Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:33:42.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weak taxation and constraints of the welfare state in democratized Taiwan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2018

Chenwei Lin
Chenwei Lin*
Affiliation:
Law Faculty, Tokoha University, Shizuoka, Japan
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relationship between taxation and welfare regime in Taiwan has largely been unexplored to date. This study argues that since taxation capacity of the state decides the fate of new welfare programs such as the public provision of long-term care, it also affects the trajectory of the welfare regime. Through the analysis of Taiwan's tax revenue structure and tax base, this study reveals that Taiwan, unlike many new democracies, has shone away from relying on goods and services taxes but at the same time continues to provide preferential tax treatment for the corporate world. The result has been the erosion of tax base which makes introducing new welfare programs extremely difficult even when new policies allow for credit-claiming. Therefore, the familialistic welfare regime persists because of a weakened taxation capacity. Furthermore, the political determinants of the weakened taxation capacity can be found in identity-based party politics, an influential capital vs acquiescent labor and the limited bargaining power of civil society.

Type
Taxation and Welfare Since the Third Wave of Democratization
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 397 - 416
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References26

Academia Sinica (2014) Zhong-Yang Yanjiuyuan Baogao-Fushui Gaige Jianyishu (Recommendations for Tax Reform). Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Apple Daily (2016) Changzhao Caiyuan: Cai Yingwen, Weisheng Yichanshui (Tsai: Inheritance Tax to Finance Long-Term Care), 21 March.Google Scholar
Aspalter, C (2006) The east asian welfare model: the east asian welfare model. International Journal of Social Welfare 15, 290–301.Google Scholar
Council of Economic Planning and Development (CEPD) (2012) Population Estimates of Republic of China: 2012–2060. Taiwan: Council of Economic Planning and Development.Google Scholar
Chang, M-k (1990) Zhishifenzi Yu shehuiyundong” (intellectuals and social movement). In Hsiao, H-HM (ed.), Bianqianzhong Taiwan Shehui de Zhongchanjieji (Middle Class and the Transformation of Taiwan Society). Taipei: Chu Liu Book Company, pp. 189–209.Google Scholar
Chang, T-c (2008) Taiwan jingjiziyouhua de Zhengzhiluoji: Dangguo Ziben Zhuyi de Zhuanxing yu Xin Zhengshanglianmeng (The political logic of economic liberalization in Taiwan: the transformation of party-state capitalism and the reconstruction of state-business relations. Taiwan Zhengzhixue Kan (The Taiwanese Political Science Review) 12, 101–145.Google Scholar
Chiu, Y-b (2014) Dan gongyun de zhiduduoxing zaoyu quanqiuhua (When inertia of labor movement encounters globalization). In Wang, J-s (ed.), Zhixubifen de Niandai1990–2010: Zouxiang Xiayilun Minzhushengshi (The Era of Colorful Order 1990–2010-Heading Towards the Next Golden Era of Democracy, 2014 Edition). Taipei: Rive Gauche Publishing House, pp. 115–33.Google Scholar
Democratic Progressive Party (2015) Minjindang Gongbu Muqinjie Mindiao: Taiwan Mama dui Zhengfu Sanda Buman-Shian, Changzhao, Tuoyu (DPP announces Mother's Day Polls: Taiwanese mothers are most unhappy with the government re: three things, food safety, long-term care, and child-care). Available at http://www.dpp.org.tw/news_content.php?&sn=7856.Google Scholar
Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) (2010) Social Indicators. Taipei: DGBAS Executive Yuan Republic of China (Taiwan).Google Scholar
Fell, D (2008) Inter-party competition in Taiwan: toward a New party system?. In Goldstein, SM and Chang, J (eds), Presidential Politics in Taiwan: The Administration of Chen Shui-Bian. Norwalk, Conn.: EastBridge, pp. 49–84.Google Scholar
Fell, D (2014) Taiwan's party system in the Ma Ying-Jeou Era. In Cabestan, J-P and deLisle, J (eds), Political Changes in Taiwan Under Ma Ying-Jeou. London: Routledge, pp. 37–59.Google Scholar
Genschel, P (2002) Globalization, tax competition and the welfare state. Politics & Society 30, 245–75.Google Scholar
He, G (2011) Taiwan Lunwei Buyizhidao (Taiwan Fallen into an Unjust Island), Common Wealth Magazine, 3 May. Available at http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5012712&page.currentPage=1%E4%BA%94%E6%9C%88%E4%B8%80%E6%97%A5 (accessed 1 October 2017).Google Scholar
Hsieh, C (2016) Xie Jinhe: Xiaoying Zongtong Qinkou Gaosu Wo…Waizi Neizi Keshui Butong, Shiwo Xinli Zuida de Tong. (President Told Me that Differences in Taxation on Domestic and Foreign Capital Truly Hurts Her Heart), Wealth Magazine, No. 508, 27 July.Google Scholar
Huang, C-l (1999) Labor Militancy and the Neo-Mercantilist Development Experience: South Korea and Taiwan in Comparison (Ph.D. Dissertation). University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Huang, T-h (2004) Taiwan zhengshangguanxi de Yanbian: Lishizhidulun Fenxi (State-business relations in Taiwan since 1949. Issues and Studies 43, 35–72.Google Scholar
Huang, H and Deng, K (2015) Changzhaofuwufa Sanda Tiaozhan (Three Daunting Challenges of the LTC Service Act), Common Wealth Magazine, No.573, 26 May.Google Scholar
Ide, E and Park, G (2014) The Tax-welfare Mix: explaining Japan's weak extractive capacity. The Pacific Review 27, 675–702.Google Scholar
Ide, E and Steinmo, S (2009) The End of the strong state?: on the evolution of Japanese tax policy. In Martin, IW, Mehrotra, AK and Prasad, M (eds), The New Fiscal Sociology: Taxation in Comparative and Historical Perspective, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 119–37.Google Scholar
Ito, T (2017) Italia ni okeru Imin Keia Roudousha Dounyu to Kazokushugi Regime-no ‘Sai-kazokuka7. (Introduction of migrant care-workers and the re-familialization of the familialist regime) In Shinkawa, T (ed.), Kokumin Saitougou no Seiji-Fukushi Kokka to Liberalism-Nationalism no Aida (The Politics of National Reintegration: Between Welfare Statism and Liberal Nationalism). Kyoto: Nakanishiya, pp. 211–34.Google Scholar
Kamimura, Y (2007) Taiwan no Seiroushi Kankei to Shakaiseisaku-Aratana Corporatism heno Mosaku? (Tripartite relationship and social policy in Taiwan: searching for a New corporatism?). In Soshou, K (ed.), Shinou Kougyoukoku ni okeru Koyou to Shakai hoshou (Transformation of Employment and Social Security in the Newly Industrialized Countries). The Institute of Developing Economies, JETRO, pp. 225–58, http://www.ide.go.jp/Japanese/Publish/Books/Sousho/565.html (accessed 5 January 2017).Google Scholar
Kato, J (2003) Regressive Taxation and the Welfare State: Path Dependence and Policy Diffusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ku, Y-w and Finer, CJ (2007) Developments in East Asian Welfare Studies. Social Policy & Administration 41, 115–31.Google Scholar
Li, K-T (1995) The Evolution of Policy Behind Taiwan's Development Success. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Liberty Times (2010 a) Chanchuang Jiama Tiaoshui, Lv pi Lan Xuanpiao Kaoliang (Lowering the Rate for Industrial Innovation is a mere Electoral Consideration), 13 April.Google Scholar
Liberty Times (2010 b) Chanchuang Sandu Butie Qieye Zengpin Yuangong (Third Reading of Statute for Industrial Innovation, Subsidies for Hiring More), 17 April.Google Scholar
Lii, D-t (2004) Daolun: Shiminshehui yu Gonggonglingyu zai Taiwan de Fazhan (Introduction: development of civil society and public sphere in Taiwan). In Ding-tzann, L (ed.), Gonggonglingyu zai Taiwan: Kunjing yu Qiji (Public Sphere in Taiwan: Predicament and Opportunities). Taipei: Lauréat Publications, pp. 10–50.Google Scholar
Lin, K-m (1997) From Authoritarianism to Statism-the Politics of National Health Insurance in Taiwan (Ph.D. dissertation). Department of Sociology, Yale University.Google Scholar
Lin, C (2014) Taiwan kazokushugi no Henyou-Taiwan no Gaikokujin Roudousha seisaku wo Chushinni” (Transformation of familialistic welfare regime in Taiwan: policies of migrant workers). Tokoha Law Review, 20–51.Google Scholar
Lin, C (2015) Tairitsu wo Tsukuridasu Media–Taiwan ni okeru Media to Seiji no Sougokankei (Shaping antagonism–media and politics in Taiwan). Nihon Taiwan Gakkaiho 17, 70–91.Google Scholar
Lin, C (2016) Shinseiken no Unmei wo Sayuu suru Shakaiteki Safetynet no Kaikaku” (Reforms of social safety net controls fate of the new administration). IDE World Trend 254, 18–9.Google Scholar
Lin, Z-h, Hong, J, Lee, J, Wang, Z and Zhang, F (2011), Bengshidai-Caituanhua, Pinqionghua yu Shaozinvhua de Weiji (The Collapsing Generation-Crisis Created by Business Interests, Poverty and Declining Birth Rate), Taiwan Labor Front.Google Scholar
Lu, Y-r (2013) Yigongpian: You-Wailao, Meifuwu; Mei-Wailao, Fuwushao (On Migrant Workers: Having Migrant Workers but No Services, Not Having Migrant Workers but Less Services), Shin-Shinwen (The Journalist), 12 December 2013.Google Scholar
Lu, Y-r (2015) Changzhaofa Sandu Xiangshi Yichang Gaobieshi (Passing the LTC Service Act Looks Like a Funeral), Shin-Shinwen (The Journalist), 18 May.Google Scholar
McGuire, JW (2010) Wealth, Health, and Democracy in East Asia and Latin America (1 edition). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan (MOHW) (2015) Draft of the LTC Insurance Act. Available at https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-4086-ff338fb2-ffb3-4fdf-891a-580e51564ef3.html (accessed 21 October 2017).Google Scholar
Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, Japan (2018), Employment Policy for Foreign Workers. Available at http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/koyou_roudou/koyou/gaikokujin/index.html (accessed 8 April 2018).Google Scholar
Ministry of Interior, Taiwan (2012) Summary of the Ten-Year Plan for Long-Term Care. Available at http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/newpage/tenyearsplan.htm (accessed 10 December 2012].Google Scholar
Ministry of Labor, Taiwan (2018), Loadong Tongji (Labor Statistics). Available at http://statdb.mol.gov.tw/statis/jspProxy.aspx?sys=210&kind=21&type=1&funid=q13012&rdm=VqqqeiVo (accessed 8 April 2018).Google Scholar
Miyamoto, T, Peng, I and Uzuhashi, T (2003) Nihongata Fushikokka no Ichi to Doutai (Position and dynamic of Japanese welfare state). In Esping-Anderson, G. (ed.), Welfare States in Transition. Tokyo: Waseda University Press, pp. 295–336.Google Scholar
National Statistics R.O.C. (2016) National Statistics R.O.C.(Taiwan) Webpage, various statistics concerning the populations of Taiwan. Available at http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=15409&CtNode=3622&mp=4) (accessed 30 November 2016).Google Scholar
National Taxation Bureau of Taipei, Ministry of Finance R.O.C (2018) Chanyechuangxin Youhui Zhuanqu (Preferential Taxation for Industrial Innovation). Available at https://www.ntbt.gov.tw/etwmain/front/ETW118W/CON/1815/4736005044563581113) (accessed 17 July 2018).Google Scholar
Peng, I (2001) Higashi Ajia Fukushikokka to Sono Aratana Chousen-Nihon, Kankoku, Taiwan no Fukushikokka wo Chuushinni (The East Asian welfare states and their new challenges: with focus on Japan, Korea, and Taiwan). In Gakkai, S (ed.), Fukushikokka no Shatei: Shakaiseisaku Gakkai-shi (The Journal of Social Policies and Labor Studies: A Scope of the “Welfare State”: The World Experience of the 20th Century and the Transition to the 21st). Kyoto: Minerva Shobo, pp. 81–98.Google Scholar
Peng, I (2017) Transnational Migration of Domestic and Care Workers in Asia Pacific (Report) (p. 24). Geneva: International Labor Office.Google Scholar
Rigger, S (2014) Political parties and identity politics in Taiwan. In Diamond, L and Shin, G-W (eds.), New Challenges for Maturing Democracies in Korea and Taiwan. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, pp. 106–32.Google Scholar
Sato, Y (2010) Post-Mishukaki ni okeru Sozei no Seijikeizaigaku (Political economy of taxation in the post-democratization period). In Wakabayashi, M (ed.), Post-Minshukaki no Taiwan Seiji (Taiwanese Politics in the Post-Democratization Period: Eight Years of Chen Shui-bian Administration), IDE Research Series. Institute of Developing Economies, Tokyo: JETRO, 169–99.Google Scholar
Sato, Y (2015) Ba Eikyuu Saisenchokugo ni okeru Zeiseikaikaku no Torikumi (Tax reform after the Reelection of Ma Ying-Jeou). In Kawakami, M (ed.), Ba Eikyu Seikenka-Taiwan no Keizaishakaigakuteki Bunseki (Socio-Economic Analysis of Taiwan Under the Ma Administration). Institute of Developing Economies, Tokyo: JETRO, pp. 17–31.Google Scholar
Sato, Y (2016) Ba Eikyuu Seiken no Zeiseikei no Meian to Taiwan no Seijiseido (Tax Reforms under the Ma Administration and Political Regime of Taiwan.) Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Shinkawa, T (2011). Nihongata Kazokushugi Henyou no Seijigaku” (The politics of the transformation of Japanese familialistic welfare regime). In Shinkawa, T (ed.), Fukushi Rejimu no Shuuren to Bunki (Convergence and Divergence of Welfare Regimes). Kyoto: Minerva Shobo.Google Scholar
Shinkawa, T, An, J and Lin, C (2015) Nikkantai no Kazokushugi Rejimu no Tayousei (Varieties of Familialism Welfare Regime-Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan). In Shinkawa, T (ed.), Fukushi+ α Fukushi Reiimu (Welfare Regimes). Kyoto: Minerva Shobo, pp. 7–34.Google Scholar
Steinmo, S (1996) Taxation and Democracy: Swedish, British and American Approaches to Financing the Modern State. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Um, SG (2012) At the Bottom: Migrant Workers in the South Korean Long-term Care Market (Ph.D. Dissertation). University of Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
United Daily (2016) Lin Shufen pi Jingli Baiyi Dachang, Shuishoushao Haineng Tuishui” (Legislator Criticizes Manufacturers with Billions of Net Profits for Not Paying Taxes), 2 November.Google Scholar
Wachman, A (1994) Taiwan: National Identity and Democratization, Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Wakabayashi, M (2008) Taiwan no Seiji-Chuukaminkoku Taiwanka no Sengoshi (The Politics of Taiwan: The Post-war History of Taiwanization in the Republic of China). Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.Google Scholar
Wong, J (2006) Healthy Democracies: Welfare Politics in Taiwan and South Korea. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wu, J-m (2002) Jiechu Clauswitz de Mozhou-Fenxi Dangqian Shehuigaige Yundong de Kunjing” (‘Clausewitzian enchantment’: analyzing the current problems of Taiwan's social reform movement). Taiwanese Sociology 4, 159–98.Google Scholar
Wu, R-j and Lin, H-h (eds.) (2016) Zhaopo: Taiyanghua Yundong de Zhenfu Zongshen yu Shiyu (Beyond Radiance: The Amplitude, Depth, and Horizon of the Sunflower Movement). Taipei: Rive Gauche Publishing House.Google Scholar
Yeh, Y (2015) Changzhao Shinian Jihua, Tui 8 nian Jin 9 cheng Shinengrenkou Jiashu Haishi Zhineng Kaoziji” (90% Still Shouldered by the Family Members after 8 Years of the Ten-Year Plan), Storm Media, November 16. Available at http://www.storm.mg/article/73747 (accessed 24 November 2016).Google Scholar