret, Christopher and Posnansky, Merrick (eds), The Archaeological and Linguistic Reconstruction of African History (Berkeley, 1982).Google Scholar

2 Oliver, Roland, ‘Reflections on the British Institute's expeditions to the Southern Sudan’ in Mack, John and Robertshaw, Peter (eds), Culture History in the Southern Sudan (Nairobi, 1982), 167Google Scholar; Nicholas David, ‘The BIEA southern Sudan expedition of 1979’, in Mack and Robertshaw, op. cit., 53; Robertshaw, Peter and Collett, David, ‘A new framework for the study of early pastoral communities in East Africa’, in J. Afr. Hist., XXIV (1983), 292–4.Google Scholar

3 For the complete text of the tradition, see Lamphear, John, The Traditional History of the Jie of Uganda (Oxford, 1976), 91.Google Scholar

4 Irwin, Paul, Liptako Speaks (Princeton, 1981), 49 and 99Google Scholar; Beidelman, Thomas O., ‘Myth, legend and oral history: A Kaguru traditional text’, Anthropos, LXV (1970).Google Scholar

5 Vansina, Jan, ‘Comment: traditions of genesis’, J. Afr. Hist., XV, ii (1974), 322Google Scholar; also his Oral Tradition as History (Madison, 1985), 136 ff.Google Scholar; Boston, J. S., ‘The hunter in Igala legends of origin’, Africa, XXXIV, ii (1964), 125.Google Scholar

6 Beidelman, , ‘Myth’, 80 ff.Google Scholar and especially 92–4; Lamphear, John, ‘Some thoughts on the interpretation of oral traditions among the central Paranilotes’, in Vossen, Rainer and Bechhaus-Gerst, Marianne (eds), Nilotic Studies (Berlin, 1983), 112–18.Google Scholar

7 See Lamphear, History of the Jie, especially chs. iii and iv. The term ‘Ateker’ replaces ‘Central Paranilotes’ used in this and other earlier writings. It should be noted that all Ateker group names properly should include the prefix ‘Ngi-’, meaning ‘The people of or ’ Those of. For convenience I have not used the ‘ Ngi-’, form in this article. The letter ‘c’ in Ateker words represents the sound ‘ch’.

8 Oral interviews with Turkana informants conducted in 1969–71 and in 1976 are abbreviated ‘T’, followed by the chronological number of the interview.

The foregoing information was derived from interviews including T-2, T-4, T-6, T-7, T-9, T-12, T-14, T-15, T-16, T-17, T-18, T-40, T-47 and T-58.

9 Lamphear, , History of the Jie, 129, 193–4, 196 and 226.Google Scholar

10 Vansina, , Oral Tradition, 173 ff.Google Scholar; Lamphear, , History of the Jie, 32–52Google Scholar; also Lamphear, , ‘Interpretation of oral traditions’, 117.Google Scholar

11 Lokimark, T-14.

12 Interviews including T-10, T-n, T-18 and T-19; also see Sobania, Neal, ‘The historical tradition of the peoples of the eastern Lake Turkana basin’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London, 1980), 83–90.Google Scholar

13 David, Nicholas, ‘The archaeological context of Nilotic expansion’, in Vossen, and Bechhaus-Gerst, , Nilotic Studies, 72–94Google Scholar; Robertshaw, and Collett, , ‘New framework’, 296Google Scholar; Lamphear, John, ‘The persistence of hunting and gathering in a “pastoral” world’, SUGIA, VII, ii (1986), 248–53.Google Scholar

14 Nicholas David, ‘Prehistory and historical linguistics in Central Africa’, in Ehret and Posnansky, Reconstruction of African History; Lamphear, , ‘Persistence of hunting and gathering’, 244–5.Google Scholar

15 Lamphear, , ‘Interpretation of oral traditions’, 116Google Scholar; Epstein, H., The Origin of the Domestic Animals of Africa, I (New York, 1971), 372–7.Google Scholar There may also be veiled reference to their first acquisition of thoracic-humped cattle in Jie tradition recorded in Lamphear, , History of the Jie, 152.Google Scholar

16 Epstein, , Domestic Animals, 409 and 541–3Google Scholar; Sobania, , ‘Historical Tradition’, 87.Google Scholar

17 See Jacobs, Alan, ‘Maasai inter-tribal relations’, in Fukui, Katsuyoshi and Turton, David (eds), Warfare among East African Herders (Osaka, 1979), 12.Google Scholar

18 Ekuton and Lemkol, T–15.

19 Interviews including T-3, T-4, T-5, T-8, T-11, T-12, T-15, T-17, T-18, T-19, T-20, T-54 and T-56; also see Sobania, , ‘Historical Tradition’, 61 ff.Google Scholar; Barton, Juxon, ‘Notes on the Turkana tribe of British East Africa’, J. African Soc. XX, 70 (1920), 109.Google Scholar

2 0Epstein, , Domestic Animals, 541–3Google Scholar; David, , ‘BIEA expedition’, 55.Google Scholar

21 Epstein, , Domestic Animals, 378.Google Scholar He also suggests that Maa-speakers continued to prefer Sanga cattle until the late nineteenth century, although the transition to Zebu began well before that.

22 Loseny, Lopus and Ebei, T-39.

23 Kenny, Michael G., ‘The stranger from the lake’, Azania, XVII (1982), 22Google Scholar; also Boston, , ‘Igala legends’, 125.Google Scholar

24 Interviews including T-16, T-17 and T-52.

25 Munro, J. Forbes, Colonial Rule and the Kamba (Oxford, 1975), 29.Google Scholar

26 Lamphear, , ‘Persistence of hunting and gathering’, 246 and 249.Google Scholar

27 Interviews including T-2, T-3, T-5, T-6, T-8, T-13, T-14, T-15, T-19, T-35, T-40, T-53, T-54; also Kittermaster, H. B., ‘History of the Turkana’, Kenya National Archives, File number PRB/211 (abbreviated KNA-PRB/211), 1911, p. 50Google Scholar; Nimmo, J. R., ‘Handing over report, Lokitaung’, KNA-HOR/886, 1948, p. 2.Google Scholar

28 For a thorough examination of the Turkana military system, see Lamphear, John, The Scattering Time: Turkana Resistance to the Imposition of Colonial Rule (forthcoming), ch. iGoogle Scholar; see also Fukui and Turton, Warfare Among Herders.

29 Tornay, Serge, ‘Generational age-systems and chronology’, an unpublished paper presented at the ‘Archaeology and ethno-history of the southern Sudan and adjacent areas seminar’, SOAS, London, 1980, 2–3Google Scholar; David, , ‘Prehistory and historical linguistics’, 86Google Scholar; Robertshaw, and Collett, , ‘New framework’, 293.Google Scholar

30 Interviews including T-6, T-9, T-11, T-12, T-16 and T-19.

31 Sobania, , ‘Historical Tradition’, 42–3 and 219.Google Scholar Traditions concerning Apatepes and the early Meturona diviners may well have been fostered in a later time after Turkana identity had begun to focus much more strongly on the diviners than in this early stage. For a full discussion of such a process, see Lonsdale, John, ‘When did the Gusii (or any other group) become a “Tribe7rd;?’, Kenya Historical Review, V (1977), 129–31.Google Scholar

32 Lokimak, T-14; Robertshaw, and Collett, , ‘New framework’, 296–97Google Scholar; Oliver, , ‘Reflections‘, 168–9.Google Scholar There may also have been important cosmological factors which underlay the expansion. See Lamphear, John, ‘Historical dimensions of dual organization’, in Almagor, Uri and Maybury-Lewis, David (eds), The Attraction of Opposites (Ann Arbor, in press).Google Scholar

33 Lamphear, ‘Historical dimensions’.

34 Interviews including T-17, T-39, T-52 and T-55; MacGaffey, Wyatt, ‘Oral tradition in Central Africa’, Int. J. Afr. Hist. Studies, VIII, iii (1975), 420.Google Scholar

35 Lamphear, Scattering Time, ch. i.

36 Lamphear, Scattering Time, ch. i; also see Hay, Margaret, ‘Local trade and ethnicity in western Kenya’, Afr. Econ. Hist. Rev., II, i (1975), 11.Google Scholar