Article contents
Gungunyane the Negotiator: A Study in African Diplomacy*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 January 2009
Extract
Gungunyane, paramount chief of the Shangana of Gazaland, 1884–95, was a very shrewd diplomat. A study of his diplomacy with Europeans suggests that his major goal was Shangana independence of action. From the beginning of his reign, Gungunyane was pressured to give concessions in both economic and political spheres. His capital was on the edge of the Rhodesian plateau until mid-1889, when the chief moved a large portion of his people as well as his capital southward to the Limpopo valley, Mozambique. This significant dislocation influenced later negotiations with Portugal. Although the chief was a strong personality, he was subject to pressures from his immediate—and in this case, warlike—African advisors. In negotiations with the British South Africa Company, the Mozambique Company and the Portuguese government, the African leader enjoyed the benefits of a fearful military reputation, a wide-reaching espionage system, and conflicts between British and Portuguese concession-seekers. A master of playing both ends against the middle to maintain his freedom of movement, Gungunyane found, nevertheless, that his diplomatic programme was undermined by Portuguese superiority in the use of firearms, disunity among the Shangana and their tributaries, and growing social disintegration caused by alcoholism, emigration, and European encroachment. His final military defeat by Portuguese forces in 1895 was not a true index of his talent as an African diplomat.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968
References
1 The traditional Portuguese rendering, ‘Gungunhana’, has been replaced by the Shangana or Shangaans pronunciation. The writer visited the Gaza area both in Mozambique and in Rhodesia in 1967 and heard the word pronounced as ‘Gungunyane’.
2 Gann, L. H., A History of Southern Rhodesia: Early Days to 1934 (London, 1965), 98: Gungunhana ‘lacked the ability of his father Umzila; he was a confirmed drunkard’.Google Scholar
3 Toscano, A. and Quintinha, J., A Derrocada do Império Vátua (Lisbon, 1930), 53–63, 75–6.Google Scholar
4 Trindade, Coelho (ed.), Dezoito Annos em Africa. Notas E Documentos Para A Biographia Do Conseiheiro José D'Almeida (Lisbon, 1898), 64–8, 231–2, 285.Google Scholar
5 Mathers, E. P., Zambesia (London, 1891), 400–12.Google Scholar
6 Coelho, , op. cit. 231–2.Google Scholar
7 Philip, Warhurst, Anglo-Portuguese Relations in South-Central Africa, 1890–1900 (London, 1962), 20.Google Scholar
8 James, Duffy, Portuguese Africa (Cambridge, 1959), 220, 231;Google Scholar‘J. C. Paiva de Andrada’, Grande Enciclopedia Portuguêsa e Brasileira (Lisbon and Rio de Janeiro), xx, 25–6.Google Scholar
9 Coelho, , op. cit. 377.Google Scholar
10 Ibid. 31, 106.
11 Rocha, Martins, Histdria dos Colonias Portuguesas (Lisbon, 1933), 294.Google Scholar
12 Coelho, , op. cit. 207–9, 283;Google ScholarGastāo de Almeida de Eça, F., História das Guerras no Zambeze (Lisbon, 1953–1954), II, 467–70;Google ScholarXavier, A. A. Caldas, ‘Districto de Inhambane’, Boletim do Sociedade de Geographia de Lisboa, series 7 (1887), 153–210.Google Scholar
13 Coelho, , op. cit. 207–9, 283.Google Scholar
14 Warhurst, P. R., ‘The scramble and African politics in Gazaland’, in Stokes, E. and Brown, R., The Zambesian Past (Manchester, 1966), 53–4.Google Scholar
15 Oral information gathered by the writer at Manjacaze, Mozambique in February, 1967.
16 Residente to Secretary General, 16 06 1889, no. 96, Codice a. 1411, in Arquivo Historica de Moçambique, hereafter A.H.M. (Lourenço Marques).Google Scholar
17 Paiva de Andrada, J. to Neves, Ferreira, 5 12 1889,Google Scholar in ‘Cartas de Paiva de Andrada’, Moçambique: Documentário Trimesfral (Lourenço Marques, 1941), 100–4.Google Scholar
18 Toscano, and Quintinha, , op. cit. 82;Google ScholarAntonio, Enes, A Guerra D'Africa em 1895 (Lisbon, 1945 ed.).Google Scholar
19 Caetano, Montez, Mouzinho (Lisbon, 1956), 83.Google Scholar
20 Mousinho de Albuquerque, J., Relatorio Apresentado Ao Conseiheiro…Governador Geral Interino da Provincia De Moçambique (Lisbon, 1896), 41 note;Google ScholarAmadeu, Cunha, Mousibho. A Sua Obra E A San Epoca (Lisbon, 220–1.Google Scholar
21 Coelho, , op. cit. 83.Google Scholar
22 Tennant, and Erasmus, to Cecil Rhodes, 28 02, 1894, file CT 1/7/9;Google ScholarLivingstone, J. to Rhodes, , 13 09, 1892,Google ScholarColquhoun, F. to Company, 24 03, 1892, file HC 3/5/17/5, National Archives (Salisbury, Rhodesia).Google Scholar
23 Residente at Mossurise to Secretary General, 6 February 1888, Codice 2.1411, A.H.M.
24 Coelho, , op. cit. 373.Google Scholar
25 Ibid. 274.
26 Ibid. 373.
27 Smith de la Cour to Currey, 23 06 1891, CT 1/7/12, N.A.Google Scholar
28 Coelho, , op. cit. 276.Google Scholar
29 Coiquhoun, F. to Harris, R., 24 01 1891, CT 1/7/2, N.A.Google Scholar
30 Smith, de la Cour to Harris, R., 24 01 1891, CT 1/7/11, N.A.Google Scholar
31 Smith de la Cour to Harris, 21, 30, 3103 1891,Google Scholar CT 1/7/12, N.A. Harris to Smith de la Cour, telegram, a 02 1891, CT 1/7/11.Google Scholar
32 Schulz, to Secretary, 31 12 1890, CT 1/7/9, N.A.Google Scholar
33 Harris, R. to Schulz, , 29 05 1890, CT 1/7/9, N.A.Google Scholar
34 Dennis, Doyle, ‘With King Gungunhana’, Fortnightly Review (London, 07 1891), 115–17.Google Scholar
35 Warhurst, , ‘The scramble and African politics’, op. cit. 53–4.Google Scholar
36 Lockhart, J. G. and Woodhouse, C. M., Cecil Rhodes (New York, 1963), 220–1.Google Scholar
37 Warhurst, , Anglo-Portuguese Relations, 80–106Google Scholar. For the text of the Schulz concession see F.O.C., 6495 (1891), Correspondence Relating to Great Britain and Portugal in East Africa, no. 1, inclosure in no. 191, pp. 218–19.Google Scholar
38 Duffy, , op. cit. 219–21;Google ScholarWarhurst, , Anglo-Portuguese Relations, 91, 104–5.Google Scholar
39 Gann, L., op. cit. 99.Google Scholar
40 Loch, to Gungunhana, , 14 08 1891, HC 3/5/33/10, N.A.Google Scholar
41 ‘History given to Holohulu’ (1891 ?), CT 5/7/4, N.A.
42 Doyle, D. and Longden, W. to Secretary of B.S.A. Company, 10 11 1891. CT ‘1/7/4, N.A.Google Scholar
43 Residente to Secretary General, 9 October 1891, Caixa 4.159, maço 63, A.H.M.
44 Coelho, , op. cit. 287–90.Google Scholar
45 Enes, , Moçambique (1893) Relatório (Lisbon, 1896), 174–8.Google Scholar
46 Coelho, , op. cit. 364–5.Google Scholar
47 Ibid; for text of modus vivendi, see 374−6.
48 Ibid. 378–9.
49 Ibid. 377.
50 Ibid. 381.
51 Ibid. 406–17.
52 Ibid. 470–80.
53 Ibid. 413–14.
54 Gungunhana, to B.S.A. Company, 23 06 1894 (copy), HC 3/5/17/5.Google Scholar
55 Cf. note 54 (National Archives), pencilled in left corner of document ‘The signature of Prime Minister “Magijahn” not attached—Document therefore invalid’. The 1894 document was signed by witnesses Dr Georges Louis Liengme, Aleida Gerber (Swiss missionaries) and P. Shumugan and four indunas.
56 Rhodes to Soveral, Dec.? 1894, HC 3/5/17/5, N.A.; Longden, W. to ‘Charter’, telegram, 18 02 1915, A 3/18/18/4, N.A.Google Scholar
57 Kimberley to MacDonald (copy), F.O., 21 November 1894, HC 3/5/17/5, N.A.
58 Coelho, , op. cit. 232–3, 324.Google Scholar
59 Ibid. 274, 457–8.
60 Hollis, to Uhl, , 28 06 1895, Despatches from U.S. Consuls in Lourenço Marques…., Roll 2, National Archives, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
61 Military Commandant of Limpopo to Residente, 21 March 1894, Caixa 4.159, A.H.M.
62 Mousinho, de Albuquerque, Moçambique 1896–1898 (Lisbon, 1913 ed.), 39–40.Google Scholar
63 Military Commandant, Inhampura, to Residente, 18 10 1894, Caixa 4.159, maço 23, A.H.M.Google Scholar
64 Marcello, Caetano (ed.), As Campanhas de 1895 Segundo Os Contemporáneos (Lisbon, 1945), 40–7.Google Scholar
65 Carlos, Selvagem, Portugal Militar (Lisbon, 1934), 618–19;Google ScholarCaetano, , op. cit. 39–40.Google Scholar
65 Coelho, , op. cit. 516–18.Google Scholar
67 Enes, , A Guerra, 310–11, 459.Google Scholar
68 Coelho, , op. cit. 459–60.Google Scholar
69 Ibid. 460–2.
70 Toscano, and Quintinha, , op. cit. 89.Google Scholar
71 Coelho, , op. cit. 473–5.Google Scholar
72 Enes, , A Guerra, 247–51.Google Scholar
73 Ibid.. 238–46.
74 Ibid.. 249–51; Almeida reported that Liengme had no influence with Gungunyane, but another Portuguese report contradicted this. Rosario, to Military Commandant, 17 12 1894, Caixa 4.159, maço 23, A.H.M.Google Scholar
75 Coelho, , op. cit. 504–5, for terms.Google Scholar
76 Ibid.. 516–18.
77 Enes, , A Guera, 459–60.Google Scholar
78 Warhurst, , Anglo-Portuguese Relations, 107–7;Google ScholarCoelho, , op. cit. 522–3.Google Scholar
79 Ayres, d'Ornellas, Cartas D'Africa (Lisbon, 1930), 85;Google ScholarEnes, , op. cit., 310–11.Google Scholar
80 Coelho, , op. cit. 499, 511, 523;Google ScholarCaetano, , op. cit. 158–60.Google Scholar
81 Ornellas, , op. cit. 97–8, 291–5, 305;Google ScholarToscano, and Quintinha, , op. cit. 360.Google Scholar
82 Albuquerque, , Relatório Apresentado A. Conseilheizo Correia E Lança (Lisbon, 1896), 35–45;Google ScholarAlbuqueŕque, , Livro das Campanhas (Lisbon, 1935), I. 43–7.Google Scholar
83 For the exiled years of Gungunyane, see Pedro, de Merelim, ‘Os Vátuas na Ilha Terçeira’, Atlantida (Angra do Heroisnio, Azores Islands), IV, (1960), 317–18,Google Scholar and my forthcoming chapter, ‘Gungunhana’, in Bennett, Norman R. (ed.), Leadership in Eastern Africa (Boston University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
84 Residente to Secretary General, ?November 1891, Caixa 4. 159, A.H.M.
85 Brown, R., ‘Aspects of the scramble for Matabeleland’, in Stokes, and Brown, , op. cit. p. 73.Google Scholar
86 Coelho, , op. Cit. 377.Google Scholar
87 Duffy's interpretation in Portuguese Africa (232) is an echoing of an earlier one in the Royal Naval Intelligence Division's A Manual of Portuguese East Africa (London, 1919), 499–500.Google Scholar
88 Coelho, , op. cit. 83.Google Scholar
89 Enes, , op. cit., 128.Google Scholar
90 Coelho, , op. cit. 83.Google Scholar
91 ‘Gazaland’ entry in LO 8/I/I Minute Book, p. 44, N.A. (Salisbury).Google Scholar
92 Many Europeans refused to believe that Gungunyane was defeated when the news first came out. The U.S. Consul in Mozambique was no exception. Hollis, to Uhl, , 01 1896, Despatches N.A. (Washington, D.C.)Google Scholar
93 David, Rodrigues, ‘A Ocupação de Moçambique’, Revista da Infanteria (Lisbon, 1910), 150.Google Scholar
- 5
- Cited by