Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:54:17.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crisis Management, LDP, and DPJ Style

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2013

ELLIS KRAUSS
ELLIS KRAUSS*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific Studies, University of CaliforniaSan [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article asks the questions: Did the DPJ engage in crisis response and management differently than the LDP did? If so, why? If not, why not? In order to try to answer these questions systematically I use an inductive comparative method of choosing three equivalent ‘cases’ each under the LDP and the DPJ in which they responded to a similar type of crisis. The crises selected were Okinawa bases issues in 1995 (LDP) and 2009 (DPJ), Senkaku Islands under the LDP (2008) and DPJ (2010), and the Hanshin quake in 1995 (LDP) and Fukushima in 2011 (DPJ). This gave me a nice mix of intense, short-term cases to compare; one domestic (disaster-related), and two foreign (Okinawa bases with US; Senkaku/Daiyou conflict with China); coalition governments under LDP and DPJ (2009) of different kinds vs. single-party (other DPJ). A very brief description of each crisis will be followed by some generalizations comparing the two parties’ responses. I find that both parties had similar problems with information management, but that there were characteristic and predictable trade-offs of their different party decisionmaking structures and relations with the national bureaucracy. Finally, I mention some of the inherent structural problems of Japanese politics and policymaking that inhibit effective response regardless of the party in power.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 14 , Special Issue 2: Japan's Crisis Management amid Growing Complexity: In Search of New Approaches , June 2013 , pp. 177 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AERA (2011a), ‘Expressions by People Evacuated from the First Fukushima Nuclear Plant: Nobody Knew the Exposure’ (福 島 第 一 原 発 か ら 「 脱 出 住 民 」 怒 り の 告 白   「 被 曝 」 誰 も 知 ら な か っ た), 28 March, p. 13.Google Scholar
AERA (2011b), ‘The Fukushima Nuclear Plant Disaster and the Outage Plan Are Going to the Worst Scenarios: Collapsed TEPCO's Organization’ (最 悪 の シ ナ リ オ へ と 突 き 進 む 原 発 事 故 、 計 画 停 電 . . .   東 京 電 力   崩 れ る 組 織), 28 March, p. 18.Google Scholar
Asahi Shimbun (1995a), ‘Too Heavy Coordinating Role for National Land Agency: Neither Information Network nor Right of Command – Great Hanshin Earthquake’ (国 土 庁 、 重 過 ぎ た ’調 整 役 ’   情 報 網 ・ 指 揮 権 な く   阪 神 大 震 災), 26 January, p. 2.Google Scholar
Asahi Shimbun (1995b), ‘Administrative Function Confused Coalition between the State and the Local: Overconfidence – the Validation of Great Hanshin Earthquake’ (行 政 機 能   国 と 地 元 の 連 携 混 乱 (過 信 ： ３   阪 神 大 震 災 の 検 証)), 30 January, p. 4.Google Scholar
Asahi Shimbun (1995c), ‘The Government Established the Local Response Headquarters with 14 Members: Great Hanshin Earthquake’ (人 の 態 勢 で 現 地 対 策 本 部   政 府 が 設 置   阪 神 大 震 災), 23 January, p. 2.Google Scholar
Asahi Shimbun (1995d), ‘Strengthening the Prime Minister's Office's Function when the Emergency and Focusing on Unified Response: The Government Will Re-Examine the Anti-Disaster Plan’ (非 常 時 の 官 邸 機 能 強 化   一 元 的 対 応 へ 検 討 開 始   政 府 、 防 災 計 画 見 直 し), 23 January, p. 1.Google Scholar
Asahi Shimbun (1995e), ‘The Different Stance between Ministries and Agencies Made the Acceptance of Foreign Countries’ Support Late – Great Hanshin Earthquake’ (外 国 救 助 隊 の 受 け 入 れ 、 役 所 の ズ レ が 遅 れ 生 む   阪 神 大 震 災), 27 January, p. 2.Google Scholar
Asahi Shimbun (1995f), ‘Too Heavy Coordinating Role for National Land Agency: Neither Information Network nor Right of Command – Great Hanshin Earthquake’ (国 土 庁 、 重 過 ぎ た ’ 調 整 役 ’   情 報 網 ・ 指 揮 権 な く   阪 神 大 震 災), 26 January, p. 2.Google Scholar
Asahi Shimbun (1995g), ‘The Reformation Is Needed for Quick Response to the Disasters and Some People Seek Reorganization – Great Hanshin Earthquake’ (大 災 害 即 応 へ 改 革 急 務   組 織 見 直 し を 迫 る 声   阪 神 大 震 災), 23 January, p. 2.Google Scholar
Asahi Shimbun (1995h), ‘Great Hanshin Earthquake Showed that Murayama's Controlling over the Bureaucracy Is Still Insufficient because of the Lack of Strong Personal Connection’ (村 山 流 の 官 僚 指 揮 ま だ   細 い 個 人 的 パ イ プ   阪 神 大 震 災 で 浮 き 彫 り), 24 January, p. 2.Google Scholar
Asahi Shimbun (1995i), ‘Nagata-Cho's Silence and Slow Reaction: Look at Political Situation – Great Hanshin Earthquake and Politics, No. 2’ (永 田 町 の 沈 黙   鈍 い 反 応 、 目 は 「 政 局 に 」 (阪 神 大 震 災 と 政 治 ： 下), 26 January, p. 2.Google Scholar
Asahi Shimbun (1995j), ‘Great Hanshin Earthquake Showed that Murayama's Controlling over the Bureaucracy Is Still Insufficient because of the Lack of a Strong Personal Connection’ (村 山 流 の 官 僚 指 揮 ま だ   細 い 個 人 的 パ イ プ   阪 神 大 震 災 で 浮 き 彫 り), 24 January, p. 2.Google Scholar
Asahi Shimbun (1995k), ‘Too Heavy Coordinating Role for National Land Agency – Neither Information Network, Nor Right of Command – Great Hanshin Earthquake’ (国 土 庁 、 重 過 ぎ た ’ 調 整 役 ’   情 報 網 ・ 指 揮 権 な く   阪 神 大 震 災), 26 January, p. 2.Google Scholar
Asahi Shimbun (1995l), ‘Great Hanshin Earthquake – Asahi Shimbun's phone survey’ (阪 神 大 震 災   朝 日 新 聞 社 電 話 調 査 の 質 問 と 回 答), 29 January, p. 2.Google Scholar
Asahi Shimbun (1998), ‘Ongoing Strengthening Crisis Management – Three Years after Great Hanshin Earthquake (道 半 ば の 危 機 管 理 強 化   阪 神 大 震 災 か ら3年), 16 January, p. 39.Google Scholar
Asahi Shimbun (2011), ‘A National Opinion Poll: A Half Year after Great East Japan Earthquake’ (全 国 世 論 調 査 の 質 問 と 回 答   東 日 本 大 震 災 半 年), 10 September, p. 7.Google Scholar
Asia Times (2010), ‘China Signals V for Victory’, by Kosuke Takahashi, 10 October, http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Japan/LJ05Dh01.html. Accessed 21 May 2012.Google Scholar
Brooks, William L. (2010), The Politics of the Futenma Base Issue in Okinawa: Relocation Negotiations in 1995–1997, 2005–2006, Washington, DC: The Edwin O. Reischauer Center for East Asian Studies, Johns Hopkins University-SAIS, Asia-Pacific Policy Series, No. 9.Google Scholar
Brooks, William L. (2011), Futenma Log: Base Relocation Negotiations 2009–2010, Washington, DC: The Edwin O. Reischauer Center for East Asian Studies, Johns Hopkins University-SAIS, Asia-Pacific Policy Series, No. 12.Google Scholar
China View (2009), ‘Ruling Parties of China, Japan Agree on Seeking Stronger Overall’, http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-12/10/content_12626887.htm. Accessed 11 June 2012.Google Scholar
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) Manifesto 2009, www.dpj.or.jp/english/manifesto/manifesto2009.pdf.Google Scholar
The Economist (2010), ‘China's Spat with Japan: Deng's Heirs Ignore His Advice – A Row Over Disputed Islands Goes from Bad to Worse’, 23 September, www.economist.com/node/17101152. Accessed 21 May 2012.Google Scholar
Fukushima, Glen (1995), ‘The Great Hanshin Earthquake’, JPRI Occasional Paper No. 2 (March), www.jpri.org/publications/occasionalpapers/op2.html.Google Scholar
Funabashi, Yoichi (1999), Alliance Adrift, Washington, DC: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
Global Security.org military (n.d.a), ‘Okinawa, Japan’ website found at www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/okinawa.htm. Accessed January 27 2012.Google Scholar
Global Security.org military (n.d.b), ‘Senkaku / Diaoyu Islands’, www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/senkaku.htm. Accessed May 21, 2012Google Scholar
Government of Japan, Speeches and Statements by Prime Minister (2009), ‘Japan's New Commitment to Asia: Toward the Realization of an East Asian Community’, address by Dr. H.E. Yukio Hatoyama, Prime Minister of Japan, 15 November, http://www.kantei.go.jp/foreign/hatoyama/statement/200911/15singapore_e.html. Accessed 11 July 2012.Google Scholar
Haley, John Owen (1991), Authority without Power: Law and the Japanese Paradox (Studies on Law and Social Control), Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Tobias (2010), ‘Observing Japan’, blog, 10 May, www.observingjapan.com/2010/05/why-did-hatoyama-go-after-futenma-first.html.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, Akikazu, Mochizuki, Mike, and Takara, Kurayoshi (eds.) (2005), The Okinawa Question and the US–Japan Alliance, Washington, DC: The Sigur Center for Asian Studies, Elliott School of International Affairs, George Washington University.Google Scholar
Hughes, Christopher W. (2012), ‘The Democratic Party of Japan's New (but Failing) Grand Security Strategy: From “Reluctant Realism” to “Resentful Realism”?’, Journal of Japanese Studies, 38 (1): 109–40.Google Scholar
Ina, Hisayoshi (2005), ‘Implementing the SACO and Revising the SOFA’, in Hashimoto et al., pp. 41–50.Google Scholar
Inoue, Masamichi, Selden, Mark, and Purves, John (1997), ‘Okinawa Citizens, US Bases, and the Dugong’, http://www.niraikanai.wwma.net/pages/archive/dugong.html. Accessed 14 February 2012. (Originally published in the Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 29 (4) (October–December), 1997.)Google Scholar
Jiji Press (2011), ‘The Great East Japan Earthquake and the Government's Response to It’ (東 日 本 大 震 災 ・ 政 府 の 大 震 災 へ の 対 応), Jiji.com, 26 April, www.jiji.com/jc/v?p=ve_soc_jishin-higashinihon20110426j-01-w530.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers A. (1982), MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers A. (1999a), ‘The 1999 Rape Incident and the Rekindling of Okinawan Protest Against the American Bases’, on Johnson, Chalmers (ed.), Okinawa: Cold War Island, Cardiff, CA: Japan Policy Research Institute, pp. 109–29.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers A. (1999b), ‘The Heliport, Nago, and the End of the Ota Era’, in Johnson, Chalmers (ed.), Okinawa: Cold War Island, Cardiff, CA: Japan Policy Research Institute, pp. 215–32.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Daniel and Penciakova, Veronika (2011), ‘Japan's Triple Disaster: Governance and the Earthquake, Tsunami, and Nuclear Crises’, Brookings, 16 March, www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2011/03/16-japan-disaster-kaufmann. Accessed 17 June 2012.Google Scholar
Kingston, Jeff (2012), ‘Mismanaging Risk and the Fukushima Nuclear Crisis’, Japan Focus, 10 (12), 19 March, www.japanfocus.org/-Jeff-Kingston/3724. Accessed 28 March 2012.Google Scholar
Krauss, Ellis S. and Pekkanen, Robert J. (2010), The Rise and Fall of Japan's LDP: Political Party Organizations as Historical Institutions, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (2010), Joint Statement of the US–Japan Security Consultative Committee, 28 May, by Secretary of State Clinton, Secretary of Defense Gates, Minister for Foreign Affairs Okada, Minister of Defense Kitazawa, www.mofa.go.jp/region/n-america/us/security/scc/joint1005.html.Google Scholar
Mulgan, George Aurelia (2010), ‘US–Japan Alliance the Big Winner from the Senkaku Islands Dispute’, East Asia Forum (26 October), www.eastasiaforum.org/2010/10/26/us-japan-alliance-the-big-winner-from-the-senkakuislands-dispute/. Accessed 11 June 2012.Google Scholar
Norimatsu Satoko (n.d.), ‘Hatoyama's Confession: The Myth of Deterrence and the Failure to Move a Marine Base Outside Okinawa’, Japan Focus, www.japanfocus.org/-Satoko-NORIMATSU2/3495.Google Scholar
Ogawa, Kazuhisa (2005), ‘A Grand Bargain for a Sustainable US Military Presence in Okinawa’, in Hashimoto et al., pp. 51–61.Google Scholar
Orr, Robert M. (1995), ‘The Relief Effort Seen by a Participant’, JPRI Occasional Paper No. 2, March, www.jpri.org/publications/occasionalpapers/op2.html.Google Scholar
Panda, Rajaram (2011), ‘IDSA Comment: DPJ's Duplicity on Futenma Base Relocation in 2009’, Institute for Defense Policy and Analysis, 9 May, http://www.idsa.in/idsacomments/DPJsDuplicityonFutenmaBaseRelocationin2009_rpanda_090511.Google Scholar
Ramseyer, Mark and Rosenbluth, Frances (1993), Japan's Political Marketplace, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sakakibara, Eisuke (2004), Structural Reform in Japan: Breaking the Iron Triangle, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Singh, Bhubhindar (2010), ‘China–Japan Dispute: Tokyo's Foreign Policy of Pragmatism’, RSIS Commentaries No. 127/2010, 5 October, http://www.rsis.edu.sg/publications/commentaries.asp?selYear=2010.Google Scholar
Smith, Sheila (1998), ‘Representing the Citizens of Okinawa’, Social Science Japan, 14 (November), pp. 8–10.Google Scholar
Taira, Koji (n.d.), ‘The China–Japan Clash Over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands’, Japan Forum, article No. 2119. A revised and expanded version of an article reprinted from The Ryukyuanist, spring 2004, http://japanfocus.org/-koji-taira/2119. Accessed 21 May 2012.Google Scholar
Taipei Times (2008a), ‘Officials Drop Plan to Visit Diaoyutais’, by Shih Hsiu-Chuan and Flora Wang, 18 June, http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2008/06/18/2003415043. Accessed 21 May 2012.Google Scholar
Taipei Times (2008b), ‘Japan Apologizes Over Boat Incident’, by Jenny Hsu, 21 September, http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2008/06/21/2003415342. Accessed 21 May 2012.Google Scholar
ThaIndian News (2008), ‘Taiwanese Boats Enter Japanese Waters To Protest Ship Collision’, 15 June, http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/world-news/taiwanese-boats-enter-japanese-waters-to-protest-ship-collision_10060642.html. Accessed 21 May 2012.Google Scholar
Tiberghien, Yves (2010), ‘The Puzzling 2010 Diaoyu Crisis: Centrifugal Domestic Politics, Shifting Balance of Power, and Weak Regional Institutionalization’, Harvard Asia Quarterly, http://asiaquarterly.com/2010/12/24/the-puzzling-2010-diaoyu-crisis-centrifugal-domestic-politics-shifting-balance-of-power-and-weak-regional-institutionalization/. Accessed 11 June 2011. Summary version available at http://ffj.ehess.fr/index/article/271/yves-tiberghien.html.Google Scholar
Waseda University Japan–US Research Institute on Security Policy Research Group [早 稲 田 大 学 日 米 研 究 機 構 安 全 保 障 政 策 研 究 会] (2008–2010), ‘ Building a Comprehensive Japan–US Security System in a New World Order’ [新 た な 国 際 秩 序 に お け る 総 合 的 日 米 安 全 保 障 体 制 構 築 の 可 能 性], Tokyo: Waseda University US–Japan Research Institute.Google Scholar
Van Wolferen, Karel (1990), The Enigma of Japanese Power: People and Politics in a Stateless Nation, New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Yanaga, Chitoshi (1968), Big Business in Japanese Politics, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar