Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:38:02.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2008 General Elections in Malaysia: Democracy at Work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

ABDUL RASHID MOTEN*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Political Science, International Islamic University [email protected]

Abstract

The Barisan Nasional (BN) which won a landslide in 2004 was returned to power in 2008 elections with reduced majority and the loss of five state assemblies. Dissatisfied with unfulfilled promises, the electorate protested by voting for a strong opposition. BN additionally was characterized by factionalism. Three opposition parties joined hands and, using alternative media, unexpectedly won 82 seats in the parliament. A strong responsible opposition bodes well for Malaysian democracy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jesudason, James V., ‘The Syncretic State and the Structuring of Oppositional Politics in Malaysia’, in Rodan, Garry (ed.), Political Opposition in Industrialising Asia (New York: Routledge, 1996), pp. 128–60Google Scholar.

2 The Malaysian political system has been variously labeled as ‘semiauthoritarian’, ‘semi-democratic’ or ‘quasi democratic’. See Crouch, Harold, ‘Malaysia: Neither Authoritarian nor Democratic’, in Hewison, Richard Kevin and Robison, Garry Rodan (eds.), Southeast Asia in the 1990s: Authoritarianism, Democracy and Capitalism (Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1993)Google Scholar; Diamond, Larry, Linz, Juan J., and Lipset, Seymour Martin (eds.), Democracy in Developing Countries, Volume III: Asia (Boulder: Lynne Riener, 1989), p. xviGoogle Scholar; Zakaria Haji Ahmad, ‘Malaysia: Quasi Democracy in a Divided Society’, in Diamond, Linz, and Lipset (eds.), Democracy in Developing Countries, pp. 347–81; Case, William, Politics in Southeast Asia: Democracy or Less (Richmond, Surrey, England: Curzon Press, 2002)Google Scholar.

3 The deposit money is returned after the election unless the candidate wins less than 1/8th of the votes cast. Additionally, each candidate is required to deposit RM 5,000 for cleaning up banners and posters after the election.

4 See International Herald Tribune, 26 February 2008.

5 The Star, 14 February 2008.

6 International Herald Tribune, 26 February 2008.

7 Anwar Ibrahim has vowed to become a member of parliament through a by-election by asking one of the members of parliament from his party to resign. His wife, Wan Azizah, agreed to vacate her parliamentary seat, if she wins, to make way for her husband. The New Straits Times, 27 February 2008. Wan Azizah did resign and Anwar Ibrahim was elected to the parliament after he won the by-election in Permatan Pauh on 26 August 2008.

8 The Star, 15 February 2008.

9 The New Straits Times, 2 March 2008.

10 Ibid., 5 March 2008.

11 The Star, 5 March 2008.

12 Ibid., 18 May 2008.

14 The New Straits Times, 6 March 2008.

15 Ibid., 22 February 2008.

16 See Horowitz, Donald, Ethnic Groups in Conflict (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1985)Google Scholar.

17 See Mauzy, Diane K., Barisan Nasional: Coalition Government in Malaysia (Kuala Lumpur: Marican & Sons, 1983)Google Scholar.

18 New Straits Times, Tuesday, 1 June1999.

19 Asiaweek, 16 April 1999, p. 21.

20 The Star, 10 January 2008.

21 Puteri UMNO was created in 1999. Its membership is open to Malay women aged between 18 and 35 years. Its major aim is to gain support from young Malay voters who were perceived to be more inclined toward the opposition.

22 The New Straits Times, 29 February 2008.

23 Ibid., 2 March 2008.

24 Nasional, Barisan, Malaysia 2008: Report, Development and Manifesto (Kuala Lumpur: Barisan Nasional Head Office, 2008), p. 3Google Scholar.

25 Manifesto of the Islamic Party of Malaysia (PAS), A Trustworthy, Just and Clean Government: A Nation of Care and Opportunity (Kuala Lumpur: PAS, 2008).Google Scholar

26 Ibid., 7.

27 Democratic Action Party, Manifesto of DAP: Just Change It (Kuala Lumpur: DAP, 2008), p. 2.Google Scholar

28 Rakyat, Parti Keadilan, KeADILan Manifesto: A New Dawn for Malaysia (Kuala Lumpur: KeADILan, 25 February 2008), p. 2Google Scholar.

31 Rakyat, Parti Keadilan, Harapan Baru untuk Malaysia: 5 Janji Saya (A New Dawn for Malaysia: My Five promises) (nd)Google Scholar.

32 The New Straits Times, 13 March 2008.

33 The Star, 11 March 2008.

34 The Straits Times, 8 March 2008.

35 The New York Times, 9 March 2008.

36 The New Straits Times, 27 March 2008.

37 See Moten, Abdul Rashid and Mokhtar, Tunku Mohar, ‘The 2004 General Elections in Malaysia: A Mandate to Rule’, Asian Survey, 46 (2) (March/April 2006): 319–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 To the Election Commission chairman, ‘this [2008 election] was the best election ever and it had the least number of problems. The election was conducted smoothly and it was very transparent’. New Straits Times, 1 May 2008.

39 The Economist, 10 March 2008.

40 See Malaysia, Ninth Malaysia Plan 2006–2010 (Putrajaya: The Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister's Department, 2006), p. 347Google Scholar.

41 The New Straits Times, 25 November and 27 December 2007.

42 Ibid., 7 April 2008.

43 The Star, 7 April 2008.

44 The New Straits Times, 11 March 2008.

45 Ibid., 26 March 2008.

46 Ibid., 2 April 2008.

47 The Star, 9 March 2008; Lorien Holland, ‘MALAYSIA: Political Tsunami’, Newsweek, 10 March 2008.

48 See Mokhtar, Tunku Mohar, ‘The Twelfth General Elections in Malaysia’, Intellectual Dioscourse, 16 (1) (2008): 95Google Scholar.

49 Ong Kian Ming, ‘Making Sense of the Political Tsunami’, Malaysiakini, 11 March 2008.

50 Khoo, Philip, ‘A New Dawn?Aliran Monthly, 28 (3): 2Google Scholar.

51 Quoted in Lorien Holland, ‘MALAYSIA: Political Tsunami’.

52 See Moten, Abdul Rashid, ‘The 1999 General Elections in Malaysia: Towards a Stable Democracy?’, Akademika, 57 (July 2000)Google Scholar.