Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:58:15.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Ndebele Kingdom South of the Limpopo River1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Extract

Starting with a small band of refugees, Mzilikazi built a personal military kingdom on the Zulu model at three successive locations in South Africa. His early successes might be attributed to the disturbances resulting from the Difaqane. Later, his strength was maintained by his ability to incorporate diverse peoples into his polity. The aggressive policy for which he is known was not maintained during those periods in which he felt secure, but rather when he was forced to migrate farther from his major enemy, the Zulu. Evidence supports the contention that his main aim was a search for security. His policies were successful against the threats from African enemies. Only with the coming of white men did they fail. The essential features of Mzilikazi's political system are described to show what he preserved of traditional Nguni practices, what he borrowed from Dingeswayo and Shaka, and what he modified to fit his particular circumstances.

The viability of Mzilikazi's developing polity is confirmed by his success in reconstructing his kingdom north of the Limpopo River. Without minimizing the traditional characterization of Mzilikazi as a warrior, a desolator and a tyrant, it is as a creative political administrator that his full stature can be appreciated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 For example, see Mason, P., The Birth of a Dilemma (London, 1958);Google ScholarHugh, Marshall Hole, The Making of Rhodesia (London, 1926), Lobengula (London, 1929), The Passing of the Black Kings (London, 1932);Google ScholarPosselt, F. W. T., Upengula The Scatterer (Bulawayo, 1945),Google ScholarFact and Fiction (Bulawayo, n.d.“1935”);Google ScholarHughes, A. J. B., Kin, Caste and Nation among the Rhodesian Ndebele (Manchester, 1956).Google Scholar

3 Malida's account is found in ‘Mziki (Campbell, A. A.), ‘Mzmo; The Rise and Fall of the Matabele (Pietermaritzburg, n.d. “1926”),Google Scholar and in substance in Edwin, W. Smith, The Life and Times of Daniel Lindley (18011980) (London), 71–2.Google Scholar

4 Bryant, A. T., Olden Times in Zululand and Natal (London, 1929; reprint, Cape Town, 1965) 420–25, 102, 167, 172–73;Google ScholarMziki, ’, 26–7.Google Scholar

5 Thomas, Morgan Thomas, Eleven Years in Central South Africa (London, 1873), 159Google ScholarBryant, , 421, thinks the estimates of Harris and Moffat too low and postulates that Mzilikazi must have been thirty at the time.Google Scholar

6 Robert, Moffat, Missionary Labours and Scenes in Southern Africa (London, 1842), 543, 546;Google ScholarThe Matabele Journals of Robert Moffat, 1829–1860, ed. Wallis, J. P. R. (2 vols., London, 1945), I, 29;Google ScholarWilliam, Cornwallis Harris, The Wild Sports of Southern Africa (5th ed., London, 1852; reprint, Cape Town, 1963), 101, 106;Google ScholarPellissier, J. P., Mosega, , 12 05 1832,Google ScholarJournal des Missions évangéliques, V, no. 3, 519;Google ScholarDaniel, Lindleyet al., 28 08. 1836,Google Scholar in Kotzé, D. J., Letters of the American Missionaries, 18351838 (Cape Town, 1950), 130;Google ScholarAndrew, Smith, ‘Manuscript Journal’ (in South African Museum, Cape Town), II, 246 (written on Smith's return from an exploratory journey in 18341936).Google Scholar

7 Bryant, , 173, 422–3; ‘MzikiGoogle Scholar (Campbell, A. A.), (26–9, 34). Ellenberger, D. F, author of The History of the Basuto, derived his account of the Ndebele from an earlier version of Malida which Campbell published in the Bulawayo Chronicle, Christmas number for 1905, and which was extracted in part by J. M. Orpen and sent to Ellenberger on 2 Jan. 1906 (see Ellenberger Papers, Grand Format, 11, 3). Henry Frances Fynn, an early trader, among the first white men to visit Shaka, gives the figure as 300. This conforms more nearly with the nature of Mzilikazi's early career than the much larger figures sometimes given. See ‘History of Godongwana (Dingiswayo) and (in part) of Chaka’,Google Scholar in John, Bird, Annals of Natal, 1495–1845 (a vols., Pietermaritzburg, 1888: reprint, Cape Town, 1965), 1,68.Google Scholar Compare Molema, S. M., the Rolong historian, who estimates Mzilikazi's force at 15,000 (The Bantu Past and Present) (Edinburgh, 1920; reprinted Cape Town, 1963), 85.Google Scholar

8 Bryant gives us the name, see p. 424.

9 Mziki, , 42–4; Bryant, 425.Google Scholar

10 Mziki, , 45–7; Bryant, 425–6;Google ScholarEllenberger, , History of the Basuto; Ancient and Modern (London, 1912), 205.Google Scholar See also Robert, Hamilton, Missionary, L. M. S., to Melvill, J., 5 08. 1824, in Edward Edwards, Wesleyan Missionary, Griqualand, 8 01.Google Scholar 1825 (WMMS Archives, S.A., box in, file 1825, no. 3). See also ‘Statement drawn up at the request of Chief Moletsane’, in Theal, G. M., Basutoland Records (3 vols., Cape Town, 1883; reprinted Cape Town, 1964), 1, 517.Google Scholar

11 Bryant, , 427;Google ScholarEllenberger, , History, 205.Google Scholar The quotation is from Thomas, Arbousset, Narrative of an Exploratory Tour to the North-East of the Colony of the Cape of Good Hope (London, 1852; originally pub. in French, Paris, 1842), 269. The Pedi have no record of this victory. Perhaps it was a smaller community rather than the paramount section which was involved.Google Scholar

12 Bryant, , 425;Google ScholarFynn, , 1, 68. This process seems to have continued until 1826 after Mzilikazi had settled on the Apies River. Bryant names the following: Ndwandwe, Mthethwa, Mkwanazi, Kosa, Nolovu, Ncwangeni, Gumede and Ngwe.Google Scholar

13 Bryant, , 424;Google ScholarMargaret, Read, The Ngoni of Nyasaland (London, 1956), 8.Google Scholar

14 Andrew, Smith, The Diary of Andrew Smith…1834–1836, ed. Percival, R. Kirby (2 vols. Cape Town, 19391940), II, 101;Google ScholarBryant, , 425.Google Scholar

15 Bryant, , 425;Google ScholarMoffat, , Matabele Jnls, 1, 89.Google Scholar

16 Macmillan, W. M., Bantu, Boer and Briton (rev. ed., Oxford, 1963), 34–6.Google Scholar

17 Bryant, , 425–7.Google Scholar

19 Arbousset, , 269.Google Scholar

20 Ellenberger, , 205; Bryant, 427.Google Scholar

21 Jan Viljoen, quoted in Macmillan, 34n.

22 A., Smith, Diary, I, 158–9, 263, 378–9;11, 261,Google Scholar. Hamilton, R. and Moffat, R., Dithakong, 6 03. 1839 (LMS Archives, 11/3/B).Google Scholar

23 Smith, A., Diary, 1, 336, 353; II, 98, 172.Google Scholar

24 Kolbe, G. A., ‘Journal for 1828–1833’ (LMS Jnls, no. 102), editor's note, Journal des Missions, VII, 202–3;Google ScholarBryant, , 431.Google Scholar

25 Smith, A., Diary, 1, 123, 331; ‘Mziki, 53–4.Google Scholar Harris met one captive in 1836 (see Wild Sports, 120).Google Scholar Moffat saw two of them in 1852 (see Matabele Jnls, I, 237–9).Google Scholar

26 Some published accounts suggest that this raid occurred in 1830, before the Berends commando. I have chosen to place it after for the reason that contemporary documents clearly place it in 1832, shortly before September see Samuel Young, Wesleyville, Caffraria, 25 09. 1832 (WMMS Archives, box v, Albany, file 1832, no. 30); (Samuel, Rolland, Lattakou, (Kuruman), 25 09. 1832, in Journal des Missions, VIII, 99).Google Scholar Bryant obtained his description of this event from Ellenberger, who received it from the newspaper version of Malida's evidence (see note 7, above; cf. 'Mziki, 48). However, oral tradition is often weak in dating and chronology. No contemporary evidence supports an earlier raid, nor does it support the idea of two raids. See note by Kotzé, Kotzé seems to accept the possibility of two raids, but places a great deal of weight on Bryant, not recognizing its origin (see Bryant, , 429–30, and Ellenberger, cf., 207, and 'Mziki).Google Scholar

27 Schapera, I., ‘A short history of the Bangwaketse’, African Studies 1, 8;Google Scholar Evidence of Gaseitsiwe, , in Evidence taken at Bloemhof before the Commision appointed to investigate the Claims of the South African Republic, Captain N. Waterboer, Chief of West Griqualand, and certain other Native Chiefs, to portions of the Territory on the Vaal River, now known as the Diamondfields (Imperial Blue Book Cape Town, 1871), 186. Hereafter cited as Bloemhof Report.Google Scholar Schoon and McLuckie related this attack to the Bloem commando. Quoted in Chase, J. C., ‘Substance of the journal of two trading travellers, and of the communications of a missionary, regarding their recent visits to the countries in the rear of the Portuguese settlements at De La Goa Bay’, South African Quarterly Journal, I, no. IV, 406.Google Scholar

28 Ellenberger, , 208;Google ScholarEugene, Casalis, The Basutos (London, 1861; originally published in French, Paris, 1859; reprinted, Cape Town, 1965), 22.Google Scholar

29 See Chase, J. C., op. cit.; James, Archbell, Plaatberg, , 31 12. 1829 (WMMS, South Africa, box in, file 1829, no. 3);Google ScholarMoffat, R., MatabeleJnls, 1, 14.Google Scholar

30 James, Archbell, Plaatberg, , 30 06 1830 (WMMS, Albany, box v, file 1830, no. 25)Google Scholar and 9 Sept. 1830 (WMMS, Albany, box v, 1830, no. 26); Prosper Lemue, 27 Nov. 1830, in Journal des Missions, VI, 305.Google Scholar

31 Motshwari, quoted in Samuel, Rolland, Lattakou, (Kuruman), 25 09. 1832, in Journal des Missions, VIII, 100–2.Google Scholar See also, Molema, S. M., Montshiwa, 1815–1896 (Cape Town, 1966), 1823;Google Scholar and Moffat, R., Kuruman, , 10 01. 1833 (in LMS Archives 13/4/E). See also Moroka's testimony, Bloemhof Report, 138, and Molema's testimony,Google ScholarIbid.. 144.

32 Lemue, P., op. cit.; Moitw's testimony, Bloseinhof Report, 315.Google Scholar

33 Molema, , Moroka, 42; Matlaba's Evidence,Google ScholarBloemhof Report, 262–3.Google Scholar

34 Lemue, , 28 02 1834, Jal des Miss. X, 1516. He also fought the Ngwaketse. See Schapera, ‘Bangwaketse’, 8.Google Scholar

35 Smith, A., Diary, II, 182–6.Google Scholar

36 Lemue, , 06 1834, Jnl Jul des Miss. X, 1415;Google ScholarHamilton, R., Moffat, R. and Edwards, R., Kuruman, , 3 09. 1834, in LMS 54/2/F;Google ScholarMoffat, , Matabele Jnls, I, 8990.Google Scholar The American missionaries expected Mzilikazi to move, should he have the opportunity, because of his fear of Dingane. See Lindley, D. et al. , Mosega, 18 08. 1836, in Kotzé, 540.Google Scholar

37 Harris, , 211; ‘Tribes to the northward’, Graham's Town Journal, v, no. 255 (10 11. 1836).Google Scholar

38 Journal of Andrew Geddes Bain, ed. Lister, M. H. (Cape Town, 1949), 141–5.Google Scholar

39 Anna Elizabeth Steenkamp (née Retief), ‘Record or journal of our migration from our mother country to Port Natal’, in Bird, J., Annals, I, 460;Google ScholarSmith, E. W., The Life and Times of Daniel Lindley, 1801–1880 (London, 1949), 99100.Google Scholar

40 Smith, E. W., 100102;Google ScholarBird, , ‘Journals of Card Cilliers and others’, Annals, I, 238–40; Lindley et al., 3 05 1837, ABC Archives (American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions, Archives held in Houghton Library, Harvard University) 15.l, vol. 1, 53. (This letter is partially published as letter 41 in Kotzé.) Lindley estimated the Ndebele force at 2,000 and said that 184 were killed. He received his information from returning warriors.Google Scholar

41 Lindley et al., Ibid..; ‘Cilliers Jnl’, I, 240; ‘Pretorius‘ Jnl’, Bird, , 5, 232; Mr and Mrs Daniel Lindley, cited in E. W. Smith, 103–6; Molema, Moroka, 49−5’. Molema estimated the force as follows: 507 Boers, 60 Rolong, 40 Griqua, 5 or 6 Korana, and some Tlokwa of Sekonyela who joined the force as it was moving towards Mosega.Google Scholar

42 Mziki, , 5960;Google ScholarBryant, , 435–8; Bell, A. Gardiner to Colone, 9 09. 1837,Google Scholar in Bird, , 1, 325.Google Scholar

43 Walker, E. A., The Great Trek (3rd ed., London, 1946), 557–8.Google Scholar The Ndebele were not the only nation to go down in defeat before the Boers. Not long after, Dingane contemplated seeking refuge with Mzilikazi beyond the Limpopo. See Pretorius, in Bird, I, 583. The Griqua also attacked Mzilikazi as the Boers were driving them off. Moilwe's testimony, Bloemhof Report, 317.Google Scholar

44 Testimony of ‘Cobejaan’, Fokeng captive of Mzilikazi, Bloemhof Report, 318.

45 Hughes, A. J. B. and van Velsen, J., ‘The Ndebele’, The Shona and Ndebele of Southern Rhodesia (London, 1955), 45.Google Scholar

46 Lindley, et al. . in Kotzé, 127.Google Scholar

47 Smith, A., Ethnographic Notes (Papers, MS), XII, 115.Google Scholar

48 Moffat, , Matabele Jnls, 1, 7, 57Google ScholarSmith, A., JnI(MS),1, 191;Google ScholarLemue, , Motito, , 1 01. 1833, in Jnl des Miss. VIII, 210.Google Scholar

49 Henry, F. Fynn, in Bird, , 1,68.Google Scholar

50 Chase, op. cit. 407; Archbell, Plaatberg, 3, 12. 1829, op. cit.

51 Kotzé cites A. Smith's correspondence in which he estimates Mzilikazi's military force at 1,000–2,000 Ndebele trained warriors, and W. C. Harris, who cites a figure of 5,000, both indicating perhaps an equal number of subject troops besides (Letters, 166 n.). The American Missionaries estimated the total Ndebele force at 3,000. Lindley et at., 18 08. 1836, in Kotzé, 129; Ibid. a May 1837, in Kotzé, 640.

52 Bryant, , 425; Fynn, in Bird, 1, 68.Google Scholar

53 Lindley, et al. , 18 08. 1836, in Kotzé, 629; Harris, 140; ‚Mziki’, passim.Google Scholar

54 Lemue, , 27 11. 1830, Jnl des Miss. VI, 305; ‘Magaal's Evidence’,Google ScholarBloemhof Report, 326; Smith, A., MS Jnl. 11, 94.Google Scholar

55 All accounts indicate the great preponderance of subject peoples compared to the Ndebele.

56 For example, see Moffat, , Matabele Jnl, 1, 24;Google ScholarPellissier, J. P., Mosega, 12 05 1832, in Jnl des Miss. VIII, 5, 7.Google Scholar

57 Lindley, et al. , 18 08. 1836, in Kotzé, 629–30.Google Scholar

58 Thomas, M. Thomas, Eleven Years in Central South Africa (London, 1873), 224–5.Google Scholar

59 A. Smith, MS Jnl, II, 265. Smith recognized a difference in treatment, but still felt the superiors were excessively submissive to the king (Moffat, , Matabele Jnl, 1, 14, 85).Google Scholar Mhlagazanhlansi (Neville Jones) cites Kumalo, a Ndebele chief, to show that Mzilikazi had formal bodies of advisers from among the nobles and the commoners of his kingdom, but this refers to a subsequent period. See My Friend Kumalo (Bulawayo, 1946), 22.Google Scholar

60 A., Smith, Diary, 11, 307.Google Scholar

61 Smith, A., MS JnI, II, 275.Google Scholar

62 Smith, A., Ethnographic Notes (MS papers), XII, 106.Google Scholar

63 Moffat, , Matabele Jnl, 1, 24.Google Scholar

64 Smith, A., Ethnographic Notes, XII, 107, 110;Google ScholarDiary, II, 79.Google Scholar Smith notes later that some of the yonger Umnumzane were required to fight (Ethno. Notes, 110).Google Scholar

65 Smith, A., Diary, II, 79, 139; Lindley, et al. . in Kotzé, 129–30.Google Scholar

66 Moffat, , Matabele Jnl, 1, 14 n. 68;Google ScholarSmith, A., Diary, 11, 242Google Scholar A fourth major Induna was in disgrace at the time of Smith's visit, primarily for the manner in which he behaved towards the French missionaries at Mosega. His name was Nkotue. See Smith, , Diary, II, 53,Google Scholar and Moffat, , Matabele jnl 1, 68,Google Scholar and Smith, A., MS JnI, II, 224.Google Scholar

67 Moffat translated the title as ‘Great Under Chiefs’. Moffat refers to ‘principal towns of his dominions’ (Matabele Jnl, 1, 26).Google Scholar See also Thomas, , Eleven Years, 224.Google Scholar

68 Smith, A., Diary, II, passim.; Lindley, et al. , in Kotzé, 129.Google Scholar

69 Moffat, , Matabele Jnl, I, 26;Google ScholarThomas, , Eleven Years, 225. Thomas names these wives Unina womuzi, ‘mother of the town’. A. Smith uses the term, ‘mother of the kraal’, but suggests that they could be wives of local Zinduna, or unrelated women, MS JnI, II, 215.Google Scholar

70 Smith, A., Diary, II, 243.Google Scholar Compare this with Eileen, Krige, The Social System of the Zulu (Pietermaritzburg, 1957), 217–19.Google Scholar

71 Mzilikazi's districts were organized around military-administrative units under Zinduna, who were commoners. Cf., Hilda Kuper, An African Aristocracy; Rank among the Swazi (London, 1957), chap. v.Google Scholar

72 Smith, A., Diary, II, 67;Google ScholarMoffat, , Matabele Jnl, I, 26.Google Scholar

73 Moffat, op. cit. cf Krige, chap. XII, for the Zulu practice.

74 John, Mackenzie, Ten Years North of the Orange River (Edinburgh, 1871), 329–30; Hughes and van Velsen, 74.Google Scholar

75 ‚Mziki’54−6.

76 Hughes and van Velsen, 73.

77 Tawana was in league with Berends, and had killed the tribute collectors. See Platje, S., Mhudi (Lovedale, 1930),Google Scholar preface; Rolland, S., Lattakou, (Kuruman), 25 09. 1832, in Jnl des Miss. VIII, 100.Google Scholar

78 Smith, A., Diary, I, 293.Google Scholar

79 Macmillan, , 34 n.; Smith, A., MS Jnl, II, 281.Google Scholar

80 ‚Mziki’ 64–5; Hughes and van Velsen, 72.

81 Arbousset, 269. See also ‘Magaal's Evidence’, Bloemhof Report, 326;Google ScholarSmith, A., Diary, I, 335.Google Scholar

82 ‚Mziki, 64–5;Google ScholarThomas, , Eleven Years, 153–4.Google Scholar

83 Mziki, 65.Google Scholar

84 Biesheuvel, E. M., cited in Hughes, Kin, Castle and Nation among the Rhodesian Ndebele (Manchester, 1956), 54Google ScholarHughes, and van, Velsen, 74;Google ScholarThomas, 153–4.Google Scholar

85 Ellenberger, D. F., 206;Google ScholarBryant, , 425.Google Scholar

86 William, C. Scully, ‘Fragments of native history: the Amahiubi’, The State, II (1909), 595602.Google Scholar

87 Smith, A., MS Jnl, II, 275;Google ScholarDiary, 11, 66.Google Scholar

88 Stow, G. W., ‘The Intrusion of Stronger Races’ (MS, typed, Grey Collection, South African Public Library), 173. Stow mentioned his recruitment efforts with the Zulu dissidents. Archbell writes of the intelligence maintained by Mzilikazi regarding the Zulu and Xhosa. See Archbell, Plaatberg, 31 12. 1829, WMMS Archives, South Africa, box II, file 1829, no 37. See also Smith, A., MS Jnl, II, 281, which refers to similar communications with regard to the Griqua. Also, Lemue to Philip, 26 Jan. 1833 (Postscript, 17 02. 1833), LMS Archives, 13/3/A.Google Scholar

89 Peter, Wright, Griqua, Town, to Philip, J., 15 07 1835, in LMS Archives, 14/4/CGoogle Scholar; ibid., 17 Aug. 1835, LMS Archives, 14/4/D.

90 ‘Tribes to the northward’, Graham's Town Journal, V, no. 255 (10 11. 1836). Moultrie was less convinced of Mzilikazi's goodwill. See letter from ‘Investigatus’, Graham's Town Journal, vi, no. 268 (9 02. 1837).Google Scholar

91 Moffat, , Matabele Jnl, 1, 14, 96.Google Scholar

92 Pellissier, , 12 05 1832, in Jnl des Miss. VIII, 57;Google ScholarLemue, , 30 03. 1832, in jnl des Miss. VII, 370.Google Scholar

93 Moffat, , Kuruman, , 3 02. 1834,Google Scholar LMS Archives 14/2/F; John Philip drew the Americans to South Africa, but Moffat assisted in getting them settled, teaching the language, and in preparing Mzilikazi to receive them. See Philip to Purney, J. B., 05 1833, in Kotzé, 31; Mrs Lindley to Mrs Philip, 25 05 1835, in Kotzé, 66–7;Google ScholarMoiffat, , Matabele Jnl, 1, 114–15.Google Scholar

94 Moifat, , ‘Fourth Journey’, Matabele Jnl, II.Google Scholar

95 Treaty cited in GH 19/4 (Cape Archives). See Moffat, , Matabele Jnl, I, 77 ff.;Google ScholarSmith, A.Diary, 1, 68;Google Scholar and Kirby's, P. preface to Diary, II, 1718.Google Scholar