Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T12:20:24.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Perceptions of unfairness and a weak universal welfare state in South Korea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2018

Sijeong Lim*
Affiliation:
Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
*
Correspondence author: Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Since its democratization, South Korea has widened the population coverage of various social programs, yet the generosity of most programs remains shallow. Existing studies offer state/elite-centered explanations for this move toward a weak universalistic welfare state. I suggest that the move rather accurately reflects citizen attitudes as well: a majority of Koreans across economic classes support welfare state expansion, yet a large segment of the self-proclaimed supporters are unwilling to pay for the expansion. I argue that underlying such mixed attitudes is the perceived unfairness of the tax and transfer systems. More specifically, (1) the perception of unfair contribution vis-à-vis other taxpayers and (2) the perception of unfair fiscal exchange with the government significantly lower one's willingness to contribute to the welfare state. My analysis of a nation-wide survey lends support to my argument. My findings have important policy implications for the emerging economies where, despite a growing citizen demand for social protection, the fiscal support base for welfare state expansion is frail.

Type
Taxation and Welfare Since the Third Wave of Democratization
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Acemoglu, D, Angélica Bautista, M, Querubin, P and Robinson, JA (2007) Economic and political inequality in development: the case of Cundinamarca, Colombia. Technical report National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
An, MY and Peng, I (2016) Diverging Paths? A Comparative Look at Childcare Policies in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. Social Policy & Administration 50, 540558.Google Scholar
Andreß, H-J and Heien, T (2001) Four worlds of welfare state attitudes? A comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States. European Sociological Review 17, 337356.Google Scholar
Ansell, B (2014) The political economy of ownership: housing markets and the welfare state. American Political Science Review 108, 383402.Google Scholar
Barr, NA (2001) The Welfare State as Piggy Bank: Information, Risk, Uncertainty, and the Role of the State. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, LM (1996) Uninformed votes: information effects in presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science 40, 194230.Google Scholar
Bartels, LM (2005) Homer gets a tax cut: inequality and public policy in the American mind. Perspectives on Politics 3, 1531.Google Scholar
Beramendi, P and Rehm, P (2016) Who Gives, Who Gains? Progressivity and Preferences. Comparative Political Studies 49, 529563.Google Scholar
Citrin, J (1979) Do people want something for nothing: public opinion on taxes and government spending. National Tax Journal 32, 113129.Google Scholar
Citrin, J (1997) Do people want something for nothing: public opinion on taxes and government spending. National Tax Journal 32, 113129.Google Scholar
Dimick, M, Rueda, D and Stegmueller, D (2017) The altruistic rich? Inequality and other-regarding preferences for redistribution. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 11, 385439.Google Scholar
Edlund, J and Johansson Sevä, I (2013a) Exploring the something for nothing syndrome: confused citizens or free riders? Evidence from Sweden. Scandinavian Political Studies 36, 293319.Google Scholar
Edlund, J and Johansson Sevä, I (2013b) Is Sweden being torn apart? Privatization and old and new patterns of welfare state support. Social Policy & Administration 47, 542564.Google Scholar
Estévez-Abe, M and Kim, Y-S (2014) Presidents, prime ministers and politics of care: why Korea expanded childcare much more than Japan. Social Policy & Administration 48, 666685.Google Scholar
Feld, LP and Frey, BS (2007) Tax compliance as the result of a psychological tax contract: the role of incentives and responsive regulation. Law & Policy 29, 102120.Google Scholar
Fernández-Albertos, J and Manzano, D (2016) Dualism and support for the welfare state. Comparative European Politics 14, 349375.Google Scholar
Holliday, I (2000) Productivist welfare capitalism: social policy in East Asia. Political Studies 48, 706723.Google Scholar
Iversen, T and Rehm, P (2016) The market for creampuffs: Big Data and the transformation of the welfare state. (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
Jæger, MM (2006) Welfare regimes and attitudes towards redistribution: the regime hypothesis revisited. European Sociological Review 22, 157170.Google Scholar
Jæger, MM (2009) United but divided: welfare regimes and the level and variance in public support for redistribution. European Sociological Review 25, 723737.Google Scholar
Jones, RS (2010) Health-care Reform in Korea: OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 797. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Publishing.Google Scholar
Kang, MS, Jang, HS, Lee, M and Park, E-C (2012) “Sustainability of Korean national health insurance.” Journal of Korean Medical Science 27(Suppl): S21S24.Google Scholar
Kim, PH (2010) The East Asian welfare state debate and surrogate social policy: an exploratory study on Japan and South Korea. Socio-Economic Review 8, 411435.Google Scholar
Koo, H (2007) The changing faces of inequality in South Korea in the age of globalization. Korean Studies 31, 118.Google Scholar
Kuhnle, S (2004) Productive welfare in Korea: moving towards a European welfare state type. In Mishra R, Kuhnle S, Gilbert N, Chung K (eds), Modernizing the Korean Welfare State: Toward the Productive Welfare Model. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, pp. 4764.Google Scholar
Kwon, S (2003) Healthcare financing reform and the new single payer system in the Republic of Korea: social solidarity or efficiency? International Social Security Review 56, 7594.Google Scholar
Kwon, H-J (2005) Transforming the developmental welfare state in East Asia. Development and Change 36, 477497.Google Scholar
Kwon, S (2008) Thirty years of national health insurance in South Korea: lessons for achieving universal health care coverage. Health policy and planning 24, 6371.Google Scholar
Kwon, S and Holliday, I (2007) The Korean welfare state: a paradox of expansion in an era of globalisation and economic crisis. International Journal of Social Welfare 16, 242248.Google Scholar
Larsen, CA (2007) How welfare regimes generate and erode social capital: the impact of underclass phenomena. Comparative Politics 40, 83101.Google Scholar
Levi, M and Sacks, A (2009) Legitimating beliefs: sources and indicators. Regulation & Governance 3, 311333.Google Scholar
Meltzer, AH and Richard, SF (1981) A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy 89, 914927.Google Scholar
Norton, MI and Ariely, D (2011) Building a better America—one wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science 6, 912.Google Scholar
Pommerehne, WW (1978) Institutional approaches to public expenditure: empirical evidence from Swiss cities. Journal of Public Economics 9, 255280.Google Scholar
Ramesh, M (2003) Globalisation and social security expansion in East Asia. In Linda, W (ed.), States in the Global Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions Back. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 83100.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D (1995) Getting interventions right: how South Korea and Taiwan grew rich. Economic policy 10, 53107.Google Scholar
Rudra, N (2007) Welfare states in developing countries: unique or universal? The Journal of Politics 69, 378396.Google Scholar
Rueda, DDS (2016) The externalities of inequality: fear of crime and preferences for redistribution in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science 60, 472489.Google Scholar
Schwartz, H and Seabrooke, L (2008) Varieties of residential capitalism in the international political economy: old welfare states and the new politics of housing. Comparative European Politics 6, 237261.Google Scholar
Sears, DO and Citrin, J (1985) Tax Revolt. Something for Nothing in California. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Song, HK (2003) The birth of a welfare state in Korea: the unfinished symphony of democratization and globalization. Journal of East Asian Studies 3, 405432.Google Scholar
Svallfors, S (2011) A bedrock of support? Trends in welfare state attitudes in Sweden, 1981–2010. Social Policy & Administration 45, 806825.Google Scholar
Wagner, RE (1976) Revenue structure, fiscal illusion and budgetary choice. Public Choice 25, 4561.Google Scholar
Yang, J-J (2017) The Political Economy of the Small Welfare State in South Korea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, J-J and Klassen, T (2010) Retirement, Work and Pensions in Ageing Korea. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar

References in Korean

김(Kim), 사현 (2015) 한국인의 복지태도 불일치에 대한 탐색적 연구: 복지지출과 증세에 대한 태도불일치를 중심으로, 사회과학연구, 41(1), 2757.Google Scholar
김(Kim), 영순 & 여(Yeo), 유진 (2011) 한국인의 복지태도, 경제와 사회, 91, 211240.Google Scholar
남(Nam), 상호 (2008) 가계자산 분포와 불평등도의 분해: 노동패널자료를 중심으로, 제 9회 한국노동패널 학술대회자료집, 527-556.Google Scholar
배(Bae), 화숙 (2005) 정규직과 비정규직 노동자의 기업복치 차이 연구: 한국노동패널 (KLIPS) 6차 자료를 중심으로, 사회복지정책 21, 217237.Google Scholar
신(Shin), 영임 & 강(Kang), 민지 (2014) 자영업자의 소득탈루율 및 탈세규모의 추정, 국회예산정책처.Google Scholar
오(Oh), 창민 (2014) 대기업 공장 내 정규직-비정규직 노동자의 법정외 기업 복지에 관한 연구, 현대사회과학연구, 18, 91108.Google Scholar
(Lee)중섭, (2009) 한국인의 복지의식에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구, 사회복지정책, 36(4), 7399.Google Scholar
(Jang) 수정, (2013) 영유아 무상보육정책 담론에 대한 분석-일가족 양립 지원 관점을 중심으로, 한국사회복지학, 65(4), 3359.Google Scholar