Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:33:39.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Labour Supply and the Genesis of South African Confederation in the 1870s1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Norman A. Etherington
Norman A. Etherington
Affiliation:
University of Adelaide
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Lord Carnarvon's scheme for a South African Confederation in the 1870s owed much more than has been generally recognized to influences emanating from Natal. Large employers of African labour recognized in the 1860s that the local population could not provide a cheap stable workforce and that immigrant workers from the African interior would be increasingly important to the prosperity of the colony. Theophilus Shepstone, Natal's Secretary for Native Affairs, used all the resources at his disposal to smooth the way for migrant labour. The development of diamond mining in Griqualand West and, to a lesser extent, gold mining in the Lydenburg district of the Transvaal diverted large numbers of African workers away from Natal and set off a frantic search for new sources of labour which underscored the importance of Moçambique and Central Africa as reservoirs of black labour. While planters, traders and officials in Natal worked to keep labour supply routes open between the Transvaal and Portuguese territory, officials in Griqualand West were recommending annexation of territories along the ‘missionary road’ in order to stop Transvaal Afrikaners from blocking labour supply routes from Central Africa. The revival of an active British campaign against the East African slave trade opened another potential source of African labour which Shepstone's former border agent Frederic Elton tried to divert to Natal while serving first as an assistant to Sir Bartle Frere and John Kirk in Zanzibar, and later as British Consul in Moçambique.

Shepstone arrived in London at a crucial point in the development of Carnarvon's thinking on southern African affairs and impressed him with his lucid analysis of the interrelation of African administration, economic development and labour supply. Carnarvon's plans for confederation reflected the advice which he was continously receiving from Shepstone and Elton. Their argument for confederation emphasized the essentially unitary nature of the developing southern African economy.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 1979 , pp. 235 - 253
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Robinson, R. and Gallagher, J., Africa and the Victorians (London, 1961), 61.Google Scholar

3 Goodfellow, C. F., Great Britain and South African Confederation (Cape Town, 1966), 218 ffGoogle Scholar. Until the publication of Goodfellow's book, the standard work on South African Confederation was de Kiewiet, C. W., The Imperial Factor in South Africa (Cambridge, 1937).Google Scholar

4 Atmore, A. and Marks, S., ‘The imperial factor in South Africa in the nineteenth century: towards a reassessment’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, iii, 1 (1974), 105–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Almanac, Natal, Directory and Yearly Register, 1874 (Pietermaritzburg, 1873), 171.Google Scholar

6 Algar, F., The Diamond Fields (London, 1872), 38.Google Scholar

7 See, for example, the Legislative Council debate on Indian immigration reported in the Natal Witness, 13 Nov. 1874, and the speech by the L.C. candidate Aiken, to his planter constituents, Natal Colonist, 23 09. 1873.Google Scholar

8 The large holdings of the Natal Land and Colonisation Company enabled large numbers of Africans to engage in profitable small-scale farming; both government and the absentee share-holders of the company depended on these Africans for revenue and would not willingly see them pushed onto the local labour market. See Slater, Henry, ‘Land, labour and capital in Natal: The Natal Land and Colonisation Company 1860–1948’, J. Afr. Hist., xvi, ii (1975), 257–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Natal Witness, 12 July 1872 and 19 Dec. 1873; Natal Colonist, 25 Mar. 1873.

10 Welsh, David, The Roots of Segregation. Native Policy in Colonial Natal, 1845–1910 (Cape Town, 1971)Google Scholar, passim. Shepstone's place in South African history is due for reappraisal. Afrikaner historians have always seen him as an arch-imperialist whose annexation of the Transvaal was the culmination rather than the postscript to his career in Natal: cf. Uys, C. J., In the Era of Shepstone (Lovedale, 1933)Google Scholar. English historians have been, like Welsh, more interested in Shepstone's experiments in indirect rule and segregation; see for example Sullivan, J. R., The Native Policy of Sir Theophilus Shepstone (Johannesburg, 1928)Google Scholar and Brookes, Edgar H., The History of Native Policy in South Africa, 1830 to the Present Day (Cape Town, 1924)Google Scholar, Chapter 1. The economic consequences of Shepstone's policies have been relatively neglected and the way is open for a study which will demonstrate the integral relationship between Shepstone's imperialism and his African administration.

11 Witness, 16 Feb. 1869.

12 Milles, to Kimberley, , 28 May 1872Google Scholar, CO 179/107.

13 Colenso, to Shaen, , 14 Dec. 1873Google Scholar, COL., folio Y.

14 Natal Mercury, 19 Dec. 1872; Witness, 15 Nov. 1872.

15 Shepstone, , Testimony before Natal Native Commission, 1852Google Scholar, SNA 2/1/2–3.

16 Shepstone, , Memorandum, 20 Jan. 1868Google Scholar in reply to Bird to Shepstone, , 10 Jan. 1868Google Scholar, SNA 1/3/18.

17 Shepstone, , Memorandum, 26 May 1873Google Scholar, SNA 1/7/8.

18 Shepstone, to Pine, , 9 Dec. 1851Google Scholar, PP, 1852–3 (1697), vol. lxii.

19 Ruth E. Gordon, , Shepstone: The Role of the Family in the History of South Africa 1820–1900 (Cape Town, 1968), 192–3.Google Scholar

20 Colenso, J. W., Church Missions among the Heathen in the Diocese of Natal (London, n.d.), 8Google Scholar; Colenso, to Hawkins, , 8 June 1859Google Scholar, SPG, D8; Colenso, to Shepstone, , 5 Mar. 1863Google Scholar, COL, folio M.

21 Shepstone, , Memorandum, 30 Mar. 1861Google Scholar, SNA 1/7/5; Gordon, , Shepstone, 192–93.Google Scholar

22 Witness, 12 May 1868.

23 Shepstone had been suggesting this annexation since the early 1860s. The first suggestion that the disputed territory should be annexed for the specific purpose of providing a corridor for the passage of African workers was made by Percy Whitehead, a settler who proposed in 1870 to form a company to buy 1,500,000 acres from the Zulus. See Murdoch (Emigration Board) to Rogers, , 5 July 1870Google Scholar, CO 179/100.

24 Colenso, to Shepstone, , 7 Oct. 1868Google Scholar, Colenso, to Domville, , 20 Dec. 1871Google Scholar, COL, folios B and N.

25 Witness, 26 June 1863, 22 Nov. 1870, 10 Feb. 1871.

26 Keate, to Kimberley, , 22 July 1871Google Scholar, CO 179/102; Shepstone's instructions in 1870 to St Vincent Erskine emphasized the importance of ascertaining the size of the potential labour pool in Shangane territory; Keate, to Kimberley, , 22 June 1871Google Scholar, CO 179/102.

27 Shepstone, to Hulett, Liege Jr, 14 Dec. 1871Google Scholar, SNA 1/8/3; Barkly, to Kimberley, , 14 Nov. 1873Google Scholar; Lanyon, to Ommaney, , 26 May 1876Google Scholar, CP 30/6/36.

28 Mercury, 18 June 1872; Witness, 26 Feb. 1869.

29 Witness, 7 Mar. and 1 Sept. 1871; Payton, Charles A., Diamond Diggings of South Africa (London, 1872), 215.Google Scholar

30 Witness, 2 Mar. 1869.

31 Lucas, to Shepstone, , 24 July 1871Google Scholar, SNA 1/3/21; Keate, to Kimberley, , 23 Sept. 1870Google Scholar, CO 179/99; Levert, to Shepstone, , 30 May 1870Google Scholar, SNA 1/1/20; Witness, 29 July 1870.

32 Coleman to Currey, Monthly Returns of African Labour, GLW, folio 71.

33 Coleman, to Currey, , 18 Nov. 1873Google Scholar, 25 July and 14 Dec. 1874, GLW 71; Mercury, 20 July 1872.

34 Osborn, , Newcastle Annual Report, 1866Google Scholar, SNA 1/3/7.

35 Mercury, 23 Sept. 1873.

36 Colonist, 18 April 1873; Witness, 24 Dec. 1872. He deserved the commendation. When Chief Mzila of the Shangane in Moçambique sent a messenger to the government of Natal in 1871 to ask for the establishment of official relations, Shepstone had immediately grasped the opportunity to open a new source of labour. In conversations with Von Zeller, Portuguese Consul General in Cape Town, he pointed out that ‘it would be of great advantage to this Colony if some arrangement could be made by which the large mass of unemployed labour at present sealed up in the territory over which Umzila is Chief might be available to it either through Portuguese Ports, or overland…’ (Keate, to Kimberley, , 22 June 1871Google Scholar, CO 179/102). Lt.-Governer Keate fully supported Shepstone's initiative but the Colonial Office worried about the diplomatic irregularity of the contact with Von Zeller and unwitting connivance in what might be ‘a possible nucleus of another Portuguese kidnapping station’.

37 Memorandum, Shepstone, 3 Mar. 1873Google Scholar, enclosed in Musgrave, to Kimberley, , 10 Mar. 1873Google Scholar, CO 179/111; Mercury, 23 Aug. 1873; Speech of Polkinghorne, M. L. C., reported in Witness, 24 Oct. 1873.Google Scholar

38 Natal Legislative Council, 3rd session, 6th Council, 1872Google Scholar, L.C. No. 12; Musgrave, to Kimberley, , 6 Jan. 1873Google Scholar, CO 179/111. The Committee estimated the total number of immigrant workers in Natal at 6,000 with 3,000 coming in each year and 3,000 going out.

39 Granville, , Memorandum, 26 Aug. 1872Google Scholar, FO 84/1386.

40 Frere, , ‘Memorandum on the Position and Authority of the Sultan of Zanzibar’, 17 Apr. 1873Google Scholar, FO 84/1391. The application of classical gun-boat diplomacy soon produced the desired treaty.

41 Granville, to Frere, , 15 Jan. 1873Google Scholar, FO 84/1388.

42 Mercury, 25 Mar. 1873.

43 Mercury, 24 June 1873.

44 Witness, II Oct. 1872.

45 Memorandum, by Wylde, , 24 May 1873Google Scholar, FO 84/1393.

46 Barkly, to Kimberley, , 15 Nov. 1873Google Scholar, CO 48/466.

47 Kirk, to Granville, , 21 March 1873Google Scholar; Frere, to Granville, , March 1873Google Scholar, FO 84/1389. For further evidence of Elton's work to direct freed slaves to Natal, see Hammond, to Herbert, , 8 Oct. 1873Google Scholar, CO 179/113; Prideaux, to Derby, , 15 July 1874Google Scholar, FO 84/1399; Pine, to Carnarvon, , 14 Sept. 1874Google Scholar, CO 179/115; Bulwer, to Carnarvon, , 1 Feb. 1878Google Scholar, CO 179/126.

48 Colonist, 23 May 1873.

49 Southey, to Barkly, , 28 Aug. 1874Google Scholar, GLW 184; Lanyon, to Ommaney, , 26 Aug. 1876Google Scholar; Lanyon, to Carnarvon, , 14 Sept. 1876Google Scholar, CP 30/6/36.

50 Lanyon, to Ommaney, , 26 May 1876Google Scholar, CP 30/6/36.

51 Mercury, 24 June 1873.

52 Extract from Consul McLeod's Report to Lord Malmesbury on the Resources of Eastern Africa, 30 Nov. 1858, CO 179/105; Keate, to Kimberley, , 8 Dec. 1870Google Scholar, CO 179/99.

53 Keate, to Kimberley, , 12 Sept. 1871Google Scholar, CO 179/102.

54 Ibid.; see also Musgrave, to Kimberley, , 8 Aug. 1872Google Scholar, CO 179/107; João de Andrade Corvo to Murray, 8 July 1872, FO 84/1386; Mercury, 24 July 1873.

55 Southey, to Barkly, , 18 Mar. 1874Google Scholar, GLW 183.

56 Pine, to Carnarvon, , 13 Aug. 1874Google Scholar, CO 179/115.

57 Fear of the ‘general combination’ is a constant factor in official thinking from the 1850s onwards. See, for example, Shepstone's transcript of a message from Mswazi, 12 Mar. 1862, SNA 1/6/2; Keate, to Kimberley, , 22 June 1871Google Scholar, CO 179/102; Sargeaunt, to Carnarvon, , 22 Nov. 1877Google Scholar, PRO 30/6/23; F.O. to C.O., 28 Nov. 1878, CO 179/128.

58 Minutes on Keate to Kimberley, , 24 Oct. 1870Google Scholar, CO 179/99.

59 Minute on Barkly, to Kimberley, , 1 Feb. 1871Google Scholar, CO 48/454.

60 Minute on Barkly, to Kimberley, , 4 April 1873Google Scholar, CO 48/465; see also Barkly, to Kimberley, , 2 Nov. 1872Google Scholar, CO 48/462.

61 See minutes: Keate, to Kimberley, , 17 Jan. 1872Google Scholar, CO 179/106; Barkly, to Kimberley, 23 Aug. 1872Google Scholar; and Memorandum, Bisset, 5 June 1874Google Scholar, CO 179/116.

62 Brookes, Edgar H. and Webb, Colin de B., A History of Natal (Pietermaritzburg, 1965), 113–23Google Scholar; Etherington, N., ‘Why Langalibalele ran away’, Journal of Natal and Zulu History, 1 i (1978), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

63 Minute of 27 Aug. 1874 on Barkly, to Carnarvon, , 25 July 1874Google Scholar, CO 48/469.

64 Brookes, and Webb, , History of Natal, 57–58.Google Scholar

65 Minutes on Pine, to Carnarvon, , 12 June 1874Google Scholar and 20 July 1874, CO 179/114–115.

66 Minutes on Lucas, Memorandum, 9 Aug. 1874 and Pine, to Carnarvon, , 24 Sept. 1874Google Scholar, CO 179/115–116.

67 Carnarvon, , ‘Notes of conversations with Shepstone’, Sept. 1874Google Scholar, in CP 30/6/49. For Shepstone's views on the ignorance of most white settlers see Bulwer, to Carnarvon, , 27 May 1876Google Scholar, CO 179/121.

68 Shepstone, , Memorandum, 18 Dec. 1871Google Scholar, enclosed in Keate, to Kimberley, , 20 Dec. 1871Google Scholar, CO 179/104.

69 Most white settlers were outraged by the suggestion of an expanded black police force; see Witness, 26 Nov. 1872.

70 Minutes of 9th, 12th, 16th and 18th Sept. on Lucas to Carnarvon, 9 Aug. 1874, CO 179/116. Shepstone continued to advocate the plan as late as 1882 (Colenso, to Chesson, , 5 Feb. and 3 May 1882Google Scholar, COL, folio Z).

71 Shepstone, to Herbert, , 30 Nov. 1874Google Scholar, CO 179/116.

72 Shepstone, to Frere, , 29 June 1877Google Scholar, CP 30/6/33.

73 For Shepstone's views on the potential revenues to be raised from Transvaal Africans, see Shepstone, to Carnarvon, , 23 July 1877Google Scholar, CP 30/6/23.

74 Colenso, to Chesson, , 29 Nov. 1875Google Scholar and 4 Mar. 1877, Anti-Slavery Papers, Rhodes House, folios C 131/89 and C 131/104; Colenso to Chesson, undated fragment, COL folio Z. Colenso became increasingly hysterical in his attacks on Shepstone, to the extent of insisting that the Transvaal Boers had a wiser ‘native policy’ than Natal (Colenso, to Chesson, , 13 Mar. 1881Google Scholar, COL, folio Z). But even Colenso would have been shocked to learn that it was proposed in the Colonial Office to pay the expenses of Shepstone's Transvaal mission by borrowing from the fund established to compensate Langalibalele's neighbours (the Ngwe) who had suffered unjustly during the punitive expedition! See Herbert's minute on Bulwer, to Carnarvon, , 3 Jan. 1877Google Scholar, CO 179/123.

75 Goodfellow, , Great Britain and South African Confederation, 57–60.Google Scholar

76 Ibid. 65.

77 Froude, to Colenso, , 18 Nov. 1875Google Scholar, COL folio Z. Goodfellow consistently underestimates the importance of Natal, regarding Griqualand West as the ‘vortex’ of central problems, and the strategic position of the Cape as Carnarvon's chief concern (Great Britain and South African Confederation, 63, 71–2).

78 Frere to Granville, n.d., FO 84/1389; Elton, F., ‘Slave Trade etc. Report on East Coast, Portuguese possessions’, 20 Mar. 1873Google Scholar, enclosed in Musgrave, to Kimberley, , 25 Apr. 1873Google Scholar, CO 179/112; Coupland, R., The Exploitation of East Africa (1939), 201Google Scholar. Coupland ignores Elton's concern to direct freed slaves to Natal, and so do more recent historians of East Africa, with the exception of Beachey, R., The Slave Trade of Eastern Africa (London, 1976), 90.Google Scholar

79 Hanna, A. J., The Beginnings of Nyasaland and North-Eastern Rhodesia, 1859–1895 (Oxford, 1956), 52–3.Google Scholar

80 Prideaux, to Wylde, , 5 June 1874Google Scholar, FO 84/1398; Prideaux, to Derby, , 15 July 1874Google Scholar, FO 84/1399; Elton, J. F. (ed. Cotterill, H. B.), Travels and Researches among the Lakes and Mountains of Eastern and Central Africa (London, 1879), 110Google Scholar, 118. It should be noted that Elton's book, which was compiled from his papers after his death, presents a confused account of his movements between Natal and Zanzibar; pp. 112–16 appear to refer to events of 1874 but in fact refer to 1873 and should have been inserted between pages 60 and 64.

81 Elton, , ‘Slave Trade’, as cited in n. 78.Google Scholar

82 Mercury, 26 Feb. 1874. For further evidence of Elton's success as a labour recruiter see: Wolseley, to Carnarvon, , 24 June 1875Google Scholar, CO 179–117; Wolseley, to Carnarvon, , 24 Aug. 1875Google Scholar, CO 179/118; Elton, to Derby, , 30 Sept. 1875Google Scholar, enclosed in F.O. to C.O., 2 Dec. 1875, CO 179/119; Bulwer, to Carnarvon, , 28 Aug. 1876Google Scholar, CO 179/121; Elton, to Frere, , 5 Feb. 1877Google Scholar, FO 84/1479.

83 Elton, to Derby, , Political, Confidential, 25 Oct. 1875Google Scholar, enclosed in Lister to Herbert, , 21 Dec. 1875Google Scholar, CO 179/119; F.O. to C.O., 3 Jan. 1876, CO 179/122. Carnarvon ordered twenty extra copies of the December report for Colonial Office use.

84 F.O. to C.O., 31 July 1875, CO 179/119. Carnarvon's first reaction was to doubt ‘the force of Mr. Elton's argument’ but later threw his weight behind efforts to negotiate a purchase (Minute on Lister, to Herbert, , 26 Jan. 1876Google Scholar, CO 179/122).

85 Elton, to Bulwer, , 8 Oct. 1875Google Scholar, CO 179/118; Lister, to Herbert, , 26 Jan. and 28 Sept. 1876Google Scholar, CO 179/122.

86 Elton, to Lloyd, (Natal's Protector of Immigrants), 25 Oct. 1875Google Scholar, CO 179/119; Elton, to Derby, , 30 Sept. 1875Google Scholar, enclosed in F.O. to C.O., 2 Dec. 1875, CO 179/119; Elton, to Derby, , 23 Apr. 1877Google Scholar, CO 179/125; F.O. to C.O., 18 June 1877, CO 179/125; Elton, to Derby, , 4 Mar. 1877Google Scholar, FO 84/1479.

87 Elton, to Derby, , 18 July 1876Google Scholar, FO 84/1448 and 6 Apr. 1877, FO 84/1479.

88 Minutes on Lister, to Herbert, , 4 Apr. 1876Google Scholar, CO 179/122.

89 Elton, to Derby, , 23 Apr. 1877Google Scholar, FO 84/1479. Robert Herbert, the Permanent Under-Secretary of the Colonial Office, agreed that ‘if a South African Dominion is formed it will ultimately spread far within the Tropic [of Capricorn], inland, at all events’ (Minute on Wolsely, to Carnarvon, , confidential, 27 Aug. 1875Google Scholar, CO 179/118). See also minutes on Thompson, George to Carnarvon, , 25 July 1876Google Scholar, CO 179/122.

90 Elton, , Travels and Researches, 241 ff.Google Scholar, 392–3; Proc. R.G.S., xxii (1877–8), 306–8; Hanna, , Beginnings, 55–6.Google Scholar

91 Under Elton's prodding, Carnarvon moved from viewing Delagoa Bay as peripheral to the work of confederation to regarding it as the ‘key position on the eastern coast’ (Carnarvon to Queen Victoria, quoted in Robinson, and Gallagher, , Africa and the Victorians, 59).Google Scholar

92 Wylde, minute on Elton, to Derby, , 21 Apr. 1876Google Scholar, FO 84/1448.

93 Elton asked rhetorically, ‘Why should England who has placed herself in the van of Slave Trade Suppression and of Central African Exploration…now, when the heat and toil of the day are almost over, form a National Committee for the accomplishment of these objects subordinate in a measure, and with its resources at the disposal of a Central Belgian Committee?’ (Elton, to Derby, , 1 Mar. 1877Google Scholar, FO 84/1479.

94 Elton, to Derby, , 13 Oct. 1877Google Scholar, FO 84/1479.

95 Carnarvon, to Frere, , 12 Dec. 1876Google Scholar, CP 30/6/4, quoted in Goodfellow, , Great Britain and South African Confederation, 117.Google Scholar

96 See, for example, Wolseley, to Carnarvon, , 5 Mar. and 16 May 1875Google Scholar, CP 30/6/38.

97 At the very beginning of the public propaganda on behalf of confederation Froude correctly observed that ‘Griqua-Land will make the whole difficulty. If we had not seized it when we did, it would have brought the Free state under English influence and Brand would long ago have petitioned to be taken under our flag’ (Froude, to Carnarvon, , 8 July and 16 Aug. 1875Google Scholar, CP 30/6/84.