Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T17:30:02.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Partners Apart? The Foreign Policy Attitudes of the American and European Publics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2005

PIERANGELO ISERNIA
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Storiche, Giuridiche, Politiche e Sociali, Università di Siena, Via Mattioli, 10, I-53100 Siena, [email protected]
PHILIP P. EVERTS
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AL Leiden, The [email protected]

Abstract

It is often argued today that a deep and troublesome gap across the Atlantic has been developing and that Europeans and Americans no longer share the same view of the world. On the basis of data gathered in the 2002 Transatlantic Trends Survey, held in the USA and six European countries, this article assesses whether there is indeed such a gap at the mass level. It focuses on three major dimensions of world views: (1) perceptions of threats (2) the sense of affinity with other countries in terms of allies, friends or foes, and (3) attitudes toward the use of force, both in general and in specific circumstances, more particularly the war over Iraq. It concludes that European publics in 2002 looked at the world in a way that is rather similar to that of many ordinary Americans including harbouring deep reservations about the conduct of certain aspects of U.S. foreign policy. Both publics share fundamental worldviews. On Iraq, Europeans and Americans agreed in some respects (such as the necessary role of the UN) but disagreed on other. In many respects at the mass level the differences across the Atlantic are of degree, and not fundamental. They result from disaffection with the present administration rather than with US policies in general. Moreover, the alleged European ‘anti-Americanism’ is a misnomer, which hides the considerable sympathies and warm feelings towards America, and the perceived common interests and values.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)