Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:06:40.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deliberation, demobilization, and limited empowerment: a survey study on participatory pricing in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2018

Xuan Qin  and
Baogang He
Xuan Qin
Affiliation:
Institute for Advanced Study in Social Sciences at Fudan University
Baogang He*
Affiliation:
Chair in International Relations, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, DeakinUniversity, and adjunct professor at Tianjin Normal University
*
*Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Authoritarian deliberation has been used widely to describe the specific form of deliberation developed in China. However, whether its practice will strengthen authoritarianism or lead to democratization remains unknown. In this study, we examine this question from the perspective of participants in public deliberation. Surveying the participants in participatory pricings held in Shanghai over the past 5 years, we find that participants’ perception of deliberative quality has a statistically significant negative impact on their level of political activism, while their level of empowerment has a moderating effect on this negative relationship. In this light, Chinese deliberative practices characterized by high-quality deliberation and low-level empowerment are likely to have a demobilization effect; thus, they reinforce the authoritarian rules.

Keywords

Deliberationdemobilizationparticipatory pricingChinapublic forum
Type
Special Section, Authoritarian Deliberation Revisited (Edited by Baogang He and Hendrik Wagenaar)
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , December 2018 , pp. 694 - 708
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bacque, MH (2014) Introduction. In Deboulet, A and Lelevrier, C (eds), Renovations urbaines en Europe. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, pp. 97–99.Google Scholar
Bohman, J and Rehg, W (1997) Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Burns, N (2007) Gender in the aggregate, gender in the individual, gender and political action. Politics & Gender 3, 104–124.Google Scholar
Cabannes, Y and Zhuang, M (2014) Participatory budgeting at scale and bridging the rural−urban divide in chengdu. Environment and Urbanization 26, 257–275.Google Scholar
Chambers, S (2003) Deliberative democracy theory. Annual Review of Political Science 6, 307–326.Google Scholar
Chow, KW (2010) Chinese state bureaucracy and democratization: contradictions and strategization. Public Organization Review 10, 259–274.Google Scholar
Coffé, H and Bolzendahl, C (2010) Same game, different rules? Gender differences in political participation. Sex Roles 62, 318–333.Google Scholar
Cohen, J (1997) Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In Bohman, J and Rehg, W (eds), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 67–92.Google Scholar
Dalton, RJ (2008) Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies 56, 76–98.Google Scholar
Dryzek, JS (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, J (1991) Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, J, He, B and Siu, A (2006) Public consultation through deliberation in China: the first Chinese deliberative poll. In Leib, JE and He, B (eds), The Search for Deliberative Democracy in China. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 229–244.Google Scholar
Fishkin, J, He, B, Luskin, RC and Siu, A (2010) Deliberative democracy in an unlikely place: deliberative polling in China. British Journal of Political Science 40, 435–448.Google Scholar
Fung, A and Warren, ME (2011) The Participedia project: an Introduction. International Public Management Journal 14, 341–362.Google Scholar
Gutmann, A and Thompson, D (2009) Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J (1985) The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J (1990) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J (1994) Three normative models of democracy. Constellations (Oxford, England) 1, 1–10.Google Scholar
He, B (2006) Participatory and deliberative institutions in China. In Leib, EJ and He, B (eds), The Search for Deliberative Democracy in China. London: Palgrave, pp. 175–196.Google Scholar
He, B (2007) Rural Democracy in China: The Role of Village Elections. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
He, B (2011) Civic engagement through participatory budgeting in China: three different logics at work. Public Administration and Development 31, 122–133.Google Scholar
He, B (2018) Deliberative citizenship and deliberative governance: a case study of One deliberative experimental in China. Citizenship Studies 22, 294–311.Google Scholar
He, B and Thøgersen, S (2010) Giving the people a voice? Experiments with consultative authoritarian institutions in China. Journal of Contemporary China 19, 675–692.Google Scholar
He, B and Wang, F (2018) “Democratizing the practice of “letters and visits” in China: a deliberative democracy perspective. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Science Edition) 4, 13–23.Google Scholar
He, B and Wu, J (2017) Social conflicts and the origin of local deliberative democracy at Chinese cities. Open Times 3, 101–124.Google Scholar
He, B and Warren, ME (2011) Authoritarian deliberation: the deliberative turn in Chinese political development. Perspectives on Politics 9, 269–289.Google Scholar
Hillygus, DS (2005) The missing link: exploring the relationship between higher education and political engagement. Political Behavior 27, 25–47.Google Scholar
Keane, J (2017) When Trees Fall, Monkeys Scatter: Rethinking Democracy In China. London: World Scientific Europe Ltd.Google Scholar
LaPorta, R, Lopez-de-Silanes, F, Shleifer, A and Vishny, R (1997) Trust in large organizations. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 87, 333–338.Google Scholar
Lu, L and Gilmour, R (2004) Culture and conceptions of happiness: individual oriented and social oriented SWB. Journal of Happiness Studies 5, 269–291.Google Scholar
Lum, T (2006) Social Unrest in China. Congressional Research Service. Washington.Google Scholar
Ma, D and Hsu, S-c (2018) The political consequences of deliberative democracy and electoral democracy in China: an empirical comparative analysis from four counties. The China Review 18, 1–34.Google Scholar
Manin, B, Stein, E and Mansbridge, J (1987) On legitimacy and political deliberation. Political Theory 15, 338–368.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J, Bohman, J, Chambers, S, Christiano, T, Fung, A, Parkinson, J, Thompson, DF and Warren, ME (2012) “A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In Parkinson, J and Mansbridge, J (eds) Deliberative Systems--Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Michailova, S and Hutchings, K (2006) National cultural influences on knowledge sharing: a comparison of China and Russia. Journal of Management Studies 43, 383–405.Google Scholar
Moore, RL (2005) Generation Ku: individualism and China's Millennial Youth. Ethnology 44, 357.Google Scholar
Olsson, SA (2014) Corruption and political participation. QOG Working Paper Series 11, 1–53.Google Scholar
Qin, X (2016) Authoritative pattern of Chinese deliberative democracy: a quantitative analysis of the relationship between ‘authoritarian level’ and ‘public concern’ in Chinese public price hearing. Zhejiang Social Sciences 16, 39–45.Google Scholar
Rodan, G (2018) Participation Without Democracy: Containing Conflict in Southeast Asia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Romano, G (2018) A critical reappraisal of resident participation in China and France: ‘authoritarian deliberation’ goes global? Japanese Journal of Political Science 19, 709–722.Google Scholar
Shapland, C (2015) Explaining variations in political interest and participation amongst countries: a cross-national comparison. Undergraduate Honors Theses 869, 1–80.Google Scholar
Tanner, MS (2004) China rethinks unrest. The Washington Quarterly 27, 137–156.Google Scholar
Verba, S, Schlozman, KL and Brady, HE (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, ME (2002) Deliberative democracy. In Carter, A and Stokes, G(eds), Democratic Theory Today: Challenges for the 21st Century. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 173–202.Google Scholar
Wu, Y and Wang, W (2011) The rationalization of public budgeting in China: a reflection on participatory budgeting in Wuxi. Public Finance and Management 11, 262–283.Google Scholar
Yan, Y (2010) The Chinese path to individualization. The British Journal of Sociology 61, 489–512.Google Scholar
Young, IM (1996) “Communication and the other: beyond deliberative democracy. In Benhabib, S (eds), Democracy and Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 120–136.Google Scholar