Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:40:16.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

John Philip's Role in Hottentot Emancipation1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Harry A. Gailey Jr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Early in 1819 a two-man deputation from the London Missionary Society arrived in Capetown. They had been instructed by the Directors in London to investigate the conditions of the missionary establishment and to make recommendations which would halt its inward decay. John Campbell, the senior member, had only reluctantly accepted the appointment on the understanding that as soon as possible he would return to England. The second man was Dr John Philip, an Aberdeen minister, who, once convinced of the importance of his presence in southern Africa was to stay as Superintendent of the Society's missions. Until his retirement in 1842 he would champion many unpopular causes and be viewed by generations of South Africans as an uninformed, irresponsible, political meddler. He received much of this reputation because of his work for Hottentot emancipation, which culminated in the famous Fiftieth Ordinance. Only recently has it been possible to re-evaluate Philip's actions in this cause and thus counter the opinions of those historians who preserved the stereotype of Philip as a master intriguer.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , November 1962 , pp. 419 - 433
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 The early relations with the Hottentots can be found in Schapera, I. and Farrington, B., eds., Early Cape Hottentots Described in the Writings of Dapper Ten Rhyne and Grevenbroeck (Capetown, 1933)Google Scholar and Stow, William, The Native Races of South Africa (London, 1905).Google Scholar

3 Theal, G. M., Records of the Cape colony (London, 1902), vii, 211–16.Google Scholar

4 Philip, John, Researches in South Africa (London, 1828), ii, Appendix 3.Google Scholar

5 Theal, op. cit., XII, 249–50.Google Scholar

6 Although biases in its conclusions, the best narrative account is in Cory, G. E., The Rise of South Africa (1911), i, 211–17. See also Letters of the London Missionary Society, hereafter reffered to as Letters, Box 3, Folder 4, Jacket C.Google Scholar

7 Campbell, John, Travles in South Africa at the Request of the Missionary Society (Andover, Mass., 1816), 79.Google Scholar

8 The best exposition of missionary grievances is found in a letter from Thom to Burder, 16 Feb, 1814, Letters, Box 5, Folder 3, Jacket C, and 20 Dec. 1815, Letters, Box 6, Folder 2, Jacket E.Google Scholar

9 Thom to Directors, 26 April 1817, Letters, Box 7, Folder I, Jacket D, and Evans to Directors, 20 May 1817, Letters, Box 7, Folder 2, Jacket A.Google Scholar

10 Memorial, Deputation to Directors, Oct. 1819, Box 8, Folder I, Jacket D.Google Scholar

11 Campbell to Philip, 30 March 1820, Letters, Box 8, Folder 2, Jacket A.Google Scholar

12 Walker, Eric A., A History of South Africa (London, 1928).Google Scholar

13 Philip to Hodson, undated 1820, Letters, Box 8, Folder 2, Jacket C.Google Scholar

14 Confidential Report to Stevens, R., 20 Dec. 1819,Google Scholar quoted in Macmillan, W. M., The Cape Coloured Question (London, 1927), 126.Google Scholar

15 A Narrative Written for Buxton, Letters, Box 3, Folder 4.Google Scholar

16 Ibid.

17 Philip, op. cit., II, 392–400, and ‘Report of Commissioner J. T. Bigge’, 30 Jan. 1830, Theal, op. cit., XXXV, 340–8.Google Scholar

18 Petition of Voh to Court, Letters, Box 6, Folder 2, Jacket E.Google Scholar

19 Donkin to Philip, 18 May 1821, Letters, Box I, Folder 5.Google Scholar

20 Philip to ‘My Dear, Dear Sir’ undated, quoted in Macmillan, op. cit., 136.Google Scholar

21 A Narrative Written for Buxton, Letters, Box 3, Folder 4.Google Scholar

22 Ibid., for the dossier of letters found see Philip, op. cit., II, Appendix XI.

23 Philip, op. cit., II, Appendix XI.Google Scholar

24 Ibid.

25 Philip to Burder, 13 Sept. 1822, quoted in Macmillan, op. cit., 185.Google Scholar

26 ‘Memorial to Colonial Office, 1823’ in Theal, op. cit., XVI, 215–23.Google Scholar

27 Philip to Directors, 11 May 1823 quoted in Macmillan, op. cit., 187.Google Scholar

28 A Narrative Written for Buxton, Letters, Box 3, Folder 4 and Theal, op. cit., XV, 237–42; XVI, 145–6.Google Scholar

29 Macmillan, op. cit., 185.Google Scholar

30 A Narrative Written for Buxton, Letters, Box 3, Folder 4.Google Scholar

31 Cory, op. cit., II, 251–76.Google Scholar

32 Philip to Governor Somerset, 24. July 1824, Letters, Box 1, Folder 5 and Philip to Burder, March 1825, Letters, Box 2, Folder 1.Google Scholar

33 Governor Somerset to Lord Bathurst, 16 Oct. 1824, C.O. 48/63.Google Scholar

34 Philip to Burder, Oct 1824, Letters, Box 1, Folder 5 and Theal, op. cit., XVIII, 362–440.Google Scholar

35 Lord Bathurst to Governor Somerset, 5 Aug. 1825, C.O. 48/80.Google Scholar

36 Theal, op. cit., XVIII, 412–26.Google Scholar

37 Proclamation 11 June 1824, C.O. 48/80.Google Scholar

38 ’Governor Somerset to Lord Bathurst, 27 Jan. 1825’, Theal, op. cit., XIX, 482–3.Google Scholar

39 Philip, op. cit., 245–6.Google Scholar

40 ‘Lord Bathurst to Governor Somerset, 28–29 Sept. 1824’, Theal, op. cit., XVIII, 323–4.Google Scholar

41 Ibid. XXV, 310.

42 The most serious charges were made by ex-Governor Donkin, ibid. XVI and XVII; Colonel Bird, ex-Colonial Secretary, Hansard, Parliamentary Debates, N.S. XV, col. 1282–4; Burnet, Parliamentary Debates, N.S. XVIII, Col. 1168–73 and 1483–5.

43 Theal, op. cit., XXII, 462 and 481.Google Scholar

44 A Narrative Written for Buxton, Letters, Box, Folder 4.Google Scholar

45 Ibid.

46 Pringle to Fairburn, 20 Oct. 1824, Theal, op. cit., XIX, 491.Google Scholar

47 Directors to Philip, 18 July 1826, Letters, Box 10, Folder 1, Jacket D.Google Scholar

48 Philip, op. cit., 11, Appendix 18.Google Scholar

49 Macmillan, op. cit., 217.Google Scholar

50 A Narrative Written for Buxton, Letters, Box 3, Folder and Theal, op. cit., XXX, 129–77.Google Scholar

51 ‘Lord Bathurst to Directors, 22 Feb. 1827’, Theal, op. cit., XXX, 202.Google Scholar

52 Macmillan, op. cit., 204.Google Scholar

53 Ibid. 232, intimates that Huskisson sent instructions to Bourke which directly resulted in the Fiftieth Ordinance. A careful check of all available sources fails to reveal any such communication. However, if such instructions could be found they would show that Philip was directly responsible for the Ordinance.

54 A Narrative Written for Buxton, Letters, Box 3, Folder 4.Google Scholar

55 Cory, op. cit., II, 418.Google Scholar

56 Macmillan, op. cit., 217–18.Google Scholar

57 A Narrative Written for Buxton, Letters, Box 3, Folder 4.Google Scholar

58 Ibid.

59 Ibid.

60 Ibid.

61 Hansard, Parliamentary Debates, N.S., XIX, Col. 1693–4.Google Scholar

62 A Narrative Written for Buxton, Letters, Box 3, Folder 4.Google Scholar

63 Macmillan, op. Cit., footnote p. 218.Google Scholar

64 C.O. 48/125.Google Scholar

65 Directors to Murray, 5 Nov. 1828, Letters, Box 11, Folder 2, Jacket B.Google Scholar

66 A Narrative Written for Buxton, Letters, Box 3, Folder 4.Google Scholar

67 Ibid.

68 Britain, Great, Parliamentary Papers, Order in Council on the Natives of South Africa, 1829.Google Scholar

69 Philip op. cit., 1, Preface xxv–xxvi.Google Scholar

70 Campbell to Orme, 4 Dec. 1828, Letters, Box 11, Folder 2, Jacket C.Google Scholar