Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:18:08.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

German Administration in Southern Togo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

D. E. K. Amenumey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Superficially, the nature of German rule in Togo differed from that of the other German colonies. For example, right from the start, it was administered by Imperial officials. It thereby escaped some of the worst abuses of Chartered Company rule. Again because of the peculiar nature fo the country—it was very small, not particularly suitable for European settlement and much of its agricultural land was already under peasant cultivation, to which it was best suited—Togo escaped the large-scale expropriation of the subject peoples' land that was characteristic of German rule elsewhere.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , October 1969 , pp. 623 - 639
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gifford, cf. P. and Louis, W. R. (eds.). Britain and Germany in Africa (Yale, 1967).Google ScholarCrowder, M., West Africa under Colonial Rule (London, 1968).Google Scholar

2 Nussbaum, M., Togo Eine Musterkolonie? (Berlin, 1962).Google Scholar

3 Townsend, M. E., The Rise and Fall of the German Colonial Empire (New York, 1930), 42 ff.,Google Scholar also Brunschwig, H., L'expansion allemande Outre Mer (Paris, 1957), chs. 3–5.Google Scholar

4 Das Deutsche Kolonialblatt (D.K.B.) 1901 Report for 1899/1900, p. 26, also Reichskolonialakten (R.K.A.), vol. 4308, p. 141.Google Scholar

5 Vietor, I. K., Die Entwicklung unserer Schutzgebiete (Bremen, 1913), p. 35.Google Scholar

6 Die Deutsche Kolonialzeitung (D.K.Z.) 1889, p. 323; 1899, p. 554; 1903, p. 993; and 1911, p. 884.Google Scholar

7 R.K.A., vol. 3831, p. 135. Public Record Office, London, C.O. 96/25, No. 8003 of 2 Apr., 1896. D.K.B. 1895, p. 247, ff., 272 ff.

8 D.K.B. 1895, p. 272 ff.Google Scholar

9 D.K.B. 1900, p. 53–54.Google Scholar

10 Trierenberg, G., Togo—Die Aufrichtung der deutschen Schutzherrschaft und die Erschliessung des Landes (Berlin, 1914), p. II.Google Scholar

11 D.K.B. 1897, p. 265.Google Scholar

12 Schnee, H. (ed.), Deutches Koloniallexikon, III (Leipzing, 1920), 524–5.Google Scholar

13 D.K.B. 1890, p. 9.

14 Beilage zum D.K.B. 1900. Report for 1898–1899, p. 22.Google Scholar

15 Beilage zum D.K.B. 1901. Report for 1899–1900, p. 26.Google Scholar

16 Denkschrift for 1909–1910, p. 3.

17 From 1885–1893 he was an Imperial Commissioner, 1893–1898 a Landeshauptman, cf., D.K.B. 1898, p. 231.Google Scholar

18 D.K.B. 1893, p. 231;Google ScholarD.K.B. 1901, p. 203. Schnee, , op. cit. III, p. 519.Google Scholar

19 D.K.B. 1898, p. 287.Google Scholar

20 Asmis, , ‘Die Stammerechte der Berzirken Misahohe, Anecho und Lomeland’ in Zeitschrift fÜr Vergleischende Rechtsgewissenschaft. XXVI (Stuttgart), p. I, also Report for 1898, p. 46.Google Scholar

21 D.K.B. 1908, p. 337. It took effect from 1 08 1908Google Scholar

22 D.K.B. 1914, p. 412.Google Scholar

23 Gaunt, M., Alone in West Africa (London, 1911), p. 259.Google Scholar

24 D.K.B. 1896, p. 241.Google Scholar

25 D.K.Z. 1907, p. 238.Google Scholar

26 Beilage zum D.K.B. 1900. Report for 1898–1899, p. 39.Google Scholar

27 R.K.A., , vol. 3915, pp. 246–64,Google Scholar also MÜller, K., Geschichte der Katholischen Kirche in Togo (Steyl, 1955), pp. 165–71.Google ScholarNussbaum, , op. cit. p. 36–7.Google Scholar

28 MÜller, K., op. cit. pp. 171–7.Google Scholar

29 D.K.B., 1898, p. 39, Report from 1898–1999, pp. 26 and 28.Google Scholar

30 D.K.B., 1891, p. 126;Google ScholarD.K.B., 1998, p. 508.Google Scholar

31 Newbury, C. W., The Western Slave Coast and its Rulers (Oxford, 1961), p. 178.Google Scholar

32 Beilage zum D.K.B., 1900. Report for 1898–1898, p. 38.Google Scholar

33 Beilage zum D.K.B. 1900. Report for 1898–1999, p. 38.Google Scholar

34 D.K.B., 1901, pp. 315–6.Google Scholar

35 For the results of this research cf. Asmis, op. cit., also Trierenberg, , op. cit., p. 50.Google Scholar

36 D.K.B., 1901, p. 315; D.K.Z., 1907, p. 138.Google Scholar

37 Graf, Zech, Circular on 11 02 1907;Google ScholarMetzger, O. F., Unsere alte Kolonie Togo, (Neudamm, 1941), pp. 101–4.Google Scholar

38 SirHugh, Clifford, German Colonies: Togo. A plea for the Native Races (London, 1958), p. 77.Google Scholar also R.K.A., vol. 4308, p. 146.Google Scholar

39 cf., Newbury op. cit., p. 178.Google Scholar

40 Report for 1898–9, p. 42.

41 Report for 1898–9, p. 31.

42 Klose, H., Togo unter Deutsche Flagge (Berlin, 1899), p. 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

43 Le Lievre, cf. P. D., ‘The Kpando Division’. In Gold Coast Review, II, no. I (1925), 29.Google Scholar

44 Clifford, , op. cit. p. 92.Google Scholar

45 Beilage zum D.K.B. 1911, p. 4.Google Scholar

46 D.K.Z., 1907, p. 426.Google Scholar

47 The average rate of wages for late 1890 and early 1900s was 30–75 Pfennige per diem for men and 15–25 Pf. for women and children for manual labour. Plantation workers collected 20 marks a month, while carriers received 75 Pf. per diem. cf., D.K.B. 1901, p. 315; Beilage zum D.K.B. 1899, Report for 1897–1898, p. 42.Google Scholar

48 Report for 1908–1909, p. 28.

49 R.K.A., , vol. 4097, p. 198, Amtsblatt for Togo, 27 05 1910.Google Scholar

50 R.K.A., , vol. 1085, p. 190.Google Scholar

51 D.K.B., 1901. Report for 1899–1900, p. 26.Google Scholar

52 Clifford, op. cit. p. 104.Google Scholar

53 R.K.A., , vol. 4308, 141; also R.K.A., vol. 3940, p. 80.Google Scholar

54 Ghana National Archives Document Adm II/S.N.A. 603 case 58/1915.

55 Newbury, , op. cit. p. 151.Google Scholar

56 R.K.A., vol. 3645, p. 29.Google Scholar

57 D.K.Z., 1904, p. 429. A foreigner was anyone at all who was non-native to the particular district.Google Scholar

58 D.K.B., 1910, p. 218.Google Scholar

59 D.K.B., 1901, pp. 149, 287, 717, 832.Google ScholarD.K.B., 1911, p.232.Google ScholarMetzger, O. F., Unsere alte Kolomie Togo (Neudamm, 1941), p. 244. The figures represent the total output by both peasant farmers and the few plantation companies like Pflanzungs gesellschaft Kpeme, Agu-Pflanzungsgesellschaft, etc.Google Scholar

60 D.K.B., 1914, p. 409.Google Scholar

61 D.K.B., 1894, p. 585.Google ScholarD.K.B., 1906, pp. 11–13.Google Scholar

62 , D.K.B. p. 479.Google Scholar

63 Annual Report, 1910. p. 7.Google Scholar

64 Trierenburg, op. cit. p. 51. Full op. cit., p. 156.Google Scholar

65 For a fuller discussion of the social services provided by the regiame see Amenumey, D. E. K., The Ewe people and the coming of European rule 1850–1914, Unpublished thesis (London, 1964), pp. 249–304.Google Scholar

66 Gifford, P. and Louis, W. R. (eds.) Britain and Germany in Africa (Yale, 1967), p. 457.Google Scholar

67 D.K.B., 1892, p, 99; D.K.B. 1900, p. 54. The law was dated 24 12 1899.Google Scholar

68 cf., Amendment on 15 08 1899.Google Scholar

69 Colonial Office, 96/323, 710. 27392 of 15 Nov. 1898, C.O. 96/341, no. 27477 of 12 July 1899, C.O. 96/342, no. 21097 of 16 Aug. 1899, C.O. 96/342, no. 24703 of 18 Aug. 1899, C.O. 96/406, no. 8185 of 10 Feb. 1903.

70 R.K.A., , vol. 6592, p. 10.Google Scholar

71 D.K.B., , 1903, p. 20.Google Scholar

72 , C.O 96/341, no. 27477 of 12 07 1899.Google Scholar

73 R.K.A., vol. 3192, p. 24, despatch of 28 08 1901.Google Scholar

74 cf., Amenumey op. cit., p. 302.Google Scholar

75 D.K.B., 1900, p. 536, Law dated 2 06 1900.Google Scholar

76 , R.K.A, vol. 3193, pp. 41 and 87.Google Scholar

77 Beilage zum D.K.B. 1911. Report for 1909–1910.Google Scholar