Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T21:51:47.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

War Occurrence: Hyper-Insecurity and Multilateral Institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2015

TAKASHI INOGUCHI*
Affiliation:
University of Niigata [email protected]

Extract

Two lines of argument seem to stand solidly without seeing eye to eye with each other about the current world order. Steven Pinker, the American psychologist, writes about the steady reduction in human violence in settling disputes among humankind (Pinker, 2012). John Mearsheimer, the American political scientist, writes about the structurally almost inevitable conflicts of interest between great powers in the early twenty-first century in his analysis of hegemonic competition between the United States and China (Mearsheimer, 2005). It is not necessary to note that their arguments are made looking at conflicts of interest and use of violence from very different angles and time ranges. Yet their differences are stark and clear. Pinker says that the future is bright and shining due to the non-use of violence. Mearsheimer says that the future is dark and potentially devastating due to the consequences of the high tensions surrounding the conflicts of interest. The question posed at the outset is thus: Is the current era one of peace or war?

Type
Special Issue Articles: Whither Multilateralism?
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellamy, Alex J. (2012), Massacres and Morality: Mass Atrocities in an Age of Civilian Immunity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, Chien-peng (2014), Contentious Integration: Post-Cold War Japan–China Relations in the Asia Pacific, Surrey, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Endo, Homare (2014), Chugokujin ga eranda worst chugokujin banzuke (Worst Chinese Ranking Chosen by Chinese), Shogakukan, pp. 24–8.Google Scholar
Etizioni, Amitai (2014), The New Normal: Finding a Balance between Individual Rights and the Common Good, New Jersey, Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Furuya, Koichi (2014), ‘Wu Jianmin: Calm, Rational Diplomacy Serves China's Interest’, Asahi shimbun, 9 August.Google Scholar
Galbraith, James K. (2014), The End of Normal: The Great Crisis and the Future of Growth, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John (2011) Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inoguchi, Takashi (1986) ‘Japan's Images and Options: Not a Challenger, but a Supporter’, Journal of Japanese Studies, 12 (1): 95119.Google Scholar
Inoguchi, Takashi (2007), ‘How to Assess World War II in World History: One Japanese Perspective’, in Koh, David and Hock, Wee (eds.), Legacies of World War II in South and East Asia, Singapore: ISEAS, pp. 138–51.Google Scholar
Inoguchi, Takashi (2013), ‘Japan in 2013: Abenomics and Abegeopolitics’, Asian Survey, 54 (1): 101–12.Google Scholar
Inoguchi, Takashi (2014a), ‘The Rise of Abegeopolitics: Japan's New Engagement with the World’, Global Asia, 9 (3): 30–6.Google Scholar
Inoguchi, Takashi (2014b), ‘A Call for a New Japanese Foreign Policy: The Dilemma of a Stakeholder State’, International Affairs, 9 (4): 943–58.Google Scholar
Inoguchi, Takashi (2014c), ‘Speculating on Asian Security, 1813–2033’, European Review of International Studies, 1 (1): 4656.Google Scholar
Inoguchi, Takashi (2014d), ‘Tenkanki ni okeru Nihon no gaiko (Japanese Diplomacy in Transition)’, Kodo, no. 1090, pp. 12–16.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Linda (2014), ‘China's Unpredictable Maritime Security Actors’, Reports 11 December 2014, Lowy Institute for International Policy.Google Scholar
Japan Times (2014), ‘Set aside hate, Xi says as first Nanking memorial’, 14 December, p. 2.Google Scholar
Junbao, Jiefang (2013), ‘Nankong yanyu zhang chuxian jiang yinyu di sanfan moni yuji jibo jiluo (During Air Force military exercise in the Nanjing Air Force Area, a third party speaking in English appeared and an Airborne Early Warning craft was shot down)’, 1 February.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Mary (2012), New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Globalized Era, 3rd edn, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kivimaki, Timo (2014), The Long Peace of East Asia, London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Le, Thi Quyhn Lien, Mikami, Yoshiki, and Inoguchi, Takashi (2014), ‘Global Leadership and International Regime: Empirical Testing of Cooperation without Hegemony Paradigm on the Basis of 120 Multilateral Conceptions Data Deposited to the United Nations System’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 15 (4): 523601.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John (2005), The Tragedy of Great Power Struggle, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Edward, Newman and DeRouen, Karl (eds.) (2014), Routledge Handbook of Civil Wars, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ohara, Bonji (2015), Chugoku no Gunji Senryaku (China's Military Strategy), Tokyo: Toyokeizai Shimposha.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven (2012), The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Stockholm International Institute for Peace Research (2014), The SIPRI Yearbook 2014, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Neil (2015), ‘Is China's Periphery Becoming the Core of Its International Relations?’, The Diplomat, 29 January.Google Scholar
Ueki, Kawakatsu Chikako and Miki, Honda (2012), Hokuto Ajia no nagai heiwa (Northeast Asia's Long Peace), Keiso shobo.Google Scholar
Weiss, Jessica Chen (2014), Powerful Patriots: Nationalist Protest in China's Foreign Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, Xuetong (2015), ‘Zhengtide ‘zhoubian’ biMeiguo geng zhongyao (Holistic ‘Periphery’ more important than the United States)’, Huangqiu shibao, 13 January.Google Scholar