Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:34:45.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

German Capital, The Netherlands Railway Company and the Political Economy of the Transvaal 1886–19001

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

J.J. Van Helten
J.J. Van Helten
Affiliation:
Institute of Commonwealth Studies, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article tries to throw light on one aspect of the ‘business partition’ of Africa, namely Anglo–erman economic rivalry on the Rand between 1886 and 1900. It examines the activities of the German-owned Netherlands South African Railway Company (N.Z.A.S.M.), which possessed the monopoly of construction and management of all railways connecting the republic with a seaport. The article assesses this company's impact upon the relations of the South African Republic with both the maritime colonies of the Cape and Natal and with Great Britain. Whitehall regarded the N.Z.A.S.M. as the fountainhead of ever-increasing German commercial and political penetration in the Transvaal and also considered the railway company hostile to its interests in that it allegedly discriminated against British commerce. The gold-mining industry also viewed the company with hostility, since its high freightrates increased the price of imported machinery, foodstuffs, etc. The South African Republic, on the other hand, saw the N.Z.A.S.M. as a useful means of access to both the German and Dutch capital markets, while the company arranged for diplomatic lobbying in Berlin and The Hague in favour of the Republic.

By 1898, German mining interests on the Rand had managed to persuade Berlin that their interests were not served by either the Kruger regime or the German-owned N.Z.A.S.M. and that an administration more favourably disposed towards their objectives, and possibly imposed by force by the British, should not be opposed. It is therefore argued that the South African War was prompted mainly by the desire to establish British commercial hegemony on the Rand, to safeguard the interests of international mining capital and to create a more pliable polity capable of articulating and responding to these particular economic imperatives.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , July 1978 , pp. 369 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 See Redford, A., Manchester Merchants and Foreign Trade, II: 1850–1939 (Manchester, 1956)Google Scholar; Mommsen, W. J., ‘Nationale und Ekonomische Faktoren im Britischen Imperialismus vor 1914’, Historisches Zeitschrift (Munich, 1968), no. 206Google Scholar; Turner, H. A. Jr, ‘Bismarck's Imperialist Venture: Anti-British in Origin?’, in Gifford, P. and Louis, W. R. (eds.), Britain and Germany in Africa (New Haven, 1967), 47–82.Google Scholar

3 Hopkins, A. G., ‘Imperial business in Africa. Part II: Interpretations’, J. Afr. Hist. XVII, 2 (1976), 274 ff.Google Scholar

4 Gordon, C. T., The Growth of Boer Opposition to Kruger (Cape Town, 1970), 61Google Scholar; Fitzpatrick, J. P., The Transvaal from Within (London, 1899), 62.Google Scholar

5 Prospectus N.Z.A.S.M. 1884. N.Z.A.V. Archief, Amsterdam. Doos Correspondentie 1884–7.

6 Nilant, F. G. E., ‘Jhr. G. Beelaerts van Blokland, Gesant van die Suid Afrikaansche Republiek, 1843–1897’ (Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of the Witwatersrand, 1952), 157.Google Scholar

7 Kroll, Ulrich, Die internationalen Buren-Agitation 1899–1902 (Munster, 1973), 140.Google Scholar

8 Kruger to N.Z.A.V., 8 Nov. 1883. Doos Correspondentie 1881–1884, N.Z.A.V. Archief, Amsterdam.

9 A. C. Wertheim to N.Z.A.V., 12 Apr. 1884. Doos Correspondentie 1881–4, N.Z.A.V. Archief, Amsterdam. A total bill of Fl. 1018, 65 included the hiring of a special train for the deputation.

10 Commissie voor het totstand brengen van een Nederlansch Z. Afr. Spoorweg Mij. N.Z.A.S.M., Omslag 3G, Nederlands Staatsarchief, Schaarsbergen (hereafter NSA). Members included A. D. de Marez Oyens, A. C. Wertheim.

11 Articles iii–vi and Section 3 of the Railway Concession of 23 Aug. 1884.

12 Dagboek der Directie, 14 May 1884. N.Z.A.S.M., 102, C55, NSA.

13 Lijst van inschrijvingen der N.Z.A.S.M. in 1884. N.Z.A.S.M., Omslag no. 3, A3g, NSA.

14 Commissie to S.A.R., 17 Nov. 1884. N.Z.A.S.M. Omslag no. 2, A2, NSA.

15 van Winter, P. J., Onder Krugers Hollanders (Amsterdam, 1937), I. 105.Google Scholar

16 Bake to Beelaerts, 9 July 1886. Doos Correspondentie 1884–7, N.Z.A.S.M. Archief.

17 Roghe, W. to Bake, 2 08. 1886Google Scholar. Doos Correspondentie 1884–7, N.Z.A.S.M. Archief.

18 Van Winter, , Onder Krugers Hollanders i. 166Google Scholar: ‘als vor einige Monaten die Disconto versucht hat die Regierung zu offiziösen Unterstützung unserer Demarches … wurde dies abgewiesen’.

19 Bake to Beelaerts. 30 June 1886. Doos Correspondentie 1884–7, N.Z.A.S.M. Archief.

20 Feis, H., Europe, the World's Banker: 1870–1914 (New Haven, 1931), 63.Google Scholar

21 Wehler, Hans Ulrich, ‘Industrial growth and early German imperialism’ in Owen, E. R. J. and Sutcliffe, R. B. (eds.), Studies in the theory of imperialism (London, 1972), 82.Google Scholar

22 Baurath to Bake, 4 July 1887. N.Z.A.S.M., Omslag no. I, Al a, NSA. Also Acte van N.V., 20 June 1887 door Notaris Pollones te A'dam. No. 20, N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, Amsterdam.

23 By 1888 some 44 mines were in operation with a nominal capital of £6,800,000 and a gold output worth £1,300,000 p.a. See de Kock, M. H., Selected Subjects in the Economic History of South Africa (Cape Town, 1924), 50.Google Scholar

24 Van Winter, , Onder Krugers Hollanders, i. 168.Google Scholar

25 Eltzbacher to Beelaerts, 20 Sept. 1887. N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, Amsterdam, no. 19.

26 Van Winter, , Onder Krugers Hollanders, II. 83Google Scholar; also Notulen der Directie, 14 Mar 1891. N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, Amsterdam.

27 Bake to Cluysenaer, 26 June 1886. N.Z.A.S.M., Omslag 7/10, A8, NSA.

28 Dr Clark to Beelaerts, 19 Feb. 1887. N.Z.A.S.M., Omslag 7/10, A5, NSA.

29 Financial Times (London), 25 Aug. 1887.Google Scholar

30 Public Record Office, Kew (PRO). C.O. 545/9109 (House of Commons Questions to Colonial Secretary).

31 PRO. C.O. 545/7721 (F.O. to C.O.); C.O. 417/218; C.O. 417/228.

32 PRO. C.O. 417/26/S12. Donald Currie to Sec. of State for Colonies. 3 Jan. 1888. Union Steam Shipping Co. to Bake, 22 Mar. 1895. N.Z.A.S.M. Speciaal Archief, Amsterdam.

33 Bake to Union Steam Shipping Co., 25 Mar. 1895. N.Z.A.S.M. Speciaal Archief, Amsterdam.

34 PRO. C.O. 417/218. Greene to Goodenough, 28 Apr. 1897.

35 PRO. C.O. 417/223. Minute by Lambert, 10 Dec. 1897.

36 Contrakt tusschen Lingham, F. R., Tacoma, U.S.A. en N.Z.A.S.M., 4 04. 1884Google Scholar. N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, no. 69, Amsterdam.

37 PRO. C.O. 417/193. Casement to Salisbury, 4 Aug. 1896. British South African Export Gazette, 3 Apr. 1893, 2 Sept. 1898.

38 British South African Export Gazette, 7 Sept. 1896.Google Scholar

39 South African Mining Journal, 13 June 1896 and 20 June 1895.Google Scholar

40 Lovell, R. J., The Struggle for South Africa 1875–1899 (London, 1934), 349.Google ScholarGarson, Noel, ‘The Swaziland Question and the Road to the Sea 1887–1895’, Archives Yearbook for South African History (Pretoria, 1957), II. 402.Google Scholar

41 PRO. C.O. 417/89. Lascelles to Salisbury, 1 Jan. 1896.

42 See above, p. 373 and below, p. 377.

43 Marais, J. S., The Fall of Kruger's Republic (Oxford, 1961), 48.Google Scholar

44 Bake to Beelaerts, 12 Sept. 1887, N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, no. 24, Amsterdam.

45 Notulen der Directie, 14 Mar. 1891. N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, Amsterdam.

46 Berliner Handelsgesellschaft lent the N.Z.A.S.M. Fl. 2, 932, 500 in June 1892 and Fl. 2,756,000 in May 1891. N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, no. 51, 41, Amsterdam.

47 Van Winter, , Onder Krugers Hollanders, II. 362.Google Scholar

48 C.O. African (South) 571, 203; van der Poel, J., Railways and Customs Policies in South Africa (London, 1933), 87.Google Scholar

49 South African Mining Journal (1896), quoted by Fitzpatrick, Transvaal, 69.Google Scholar

50 Fitzpatrick, J. P., Transvaal, 66.Google Scholar

51 Verwey to N.Z.A.S.M., 11 Dec., 1891; Bake to Middelberg, 21 July 1892; Middelburg to Leyds, 24 June 1892, N.Z.A.S.M. Corresp. 1890–5, N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, Amsterdam.

52 Marais, J. S., Krugers Republic, 38.Google Scholar

53 Nota tariefverlaging Januari 1898, N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, Amsterdam. Thompson, L. M., The Unification of South Africa (Oxford, 1960), 68.Google Scholar

54 PRO. C.O. African (South) 470, 219/220.

55 PRO. C. 8474. p. 3; Middelberg to Bake, 15 May 1895. N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, Amsterdam.

56 Nota van Bake aan Middelberg betr. verdeling van verkeer tussen Afrikaanse haven-routes, 8 Mar. 1895. N.Z.A.S.M. Speciaal archief, Amsterdam.

57 Chamber of Mines Annual Report (Johannesburg, 1890), 16.Google Scholar

58 Overeenkomst met de SAR betr. den aanleg en exploitatie van een tramlijn over de Witwatersrand. 14 Sept. 1888. N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, Amsterdam.

59 N.Z.A.S.M. Jaarverslag, 1892. N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, Amsterdam.

60 Contract tusschen Lewis, Marks etc. en de N.Z.A.S.M., 4 Apr. 1893. N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, Amsterdam.

61 Rapport van den Regeeringscommissaris, 10 Aug. 1893. N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, Amsterdam.

62 Contracts between Douglas Colliery, Transvaal Cons. Coal Mines etc. and the N.Z.A.S.M., 5 Aug. and 16 Nov. 1893. N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, Amsterdam.

63 van der Horst, S., Native Labour in South Africa (Cape Town, 1942), 126.Google Scholar

64 Blainey, G., ‘Lost Causes of the Jameson Raid’, Economic History Review, second series, XVIII (1965), 350–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

65 Schumann, C. G. W., Structural changes and business cycles in South Africa 1806–1936 (London, 1938), 91.Google Scholar

66 Blainey, G., ‘Lost causes’, 355.Google Scholar

67 A. Little to C. Rhodes, 7 Oct. 1897, Rhodes Papers, xxiii, 7. Rhodes House, Oxford.

68 South African Mining Journal (1896) quoted by Fitzpatrick, Transvaal 69.

69 South African Mining Journal (1896) quoted by Fitzpatrick, Transvaal 69.Google Scholar

70 Geheim Rapport 1896; N.Z.A.S.M. Jaarverslag, 1897. N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, Amsterdam.

71 Geheim Rapport 1896; N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, Amsterdam.

72 Industrial Commission of Enquiry Report (Chamber of Mines, Johannesburg, 1897), 51.Google Scholar

73 Industrial Commission Report, 55–7.Google Scholar

74 Memorie van den Directeur. N.Z.A.S.M. Arch. no. 4, 29, Amsterdam.

75 Memorie van den Directeur, 32. N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, Amsterdam.

76 Industrial Commission Report, 448.Google Scholar

77 Transvaal Consol. Coal Mines to Bake, 22 July 1898. N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, Amsterdam.

78 Chamber of Mines of South Africa, Annual Report 1898 (Johannesburg, 1899), 213.Google Scholar

79 Imperial South Africa Association. Pamphlet I 1901. Handy notes on South Africa for the use of Speakers and others—The Company and republican government are indistinguishable…36 pp. PRO. C.O. 537/133. Chamberlain to Greene, 13 Mar. 1897.

80 Nilant, , ‘Beelaerts’, 237.Google Scholar

81 Van Winter, , Onder Krugers Hollanders, i. 289.Google Scholar

82 Leyds to N.Z.A.S.M., 25 Feb. 1893. N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, Amsterdam.

83 Nilant, , ‘Beelaerts’, 245.Google Scholar

84 Van Winter, , Onder Krugers Hollanders, i. 238.Google ScholarNilant, , ‘Beelaerts’, 213.Google Scholar

85 Bake to Verwey, 6 Nov. and 11 Dec. 1891. N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, Amsterdam. Gordon, , Boer Opposition, 34.Google Scholar

86 Nederlandsche Handel Maatschappij (NHM) Archief, directievergadering 19 May 1891. Middelberg to N.Z.A.S.M., 8 Aug. 1892. Wilhelm Knappe, an agent of the Berliner Handelsgesellschaft, contracted various other German banks on behalf of the S.A.R.—Winterfeldt to Oyens, 1892, dossier Oyens, NHM Archief.

87 PRO. C.O. 417/89. Minute by Fairfield, E., 23 May 1892Google Scholar, on the connexions between Rhodes, Rothschilds and Lippert.

88 Bake to Middelberg, 4 May 1892. N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, Amsterdam. The intermediary was Wilhelm Knappe: Cecil, Gwendolen, The Life of Robert, Marquis of Salisbury (London, 1921), IV. 126.Google Scholar

89 PRO. C.O. 537/134. Milner to Chamberlain, 9 Mar. 1898.

90 PRO. C.O. 537/134. Minute by Selborne, 9 Mar. 1898.

91 Wertheim Gompertz to Hardy, 24 Feb. 1898. Amsterdam Stads Archief (ASA) no. 593, 737.

92 Van Kretschmar to Regeeringscommissaris, 25 Apr. 1899. N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, Amsterdam.

93 Ministerie van Buitenl. Zaken to Bake, 20 May 1891. N.Z.A.S.M. Omsl. 5/8, A4g, NSA.

94 In Memoriam, N.Z.A.S.M. (Amsterdam, 1908), quotes letter by Mr Dufour to the N.Z.A.S.M.

95 In Memoriam, 69.

96 In Memoriam, quoting the Institute's director, 80; Van-Helten, J. J., ‘Dutch social and economic influence in the Transvaal, 1880–1900’, M.A. Thesis (S.O.A.S., University of London, 1976), 36.Google Scholar

97 Handels- und Schiffahrtsverhändlungen (Berlin, 1890–1900), VII. In March 1893 the German government contacted the N.Z.A.S.M. via Winterfeldt (of the Berl. Hand. Gesellschaft) about a possible deal on railway throughrates between the N.Z.A.S.M., the German State Railways and the Deutsche Ostafrika Linie.

98 Bake to Woerman, 15 Oct. 1895; van Kretschmar to Woerman, 27 Nov. 1895. N.Z.A.S.M. Archief, Amsterdam. Consul Herri, 21 Oct. 1890 in Akta betr. die Eisenbahnen in Afrika IV in Handels- und Schiffahrtsverh., IX.

99 PRO. C.O. 417/89. Lascelles to Salisbury, 1 Jan. 1896.

100 PRQ. C.O. 4I7/89. Lascelles to Salisbury, 2 Jan. 1896.

101 De Marez Oyens to Bake, 5 Nov. 1887. Syndicaatsverdrag van 4 maart 1890, dossier Oyens, NHM Archief.

102 Winterfeldt to Oyens, 30 Nov. 1888, dossier Oyens, NHM Archief. ‘Ich habe entnommen dass unserer Regierung die Beteiligung deutscher Firmen an der Bank sehr erw¨nscht sein w¨rde auch wenn dieselbe ihren Sitz nicht in Deutschland erhielte’…

103 Winter, Van, Onder Krugers Hollanders, ii. 93.Google Scholar

104 Nilant, , ‘Beelaert’, chs. i–iii.Google Scholar

105 Adolf Goerz to Auswärtiges Amt (AA) 15 Dec. 1893. Handels- und Schiffahrtsverh. X; PRO. C.O. 417/250. Minutes by Graham, , Just and Lambert, 1 07 1898Google Scholar; C.O. Africa (South), 543: p. 340.

106 Gooch, G. P. and Temperley, H. (eds.), British Documents on the Origins of the War 1898–1914 (London, 1927–38), i. 67Google Scholar; Robinson, R. and Gallagher, J., Africa and the Victorians (London, 1961), 447–8.Google Scholar

107 Cf. K–lnische Zeitung, 26 May 1898, 22 Sept. 1898, 3 Nov. 1898. The paper applauded the agreement of 1898 and the anticipated increase of British influence in the Transvaal. It represented Ruhr mining interests with connexions on the Rand. See also Gifford, P. and Louis, W. R. (eds.), Britain and Germany in Africa, 205–6.Google Scholar

108 Goerz to Ausw. Amt, 17 Dec. 1897. Handels- und Schiffahrtsverh. xi.

109 Dugdale, E. T. S., German Diplomatic Documents 1871–1914 (London, 1929), II. 388.Google Scholar

110 Blainey, ‘Lost causes’ (as cited in n. 64); Mendelsohn, R., ‘Blainey and the Jameson Raid. The debate renewed’, Collected Seminar Papers, Societies of Southern Africa, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, London 1976Google Scholar. Johnstone, F. A., Class, Race and Gold (London, 1976), 17–20.Google Scholar

111 C.O. 417/217. Greene to High Commissioner, 5 Apr. 1897. C.O. 417/218. Greene to Goodenough, 28 Apr. 1897. C.O. 417/223. Minute by H. Lambert on the Report of the Volksraad debate on the expropriation of the N.Z.A.S.M., 10 Dec. 1897, ‘…the South African Republic can penalize British trade in defiance of the Convention..’.

112 Cd. 623. Apr. 1900. Report of the Transvaal Concessions Commission. Also SirRattigan, W. H., K.C., The Netherlands South African Railway Question (London, 1901).Google Scholar

113 Van-Helten, , ‘Dutch political and economic influence in the Transvaal 1880–190’, 37.Google Scholar

114 Cd. 1844 (1903), The present position and future prospects of British trade in South Africa; also Morgan, B., Report on the Engineering Trades of South Africa for the National Industrial Association (London, 1902).Google Scholar

115 Bozzoli, Belinda, ‘Ideology and the manufacturing class in South Africa 1907–192’, Collected Seminar Papers, Societies of Southern Africa, vol. 5 (1973/1974)Google Scholar, no. 18.

116 Kubicek, Robert V., ‘Finance Capital and South African Goldmining 1886–191’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, III, 3, (1975)Google Scholar; also Annexure to Thirteenth Annual Report of Transvaal Chamber of Mines for the Year 1902 (Johannesburg, 1903), exhibit 7.Google Scholar