Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:56:29.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Evidence-Based Typology of Asian Societies: What Do Asian Societies Look Like from the Bottom Up instead of Top Down?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2017

TAKASHI INOGUCHI
TAKASHI INOGUCHI*
Affiliation:
University of Niigata Prefecture/University of [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In profiling Asian societies, such classical authors as Hegel, Marx, and Wittfogel have had considerable influence on the subject. They adopted power-centered approaches in characterizing Asian societies. This manuscript adopts the evidence-based approach with a bottom-up angle in constructing a people-centered typology of Asian societies. People's daily life satisfaction in 29 Asian societies is factor-analyzed with varimax rotation, society by society. Using the first two dimensions of factor analysis for each society, five types of Asian society are constructed: Ab, Ac, Ba, Bc, and Ca, where A means materialism in the primary, b means postmaterialism in the secondary, B means postmaterialism in the primary, a means materialism in the secondary, c means public sector dominance in the secondary, and C means public sector dominance in the primary. Ab societies include: Afghanistan, Indonesia, Japan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. Ac societies include: China, South Korea, Taiwan, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, and Mongolia. Ba societies include: Hong Kong, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Kyrgyzstan. Bc includes Brunei, the Philippines, Bhutan, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Kazakhstan. Ca societies include: Singapore and the Maldives. Responses to questions about lifestyle priorities are also provided to corroborate and reinforce the above typology. Applicability of this method is open to non-Asian as well as Asian societies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 216 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, G. and Verba, S. (1963), Civic Culture: Attitudes and Beliefs of Five Nations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chugrov, S. (2016), ‘Suschestbuyet li nezanadnaya politologiya (Is There Non-Western Political Science?)’, Politicheskaya Teoriya by Takashi Inoguchi (‘Political Theory’) by Takashi Inoguchi, Polis: Political Studies Journal (a review essay on Takashi Inoguchi).Google Scholar
The Economist (2016), ‘Twilight of the King: Politics in Thailand’, 23 July 2016, pp. 17–19.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (1995), Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Fanon, F. (2005), The Wretched of the Earth, New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Genron-NPO (2016), ‘Sekai no demokurasi wa kotai shitanoka? Ajia no minshushugiha kono shiren ni dou tachimukaunoka?’ (Has democracy receded in the world? How do Asian democracies cope with this challenge?)’, http://www.genron-npo.net/future/archives/6333.html [accessed 20 August 2016].Google Scholar
Gilley, B. (2015), The Nature of Asian Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (2004), The Philosophy of History, London: Dover Philosophical Classics.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1971), Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1977), The Silent Revolution, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1990), Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1997), Modernization and Postmodernization, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. and Welzel, C. (2005), Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inoguchi, T. (2015a), ‘Multiple Modes of Well-Being in Asia’, Glatzer, Wolfgang et al. (eds.), Global Handbook of Quality of Life: Exploration of Well-Being of Nations and Continents, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 597–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoguchi, T. (2015b), ‘Quality of Life Research in Asia’, in Maggino, Filomena (ed.), A Life Devoted to Quality of Life: Festschrift in Honor of Alex Michalos, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 237–69.Google Scholar
Inoguchi, T. (2016), ‘The Emergence of Comparative Politics in Japan’, Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 1 (1): 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoguchi, Takashi (forthcoming in 2017), Exit, Voice and Loyalty in Asia, Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoguchi, T. and Estes, R. (2016), ‘The History of Well-Being in East Asia: From Global Conflict to Global Leadership’, in Estes, R. and Sirgy, J. (eds.), The Pursuit of Well-Being: The Untold Global History, Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Inoguchi, T. and Fujii, S. (2013), The Quality of Life in Asia: A Comparison of Quality of Life in Asia, Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Inoguchi, T. and Le, L. T. Q. (2016), “Toward Modelling a Global Social Contract: Jean-Jacques Rousseau and John Locke,” Japanese Journal of Political Science, 17 (3): 489–522.Google Scholar
Inoguchi, T. and Tokuda, Y. (eds.) (2017), Trust with Asian Characteristics, Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Kato, T. (2012), Buki to shiteno shakai ruikei ron (Typology of Societies as a Weapon), Tokyo: Kodansha.Google Scholar
Keane, J. (2009), The Life and Death of Democracy, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Lee, K. Y. (2000), From Third World to First: Memoirs of Lee Kuan Yew, Vol. 2, New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Lieven, A. (2012), Pakistan: A Hard Country, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Levin, Y. (2016), The Fractured Republic: Renewing America' Social Contract in the Age of Individualism, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mair, P. (2013), Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy, London: Verson.Google Scholar
Maruyama, M. (1961), Nihon no shiso (The Idea of Japan), Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1875), ‘Critique of the Gotha Programme’, Marx and Engels Selected Works, Vol. 3, Moscow: Progress Publishers, pp.13–30.Google Scholar
Matsui, T. (2000), Seinan Ajia no Sabaku Bunka (Desert Culture in Southwest Asia), Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Nakane, C. (1967a), Garo and Khasi: A Comparative Study in Matrilineal Systems, Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nakane, C. (1967b), Kinship and Economic Organization in Rural Japan, London: Bloomsbury Academics.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G. (1973), Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Phongpaichit, P. and Baker, C. (2015), Unequal Thailand: Aspects of Income, Wealth and Power, Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (1997), ‘Democracy in America at Century's End’, in Hadenius, Axel (ed.), Democracy's Victory and Crisis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pye, L. W. (1985), Asian Power and Politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roy, A. (1997), The God of Small Things, London: Flamingo.Google Scholar
Scott, J. (2009), The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shan, H. (2004), Zhongguoren yu Induren: Wenhua zhuangtong de bijiao yanjiu (Chinese and Hindu: A Comparative Study of Cultural Traditions), Beijing: Shehui Kexue wenxian Chupanshe.Google Scholar
Todd, E. (2011), The Origin of the Family System, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (2002), The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism: And Other Writings, London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Wittfogel, K. (1981), Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power, New York: Vintage.Google Scholar