Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:39:14.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

South Asia and the ‘Great Divergence’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2010

C.A. Bayly
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Indian nationalism was born out of the notion that India's poverty and backwardness was not a natural result of technical inferiority or inefficient use of resources, but that it was a consequence of colonial rule. Even before the development of scientific nationalist economics in the 1890s, the moralists of Young Bengal had called for a protectionist ‘national political economy’ on the lines advocated by Friedrich List in Germany, whom they had read as early as 1850. Bholanath Chandra asserted in 1873 that India had once been the greatest textile producer in the world and had initiated the industrial revolution. By 1970,.he predicted, Britain would be eclipsed by the United States and by India as the greatest industrial producers. This would be brought about by rigorous protectionism and by the growth of what he called ‘moral hostility’ to the consumption of foreign goods which had even polluted the materials used in the making of the sacred threads of orthodox Hindus. This emphasis on the culture of consumption and the structure of external economic relations was central to different varieties of Indian nationalist thought as they developed from Dadhabhai Naoroji through to Mahatma Gandhi.

Type
Conference: European Miracle
Information
Itinerario , Volume 24 , Issue 3-4 , November 2000 , pp. 89 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © Research Institute for History, Leiden University 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Chunder, Bholanath, ‘A Voice for the Commerce and Manufactures of India’, Mookerjee's Magazine (12 March 1873) 120Google Scholar.

2 A discussion of all these issues can be found in Habib, I. ed., Cambridge Economic History oflndia l (Cambridge 1982)Google Scholar and Raychaudhuri, T. and Kumar, D. eds, Cambridge Economic History of India II (Cambridge 1983)Google Scholar.

3 Notably in Habib, I., ‘Potentialities of Capitalistic Development in the Economy of Mughal India’, Journal of Economic History 29/1 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Chaudhuri, K.N., Asia Before Europe: Economy and Civilisation of the Indian Ocean from the Rise of Islam to 1750 (Cambridge 1990)Google Scholar.

5 Qaisar, A. Jan, Indian Response to European Technology and Culture (AD 1498–1707) (Delhi 1982)Google Scholar.

6 Mukhia, Harbans, Perspectives on Medieval History (Delhi 1992)Google Scholar.

7 Perlin, Frank, ‘Proto-industrialisation and Pre-colonial South Asia’, Past and Present 98 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar;Bajekal, Madhavi, ‘Agricultural Production in Selected Taluqas of theJaipur State, 1700–1770’ (PhD Diss., London University, 1990)Google Scholar;Hatekar, Neeraj,.‘Agricultural Production in the Eighteenth Century Deccan’ ]unpublished paper];Google ScholarLudden, David, Peasant History in South India (Princeton 1985)Google Scholar;Bayly, C.A., Ruwlers, Townsmen and Bazaars: North Indian Society in the Age of British Expansion 1780–1870 (Delhi 1992)Google Scholar.

8 , Bayly, Rulers; Gokhale, Balkrishna G., Poona in the Eighteenth Century: An Urban History (Delhi 1988)Google Scholar;Jones, R. Llewellyn, A Fatal Friendship: The Nawabs, the British and the City of Lucknow (Delhi 1985)Google Scholar;Chandra, Sunil, ‘The Hyderabad Deccan c. 1750–183O’,(PhD thesis, Cambridge. 1986)Google Scholar;Chatterjee, Kumkum, Merchants, Politics and Society in Early Modern India: Bihar 1730–1820 (Leiden 1996)Google Scholar.

9 Datta, Rajat, Society, Economy and the Market: Commercialisation in Rural Bengal, c. 1760–1800 (Delhi 2000)Google Scholar; cf. Bhargava, Meena, State, Society and Ecology. Corakhpurin Transition 1750–1830 (Delhi 1999)Google Scholar.

10 Subramanian, Lakshmi, Indigenous Capital and Imperial Expansion: Bombay, Sural and the West Coast (Delhi 1996)Google Scholar.

11 Prakash, Om, The Dutch East India Company and the Economy of Bengal (Princeton 1985)Google Scholar.

12 Parthasarathi, Prasannan, ‘Rethinking Wages and Competitiveness in the Eighteenth Century’, Past and Present 158 (02 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Pomeranz, Kenneth, The Great Divergence: Europe, China and the Making of the Modem World (Princeton 2000)Google Scholar.

14 Datta, Society, 248–260.

15 Sharma, Sanjay, ‘The 1837–1838 Famine in UP’, Indian Economic and Social History Review 30/3 (1993)Google Scholar, see also this author's unpublished London PhD Dissertation which covers the later eighteenth century; Mann, Michael, British Rule on Indian Soil: North India in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century (Delhi 2000)Google Scholar.

16 ‘Note on the Decrease in the Number of Wells in the Agra Division’, Selections from the Records of the Government ofthe N.W. Provinces VIII (Agra 1854)Google Scholar art. 23, 345.

17 Wellesley's Report on the trade of the Ceded and Conquered Provinces, 29 May 1802, British Library, London, Board's Collections, 2803, OIOC.

18 Datta, Society; Chowdhury-Zilly, A.N., The Vagrant Peasant: Agrarian Distress and Desertion in Bengal, 1770–1830 (Wiesbaden 1982)Google Scholar;Ray, Ratnalekha, ‘Change in Bengal Agrarian Society, c. 1760–1850’ (unpublished PhD Diss., Cambridge University, 1984)Google Scholar.

19 Ludden, David, An Agrarian History of India (Cambridge 1999)Google Scholar.

20 This is commented on by Warren Hastings himself, see Hastings, , ‘Persia’, The Present State of the East Indies (London 1786)Google Scholar 114ff.

21 Bayly, Rulers, chapter 5.

22 de Vries, Jan, ‘The Industrious Revolution and the Industrial Revolution,’ Journal of Economic History 54/2 (01 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Professor de Vries recently greatly expanded his analysis of'Industrious Revolutions' in his Ellen McArthur Lectures, Cambridge University, 2000, but while he strongly emphasised the role of tropical produce in these changes, he did not expand his argument to encompass extra European societies directly.

23 See e.g. Hamilton, C., An Historical Relation of the Origin of the Rohilla Afghans (London 1787) 169Google Scholar.

24 Wajib ul An of Maulvi Karimullah, Saletore, G. ed., Banaras Affairs I (Allahabad 1955) 77Google Scholar.

25 Buchanan, Hamilton, The History, Antiquities, Topography, and Statistics of Eastern India I-III [ed. Montgomery Martin] (London 1838)Google Scholar.

26 Khan, Abu Taleb, The Travels of Mirza Abu Taleb Khan in Africa, Asia and Europe in the years 1799–1803 [ed. C. Stewart] (London 1814) 47Google Scholar.

27 Subrahmanyam, S., ‘Rural Industry and Commercial Agriculture in Late Seventeenth Century Eastern India’, Past and Present 126/1 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Hasan, Farhat, ‘State and Local Power Relations in the Towns of Gujarat. Surat and Cambay, c. 1572–1740’ (unpublished PhD Diss., Cambridge University, 1997)Google Scholar.

29 Bayly, C.A., ‘Merchants and Rationality in Pre-colonial India’ in: Gupta, N. and Hasan, M. eds, India's Colonial Encounter (Delhi 1996)Google Scholar and Rudner, David, Caste and Capitalism in Colonial India: The Natukotlai Chettiars (Berkeley 1994)Google Scholar.

30 The case of Banaras bankers, Bayly, , Rulers, 177–179Google Scholar;, Rajasthan, Timberg, T. A., The Marwaris. From Traders to Industrialists (Delhi 1978)Google Scholar; N. Peabody, The Logic of the Fish (Cambridge forthcoming).

31 Subrahmanyam, Sanjay and Bayly, C.A., ‘Portfolio Capitalists and the Economy of Early Modern India’, Indian Economic and Social History Review 25/4 (1988) 401–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar;Gupta, A. Das, Malabar in Asian Trade, 1740–1800 (Cambridge 1967)Google Scholar.

32 Sjoberg, G., The Pre-induslrial City, Past and Present (London 1960)Google Scholar;Blake, S., Shahjahanabad, The Sovereign City in Mughal India, 1639–1739 (Cambridge 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Bayly, Rulers, chapter 4; Subramanian, Indigenous Capital; Chatterjee, Merchants, Politics.

34 A point made by the parliamentary reports on East Indian affairs, but more recently by T.R. Travers, PhD Diss., University of Cambridge, forthcoming.

35 Gellner, E., Plough, Sword and Book: The Structure of Human History (London 1991)Google Scholar.

36 Duffy, Michael, ‘Worldwide war and British expansion, 1793–1815’ in: Marshall, P.J. ed., Oxford History of the British Empire, The Eighteenth Century (Oxford 1998) 185Google Scholar and N.M. Rodger, ‘Sea-power and Empire’ in: ibid.

37 Drayton, Richard, Nature's Government: Science, Imperial Britain and the ‘Improvement'of the World (Yale 2000)Google Scholar.

38 Samson, J., Imperial Benevolence: Making British Authority in the Pacific Islands (Honolulu 1996)Google Scholar.

39 Calculated by Prof. R. Drayton, personal communication.

40 Gommans, J., The Rise ofthe Indo-Afghan Empire (Leiden 1994)Google Scholar;Kolff, D.H.A., Rájput, Naukar and Sepoy (Cambridge 1990)Google Scholar.

41 Perdue, P., ‘Military Mobilisation in Seventeenth and Eighteent h Century China, Russia and Mongolia’, Modern Asian Studies 30/4 (1996) 757–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 Bayly, C.A., The Origins of Nationality in South Asia: Patriotism and Ethical Government in the Making of Modern India (Delhi 1998)Google Scholar.

43 Cf. the classic work of Jurgen Habermas, but most recently, Clark, Peter, British Clubs and Societies 1580–1800: The Origins of an Associalional World (Oxford 2000)Google Scholar.

44 Franklin, B., Autobiography [Everyman edition] (London 1906)Google Scholar.

45 Khan, Gulfishan, Indian Muslim Perceptions ofthe West in the Eighteenth Century (Oxford 1998)Google Scholar.

46 Spence, Jonathan, The Search For Modern China (New York 1990) 102–109Google Scholar.

47 Bayly, C.A., Empire and Information: Intelligence Gathering and Social Communication in India, 1780–1870 (Cambridge 1996)Google Scholar chapter 5.

48 Encyclopaedia Britannica [13th edition] (1902) ‘newspaper’.