Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:11:23.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surat to Bombay: Transfer of Commercial Power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2010

Ruby Maloni
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The island of Bombay is the ancient property of the English East India Company; it hath hitherto been, of all her settlements, the most conducive to the greatness of the nation in Asia; yet, through the splendour of achievement, great acquisition of the territory, and immense harvests of wealth in Bengal and the Coast of Coromandel, it hath been in some measure overlooked, and, as if in a corner of the world, unnoticed.

Type
Articles
Information
Itinerario , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 2002 , pp. 61 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © Research Institute for History, Leiden University 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Pechel, S., An Historical Account of the Settlement and Possession of Bombay by the English East India Company (London 1781)Google Scholar.

2 Barendse, R.J., ‘Reflections on the Arabian Seas in the Eighteenth Century’, Itinerario, 25/1 (Leiden 2001)Google Scholar

3 Chaudhuri, K.N., Trade and Civilisation in the Indian Ocean: An Economic History from the Rise of Islam to 1750 (Cambridge 1986)Google Scholar.

4 Gupta, Ashin Das, ‘The Maritime City’ in: Banga, Indu ed., Ports and their Hinterlands in India 1700–1950 (New Delhi 1992) 359–367Google Scholar.

5 Terpstra, H., De Nederlanders in Voor-Indie (Amsterdam 1947) 78Google Scholar.

6 The English East India Company established a factory at Surat in 1613.

7 The Dutch Vereenigde Oost-Indische Compagnie set up a factory at Surat in 1617.

8 The French Compagnie des lndes Orientales established its first Indian factory in 1668 at Surat.

9 Gupta, Ashin Das, Indian Merchants and the Decline of Surat c. 1700–1750 (Wiesbaden 1979) 2–20Google Scholar.

10 As in saltpetre and indigo.

11 Henceforth referred to as EIC.

12 I have used documents from the India Office Library, London, and the Archives of the Dutch United East India Company (VOC), kept in the National Archives of the Netherlands (ARA) in The Hague. KA (Koloniaal Archief) refers to the old numbering of these VOC archives.

13 Maloni, Ruby, European Merchant Capital and the Indian Economy: Surat Factory Records, 1630–1668 (New Delhi 1992)Google Scholar.

14 Deshpande, C.D., Western India (Dharwar 1948) 164Google Scholar.

15 Ovington, J. and Rawlinson, H.G. eds, A Voyage to Surat in the year 1689 (London 1929) 85Google Scholar; Fryer, J. and Crooke, W. eds, A New Account of East India and Persia 1 (London 1909) 62Google Scholar.

16 Foster, W., The English Factories in India, 1665–67 (Oxford 1927) 72Google Scholar.

17 Khan, S.A., The East India Trade in the XVIIth Century (London 1923) 425Google Scholar.

18 Ibid., 421.

19 Foster, The English Factories in India, 1668–69, 92.

20 J.M. Campbell, Bombay Gazetteer, Materials towards a Statistical Account of the Town and Island of Bombay 1, 49.

21 Fawcett, C.G.H., The English Factories in India, 1670–77 (Oxford 1936) 44Google Scholar.

22 Forrest, G.W., Selections from the State Papers preserved in the Bombay Secretariat, Home Series 1 (Bombay 1887) 52Google Scholar.

23 Furber, Holden and Rocher, Rosane eds, Private Fortunes and Company Profits in the India Trade in the 18th Century (London 1997) 71Google Scholar.

24 Koloniaal Archief 1841 passim.

25 Koloniaal Archief 1841, f. 84.

26 Koloniaal Archief 1841, General Letter to Bombay, 4 November 1719, paragraph 45.

27 Reports of Committee of Correspondence, 1722–1724, India Office Library.

28 Home Miscellaneous Series, 1709–1714, India Office Library.

29 Furber, Private Fortunes, 71.

30 In 1708 Bombay became an independent Presidency along with Calcutta and Madras. Surat, Broach, Cambay, Karwar, Tellicherry and Anjengo became its subordinate factories in 1710.

31 Singh, M.P., ‘Sa'air Customs and Mint Revenues at the Gujarat Ports’, Proceedings of Indian History Congress, 36th session (Aligarh 1975) 286Google Scholar.

32 Ray, Indrani, ‘India in Asian Trade in the 1730s: A Discussion by a French Trader’, Essays in Honour of S.C. Sarhar (New Delhi 1976) 217–244Google Scholar.

33 Grose, J.H., A Visit to the East Indies, 1757 (London 1920) 159–160Google Scholar.

34 Although most of her crew was Flemish, she had a Polish first mate, an Italian supercargo, a German surgeon, a French gunner and a Malay cook.

35 University of Ghent Library, MSS H. Hoys, 929, ‘Beschryvinghe van de stad Zurrate’.

36 Koloniaal Archief 1907, f. 237.

37 Koloniaal Archief 1907, f. 53.

38 Unfortunately, their names are not provided.

39 Koloniaal Archief 1907, ff. 230–233.

40 Lists of shipping and summaries of voyages were regularly sent to Batavia. Koloniaal Archief 1748, ff. 224–238 (1713–1714) and Koloniaal Archief 1907, ff. 230–233 (1723–1724).

41 Reports of Committee of Correspondence, July 1724.

42 Foster, The English Factories in India, 1665–67, 181–188.

43 David, M.D., History of Bombay, 1661–1708 (Bombay 1973) 77Google Scholar.

44 Khan, The East India Trade, 421.

45 Campbell, Materials 1, 48.

46 Polanyi, K., ‘Ports of Trade in Early Civilisation’, Journal of Economic History 23/1 (1963) 30–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 Frank Broeze, ‘The External Dynamics of Port City Morphology’ in: Banga, Ports, 245–273.

48 Jim Masselos, ‘Changing Definitions of Bombay: City State to Capital City’ in: Banga, Ports, 273–317.

49 Chaudhuri, Trade and Civilisation.

50 Maloni, European Merchant.

51 Nightingale, Pamela, Trade and Empire in Western India: 1784–1806 (Cambridge 1970)Google Scholar.

52 Gumperz, Ellen McDonald, ‘City-Hinterland Relations and the Development of a Regional Elite in Nineteenth Century Bombay’, Journal of Asian Studies 33 (1974) 593CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 Foster, The English Factories in India, 1668–69, 65 and 74–75.

54 Maloni, Ruby, ’Seventeenth Century Surat: Cultural Interface in an Urban Environment’ in: Mathew, K.S. ed., Indian Ocean and Cultural Interaction 1400–1800 (Pondicherry 1996) 161–175Google Scholar.

55 A.H. Kidwai, ‘Conceptual and Methodological Issues: Ports, Port Cities and Ports Hinterlands’ in: Banga, Ports, 7–45.