Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T23:00:21.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relationship between Interactive Functions and Website Ranking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2005

ALAN C. B. TSE  and
CHI-FAI CHAN
ALAN C. B. TSE
Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, [email protected]
CHI-FAI CHAN
Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This study looks into different types of interactive functions, and the associative relationship between these interactive functions and website ranking. Six types of interactive functions are identified, and four of them are found to be significant in affecting website ranking. The four important types of interactive functions are Online Two-way Communication, Customization, Content Variety, and Interactive Job Search.

Type
INSIGHTS INTO ONLINE MARKETING EFFECTIVENESS
Information
Journal of Advertising Research , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , December 2004 , pp. 369 - 374
Copyright
© Copyright © 1960-2004, The ARF

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agarwal, R., and E. Karahanna. “Time Files When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs about Information Technology Usage.” MIS Quarterly 24, 4 (2000): 665–94.Google Scholar
Alba, J., J. Lynch, B. Weitz, C. Janiszewski, R. Lutz, A. Sawyer, and S. Wood. “Interactive Home Shopping: Consumer, Retailer, and Manufacturer Incentives to Participate in Electronic Marketplaces.” Journal of Marketing 61, 3 (1997): 38–53.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. “Computer as Audience.” In Interactive Marketing: The Future Present, E. Forrest, and Richard Mizerski, eds. Chicago, IL: NTC Business Books, 1996.
Deighton, J. “The Future of Interactive Marketing.” Harvard Business Review 74, 6 (1996): 151–61.Google Scholar
Evans, J.R., and V.E. King. “Business-to-Business Marketing and the World Wide Web: Planning, Managing, and Assessing Web Sites.” Industrial Marketing Management 28, 4 (1999): 343–58.Google Scholar
Evans, P., and T. Wurster. Blown to Bits. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1999.
Ghose, S., and W. Dou. “Interactive Functions and Their Impacts on the Appeal of Internet Presence Sites.” Journal of Advertising Research 38, 2 (1998): 29–43.Google Scholar
Green, S.B. “Identifiability of Spurious Factors Using Linear Factor Analysis with Binary Items.” Applied Psychological Measurement 7, 2 (1983): 139–47.Google Scholar
Gregory, N. “Of Amazonian Proportions.” bLink Online, 1999: [URL: http://www.earthlink.net/partner/usaa/blink/dec99/celebrity.html].Google Scholar
Hair, Joseph F., Rolph E. Anderson, Ronald L. Tatham, and W. Black. Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998.
Hoffman, D., and T.P. Novak. “Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations.” Journal of Marketing 60, 3 (1996): 50–68.Google Scholar
Infoplease. 2002: [URL: http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0903376.html].
Leckenby, J.D., and H. Li. “From the Editors: Why We Need the Journal of Interactive Advertising.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 1, 1 (2000): [Retrieved from URL: http://www.jiad.org].Google Scholar
Lim, K.H., and I. Benbasat. “The Influence of Multimedia on Improving the Comprehension of Organizational Information.” Journal of Management Information Systems 19, 1 (2002): 99–127.Google Scholar
Palmer, J.W., and D.A. Griffith. “Information Intensity: A Paradigm for Understanding Web Site Design.” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 6, 3 (1998): 38–42.Google Scholar
Parsons, A., M. Zeisser, and R. Waitman. “Organizing Today for the Digital Marketing Tomorrow.” Journal of Interactive Marketing 12, 1 (1998): 31–46.Google Scholar
Peterson, R.A., S. Balasubramanian, and B.J. Bronnenberg. “Exploring the Implications of the Internet for Consumer Marketing.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25, 4 (1997): 329–46.Google Scholar
Stewart, D.W., and P.A. Pavlou. “From Consumer Response to Active Consumer: Measuring the Effectiveness of Interactive Media.” Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 30, 4 (2002): 376–96.Google Scholar
Vendittp, G. “Critic's Choice.” Internet World, January 1997.Google Scholar
Zhao, L. “Jump Higher: Analyzing Web-Site Rank in Google.” Information Technology and Libraries 23, 3 (2004): 108–18.Google Scholar