Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:19:54.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Light on Medieval Nubia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

P. L.  and
M. Shinnie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The importance of the Christian states of Nubia in medieval times has hitherto been under-estimated by historians of Africa. There is now sufficient information to show that they played a significant part in the history of the Nile valley for some 800 years. Not only did the existence of Christian states impose a barrier to the expansion of Islam, but the Dongola kingdom at least was at times an important force in the politics of the area.

The recent campaign of excavations made necessary by the building of the Aswan dam has provided much new information about the material culture of the period, and shows a much higher artistic and social development than earlier emphasis on ecclesiastical monuments had suggested. Nubia is now seen to have had a highly developed civilization with considerable urban development. Detailed study of the pottery has made possible more precise dating of buildings and objects, as well as showing periods of increased and decreased trade with Egypt.

The discovery of important frescoes in the cathedral at Faras makes it possible to study the artistic development, and also adds new material for a study of the eastern, particularly Persian, influences already suspected in Nubian art. Information about domestic life is made available by the excavations at Debeira West, the first predominantly domestic site to have been excavated, whose material remains provide new evidence on diet, crafts and agriculture.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , November 1965 , pp. 263 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kush, XI, 315–19.Google Scholar

2 de Villard, Monneret, Storia delia Nubia Cristiana (Rome, 1938).Google Scholar

3 de Villard, Monneret, La Nubia Medioevale (Cairo, 1935).Google Scholar

4 Clarke, Somers, Christian Antiquities in the Nile Valley (Oxford, 1912).Google ScholarMileham, , Churches in Lower Nubia (Philadelphia, 1910).Google Scholar

5 Monneret de Villard, Storia della Nubia Cristiana, p. 72.Google Scholar

6 Now known as Dongola el aguz, ‘Old Dongola’, to distinguish it from the modem town of Dongola, more properly known as el Urdi.Google Scholar

7 But see Holt, , Journal of African History, IV, 3 (1963), 39–55 for a reconsideration of the traditional date for the fall of Soba.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Monneret de Villard, op. cit. 220–1.Google Scholar

9 Illustrated London News, No. 6519, II July 1964, pp. 50–53.Google Scholar

10 Glidden, , Kush, ii (1954), 63–5.Google Scholar

11 This text, frequently referred to, has never been adequately published.Google Scholar

12 Kush, xii (1964), 39 and 249–50.Google Scholar

13 From the excavation at Soba and Ghazali. See Shinnie, , Excavations at Soba (Khartoum, 1955),Google Scholar and Shinnie, and Chittick, , Ghazali—A Monastery in the Northern Sudan (Khartoum, 1961).Google Scholar

14 Michalowski, , Faras—Fouilles Polonaises 1961 (Warsaw, 1962)Google Scholar, and Kush, XI (1963), 235–56, Kush, xii (1964), 195–207.Google Scholar

15 Adams, Kush, X (1962), 243–88. This classification has been much modified by a typescript ‘Field Manual of Christian Nubian Pottery Wares’ made available to expeditions in the field.Google Scholar

16 journal of Egyptian Archaeology, xiii (1927), 141–50.Google Scholar

17 The tracing of such sources is a matter of some importance. Some seem to be Persian and some Fatimid Egyptian. But much is still unknown. Compare Shinnie and Chittick, op. cit. 30.Google Scholar

18 For the arguments on which this is based see Adams, op. cit. In the periods proposed here Early is equivalent to Adams's periods 3–5, Middle is 6 and 7, and Late is 8. Adams himself grouped these periods into three main ones similar, to these suggested here Kush, XI, 32, 63n.Google Scholar

19 Shinnie, op. cit. 77.Google Scholar

20 Shinnie and Chittick, loc. cit.Google Scholar

21 Some were inadequately published, Shinnie, , Sudan Notes and Records, XXXI, 297–9. More have since been found and will shortly be published.Google Scholar

22 For a list of Nubian bishoprics see de Villard, M., op. cit. 162–5.Google Scholar

23 The chronology is discussed by Michalowski, Kush, xii (1964), 195–207.Google Scholar

24 Kush, xi (1963), 240 and 313–14.Google Scholar

25 Kush, xi (1963), PI. LXI.Google Scholar

26 Kush, XII (1964), PI. XLIIb.Google Scholar

27 Kush, xi (1963), 257–63, xii, 208–15.Google Scholar

28 The technique of building is described by Mileham, op. cit. 8–10.Google Scholar

29 The Castor oil seeds are cut in half and rubbed over the dish on to which is then poured a thin mixture of flour and water.Google Scholar

30 Kush, xi (1963), 132.Google Scholar

31 Oates in Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, xxxxix (1963), 161–71, has shown from a study of several gravestones how some of the aberrant spellings reflect contemporary Greek pronunciation, and argues that colloquial Greek must have been known in Nubia in the eleventh and twelfth centuries.Google Scholar