Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T20:30:38.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rethinking the Komeito Voter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

GEORGE EHRHARDT*
Affiliation:
Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, [email protected]

Abstract

Drawing on five months of ethnography among rank-and-file Soka Gakkai members, this article takes issue with the conventional view of Komeito and Gakkai political socialization as one of group identity. It uses interviews and primary sources from Gakkai socialization practice to document how the two organizations appeal to Gakkai members by promoting the Komeito policy agenda, and how Gakkai members use the same arguments in search of non-Gakkai votes for the party. Social ties remain important, but they are vehicles for this policy message, not a justification for supporting Komeito. This makes Komeito leadership far more constrained in its political choices than is currently recognized. The article finishes by showing how this theory explains variation in Komeito electoral support better than a social identity alternative.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aruga, Hiroshi (2001), ‘Soka Gakkai and Japanese Politics’, in Machacek, David and Wilson, Byran (eds.), Global Citizens: The Soka Gakkai Buddhist Movement in the World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Azumi, Koya (1971), ‘Political Functions of Soka Gakkai Membership’, Asian Survey, 11 (9): 916–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baerwald, Hans (1986), Party Politics in Japan, Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Bayard de Volo, Lorraine and Schatz, Edward (2004), ‘From the Inside Out: Ethnographic Methods in Political Reseach’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 37: 267–71.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip, Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald (1960), The American Voter, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Curtis, Gerald (1999), The Logic of Japanese Politics, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dator, James (1969), Soka Gakkai Builders of the Third Civilizaton: American and Japanese Members, University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Ehrhardt, George (2008), ‘Buddhists in the Diet: A Review of Japanese Writings on the Soka Gakkai/Komeito Connection’, Politics and Religion, 1(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eto, Shunsuke and Hichiri, Wajo (2003), Jiminto – Soka Gakkai – Komeito: Kokumin Fuzai no Renritsu Seikken – Hishi [LDP-Soka Gakkai-Komeito: The Secret History of Coalition Government without the People], Gakushunotomo Press.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard (1990), Watching Politicians: Essays on Participant Observation, Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris (1981), Retrospective Voting in American National Elections, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Scott C.Kohei, Shinsaku, Miyake, Ichiro, and Richardson, Bradley M. (1991), The Japanese Voter, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald, Palmquist, Bradley and Shickler, Eric (2002), Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Harada, Shinichi, and Murayama, Kazuo (1995), ‘Kore ga Gakkai senkyo urabutai da’, in Tonari no Soka Gakkai [The Soka Gakkai Next Door], Igami, Minobu (ed.), Tokyo: Takarajima, pp. 6874.Google Scholar
Hardacre, Helen (2003), ‘Fieldwork with Japanese Religious Groups’, in Bestor, Theodore C., Steinhoff, Patricia G., and Bestor, Victoria Lyon (eds.), Doing Fieldwork in Japan, University of Hawaii Press, pp. 7188.Google Scholar
Hrebenar, Ronald (2000), Japan's New Party System, Westview Press.Google Scholar
Igami, Minobu (1995), Tonari no Soka Gakkai [The Soka Gakkai Next door], Tokyo: Takarajima.Google Scholar
Kabashima, Ikuo (2000), ‘Public Opinion and Its Impacts on the 2000 HR Election’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 1: 341–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawanishi, Keiichi (1996), Soka Gakkai no Kaibou [Dissecting the Soka Gakkai], Tokyo: Asahi Shinbun Press.Google Scholar
Killian, Mitchell (2007), ‘Who Changes Their Party Identification?’, Dissertation, George Washington University.Google Scholar
Kisala, Robert (1999), Prophets of Peace: Pacifism and Cultural Identity in Japan's New Religions, University of Hawaii Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koellner, Patrick (2002), ‘Upper House Elections in Japan and the Power of the “Organized Vote”’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 3 (1).Google Scholar
Leblanc, Robin (1999), Bicycle Citizens: The Political World of the Japanese Housewife, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarland, H. Neill (1967), The Rush Hour of the Gods a Study of New Religious Movements in Japan, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Levi (2008), ‘Reconsidering the Periphery: Members' Perspectives on Soka Gakkai in the 1950s’, Paper presented at the 2008 annual meeting of the American Association for Asian Studies, 3–6 April, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Brian (2004), ‘Religious Social Networks, Indirect Mobilization, and African-American Political Participation’, Political Research Quarterly, 57 (4): 621–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metraux, Daniel (1988), The History and Theology of the Soka Gakkai, Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Metraux, Daniel (2001), ‘The Changing Role of Komeito in Japanese Politics in the 1990s’, in Machacek, David and Wilson, Byran (eds.), Global Citizens: The Soka Gakkai Buddhist Movement in the World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mulgan, Aurelia George (2000), The Politics of Agriculture in Japan, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reed, Steven (2003), ‘A Religious Party with No Religious Cleavage: The Role of Religious Groups in Japanese Politics’, Paper presented at the British Association for Japanese Studies, Sheffield, England, 14–16 April.Google Scholar
Richardson, Bradley (1974), Political Culture in Japan, University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Bradley (1998), Japanese Democracy: Power, Coordination, and Performance, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sado, Hirano (2005) Komeito – Soka Gakkai no Shinjitsu [The truth about Komeito – Soka Gakkai], Kodansha.Google Scholar
Seager, Richard (2006), Encountering the Dharma: Daisaku Ikeda, Soka Gakkai, and the Globalization of Buddhist Humanism, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shimada, Hiromi (2004), Soka Gakkai, Tokyo: Shinchosha.Google Scholar
Shimada, Hiromi (2007), Komeito vs. Soka Gakkai [Komeito vs. Soka Gakkai] Asahi Shinbun Press.Google Scholar
Shinoda, Tomohito (2006), ‘Japan's Top–Down Policy Process to Dispatch the SDF to Iraq’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 7: 7191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, David (2006), Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction, Sage Press.Google Scholar
Soka Gakkai Problem Research Center (2001), Soka Gakkai Fujinbu: saikyo hyoshu gundan no kaibo [Soka Gakkai Women's Division: Dissection of the Strongest Vote Gathering Machine], Tokyo: Gogatsu Press.Google Scholar
Stockwin, J.A.A. (1989), ‘Political Parties and Political Opposition’, in Ishida, and Krauss, (eds.), Democracy in Japan, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Thomsen, Harry (1963), The New Religions of Japan, Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Watanuki, Joji (1991), ‘Social Structure and Voting Behavior’, in Flanagan, Scott C. et al. (eds.), The Japanese Voter, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
White, James (1970), The Soka Gakkai and Mass Society, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Yamada, Naoki (2004), Soka Gakkai to ha Nanika [What is the Soka Gakkai?], Shinkosha Press.Google Scholar
Yoshikawa, Akemitsu (1999), Shisutemu toshiteno Soka Gakkai = Komeito [Soka Gakkai as System = Komeito], Tokyo: Daisanshokan, 1999.Google Scholar