Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:38:43.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

National Security Environments, Patriotism, and Japanese Public Opinion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2015

KOJI KAGOTANI
KOJI KAGOTANI*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics, Osaka University of [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines Japanese reactions to neighboring countries’ behavior by addressing possible micro-motives, such as patriotism, the rational demand for national defense, and retrospective policy evaluation. This theoretical development leads to distinctive hypotheses from different motivations and directly tests them using macro-data (not survey data). This research will apply this framework to Japanese politics and will show that foreign threats stimulate patriotism in the public mind and enhance political support for national leaders. It will also demonstrate that the Japanese public has no optimistic view of the new prime minister and that the honeymoon effect in previous research may be confounded with the patriotic effect because the new leader is less experienced and is often challenged by foreign countries.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 16 , Issue 1: Who Does or Does Not Respond to Whom or What in a Democracy? The Case of Japan , March 2015 , pp. 96 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azar, Edward E. (1980), ‘The Conflict and Peace Data Bank (COPDAB) Project’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24 (1): 143–52.Google Scholar
Box, George E. and Jenkins, Gwilym M. (1970), Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, San Francisco, CA: Holden Day.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. and Tomlinson, Andrew R. (2000), ‘Fractional Integration Methods in Political Science’, Electoral Studies, 19 (1): 63–76.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. and Smith, Renee M. (1998), ‘Investigating Political Dynamics Using Fractional Integration Methods’, American Journal of Political Science, 42 (2): 661– 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Richard A. (1991), Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Harold D. and Lebo, Matthew (2003), ‘Fractional (Co)Integration and Governing Party Support in Britain’, British Journal of Political Science, 33 (2): 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards III, George C. and Swenson, Tami (1997), ‘Who Rallies? The Anatomy of a Rally Event’, Journal of Politics, 59 (1): 200–12.Google Scholar
Ghosn, Faten, Palmer, Glenn, and Bremer, Stuart A. (2004), ‘The MID3 Data Set, 1993–2001:Procedures, Coding Rules, and Description’, Conflict Management and Peace Science, 21 (2): 133–54.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua S. (1992), ‘A Conflict-Cooperation Scale for WEIS Events Data’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36 (2): 369–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, Thomas and Russett, Bruce (1992), ‘Public Opinion and the Common Defense: Who Governs Military Spending in the United States?’, American Political Science Review, 86 (4): 905–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iida, Takeshi (2005), ‘Seitō Shiji no Naikaku Shiji heno Eikyō no Jikanteki Henka: ARFIMA Moderu to Jihen Parametā wo Mochiita Jikeiretsu Bunseki [Temporal Changes in the Effects of the Party Support on the Cabinet Support: the Time-Series Analysis using ARFIMA Model and Time Covariant Parameter]’, Senkyo Gakkai Kiyō, 4: 41–61.Google Scholar
Izumikawa, Yasuhiro (2010), ‘Explaining Japanese Antimilitarism: Normative and Realist Constraints on Japan's Security Policy’, International Security, 35 (2): 123–60.Google Scholar
James, Patrick and Oneal, John R. (1991), ‘The Influence of Domestic and International Politics on the President's Use of Force’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35 (2): 307–32.Google Scholar
Kagotani, Koji and Iida, Takeshi (2012), ‘Scramble for Security: Domestic Turmoil and Tensions in Interstate Rivalries’, mimeo, University of Dublin, Trinity College.Google Scholar
Kagotani, Koji and Yanai, Yuki (2014), ‘External Threats, US Bases, and Prudent Voters in Okinawa’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 14 (1): 91–115.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Amos (1979), ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk’, Econometrica, 47 (2): 263–92.Google Scholar
King, Gary and Lowe, Will (2003a), ‘10 Million International Dyadic Events’, http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/FYXLAWZRIA UNF:3:dSE0bsQK2o6xXlxeaDEhcg = = IQSS Dataverse Network [Distributor] V3 [Version] .Google Scholar
King, Gary and Lowe, Will (2003b), ‘An Automated Information Extraction Tool for International Conflict Data with Performance as Good as Human Coders: A Rare Events Evaluation Design’, International Organization, 57 (3): 617–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, James P., Goertz, Gary, and Diehl, Paul F. (2006), ‘The New Rivalry Dataset: Procedures and Patterns’, Journal of Peace Research, 43 (3): 331–48.Google Scholar
Lai, Brian and Reiter, Dan (2005), ‘Rally Round the Union Jack? Public Opinion and the Use of Force in the United Kingdom, 1948−2001’, International Studies Quarterly, 49 (2): 255–72.Google Scholar
Lebo, Matthew J., Walker, Robert W., and Clarke, Harold D. (2000), ‘You Must Remember This: Dealing with Long Memory in Political Analyses’, Electoral Studies, 19 (1): 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jack S. (1989), ‘The Diversionary Theory of War: A Critique’, in Midlarsky, Manus I. (ed.), Handbook of War Studies, Massachusetts: Unwin Hyman, pp. 259–88.Google Scholar
Lind, Jennifer M. (2004), ‘Pacifism or Passing the Buck? Testing Theories of Japanese Security Policy’, International Security, 29 (1): 92–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maeda, Yukio (2011), ‘Economy, Cabinet Approval, and LDP support’, Syakai Kagaku Kenkyu, 62 (1): 151–71.Google Scholar
Marra, Robin F., Ostrom, Charles W., and Simon, Dennis M. (1990), ‘Foreign Policy and Presidential Popularity: Creating Windows of Opportunity in the Perpetual Election’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 34 (4): 588–623.Google Scholar
McClelland, Charles A. (1983), ‘Let the User Beware’, International Studies Quarterly, 27 (2): 169–77.Google Scholar
Midford, Paul (2002), ‘The Logic of Reassuarance and Japan's Grand Strategy’, Security Studies, 11 (3): 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Midford, Paul (2011), Rethinking Japanese Public Opinion and Security, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. Clifton and Bickers, Kenneth N. (1992), ‘Domestic Discontent and the External Use of Force’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36 (1): 25–52.Google Scholar
Mueller, John E. (1970), ‘Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson’, American Political Science Review, 64 (1): 18–34.Google Scholar
Nickelsburg, Michael and Norpoth, Helmut (2000), ‘Commander-in-chief or Chief Economist? The President in the Eye of the Public’, Electoral Studies, 19: 313–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishizawa, Yoshitaka (1999), ‘55nen Taiseika no Naikakushijiritsu to Keizaiseisaku nitaisuru Hyōka [The Cabinet Support and the Public Evaluation of Economic Policy in the 1955 system]’, Doshisha Hougaku, 51 (1): 1–31.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William, Oneal, John R., and Russett, Bruce (2012), ‘The Effects of the International Security Environment on National Military Expenditures: A Multicountry Study’, International Organization, 66 (6): 491–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut (1991), ‘The Popularity of the Thatcher Government: A Matter of War and Economy’, in Norpoth, Helmut, Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Lafay, Jean-Dominique (eds.),Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 141–60.Google Scholar
Ohmura, Hirotaka and Ohmura, Hanako (2014), ‘Buryoku Shōtotsu to Nihon no Seron no Hannō [The ‘Rally ’Round the Flag’ Effect and Public Opinion in Japan]’, Leviathan, 54: 77–90.Google Scholar
Okamura, Minoru (1991), ‘Estimating the Impact of the Soviet Union's Threat on the United States–Japan Alliance: A Demand System Approach’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 73 (2): 200–7.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Charles W. and Job, Brian L. (1986), ‘The President and the Political Use of Force’, American Political Science Review, 80 (2): 541–66.Google Scholar
Parker, Suzanne L. (1995), ‘Toward an Understanding of “Rally” Effects: Public Opinion in the Persian Gulf War’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 59 (4): 526–46.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce (1993), Grasping the Democratic Peace, Princton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce and Oneal, John R. (2001), Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Samuels, Richard J. (2007), Securing Japan: Tokyo's Grand Strategy and the Future of East Asia, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth A. (2001), Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Twomey, Christopher P. (2000), ‘Japan, a Circumscribed Balancer: Building on Defensive Realism to Make Predictions about East Asian Security’, Security Studies, 9 (4): 167–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979), Theory of International Politics, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar