Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:29:11.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Socialization Shapes Chinese Views of America and the World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2016

PETER HAYS GRIES  and
MATTHEW SANDERS
PETER HAYS GRIES
Affiliation:
University of [email protected]
MATTHEW SANDERS
Affiliation:
Hospital Corporation of [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Urban Chinese today do not appear to trust foreign countries. Why are they so suspicious? Over the past quarter century, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has utilized its educational and propaganda systems to produce historical narratives of imperial China's beneficence towards its East Asian neighbors, and of an early modern ‘Century of Humiliation’ at the hands of ‘imperialist’ foreign powers. Qualitative analysis of Chinese social media today suggests that these narratives are tied to widespread popular distrust of China's ‘ungrateful’ East Asian neighbors and the ‘hegemonic’ West today. Interrogating a 2012 survey of urban Chinese, this paper explores the sources of international attitudes quantitatively. It first examines whether Chinese today do indeed distrust foreign countries. It then tests two hypotheses about the drivers of Chinese distrust towards the world today. A ‘top-down’ socialization hypothesis holds that political (e.g. party propaganda via education and the media) and/or social (e.g. peer groups, social conformity) pressures shape the international attitudes of the Chinese people. A ‘bottom-up’ psychological hypothesis, by contrast, holds that individual differences like age and gender shape Chinese attitudes. We find substantial support for the former: more years of education are associated with levels of dis/trust in foreign countries in the socially or politically appropriate ways. However, we also find that ‘bottom-up’ individual differences in subjective interest in international affairs interact with ‘top-down’ socialization processes like education and media exposure in shaping the international attitudes of urban Chinese today. The prevalence of public discourses of distrust towards foreign countries does not bode well for Chinese foreign policy in the twenty-first century.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 1 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brady, Anne-Marie (2008), Marketing Dictatorship: Propaganda and Thought Work in Contemporary China, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Brewer, Paul R (2004), ‘Public Trust in (or Cynicism about) other Nations across Time’, Political Behavior, 26 (4): 317–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Wæver, Ole, and de Wilde, Jaap (1998), Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, John T. and Petty, Richard (1989), ‘Effects of Message Repetition on Argument Processing, Recall, and Persuasion’, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10 (1): 3–12.Google Scholar
Callahan, William A. (2010), China: The Pessoptimist Nation, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crisp, Richard J., Hutter, Russell, and Young, Bryony (2009), ‘When Mere Exposure Leads to Less Liking: The Incremental Threat Effect in Intergroup Contexts’, British Journal of Psychology, 100:133–49.Google Scholar
Denton, Kirk A. (2014), Exhibiting the Past: Historical Memory and the Politics of Museums in Postsocialist China, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Gries, Peter Hays (2014), The Politics of American Foreign Policy: How Ideology Divides Liberals and Conservatives over Foreign Affairs, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Peter Hays (2012), ‘Disillusionment and Dismay: How Chinese Netizens Think and Feel about the Two Koreas’, Journal of East Asian Studies, 12: 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Peter Hays, Zhang, Qingmin, Crowson, H. Michael, and Cai, Huajian (2011), ‘Patriotism, Nationalism, and China's US Policy: Structures and Consequences of Chinese National Identity’, The China Quarterly, 205: 1–17.Google Scholar
Jiang, Zemin (1991), ‘Comrade Jiang Zemin's letter to Li Tieying and He Dongchang’ (江泽民同志致李铁映、何东昌的信), People's Daily (人民日报), 1 June 1991.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Martin F., Schaefer, Evelyn, and Zinkiewicz, Lucy (1994), ‘Member Preferences for Discussion Content in Anticipated Group Decisions: Effects of Type of Issue and Group Interactive Goal’, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15 (4): 489–508.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Martin F. and Wilke, Henk (2001), ‘Cognitive and Social Motivation in Group Decision Making’, in Forgas, J. P., Williams, K. D., and Wheeler, L. (eds.), The Social Mind: Cognitive and Motivational Aspects of Interpersonal Behavior, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 406–28.Google Scholar
Landry, Pierre F. and Shen, Mingming (2005), ‘Reaching Migrants in Survey Research: The Use of the Global Positioning System to Reduce Coverage Bias in China’, Political Analysis, 13 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laughlin, Patrick R. (1980), ‘Social Combination Processes of Cooperative Problem-Solving Groups on Verbal Intellective Tasks’, in Fishbein, M. (ed.), Progress in Social Psychology, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 127–55.Google Scholar
Laughlin, Patrick R. and Ellis, Alan (1986), ‘Demonstrability and Social Combination Processes on Mathematical Intellective Tasks’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22: 177–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. (2001), The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Petty, Richard. E. and Cacioppo, John (1986), Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change, New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Rugs, Deborah and Kaplan, Martin (1993), ‘Effectiveness of Informational and Normative Influences in Group Decision Making Depends on the Group Interactive Goal’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 32: 147–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce (1994), Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Swaine, Michael D., Esplin Odell, Rachel, Yuan, Luo, and Xiangdong, Liu (2013), US–China Security Perceptions Survey: Findings and Implications, Carnegie Endowment.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander (1999), Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, James (2002), Voices of Collective Remembering, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zhao, Suisheng (2004), A Nation-State by Construction: Dynamics of Modern Chinese Nationalism, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar