Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T11:34:00.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How to Fill the Accountability Gap in Demand Creation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2005

ERIC EINHORN
Affiliation:
McCann Worldgroup, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Accountability is management's new mantra. The challenge comes from the fact that currently each discipline within the marketing communications plan is measured differently, so there can be no composite scorecard. McCann introduces two models, based on seven Universal Marketing Drivers that assess how these drivers work in tandem, in a discipline-neutral manner. These models can help marketers assess the contributions of each of the diverse disciplines within a marketing communications plan and accurately allocate resources to best deliver strategic priorities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Copyright © 1960-2004, The ARF

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Lavidge, Robert J., and Gary A. Steiner. “A Model for Predictive Measurements of Advertising Effectiveness.” Journal of Marketing 25, 6 (1961): 5962.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Alan. “New Marketing Measures: Alan Mitchell Argues That the Industry Needs New Measurement Tools That Analyse Customers and Not Media.” Brand Strategy (April 2004): 9.Google Scholar
Pilotta, Joseph J., Don E. Schultz, Gary Drenik, and Philip Rist. “Simultaneous Media Usage: A Critical Consumer Orientation to Media Planning.” Journal of Consumer Behaviour 3, 3 (2004): 28592.Google Scholar
Plummer, Joe, and J. David Phillips. “Do You Know What's Driving Your Brand? McCann Brand CloutTM An Overview.” ESOMAR/ARF Worldwide Audience Measurement Conference (2003).
Weilbacher, William M.Point of View: How Advertising Affect Consumers.” Journal of Advertising Research 43, 2 (2003): 23034.Google Scholar