No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Comprehensive Retrospective Voting in Mixed Electoral Systems: Evidence from the 2016 Korean Legislative Election
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 May 2018
Abstract
Performance-based retrospective voting is a fundamental mechanism of democracy. A good deal of scholarship has examined this electoral mechanism, but the extant studies have two omissions. First, there is little research that considers several retrospective evaluations together using an incumbent voting model. Second, there is little research that examines the difference in the effects of voters’ retrospective evaluations on two different ballots in mixed electoral systems. To fill these omissions, this article tests a comprehensive retrospective performance voting model in a mixed electoral system. Specifically, this article examines the effects of voters’ retrospective economic evaluations of economic performance at the national and personal levels, human rights, corruption, welfare protection, and foreign policy on vote choice for the incumbent party in the 2016 Korean legislative election in which voters had two ballots: one for the party list vote and one for the district vote. By using multinomial logistic regression models, this article finds that among the six retrospective evaluation categories, judgments of national economic performance at the national level, human rights, and foreign policy have a statistically significant impact on the likelihood of voting for the incumbent party in party list vote choice, whereas only voters’ evaluation of foreign policy matter in the district level vote decision. The results imply that Korean voters consider various aspects of government performance, such as the conditions of human rights and relationships with other countries, rather than just focusing on the economy. The retrospective voting behavior of Korean voters differs between party list and district level ballots.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018
References
Aldrich, John H., Gelpi, Christopher, Feaver, Peter, Reifer, Jason, and Sharp, Kristin Thompson (2006), ‘Foreign Policy and the Electoral Connection’, Annual Review of Political Science, 9: 477–502.Google Scholar
Anand, Sowmya and Krosnick, Jon A. (2003), ‘The Impact of Attitudes toward Foreign Policy Goals on Public Preferences among Presidential Candidates: A Study of Issue Publics and the Attentive Public in the 2000 US Presidential Election’, Presidential Studies Quarterly, 33 (1): 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Clem and Manza, Jeff (2006), ‘Why Do Welfare States Persist?’, Journal of Politics, 68 (4): 816–27.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E., Dettrey, Bryan J., and Yi, Hongxing (2010), ‘The Theory of Conditional Retrospective Voting: Does the Presidential Record Matter Less in Open-Seat Elections?’, Journal of Politics, 72 (4): 1–13.Google Scholar
Choi, Eunjung and Woo, Jongseok (2010), ‘Political Corruption, Economic Performance, and Electoral Outcomes: A Cross-National Analysis’, Contemporary Politics, 16 (3): 249–62.Google Scholar
Choi, Eunjung and Woo, Jongseok (2012), ‘Political Corruption, Economy, and Citizens’ Evaluation of Democracy in South Korea’, Contemporary Politics, 18 (4): 451–66.Google Scholar
Choi, Eunjung (2007), ‘ What's in Minds? Economic Conditions and Identity Issues in Korean and Taiwanese Elections’, Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Chong, Alberto, Ana De La, O, Karlan, Dean, and Wantchekon, Leonard (2015), ‘Does Corruption Information Inspire the Fight or Quash the Hope? A Field Experiment in Mexico on Voter Turnout, Choice, and Party Identification’, Journal of Politics, 77 (1): 55–71.Google Scholar
Cingranelli, David and Filippov, Mikhail (2010), ‘Electoral Rules and Incentives to Protect Human Rights’, Journal of Politics, 72 (1): 243–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Mathew D. (1986), ‘Electoral Politics as a Redistribution Game’, Journal of Politics, 48 (2): 370–89.Google Scholar
Debus, Marc, Stegmaier, Mary, and Tosun, Jale (2014), ‘Economic Voting under Coalition Governments: Evidence from Germany’, Political Science Research and Methods, 2 (1): 49–67.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael, and Keeter, Scott (1996), What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Duch, Raymond M. and Stevenson, Randolph T. (2008), The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ecker, Alejandro, Glinitzer, Konstantin, and Meyer, Thomas M. (2016), ‘Corruption Performance Voting and the Electoral Context’, European Political Science Review, 8 (3): 333–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James (1999), ‘Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types Versus Sanctioning Poor Performance’, in Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard, Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 55–66.Google Scholar
Feldman, Paul and Jondrow, James (1984), ‘Congressional Elections and Local Federal Spending’, American Journal of Political Science, 28 (1): 147–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris (1981), Retrospective Voting in American Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gadarian, Shana K. (2010), ‘Foreign Policy at the Ballot Box: How Citizens Use Foreign Policy to Judge and Choose Candidates’, Journal of Politics, 72 (4): 1046–62.Google Scholar
Gelpi, Christopher, Reifler, Jason, and Feaver, Peter (2007), ‘Iraq the Vote: Retrospective and Prospective Foreign Policy Judgments on Candidate Choice and Casualty Tolerance’, Political Behavior, 29 (2): 151–74.Google Scholar
Giger, Nathalie and Nelson, Moira (2010), ‘The Electoral Consequences of Welfare State Retrenchment: Blame Avoidance or Credit Claiming in the Era of Permanent Austerity?’, European Journal of Political Research, 50 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Gschwend, Thomas and van derKolk, Henk (2006), ‘Split Ticket Voting in Mixed Member Proportional Systems: The Hypothetical Case of the Netherlands’, Acta Politica, 41: 163–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwitz, John and Peffley, Mark (1987), ‘How Are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured? A Hierarchical Model’, American Political Science Review, 81 (4): 1099–110.Google Scholar
Hwang, A-ran (2000), ‘Political Psychology Approach to Economic Voting: Evidence from the 15th Presidential Election’, Korean Political Science Review, 34 (2): 193–212.Google Scholar
Inoguchi, Takashi (2017), ‘Sociotropic and Pocketbook Politics in Polling in Japan’, in Inoguchi, Takashi and Tokuda, Yasuharu (eds.), Trust with Asian Characteristics: Interpersonal and Institutional, Singapore: Springer, pp. 169–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. (1997), The Politics of Congressional Elections, New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Kang, Woo Chang (2012), ‘Regional Party System, Causal Attribution, and Economic Voting in New Democracies: The Case of the 2007 Korean Presidential Election’, International Political Science Review, 34 (2): 173–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V.O. Jr. (1966), The Responsible Electorate, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiewiet, Roderick. D. (1983), Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Issues, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Jae-Han (1993), ‘The 14th Presidential Election and the Korean Economy’, Korean Political Science Review, 27 (1): 99–120.Google Scholar
Krause, Stefan and Mendez, Fabio (2009), ‘Corruption and Elections: An Empirical Study for a Cross-Section of Countries’, Economics and Politics, 21 (2): 179–200.Google Scholar
Kull, Steven, Ramsay, Clay, and Lewis, Evan (2003), ‘Misperceptions, the Media, and the Iraq War’, Political Science Quarterly, 188 (Winter): 569–98.Google Scholar
Kwon, Hyeok Yong (2008), ‘Economic Voting in the 2007 Presidential Election’, in Hyeon-Woo, Lee and Yong Kwon, Hyeok (eds.), Changing Korean Voter II, Seoul: East Asia Institute.Google Scholar
Lee, Aie-Rie and Glasure, Yong U. (2012), ‘Economic Voting in South Korea: Pocketbook or Sociotropic?’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 13 (3): 337–53.Google Scholar
Lee, Junhan and Kyunghoon, Im (2005), ‘A Critical Election: An Analysis of Voting Determinants in the 17th Assembly Election’, in Wook Park, Chan (ed.), The Analysis of the 17th General Election for the National Assembly, Seoul: Purungil. [ In Korean].Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (1988), Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Stegmaier, Mary (2000), ‘Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes’, Annual Review of Political Science, 3 (1): 183–219.Google Scholar
Lewis-BeckMichael, S. Michael, S. and Stegmaier, Mary (2010), ‘Economic Models of Voting’, in Dalton, Russell J. and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 518–37.Google Scholar
Li, Yitan, James, Patrick, and Cooper Drury, A. (2009), ‘Diversionary Dragons, or ‘Talking Tough in Taipei’: Cross-Strait Relations in the New Millennium’, Journal of East Asian Studies 9 (3): 369–98.Google Scholar
Manzetti, Luigi and Wilson, Carole J. (2007), ‘Why Do Corrupt Governments Maintain Public Support?’, Comparative Political Studies 40 (8): 949–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthew, S. Shugart and Wattenberg, P. Martin (2003), Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David (1974), Congress: The Electoral Connection, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nadeau, Richard and Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (2001), ‘National Economic Voting in US Presidential Elections’, Journal of Politics, 63 (1): 159–81.Google Scholar
Nadeau, Richard and Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (2004), ‘Dual Governance and the Economic Vote: France and the United States’, in Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (ed.), The French Voter: Before and After 2002 Elections, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 136–54.Google Scholar
Nadeau, Richard, Lewis-Beck, Michael. S., and Bélanger, Éric (2013), ‘Economics and Elections Revisited’, Comparative Political Studies, 46 (5): 551–73.Google Scholar
Park, Chan Wook (2009a), ‘Effects of a Two-Vote Mixed-Member Majoritarian System on Citizens’ Voting Behavior in the Korean National Assembly Elections’, Korean Political Science Review, 43 (5): 93–111.Google Scholar
Park, Chan Wook (2009b), ‘Social Cleavages and Vote Choice: The Effects of Region, Generation, and Ideology’, in Nae-Young, Lee and Mingeon, Kim (eds.), The Changing Korean Voter III, Seoul: EAI [In Korean].Google Scholar
Park, Kyoungsan (1993), ‘Economic Voting in the 14th Presidential Election’, Korean Political Science Review, 27 (1): 185–208.Google Scholar
Peters, John G. and Welch, Susan (1980), ‘The Effects of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections’, American Political Science Review, 74 (3): 697–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrocik, R. John (1996), ‘Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study’, American Journal of Political Science, 40 (3): 825–50.Google Scholar
Petrocik, John R. and Steeper, Frederick T. (1986), ‘The Midterm Referendum: The Importance of Attributions of Responsibility’, Political Behavior, 8 (3): 206–29.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham and Whitten, Guy D. (1993), ‘A Cross-National Analysis of Retrospective Voting: Integrating Economic and Political Variables’, American Journal of Political Science, 37 (2): 391–414.Google Scholar
Richards, David L. and Gelleny, Ronald D. (2007), ‘Good Things to Those Who Wait? National Elections and Government Respect for Human Rights’. Journal of Peace Research. 44 (4): 505–523.Google Scholar
Shin, Jungsub (2016), ‘The Consequences of Government Ideology and Taxation on Welfare Voting’, Political Research Quarterly, 69 (3): 430–43.Google Scholar
Shugart, Mattew and Wattenberg, Martin P. (2003), ‘Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?’, Oxford Scholarship online.Google Scholar
Singer, Matthew (2011), ‘Who Says ‘It's the Economy?’ Cross-National and Cross-Individual Variation in the Salience of Economic Performance’, Comparative Political Studies, 44 (3): 284–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Donald (1966), ‘Some Dynamic Elements of Contests for the Presidency’, American Political Science Review, 60 (1): 19–28.Google Scholar
Stokes, Donald (1992), ‘Valence Politics’, in Kavanagh, Dennis (ed.), Electoral Politics, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 80–100.Google Scholar
Tucker, Joshua A. (2006), Regional Economic Voting: Russia, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic, 1990–1999, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan and Hibbing, John R. (1997), ‘The Effects of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections, 1982–1990’, Journal of Politics, 59 (1): 226–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, Clyde and Allsop, Dee (1991), ‘Economic and Foreign Policy as Sources of Reagan Support’, Western Political Quarterly, 44 (4): 941–58.Google Scholar
Winters, Matthew S. and Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca (2013), ‘Lacking Information or Condoning Corruption: When Do Voters Support Corrupt Politicians?’, Comparative Politics, 45 (4): 418–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher (2005), ‘On the Salience of Political Issues: The Problem with Most Important Problem’, Electoral Studies, 24 (4): 555–79.Google Scholar