Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-03T01:08:20.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Global Citizenries Think about Democracy: An Evaluation and Synthesis of Recent Public Opinion Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2018

DOH CHULL SHIN  and
HANNAH JUNE KIM
DOH CHULL SHIN
Affiliation:
Center for the Study of Democracy, University of California, [email protected]
HANNAH JUNE KIM
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of California, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989, individual scholars and research institutes have conducted numerous public opinion surveys to monitor how global citizenries react to the process of democratization taking place in their own countries and elsewhere. This article reviews the various issues surrounding the divergent conceptions of democracy among political scientists and ordinary citizens, and synthesizes significant findings of the conceptual and empirical research based on these surveys. It also raises a set of new questions that future surveys should address to broaden and deepen our knowledge about citizen conceptions of democracy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 2018 , pp. 222 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, Christopher and Bartels, Larry M. (2016), Democracy for Realists: Why Electionsddo not Produce Responsive Government, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Amaney, Jamal and Tessler, Mark (2008), ‘Attitudes in the Arab World’, Journal of Democracy, 19 (1): 97–110.Google Scholar
Ariely, Gal (2015), ‘Democracy-Assessment in Cross-National Surveys: A Critical Evaluation of How People Evaluate their Regime’, Social Indicators Research, 121: 621–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariely, Gal and Davidov, Eldad (2011), ‘Can We Rate Public Support for Democracy in a Comparable Way?’, Social Indicators Research, 104 (2): 271–286.Google Scholar
Baker, Ernest Trans (1962), The Politics of Aristotle, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Samuel and Simon, Janos (eds.) (1998), The Postcommunist Citizen, Budapest: Erasmus Foundation.Google Scholar
Baviskar, Siddhartha and Malone, Mary Fran T. (2004), ‘What Democracy Means to Citizens − and Why It Matters’, European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 76: 3–23.Google Scholar
Blokker, Paul (2012), Multiple Democracies in Europe: Political Culture in New Member States, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Booth, John and Richard, Patricia (2014), Latin American Political Culture: Public Opinion and Democracy, Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Bratton, Michael (2010), ‘Anchoring the D-Word in Africa’, Journal of Democracy, 2 (4): 106–113.Google Scholar
Bratton, Michael, Mattes, Robert, and Gyimah-Boadi, E. (2005), Public Opinion, Democracy, and Market Reform in Africa, New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Camp, Roderic. A. (2001), Citizen Views of Democracy in Latin America, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canache, Damarys (2012), ‘Citizens’ Conceptualizations of Democracy: Structural Complexity, Substantive Content, and Political Significance’, Comparative Political Studies, 45 (9): 1132–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnaghan, Ellen (2011), ‘The Difficulty of Measuring Support for Democracy in a Changing Society: Evidence from Russia’, Democratization, 18 (3): 682−706.Google Scholar
Carrión, Julio (2008), ‘Illiberal Democracy and Normative Democracy: How is Democracy Defined in the Americas?’, in Seligson, Mitchell (ed.), Challenges to Democracy in Latin America and the Caribbean: Evidence from the AmericasBarometer, Nashville: Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
Cho, Youngho (2013), ‘How Well Global Citizens are Informed about Democracy?’, Political Studies, 63 (1): 1−19.Google Scholar
Cho, Youngho (2014), ‘To Know Democracy is to Love it: A Cross-National Analysis of Democratic Understanding and Political Support for Democracy’, Political Research Quarterly, 67: 478−88.Google Scholar
Chu, Yun-han, Bratton, Michael, Lagos, Marta, Shastri, Sandeep, and Tessler, Mark, (2008a), ‘Public Opinion and Democratic Legitimacy’, Journal of Democracy, 9 (2): 74−87.Google Scholar
Chu, Yun-han, Diamond, Larry, Nathan, Andrew, and Shin, Doh Chull (eds.) (2008b), How East Asians View Democracy, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Chu, Yun-han and Huang, Min-hua (2010), ‘Solving an Asian Puzzle’, Journal of Democracy, 21 (4): 114−21.Google Scholar
Collier, David and Levitsky, Stephen (1997), ‘Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovations in Comparative Research’, World Politics, 49 (3): 430−51.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael (1999), ‘Thickening Thin Concepts and Theories: Combining Large N and Small in Comparative Politics’, Comparative Politics, 31 (4): 465–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1971), Polyarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1992), ‘The Problem of Citizen Competence’, Journal of Democracy, 3 (4): 45−59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert, Shapiro, Ian, and Cheibub, Jose (2003), The Democracy Sourcebook, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell and Shin, Doh Chull (eds.) (2006), Citizens, Democracy, and Markets around the Pacific Rim, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell and Shin, Doh Chull (2014), ‘Reassessing the Civic Culture Model’, in Dalton, Russell and Welzel, Christian (eds.), The Civic Culture Transformed, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91−115.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell, Shin, Doh, and Jou, Willy (2007), ‘Understanding democracy: Data from Unlikely places’, Journal of Democracy, 18 (4): 142–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Regt, S. (2013), ‘Arabs Want Democracy, but What Kind?’, Advances in Applied Sociology, 3: 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry (1999), Developing Democracy, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry (2008), The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies Throughout the World, New York: Times Book.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry (2013), ‘Why Wait for Democracy?’, The Wilson Quarterly (winter), http://wilsonquarterly.com/stories/why-wait-for-democracy/.Google Scholar
Doherty, David and Mecellem, Jessica ( n.d.), ‘Conceptions of Democracy in the Arab World’, working paper, PCLS 5188, Central European University.Google Scholar
Ferrin, Monica and Kriesi, Hanspeter (2014), ‘Europeans’ Understandings and Evaluations of Democracy: Topline Results from Round 6 of the European Social Survey’, www.europeansocialsurvey.org/permalink/800ea36f-3a8d-11e4-95d4-005056b8065f.pdf.Google Scholar
Ferrin, Monica and Kriesi, Hanspeter (eds.) (2016), How Europeans View and Evaluate Democracy, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fish, M. Steven (2005), Democracy Derailed in Russia: The Failure of Open Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Dieter (1999), ‘The Democratic Culture of United Germany’, in Norris, Pippa (ed.), Critical Citizens, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 123−45.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis (2014), ‘At the end of “History” still Stands Democracy’, The Wall Street Journal, 6 June.Google Scholar
Gerring, John (1999), ‘What Makes a Good Concept? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences’, Polity, 31 (3): 357−93.Google Scholar
Gilani, Ijaz Shafi (2006), ‘Global Verdict on Democracy’, http://gallup.com.pk/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/The-Global-Verdict-on-Democracy-Voice-of-the-People.pdf.Google Scholar
Hale, Henry E. (2011), ‘The Myth of Mass Russian Support for Autocracy: Public Opinion Foundation of Hybrid Regime’, Europe−Asia Studies, 63 (8): 1357−75.Google Scholar
Hale, Henry E. (2012), ‘Trends in Russian Views on Democracy 2008–2012: Has There Been a Russian Democratic Awakening?’, Russian Analytical Digest, 117: 9−11.Google Scholar
Heath, Anthony, Fisher, Stephen, and Smith, Shawna (2005), ‘The Globalization of Public Opinion Research’, Annual Review of Political Science, 8: 297−331.Google Scholar
Huang, Min-Hua (2014), ‘Understanding Democracy in East Asian Societies’, presented at the 23rd World Congress of Political Science held in Montreal, Canada on 19–24 July.Google Scholar
Huang, Min-Hua, Chu, Yun-han, and Chang, Yu-tzung (2013), ‘Popular Understanding of Democracy and Regime Legitimacy’, Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 9 (1): 147−71.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald (2003), ‘How Solid Is Mass Support for Democracy − and How Can We Measure It?’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 36 (1): 51−57.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald and Welzel, Christian (2005), Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Joshi, Devin (2013), ‘The Protective and Developmental Varieties of Liberal Democracy: A Difference in Kind or Degree’, Democratization, 20 (2): 187−214.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry (2000), ‘Electoralism: Why Elections are not Democracy’, in Rose, Richard (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Elections, Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Murray, Christopher J. L., Salomon, Joshua A., and Tandon, Ajay (2004), ‘Enhancing the Validity and Cross-Cultural Comparability of Measurement in Survey Research’, American Political Science Review, 98 (1): 191−207.Google Scholar
Klingemann, Hans Dieter (2014), ‘Dissatisfied Democrats: Democratic Maturation in Old and New Democracies’, in Dalton, Russell and Welzel, Christian (eds.), The Civic Culture Transformed, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 116−57.Google Scholar
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Fuchs, Dieter, and Zielonka, Jan (eds.) (2008), Democracy and Political Culture in Eastern Europe, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lekvall, Anna (2013), Development First, Democracy Later? Stockholm: International Institute for Development and Electoral Assistance.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend (1999), Patterns of Government: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-six Countries, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lu, Jie (2013), ‘Democratic Conceptions in East Asian Societies: A Contextualized Analysis’, Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 9 (1): 117−45.Google Scholar
Lu, Jie and Shi, Tianjian (2015), ‘The Battle of Ideas and Discourses before Democratic Transition: Different Conceptions of Democracy in Authoritarian China’, International Political Science Review, 36: 20−41.Google Scholar
Mattes, Robert (2007), ‘Public Opinion Research in Emerging Democracies’, in Donsbach, W. and Traugott, M. W. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Public Opinion Research, London: Sage, pp. 113–22.Google Scholar
Mattes, Robert (2010), ‘What Drives Support for Democracy?’, presented at a Global Barometer Survey Conference held in Taipei, Taiwan on 15–16 October 2010.Google Scholar
McClosky, Herbert and Brill, Allida (1983), Dimensions of Tolerance, New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
McClosky, Herbert and Zaller, John (1984), The American Ethos, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur, Hesli, Vicky, and Reisinger, William (1997), ‘Conceptions of Democracy Among Mass and Elite in Post-Soviet Societies’, British Journal of Political Science, 27 (2): 157–90.Google Scholar
Moller, Jorgen and Skaaning, Svend-Erik (2013), ‘The Third Wave: Inside the Numbers’, Journal of Democracy, 24 (4): 97−109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa (2009), ‘The Globalization of Comparative Public Opinion Research’, in Landman, Todd and Robinson, Neil (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Comparative Politics, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa (2011), Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pereira, Monica Ferrin (2012), ‘What is democracy to Citizens?’, PhD Thesis submitted, European University Institute.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Antonio Cheibub, Jose, and Limongi, Ferando (2000), Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard (1996), ‘Viewpoint: Choosing Democracy as the Lesser Evil’, www.tol.org/client/article/2556-viewpoint-choosing-democracy-as-the-lesser-evil.html.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard (2007), ‘Learning to Support New Regime’, Journal of Democracy, 8 (3): 111−25.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard, Mishler, William, and Haerpfer, Christian W. (1998), Democracy and Its Alternatives, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard, Mishler, William, and Munro, Neil (2011), Popular Support for an Undemocratic Regime, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni (1987), Theory of Democracy Revisited, Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas and Sarsfield, Rodolfo (2007), ‘Democrats with Adjectives: Linking Direct and Indirect Measures of Democratic Support’, European Journal of Political Research, 46 (5): 637−59.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Phillippe and Karl, Terry (1991), ‘What Democracy is . . . and Is Not’, Journal of Democracy, 2 (3): 75−88.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya (1999), ‘Democracy as a Universal Value’, Journal of Democracy, 10 (3): 3−17.Google Scholar
Shi, Tianjian (2008), ‘China: Democratic Values Supporting an Authoritarian System’, in Yun-han, Chu, Diamond, Larry, Nathan, Andrew, and Shin, Doh Chull (eds.), How East Asians View Democracy, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 209−37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, Tianjian (2014), The Cultural Logic of Politics in Mainland China and Taiwan, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shi, Tianjian and Lu, Jie (2010), ‘The shadow of Confucianism’, Journal of Democracy 21 (4): 123−30.Google Scholar
Shin, Doh Chull (2009), ‘Is the Whole World becoming Democratic?’, Woodrow Wilson Center working paper.Google Scholar
Shin, Doh Chull (2012), Confucianism and Democratization in East Asia, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shin, Doh Chull (2015), ‘Cultural Hybridization in East Asia’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 25 (1): 10−30.Google Scholar
Shin, Doh Chull (2017), ‘Popular Understanding of Democracy’, Oxford Research Encyclopedia, http://politics.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-80.Google Scholar
Shin, Doh Chull and Cho, Youngho (2010), ‘How East Asians Understand Democracy: From a Comparative Perspective’, Asien, 116: 21−40.Google Scholar
Shin, Doh Chull and Wells, Jason (2005), ‘Is Democracy the Only Game in Town?’, Journal of Democracy, 16 (2): 88−101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tessler, Mark (2015), Islam and the Search for a Political Formula: How Ordinary Citizens in the Muslim Middle East Think about Islam's Place in Political Life, Bloomington, ID: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (2013), ‘My World. The United Nations Global Survey for a Better World, www.beyond2015.org/sites/default/files/MY%20World%20Results%20Report%20of%20BALI_final.pdf.Google Scholar
Welzel, Christian (2013), Freedom Rising: Human Empowerment and the Quest for Emancipation, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Welzel, Christian and Moreno Alvarez, Alejandro (2014), ‘Enlightening People: The Spark of Emancipative Values’, in Dalton, Russell and Welzel, Christian (eds.), The Civic Culture Transformed, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 59–88.Google Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed (1997), ‘The rise of illiberal democracy’, Foreign Affairs, 76 (6): 22–43.Google Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed (2007), The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar