Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:27:45.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VI. Expansion Without Design. The Snare of Javanese Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2011

W. Remmelink
W. Remmelink
Affiliation:
(The Japan-Netherlands Institute, Tokyo)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

That territorial expansion was not necessarily good business had been succinctly stated by Governor-General Jacob Mossel eight years before Hartingh: ‘What the lord spends, the merchant has to pay.’ In fact, concern about the price of territorial expansion had been voiced almost from the beginning, especially in the Board of Directors in Holland, witness Coenraad van Beuningen's analysis of the dual nature of the Company in 1684, in which he decried the territorial role of the Company as detrimental to its true function as a trading company. Also the underlying cause for the eventuel decline of the Company has by contemporaries as well as later observers often been blamed on this almost congenital defect of mixing trade and government in one body.

Type
Articles
Information
Itinerario , Volume 12 , Special Issue 1: The Ancien Regime in India and Indonesia , March 1988 , pp. 111 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © Research Institute for History, Leiden University 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 ʻAch! had dc Compagnic koopman gebleven, en nooyt het lijntje zoo hard getrokken, ‘tgcen men al begreep in den jare 1733 […] om van geen landen meer te spreken, en dus den Javaan in geen denkbeeld te brengen, dat men alles in wilde slokken, en wat heeft de Comp. tot nog toe voor alle zyne uytgeschoten schattcn.’ Nicolaas Hartingh, Mcmorie van Overgave 1761, in: de Jonge, J.K.J., Deopkomst van hel Nederlandsch gezag in Oost-Indië (13 vols.; ʻs-Gravenhage 1862–1909) X, 330.Google Scholar

2 Ibidem, 215.

3 Gaastra, F.S., De geschiedenis van de VOC(Haarlem 1982) 53.Google Scholar

4 Ibidem, 155.

5 Ricklefs, M.C., Jogjakarta under Sultan Mangkubumi 1749–1792 (London 1974) 21–36Google Scholar; Ricklefs, M.C., A History of Modern Indonesia (London 1981) 74–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Carey, P., ‘Waiting for the “Just King”: the Agrarian World of South-Central Java from Giyanti (1755) to the Java War (1825–30)’, Modern Asian Studies 20, 1 (1986) 59–137, esp. 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Ricklefs, jogjakarla, 25ff.

8 Moertono, Socmarsaid, State and Statecraft in Old Java: A Study of the Later Mataram Period 16th to 19th Century (Ithaca 1968) 120Google Scholar; Kumar, A., ‘Javanese Court Society and Politics in the late Eighteenth Century: The Record of a Lady Soldier’, Indonesia 30 (1980) 67–111, esp. 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Anderson, B.R.O.G., ‘The Idea of Power in Javanese Culture’ in: Holt, Claire ed., Culture and Politics in Indonesia (Ithaca 1972) 1–69, esp. 35.Google Scholar

10 Weber, M., Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Roth, G. and Wittich, C. eds. (Berkeley 1978) 1042.Google Scholar

11 Anderson, ‘Idea of Power’, 65ff.

12 Ricklefs, History of Modern Indonesia, 16.

13 Ricklefs, Jogjakarta, 25.

14 Schrieke, B.J.O., Indonesian Sociological Studies: Selected Writings II (The Hague 1957) 100.Google Scholar

15 Burger, D.H., Sociologisch-economische geschiedenis van Indonesia I. Indonesia voor de 20e eeuw (Wageníngen 1975) 39.Google Scholar

16 Soemarsaid Moertono, State and State and Statecraft, 101ff.

17 Anderson, ‘Idea of Power’, 22.

18 Elias, N., Die Hofische Gesellschaft (Darmstadt 1977) 154.Google Scholar

19 Ibidem, 140.

20 Algemeen Rijksarchief, The Hague, VOC 2056 apart: July 10, 1726.

21 VOC 2169, Memorie van Overgave Semarang 1730.

22 Kumar, ‘Javanese Court Society’, 108, 109.

23 Ricklefs, M.C., ‘The Crisis of 1740–1 in Java: The Javanese, Chinese, Madurese and Dutch, and the Fall of the Court of Kartasura’, Bijdragen lot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 139 (1983) 268–290, esp. 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24 Art. 3,4,5: De Jonge, Opkomst IX, 434.

25 ‘En vermits het waare voordeel van een land en gevolgelijk ook het regte interest van een vorst daarin bestaat dat hetzelve allorlye voordeelige producten uytlevere waardoor den inwoonder zijn bestaan en den vorst zijne inkomsten zoo veel ruymer kan vinden, zoo […].’ ‘Sawab dening babathening nagari punapa dening ratunipun amedalaken sarupining wewedalan darapon dadosa babathenipun ingkang anggenggeni sarta kalih awewaha dados dhahare ratunipun mila […].’ Contract 1743: art. 19; Arsip Nasional Solo (ANS) 53/7.

26 ‘mila sapunika ingkang karsa Kangjeng Susuhunan dening sakathahing paparentahan utawi sakathahing dagangan kang miyos saking ing tanah Jawi, ing mangke akarsa dipun parentahi ing Kangjeng Susuhunan piyambek.’ ANS 52/8.

27 ‘wonten dene bilih manawi wonten tiwasipun dameling Kumpni utawi tiwasing dagangan punika atas pinanggiya ing Kangjeng Susuhunan.’ ANS 52/8.

28 ‘boten tumut-tumut anyekel parentah Jawi.’ ANS 52/8.

29 ‘saking Kangjeng Susuhunan sakalangkung atemen-temen sedya langgeng apawongsanak sabayantu kalih Kumpeni Olandi.’ ANS 52/8.

30 VOC 968, May 31, 1733.

31 VOC 2294 apart: Aug. 6, 1733.

32 VOC 2295 apart: Oct. 15,1733.

33 VOC 7889 apart: Aug. 9, 1738.

34 Soemarsaid Moertono, Stale and Statecraft, 22.