Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T23:04:14.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decay Effects in Online Advertising: Quantifying the Impact of Time Since Last Exposure on Branding Effectiveness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2005

WILLIAM J. HAVLENA  and
JEFFREY GRAHAM
WILLIAM J. HAVLENA
Affiliation:
Dynamic Logic, [email protected]
JEFFREY GRAHAM
Affiliation:
Starcom MediaVest Group, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Advertising effectiveness tests combining surveys and electronic tracking of online advertising are common, and the method is increasingly being utilized within more comprehensive, cross-media methodologies. The validity of these tests, however, has sometimes been called into question because of the short duration between online advertising exposure and survey taking. Using a unique database containing more than 1,600 online advertising campaigns, we find that there is a measurable but weak relationship between time since last exposure and branding effectiveness, indicating the shortness of duration does not have a substantial impact on the validity of these tests.

Type
INSIGHTS INTO ONLINE MARKETING EFFECTIVENESS
Information
Journal of Advertising Research , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , December 2004 , pp. 327 - 332
Copyright
© Copyright © 1960-2004, The ARF

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bass, F., and F. Clarke. “Testing Distributed Lag Models of Advertising Effect.” Journal of Marketing Research (9, August 1972): 248–308.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, D., A. Allaway, and G. D'Souza. “The Impact of Differential Lag Effects on the Allocation of Advertising Budgets across Media.” Journal of Advertising Research 41, 2 (2001): 27–36.Google Scholar
Broadbent, S. “One Way TV Advertisements Work.” Journal of the Market Research Society 21, 3 (1979): 139–66.Google Scholar
Broadbent, S. “Modelling with Adstock.” Journal of the Market Research Society 26, 4 (1984): 295–312.Google Scholar
Broadbent, S. When to Advertise. Henley-on-Thames, UK: Admap Publications, 1999.
Cook, T.D., and B.R. Flay. “The Persistence of Experimentally Induced Attitude Change.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, L. Berkowitz, ed. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
Dravillas, J., G. Broussard, and J. Graham. “Cross-Media and the Web: Best Practices for Using the Internet to Measure Cross-Media Advertising Campaigns.” ARF Week of Workshops, September 2003.
Dynamic Logic. “AdIndex Methodology,” 2004: [URL: http://www.dynamiclogic.com/adIndex_methodology_rev4.pdf], accessed November 15, 2004.
Edell, Julie A., and K. Keller, “The Information Processing of Coordinated Media Campaigns.” Journal of Marketing Research 26, 2 (1989): 149–63.Google Scholar
Ephron, E. “Recency Planning.” Journal of Advertising Research 37, 4 (1997): 61–65.Google Scholar
Ephron, E., and C. McDonald. “Media Scheduling and Carry-over Effects: Is Adstock a Useful TV Planning Tool?” Journal of Advertising Research 42, 4 (2002): 66–70.Google Scholar
Factor TG. [URL: http://www.factortg.com/products/brand/ad/adeffect_methodology.html], accessed December 2004.
Goerlich, B. “A Consumer's Guide to Marketing Mix Models,” Admap 30, 11 (2001): 8–9.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, J., and D. Moore. “Issues Surrounding the Examination of Delay Effects in Advertising.” Advances in Consumer Research, 11 (1984): 650–55.Google Scholar
Insight Express. [URL: http://www.insightexpress.com/products/adinsights.asp], accessed December 2004.
Interactive Advertising Bureau. [URL: http://www.iab.net/news/pr_2005_2_22.asp], accessed February 2005.
King, K.W., and S. Tinkham. “The Learning and Retention of Outdoor Advertising.” Journal of Advertising Research 30, 6 (1990): 47–51.Google Scholar
Madansky, M., and J. Graham. “Measuring the Complementary Effects of Online and Offline Advertising.” ESOMAR/ARF Week of Audience Measurement, June 2004.